Channel
@baoguangba0
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
157,783subscribers
-19,660 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002057803160 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baoguangba0 |
| Description | #新闻发布 #行业新闻 #博彩热点 #曝光骗子 点亮曝光吧！！分享东南亚每日最新新闻资讯，关注本频道，让您第一时间了解行业信息和生活小技巧！！ 投稿爆料【广告】联系 @bgtgobot |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baoguangba0 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @jrttbg/624617 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC | @baoguangba0/46155 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC | 1.00 | 6 minutes |
| @jrttbg/624647 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC | @baoguangba0/46163 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC | 1.00 | 6 minutes |
| @jrttbg/624667 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC | @baoguangba0/46165 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC | 1.00 | 6 minutes |
| @baoguangba0/46146 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC | @jrttbg/624717 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC | 1.00 | 6 minutes |
| @baoguangba0/46144 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC | @jrttbg/624797 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC | 0.85 | 14 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @jrttbg | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.97 | 6 minutes | @jrttbg (3–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 3 of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 8 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @baoguangba0 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 157,783 | -435 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 158,218 | -324 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 158,542 | -502 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 159,044 | -975 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 160,019 | -827 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 160,846 | -470 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 161,316 | -254 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:09 | 161,570 | -215 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:53 | 161,785 | -400 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:39 | 162,185 | -215 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 162,400 | -132 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 162,532 | -167 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 