人民币创四年新高 央行连续第八日上调中间价 人民币兑美元升至四年高位,周五离岸人民币一度升 0.1% 至 6.6957,为 2022 年 7 月以来最强水平,此前中国央行连续第八个交易日上调中间价,为 2023 年以来最长连升。 此举发生在习近平与特朗普下周会晤前夕,贸易紧张料成焦点。经济学家预计,离岸人民币 9 月底约 6.70、年底 6.65;人民币正迈向连续第七个季度上涨,为今年亚洲表现最佳货币。 最前线大事件曝光 🔗https://t.me/+RnyRyEDjsiozMmRl ➡️欢迎投稿爆料:@Kk_12388 ➡️商务合作联系: @Kk_12388

Channel
最前线大事件曝光
@cctv_dy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
39,682subscribers
-36,467 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002059177536 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cctv_dy |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cctv_dy |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 39,682 | -2,039 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 41,721 | -1,400 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 43,121 | -1,567 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 44,688 | -2,197 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 46,885 | -2,263 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 49,148 | -2,733 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 51,881 | -1,772 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 53,653 | -1,299 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:27 | 54,952 | -996 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:45 | 55,948 | -934 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 56,882 | -717 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 57,599 | -1,385 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 58,984 | -755 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 59,739 | -357 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 60,096 | -174 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 60,270 | -365 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 60,635 | -455 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 61,090 | -584 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 61,674 | -442 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 62,116 | first reading |
Engagement
579 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.74%
- avg views ÷ 39,682 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,880
- 344 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.25%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 344
- of 579 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 282 of 344 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 579 (7 August 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 647,231 |
| Reactions total | 14,185 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Sept 2026, 13:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 52m 07s
- Average length
- 1m 32s
Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
37,412 reactions across 484 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3,933 | 10.5% | |
| ❤ | 3,908 | 10.4% | |
| 🔥 | 3,846 | 10.3% | |
