#币圈资讯:火币HTX突遭DDoS猛攻,黑客高调认领点名孙宇晨,币安此前已限制相关转账 8月31日,火币HTX遭遇DDoS攻击。孙宇晨随后确认平台服务已经恢复,用户资产未受影响,HTX已保存相关证据并向执法部门报案。 同一天,X账号“Hacker_Fuckvc”公开认领此次攻击,并直接点名孙宇晨,称此次出手是为了给他“一个教训”。 这次攻击发生之际,HTX与币安之间的资金往来本身已经受到限制。 币安早在8月14日就宣布,从8月23日起限制涉及HTX、EXMO等11家加密平台的相关交易。用户通过币安直接或间接向这些平台转账,交易可能被暂扣审查,相关钱包也可能受到限制。 币安此前给出的原因是监管和合规要求,这项限制早于此次DDoS攻击生效,并不是黑客攻击发生后临时采取的措施。

Channel
【菲律宾新闻】最新爆光
@baoguang211
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,074subscribers
+19,001 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001620359632 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baoguang211 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baoguang211 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 31% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 24,074 | -12 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 24,086 | -27 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 24,113 | -19 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 24,132 | -11 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:02 | 24,143 | -23 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 24,166 | -26 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:57 | 24,192 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:34 | 24,207 | -67 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 24,274 | -26 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 24,300 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 24,318 | -50 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 24,368 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:08 | 24,370 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 24,372 | +19,964 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 4,408 | -36 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 4,444 | -148 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 4,592 | -110 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 4,702 | -224 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 4,926 | -143 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 5,069 | first reading |
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.52%
- avg views ÷ 24,074 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 366
- 42 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.464%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 42
- of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 52 (4 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 15,388 |
| Reactions total | 53 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9m 42s
- Average length
- 42s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
55 reactions across 30 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 10 | 18.2% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 14.5% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 12.7% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 10.9% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 10.9% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 10.9% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 9.09% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 9.09% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
柬埔寨依法遣返121名涉嫌网诈及违法犯罪的中国籍人员 今天,柬埔寨移民总局通过德崇国际机场包机将121名(含2名女性)中国籍人员遣返回国。 经警方查实,上述人员在柬涉嫌非法入境、非法居留与劳务、无有效护照及从事网络诈骗。 #柬埔寨资讯 #遣返
#最新消息:西港OB5一别墅被抓37人 8月31日,西港相关执法部门对第四分区第五村的一处别墅进行了公开查处,此次行动查获了以下证据:5台一体机电脑、110部手机、1辆汽车。 共逮捕了37人,其中包括2名女性(2名柬埔寨人,1名女性)、34名中国人(1名女性,无护照及相关证件,23名男性)和1名缅甸男性(无护照及相关证件)。 目前,这37名嫌疑人连同证据已被送往西哈努克省警察总部继续接受审讯。
木牌突查4处地点,查8名越南人1印尼人 8月31日,柴桢省警方在木牌一处住宅区突查4个地点,共发现9名外国人,包括8名越南人和1名印度尼西亚人,其中2名越南人没有护照,已被带走处理。 警方还在其中一处地点发现大批电子设备,怀疑属于走私商品,现场已被暂时封锁等待进一步检查。
#突发事件:🇰🇭西港蓝色海湾目前被一大批宪兵队包围检查了,昨天接到通知,今天就被包围了,目前大街上挨家挨户的查护照之类的,证件不齐全的快跑!!!