162,699 | -158 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 162,857 | -86 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 162,943 | -92 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 163,035 | -196 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 163,231 | -160 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 163,391 | -266 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 163,657 | -1,172 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 164,829 | first reading |
499 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 499 (7 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 372,109 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 08:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 96 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 499 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 499 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#网友曝光 #刘鑫——河南驻马店人，常年混迹西港、兰卡、马来、巴林。 此女名叫刘鑫，河南驻马店人， 专门坑蒙拐骗，常年混迹于西港、斯里兰卡、马来西亚、巴林等地，从事职业会所卖淫。 📌 过往经历 她混迹于亚多利、博莱，与外号“阿诚”的广西男子常年贩毒。后来西港严打，贩毒生意明显下降，都不够自己吸食，随后与阿诚分道扬镳。 之后她去了盘口敲键盘做诈骗，待了几个月，也是坑蒙拐骗别人，到处借钱跑路，各种卖惨。最后跟在网上认识的一个叫“元宝”的男人搞到一起，别人帮她拿了护照后，她与另外玩包厢的男人搞在一起去了。 📌 骗“元宝” 没有多久怀孕了，最后骗元宝怀了元宝的孩子。元宝也是吸食电子烟依托咪酯导致神智不清，也相信这个女人的鬼话，最后给她拿了一千美金。她又骗元宝说去打胎，结果胎也没有打，又跟以前的一个客人——外号叫“老宋”、永州籍男子、真名蒋明俊的电诈总监——去了斯里兰卡。 最后这个男的发现这个女的一个月都在来大姨妈，觉得…
#亚太“ #七七 ” #被曝跑单27万泰铢、 #携带艾滋病，多名网友联合曝光。 据网友曝光，亚太地区一名缅甸籍女子“七七”，被指与多名中国人发生关系，并携带艾滋病病毒。爆料人称，此前几名男子带她们去包厢玩，开了两间房，爆料人提前离开。那几名男子最后称去取钱，结果跑单，总费用27万泰铢无法买单，被店家扣下。爆料人和朋友曾想借钱保他们出来，但对方不知好歹，反质问“为什么只抓他们两个不抓我们”，甚至想拉爆料人姐妹一起进去。另有网友补充曝光，称该女子是仰光人，经常在外面找男人，包厢玩时自行拿K和水，骂人、诬陷偷手机，到处骗中国人的钱，且是艾滋病携带者。 跑单27万泰铢、反咬朋友、还携带艾滋病毒——如果爆料属实，这已经不是感情纠纷，是公共卫生和安全问题。 多人联合曝光，说明受害者不止一两个。**“到处骗中国人的钱”“偷偷拿K和水”“诬陷偷手机”，每一项都指向同一个模式：靠近你、消耗你、最后让你买单。** 提醒在亚太的男性，**遇到此…
#网友投稿 #大发娱乐 【曝光大发娱乐4888｜赢钱不给提现】 本人通过大发宣传的 USDT无风控通道充值3万多元，正常玩百家乐赢钱后申请USDT提现，却被拒绝。 客服随后要求我下载 ABPay 才能提款，我完全按要求注册绑定，申请提现 202,380元，结果再次被取消，理由变成“部分注单系统稽查”，而且客服连审核多久都说不清楚。 更离谱的是，不给提现的同时，客服还让我继续充值、继续游戏增加活跃度。 期间我又正常赢了约 4万元，结果情况更严重：账户一度被设置 还需投注1,205,395元才能提现，之后甚至直接显示 “已被禁止领取”。 我累计已经有 816,821元有效投注。充值3万多、打了80多万流水，现在20多万不给提，还让我继续充钱继续玩？ 所有充值、投注、提款取消、客服聊天及账户限制截图全部保留。 大发如果认为我违规，请公开具体违规注单和规则；如果没有，请正常出款。
#网友投稿 #凯旋宝威 #天行集团 入职两个月，部门解散 跟我没有任何关系，让去公司交接也去了两次了，现在护照不给，发老板信息没看直接删，发劳动关系消息已读不回还冻结工资，完全不管死活，目前暂住在朋友家里，生活都是问题。
#网友爆料 各位在西港的嗨场，女孩子们，请务必擦亮眼睛，警惕一个名叫 #凌雲（飞机/微信同名，频繁更换头像）的人利用人设，装富以及包装，涉及盗U和借钱，其中盗U金额10万USDT以上，装富造梦借钱涉及金额100万人民币以上。 此人极其险恶，不仅是个专业盗U的，我相信身边亲朋好友们，哪怕我们做灰产也是有底线的，这种相当于国内的小偷，自己人的更是一个毫无底线的杀猪盘骗子。他专门以“设局”为目的，骗取西港嗨场女孩子辛辛苦苦赚来的血汗钱！ 此人的真实面目与作案手法： 1. 专业盗U，利用“无限授权”洗劫钱包。他（图5交易记录）利用TRON网络，诱导受害者签署“无限授权（无限 USDT）”。一旦授权，你的钱包就像敞开了大门，他可以在你毫无察觉的情况下，瞬间将你所有的U洗劫一空！事后还装作无辜，谎称“我做的钱包你怕啥”（图6），以此来拖延时间转移资产。 2. 专坑西港女孩，夜场“两头吃”。他经常设局叫女孩子去包厢陪大哥，不仅不给女孩子…