| 🎉 | 3,773 | 10.1% | |
| 😁 | 3,653 | 9.76% | |
| 😢 | 3,510 | 9.38% | |
| 👎 | 3,300 | 8.82% | |
| 💩 | 3,267 | 8.73% | |
| 😱 | 3,244 | 8.67% | |
| 🤮 | 3,193 | 8.53% | |
| 🤩 | 465 | 1.24% | |
| 🥰 | 317 | 0.847% | |
| ❤🔥 | 235 | 0.628% | |
| 💯 | 206 | 0.551% | |
| 😍 | 206 | 0.551% | |
| ⚡ | 106 | 0.283% | |
| 👏 | 78 | 0.208% | |
| 🖕 | 31 | 0.083% | |
| 🤬 | 29 | 0.078% | |
| 😡 | 27 | 0.072% | |
| 5 further kinds | 85 | 0.227% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 484 of the 579 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,412 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 579 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#网友分享 护照还在手里,机票也买得到,但你还能说走就走吗? 很多人以为,出境就是一件很简单的事—— 一本护照,一张机票,想去哪里就去哪里。 但真正值得关注的,往往不是某一天突然发生了什么, 而是那些一点一点增加的手续和限制。 今天多一道手续,明天多一份证明; 今天只是少数人受到影响, 以后会不会扩大到更多人? 最容易被忽略的,就是这种“慢慢发生的变化”。 因为当你回头看的时候,可能才突然发现: 护照还是那本护照, 机场还是那个机场, 飞机依然每天起飞。 只是从前的“我想走”, 慢慢变成了—— “我能不能走?” 真正值得讨论的,从来不只是一张机票, 而是当“出发”从个人选择变成需要经过审核的事情时。 最前线大事件曝光 🔗https://t.me/+RnyRyEDjsiozMmRl ➡️欢迎投稿爆料:@Kk_12388 ➡️商务合作联系: @Kk_12388
👍1🔥1
20多国齐聚金边联手打击网络诈骗 柬埔寨将办两天国际大会 9月18日,柬埔寨公布国际打击网络诈骗大会安排。大会将于9月23日至24日在金边举行,为期两天,20多个国家和3个国际组织的代表将参加,柬埔寨首相洪玛奈将主持开幕活动。 大会重点围绕跨国网络诈骗展开,各国执法、金融、科技等领域代表将集中讨论诈骗趋势、资金追查、信息共享、联合执法和受害者保护等问题。 澜湄综合执法安全合作中心、联合国毒品和犯罪问题办公室东南亚及太平洋区域办事处、国际刑警组织共同参与协办。 柬埔寨希望借此次大会加强各国之间的直接合作,推动跨境信息共享和联合执法,进一步切断网络诈骗背后的资金、人员和犯罪链条。 最前线大事件曝光 🔗https://t.me/+RnyRyEDjsiozMmRl ➡️欢迎投稿爆料:@Kk_12388 ➡️商务合作联系: @Kk_12388
🤩2❤1
#越南资讯:警方揭露25种网络诈骗剧本 AI“深度伪造”成新型工具 越南河内警方近日提醒,当前网络诈骗手段不断升级,诈骗分子已从传统冒充公检法、网络“绑架”等方式,发展到利用个人数据、AI、Deepfake(深度伪造)和DeepVoice(AI仿声)实施诈骗。 7月16日,河内市河东郡警方与一家金店联手,及时阻止一名2008年出生的女学生被骗走近7亿越南盾(约合人民币19万元)。 此前,女学生接到自称警方的电话,对方准确说出她及家人的个人信息,并谎称其涉嫌重大毒品案件,威胁如果不能“证明清白”,全家都将被抓。女孩受到惊吓后,带着24只黄金手镯、3枚戒指、1条项链及8950万越南盾现金前往金店,准备按照对方要求处理资金。店员发现异常后立即报警,警方赶到现场,成功保住了全部财物。 警方指出,目前网络诈骗主要集中在5大类、25种剧本: 一是冒充政府机构。假冒警察、检察院、法院、银行等,以核实身份、处理违法行为、缴纳罚款或退款…
🎉1😁1
#国内资讯:江苏警方公布5起涉网犯罪典型案例,123人被抓 9月17日,江苏省公安厅公布“净网—2026”专项行动5起典型案例,涉及电信诈骗引流、远程控制木马、裸聊敲诈、网络侮辱诽谤以及侵犯公民个人信息等多类涉网犯罪。 据江苏警方通报,今年以来,江苏公安机关持续开展“净网—2026”专项行动,重点打击网络黄赌诈、黑客犯罪、侵犯公民个人信息以及网络暴力等违法犯罪。截至此次公布的5起案件,共抓获犯罪嫌疑人123名。 一、徐州:75人冒充证券公司员工,为境外电诈团伙引流 今年3月,徐州警方侦破一起帮助信息网络犯罪活动案件,抓获犯罪嫌疑人75人。 警方调查发现,以师某为首的团伙受雇于境外电诈团伙,冒充证券公司员工拨打电话,以投资理财、炒股指导等名义与受害人接触,诱导受害人添加诈骗团伙的服务号、公众号或企业微信,为后续诈骗实施精准引流。 警方表示,师某等人的行为涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪,目前相关犯罪嫌疑人已被依法采取刑事强制措…
⚡1❤1😁1
#群友投稿:西港所谓大哥,欢迎诸位对号入座。 说说西港部分口中的“大哥”,也包括我曾经瞎了眼认下的这位。 人前张口闭口仁义道德,逢外人标榜自己以德服人,一副江湖长者做派,撕开表象,内里一无是处。嗜赌成性,拿兄弟的血汗、拿手下员工的钱,肆意挥霍在赌桌之上。坐下来推牌九下注的那一刻,可曾想过,这些钱背后,是一个个要养家糊口的普通人,人家身后有父母,有妻儿老小要养活。 你真以为你很行?你很牛逼?啊?你是能打还是咋的?要不是这些兄弟捧你,你能上得去?你能做大哥? 风光的时候,身边围着一众讲义气的弟兄倾力扶持。可一旦祸事临头,第一反应从来不是站出来扛事担责,反倒是一股脑把所有过错全部推到自己手下人身上。永远都是自己没有错,错的全是身边跟着你的兄弟。好好想想,你这般做派,真是对得起为你卖命的兄弟吗? 外人欺负到头上,怯弱怕事,缩在后面不敢出头,半点担当拿不出来,本事还不如下面兄弟。可对外怂包,对内专会拿捏、欺负跟着你的自家兄弟。出…
❤2⚡1👏1