打击电诈影响柬埔寨经济?官方:只有灰产受影响 据《湄公河独立报》报道,位于柬越边境的柴桢省巴域市(木牌)是柬埔寨主要电诈聚集地之一,遍布赌场和酒店园区,是仅次于西港的柬埔寨主要的电诈中心之一。今年1月开始,当地大量人员撤离,一度出现混乱场面。 一些食品摊贩、出租车司机、建筑工人以及其他依靠电诈周边经济谋生的人曾表示,当地经济随着电诈产业迅速扩张而繁荣,也随着打击行动和园区关闭而迅速衰退。 但柴桢副省长孟英称,打击电诈并没有给正常经济带来什么影响。“大家也不用太担心,那些真正觉得受影响的兄弟姐妹基本都是靠灰产吃饭的。” 孟英称,柴桢省共有13个经济特区,其中12个不存在电诈活动,每年创造约5亿美元产值。但他没有说明第13个经济特区的情况。 他还提醒房东,在出租房屋时必须注意租客身份,以免因打击电诈行动而遭到处罚。 对于靠建房出租赚钱的民众,孟英也表示歉意。 他说:“我们也向那些建房出租的民众表示歉意,但这些处罚措施并不…
伊斯兰堡大排查只是开始!巴基斯坦接下来或将严查电诈人员 前几天,巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡警方开展全市范围搜查行动,检查443人、213处住宅、66家商铺、25家酒店,以及248辆摩托车和93辆汽车,另有16名可疑人员和23辆摩托车被带回警局进一步核查。 此次行动释放出一个明显信号:巴基斯坦对可疑人员、无合法证件外籍人员以及潜在违法活动的排查正在持续加强。 而随着跨境网络诈骗问题受到关注,接下来当地执法部门对电诈窝点、涉诈人员及相关场所的检查力度或将进一步加大。 对于藏身当地从事网络诈骗的人来说,前几天的全城排查可能只是开始,真正的严查还在后面。
#网友反馈 木牌园区左手边这个新开的酒店,现在很多警察在道子里面,这个酒店已经是危了
#老挝资讯 老挝公安部突击清查4处涉诈据点,现场控制30名相关人员 老挝公安部门近日开展针对网络诈骗活动的专项执法行动,连续查处4处涉嫌从事诈骗活动的场所,并控制30名相关人员。 据当地消息,此次行动由老挝公安部相关部门组织实施,执法人员对多个被列入调查范围的地点展开集中检查,对现场人员身份及相关活动进行核查。 被控制人员目前正接受进一步调查,以确认其在相关诈骗活动中的具体角色及责任。 截至目前,老挝方面尚未公布这4处场所的具体位置,以及30名人员的国籍、涉案金额、诈骗方式和查获设备数量等详细信息,后续调查结果仍待官方进一步通报。
#曝光 #黑平台 #汇盈国际 后台操控杀盘 汇盈国际 黑台实锤:连续十多天只输不赢,累计亏十几万;几十元小额下注也几乎不中,胜率反常疑似控结果。 客服态度恶劣、百般推诿,只进不出迹象明显。反常概率、长期不中奖、客服失联 / 恶劣,都是杀猪盘预警! 立刻止损别再充值,保留充值与聊天记录,联合举报维权! #黑平台曝光 #杀猪盘 #只进不出黑平台
❤1
#群友反馈:波贝夜市旁边一出地点被突袭,目前4.5量大巴车就位,道路也封锁了,看样子抓了不少人。
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @baoguang211. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@toutiaoshijian · 77,547#1
@baoguang212 · 17,644#2
@feilongwang · 95,154#3
@iiiik · 49,140#4
@chiguabaoliaozhan · 39,665#5
@cctv_dy · 39,682#6
@phnews · 14,726#7
@baoheitai · 1,136#8
@HR8877 · 320,634#9
@baoguangba088 · 240,574#10
@vipn8888 · 72,207#11
@quanwangbaoguangb · 149,935#12
@xinwen118 · 114,190#13
@bodutt · 40,638#14
@kaleminews · 170,133#15
@xinhuaribao · 939#16
@jiuboo · 22,140#17
@gouzaibaoliao · 2,150#18
@dongnanya108 · 161,350#19
@huarenvvip · 36,039#20
@nnccqq · 38,630#21
@DNYBG234 · 88,578#22
@yihuanqz · 15,173#23
@HRZelda · 7,345#24
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@chiguabaoliaozhan · 39,665
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 13 here — alongside 12 others — read 17 September 2026
@qqt13 · 201,549
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
@jiuboo · 22,140
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 21 September 2026
@uuuuuf · 244,570
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
@jrttbg · 159,574
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
@cctv_dy · 39,682
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
@flb608 · 104,310
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
@HR8877 · 320,634
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@db2023dbg · 77,246
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
@quanwangbaoguangb · 149,935
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
@AQzx_3 · 93,113
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
@baoguangba088 · 240,574
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
@AoneExp · 122,517
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 August 2026
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 72,699
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
@feilongwang · 95,154
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 18 August 2026
@flwph66 · 148,371
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
@baoguangba0 · 157,783
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
@bg833 · 300,112
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 10 August 2026
@AQzx_1 · 180,899
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@AQzx_2 · 89,932
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
@sssvip2 · 279,643
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
@quanwangbaoguang0 · 124,686
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
@CG887 · 114,193
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@qqhrdsjbg · 199,456
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 66 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“【菲律宾新闻】最新爆光” (@baoguang211), 24,074 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baoguang211.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.