#群友投稿：毛总，跟你认识这么多年了，生意上也合作过。 今年9月5号，你说你手上有人民币要换美金，工地开工需要用。出于认识多年、生意上合作过，我才换给你。结果你给我打诈骗款，现在我银行卡被国内警察冻结，我里面的钱也用不了，涉及资金也全部原路退回了，一共10万9821美金。 出事了让你退钱，你一直拖，而且嘴里没一句实话。你老婆刚生小孩，我知道你老婆在哪里坐月子，包括你爸妈在哪里我都知道。 现在我要求也不多，你把钱退回来给我。我当没事发生。如果你还是一直逃避，我只能动用一切手段来解决这个事情。
#曝光 #黑平台 #YG电玩城 大额卡款！输500万没事，提现250万遭强行抹黑 网友爆料在YG电玩城 玩了两个月累计输500多万，后续回本申请提现250万时，被平台客服先以“审核12小时”拖延 后面直接黑了
原新币公群K组815-供押18888U（减押80000U）白鲨二道微信牛户支付宝承兑回U公 公群负责人@kz815 匿名号码：+888 0657 1029 公群管理人@www66www 事件原因：本来七月底和八月份我一直在他们那里干承兑，提供微信个人码卸货，最高押到人民币3万，后来他们那微信一直没有客户，没货了，押金一直没有全部退回给我，每次我用一点退一点，直到新币跑路后我让他们退押一直不给我，10-12号我要退押一直拖着说出去找业务了设备没在身边，回去给我转，昨天发消息不搭理，今天我一直问这个来财就说不在一块干了，让我找白鲨要押金，这个+888的公群负责人直接退出群聊，然后消息双向删除，总共黑我1182u 他们业务一直在进行，各位老板，车队擦亮眼睛。也许跟他们一直有业务往来不黑你，但凡没业务往来直接跑路， 公群上押下发地址TTqPT2K7DQ43SJfpGjULdMU8LEYRyNqVEj
#网友投稿 No钱包： no.com #新葡京国际： 9085.com #云顶国际： 8847.con #U5贵宾会： U5.vip 避雷避雷，no钱包和这几家平台都是串通一气的，莫名奇妙让人录制视频，问怎么违规了，客服也不说，大环境确实是差了，钱可以送给你了，我想过平台提不出，我怎么也想不到，no钱包居然卡提现，不能提币你弄个兑换提币的功能干鸡毛呢？你自己写的注意事项有提币要录视频吗？你就是退一步讲，不提币了也不给你解除，账号和钱就给你直接锁死，要你跟小丑一样录持身份证的视频，懂得都懂，基本上到这一步就是你录视频也不会给你解开的，就这个信用你也好意思搞个担保，你担保的明白吗？兜里几个子啊，什么阿猫阿狗都能干担保了，我看你是没U出款给我了吧😂
#曝光 #黑平台 #天子娱乐 开始以流水不足为理由限制我提现，后来客服看我找到了投注记录手动清除了流水限制，说财务正在处理出款，等了大概一个小时说同Ip，同Ip玩u台的朋友也知道，只要没理由没借口就说同Ip多账号，我让客服查询我的同Ip账号客服查询不了，我让封禁所有跟我同Ip也封不了，我本人确实也没充值，是之前认识的代理邀请我去天子要发的红包发了50，我也庆幸自己没充值，如果参加首充活动，一样说你套利不出款，总之就是狗庄要给你出不出有没有理由只有狗庄想不想出，我劝准备去做代理的或者娱乐的，擦亮双眼
#网友投稿 #吴子昊 #鲍自兵 #潘声万 #蔺式炜 西港逍遥团队，白羊，陈末，阿红，安顺，恶意炒作财神名声，曾持枪威胁财神，好在财神小弟及时赶来，化解危机，财神从始至终从未跟他们有任何瓜葛。现在已经送往海豚警察局 ，自作孽不可活
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 0审核|包出款🤩🤩🤩 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 🤩亿级域名｜78.COM 🤩官方飞投｜充提自由 🤩NO钱包担保3亿U｜可查验 😀 📱官方频道：@DF78 ➡️关注领VIP 😀 🔝好品牌，实力派： 78.COM 无需标签，本身便是最好的辨识度 🔥香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限！ 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩连码四中四🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣； 🏆百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U； 💥新人超会赢，精彩时刻： 🥇六合彩 玩家用7个号码组合下注连码三全中➕四全中，每注100U，开出4个号码。7000U的本钱，命中4注878倍及一注10000倍大奖，稳稳落袋135万U； 🥈PG电子 客户充150U，狂赚79万U，已提款50万U 🥉DB真人 玩百家乐的老板，第一天存款50万U，连续7天每日提款500万…
Showing the 12 most recent of 499 posts we hold for @baoguangba0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“点亮曝光吧️💥” (@baoguangba0), 157,783 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baoguangba0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.