🇬🇪 格鲁吉亚前国家安全局局长受贿被判13年监禁 近日,格鲁吉亚第比利斯城市法院判处前国家安全局局长格里戈尔·利卢阿什维利13年有期徒刑。他被认定犯有受贿罪,受贿总额超200万美元。 法院采信的证据显示,他在2021至2022年间收取136.5万美元保护费,为第比利斯一有组织犯罪集团运营的诈骗呼叫中心提供庇护;此外还涉及风电、燃气及政府采购项目中的巨额回扣。 收的台湾许总的钱~~ 最前线大事件曝光 🔗https://t.me/+RnyRyEDjsiozMmRl ➡️欢迎投稿爆料:@Kk_12388 ➡️商务合作联系: @Kk_12388
🔥1😁1
#越南新闻 芽庄公寓落网后 两名中国籍通缉人员正式移交中国警方 9月17日,越南警方在谅山省友谊国际口岸,将两名中国籍通缉人员徐品凡和徐品弟正式移交中国警方。 徐品凡出生于1982年,徐品弟出生于1983年。越南警方此前对两人的身份和通缉情况展开核查。 8月11日,庆和省公安出入境管理部门联合芽庄北坊警方检查当地一处公寓时,发现并抓获两人。 完成相关手续后,两人被押送至越中边境,通过友谊国际口岸正式移交中国警方处理。 最前线大事件曝光 🔗https://t.me/+RnyRyEDjsiozMmRl ➡️欢迎投稿爆料:@Kk_12388 ➡️商务合作联系: @Kk_12388
🔥1😁1
柬埔寨监狱安全局突击检查西港省监狱 昨天,西港省监狱长梅迪恩迎接到访的柬埔寨监狱总局安全局局长梅塔维林及其工作组,共同对西港省监狱的监舍及在押人员展开清查行动。 据悉,此次行动旨在针对涉嫌有组织网络诈骗的案件进行专项搜查。西港省监狱副监狱长、各科室正副主任、组长及监区主管等共同参与了检查。 在监狱内搜查诈骗犯? 最前线大事件曝光 🔗https://t.me/+RnyRyEDjsiozMmRl ➡️欢迎投稿爆料:@Kk_12388 ➡️商务合作联系: @Kk_12388
❤1👍1
柬埔寨前驻昆明领事被国王赦免 日前,柬埔寨国王西哈莫尼签署王令,决定赦免罪犯桂林兴的罪行。 据悉,桂林兴是柬埔寨驻中国云南省昆明市领事馆前领事,2020年10月,他因为贪污罪被判入狱7年。 牢差不多坐满了,来个赦免~~准备再次启用? 最前线大事件曝光 🔗https://t.me/+RnyRyEDjsiozMmRl ➡️欢迎投稿爆料:@Kk_12388 ➡️商务合作联系: @Kk_12388
🎉1
#网友投稿:我尼玛,现在的大湿一个比一个会玩,直接都整上三个美女了。 别人修行是清心寡欲,大湿修行是左拥右抱。佛门修的是武功绝学吗,我也想去修行。大湿的生活,我的梦 最前线大事件曝光 🔗https://t.me/+RnyRyEDjsiozMmRl ➡️欢迎投稿爆料:@Kk_12388 ➡️商务合作联系: @Kk_12388
❤2
🇻🇳🇱🇦越老警方联合破获老挝博胶省跨国诈骗案 抓获64名越南籍嫌疑人 近日,老挝博胶省执法部门与越南警方合作,成功打掉一个设在博胶省的跨国网络诈骗团伙,抓获64名越南籍涉案人员。 初步调查显示,自2026年初至案发,该犯罪团伙共骗取数千名越南受害者,涉案金额高达1.5万亿越南盾(约合超6000万美元)。 目前,越南老街省公安局正进一步扩大调查范围并收集证据,将依法对涉案人员追究刑事责任。 最前线大事件曝光 🔗https://t.me/+RnyRyEDjsiozMmRl ➡️欢迎投稿爆料:@Kk_12388 ➡️商务合作联系: @Kk_12388
Showing the 12 most recent of 579 posts we hold for @cctv_dy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@cctv_dy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 31 August 2026 – 31 August 2026 · confirmed gone 24 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@vip35r · 47,874#1
@iiiik · 49,140#2
@anwei2 · 34,467#3
@heicaibaog · 82,698 (as read 22 August 2026)#4
@baoheitai · 1,136#5
@toutiao_4 · 1,186#6
@jinritoutiao6 · 35,847 (as read 22 August 2026)#7
@dny1577 · 5,364#8
@feilvbinghuarenriji · 16,900#9
@tghuarenba · 44,835#10
@xinhuaribao · 939#11
@ke5689 · 167,871#12
@svipzz · 89,708#13
@aza520 · 3,297#14
@quanqiubaoliao · 186,631#15
@quanwangbaoguangb · 149,935#16
@bbb1b · 348,524#17
@BG886 · 54,835#18
@baoguang85 · 31,656#19
@xinwen118 · 114,190#20
@baoguangba088 · 240,574#21
@dny099 · 60,992#22
@baoguang211 · 24,074#23
@vipn8888 · 72,207#24
@gouzaibaoliao · 2,150#25
@flwph66 · 148,371#26
@xbbg8 · 280#27
@jiuboo · 22,140#28
@DNYXW008 · 86,205#29
@tg04277 · 39,584#30
@BG_BG8 · 38,943#31
@nnccqq · 38,630#32
@dongnanya108 · 161,350#33
@kaleminews · 170,133#34
@bodu08 · 58,568#35
@baoguang821 · 54,118#36
@dxdb001 · 7,904#37
@Banma_xinwen · 92,372#38
@rdzx0 · 109,241#39
@jrttbg · 159,574#40
@BG423 · 33,388#41
@tg89aa · 142,617#42
@flbhuarenquan · 43,235#43
@sii76 · 200,317#44
@hrs166 · 50,473#45
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 72,699#46
@TGPG999 · 4,748#47
@DNYBG234 · 88,578#48
@dsj0161 · 2,035#49
@makatinews · 34,540#50
@baoguangqun999 · 37,798#51
@baoguangqun110 · 37,625#52
@woaiui · 9,449#53
@sssvip2 · 279,643#54
@AnWei08 · 57,479#55
@kz692nn · 139,774#56
@huohu158 · 147,330#57
@HR8877 · 320,634#58
@baoguang032 · 21,224#59
@xinwenhc · 127,191#60
@Dubaihuarenzixun · 67,684#61
@toutiaoshijian · 77,547#62
@BG576 · 432,047#63
@rjjjj · 43,080#64
@feixingzhe0 · 58,575#65
@SB919 · 139,268#66
@mgldpd1 · 1,112#67
@huaren_zixun · 91,317#68
@svip40 · 110,383#69
@BG2288 · 81,773#70
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nnccqq · 38,630
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 23 here — alongside 22 others — read 31 August 2026
@flwph66 · 148,371
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
@baoguang_bc · 39,402
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 29 August 2026
@baoguang988 · 99,075
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 17 August 2026
@dnydxw · 86,987
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 August 2026
@a0159 · 128,519
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
@BG576 · 432,047
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 10 August 2026
@bbb1b · 348,524
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 August 2026
@qiusu664 · 52,646
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 24 August 2026
@dny099 · 60,992
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
@gtkx1 · 168,299
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
@f_kbg · 147,727
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 14 August 2026
@AQzx_3 · 93,113
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
@dongnanya108 · 161,350
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
@chadnag001 · 56,674
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 1 September 2026
@kaleminews · 170,133
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 18 here — alongside 17 others — read 28 August 2026
@tghuarenba · 44,835
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 26 August 2026
@feilvbin2025 · 128,537
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 25 August 2026
@baoguang2022 · 141,409
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 August 2026
@AQzx_2 · 89,932
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
@baoguangba0 · 157,783
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
@baoguang211 · 24,074
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 17 September 2026
@huarenvvip · 36,039
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 19 here — alongside 18 others — read 30 August 2026
@quanwangbaoguangb · 149,935
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 123 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“最前线大事件曝光” (@cctv_dy), 39,682 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cctv_dy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.