Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东南亚 曝光 悬赏 新闻

Channel

东南亚 曝光 悬赏 新闻

@DNYXW008

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

73,793subscribers

-77,887 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001559444932
TypeChannel
Username@DNYXW008
Description#东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #泰国 #迪拜 热门曝光、新闻频道,安危事件, 曝光爆料,悬赏找人,东南亚必备的信息频道 Hot exposure, news channel, safety incidents, exposure and revelations, reward for finding people, a must-have exposure channel in Southeast Asia 投稿爆料: @fafa79900
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/DNYXW008

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 8 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@bxc888/498117 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC@DNYXW008/64981 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC1.00under a minute
@bxc888/498167 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC@DNYXW008/64985 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC1.00under a minute
@bxc888/498187 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC@DNYXW008/64986 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC1.00under a minute
@bxc888/498207 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC@DNYXW008/64987 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC1.00under a minute
@bxc888/498267 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC@DNYXW008/64991 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC1.00under a minute
@bxc888/498327 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC@DNYXW008/64994 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bxc88813 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (13–0)
@gtkx18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.4 hours@gtkx1 (8–0)
@haixiashibao15 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.9 hours@haixiashibao1 (5–0)
@hxsbl5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.9 hours@hxsbl (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 18 of the 18 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 25 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 8, the earliest publisher we hold is @gtkx1. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 7 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

73,793151,680112,736.57 August 20268 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 93 days, net -77,887. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,110–163,363 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 02:0073,793-91
7 Nov 2026, 00:3073,884-80
6 Nov 2026, 02:1773,964-51
5 Nov 2026, 01:0774,015-52
3 Nov 2026, 23:0674,067-17
3 Nov 2026, 00:1674,084-26
2 Nov 2026, 02:2074,110-126
1 Nov 2026, 02:1874,236-96
31 Oct 2026, 02:2074,332-217
30 Oct 2026, 00:3074,549-113
28 Oct 2026, 21:3774,662-149
27 Oct 2026, 18:3874,811-170
26 Oct 2026, 15:2874,981-205
25 Oct 2026, 17:3875,186-164
24 Oct 2026, 15:5675,350-130
23 Oct 2026, 18:0575,480-84
22 Oct 2026, 20:4975,564-102
21 Oct 2026, 18:5975,666-102
20 Oct 2026, 16:5675,768-73
19 Oct 2026, 18:3775,841first reading

Engagement

1,239 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 190 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.15%
avg views ÷ 73,793 subscribers
Avg views / post
850
380 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.201%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
381
of 1,239 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 348 of 380 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held1,239 (6 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total323,010
Reactions total593
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 07:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈42,600
Videos
≈9,290
Links
≈548

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 53m
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 166 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,973 reactions across 902 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍24512.4%
🔥22411.4%
👏21110.7%
❤20810.5%
💔1427.20%
🍌1366.89%
👌1336.74%
👎1306.59%
❤‍🔥1165.88%
🥰884.46%
🎉864.36%
😁844.26%
🤩834.21%
⚡733.70%
😭80.405%
🤯60.304%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 904 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,973 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 381 posts held from the last 30 days (0.525%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 07:13 UTC585 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

离谱!柬埔寨电诈窝点玩起“密室逃脱”,衣柜后面竟藏着地下通道! 这年头,电诈窝点的装修都快赶上谍战片了! 前几天柬埔寨柴桢省巴域市一处涉嫌网络诈骗的场所遭执法部门突击检查。执法人员进入现场后,竟意外发现衣柜后方暗藏玄机,扒开一看,里面居然还有一条秘密地下通道! 好家伙,表面上是普通房间,衣柜一关,后面竟然还有另一番天地。这是把办公室当成了密室,还是把逃生路线提前安排好了? 只能说,现实有时候比电影还离谱。别人家的衣柜放衣服,这里的衣柜居然还兼职当秘密入口! 订阅➡️@DNYXW008 投稿联系➡️ @fafa79900

💔1

8 Nov 2026, 06:38 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣送 2️⃣8️⃣ ,亏损再送1️⃣8️⃣ 😡主营旗下博彩业务有 😭电子🐠捕鱼🎬真人视讯♟棋牌💵彩票 😀❤️❤️❤️❤️ 😡本平台客户可免费享受本集团的酒店客房及餐饮服务 😄我们的服务: 😚简单注册/USDT、ABA充值/无上限 😝实时可查、返奖快、无冻号、秒到账 😒国际盘口、公开透明、高额返水 😂超低投注门槛7*24小时想玩即玩 ➡️➡️放心玩、放心赢、放心提,😀 😀 😀 😀 祝各位贵宾游戏愉快、盈利多多、好运连连哟!!! 👻😇🥰😘💩✍️🍡🎈 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 👍😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀

8 Nov 2026, 06:27 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#泰国资讯:春武里府开展执法行动,多名非法务工人员被捕 11月8日上午,据当地消息,泰国有关部门在春武里府展开执法检查行动,现场有多名涉嫌非法务工的人员被执法人员带走调查。 目前,具体抓捕人数、涉案人员国籍及后续处理情况尚未公布。 订阅➡️@DNYXW008 投稿联系➡️ @fafa79900

💔1

8 Nov 2026, 06:25 UTC≈1,100 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

老挝金三角经济特区持续打击电诈及非法网络赌博,大批酒店和商业建筑沦为空楼 据泰国媒体 MGR Online 11月8日报道,老挝金三角经济特区过去一年持续开展针对电信诈骗、网络诈骗及非法网络赌博团伙的清理整治行动。随着当地执法力度不断加强,部分此前被诈骗及网络赌博团伙租用的酒店、商业建筑和办公场所已经停止运营,目前处于废弃状态。 报道指出,老挝当地执法部门持续与中国有关方面开展合作,对涉及电信诈骗、非法网络赌博等跨国犯罪活动进行打击,并依法处理及遣返涉案的不同国籍人员。 随着整治行动持续推进,金三角经济特区内部分曾被犯罪团伙使用的场所已经失去原有用途。特区方面表示,后续将继续加强监管,防止相关犯罪团伙重新利用当地商业设施开展非法活动。 与此同时,当地也在推动基础设施及旅游项目建设,希望逐步改善特区形象,推动经济和旅游业恢复发展。 订阅➡️@DNYXW008 投稿联系➡️ @fafa79900

🔥1

8 Nov 2026, 05:47 UTC≈1,110 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

网传:一中国男子死在西港省警察局内 昨晚,有读者向西港日记反馈称,西港“海豚警察局号子抬走一个”。 据了解,这位爆料人此前居住在西港星汇·海景湾小区。据他陈述,他在西港没有从事任何违法活动,且证件齐全,但依然在西港警方前不久针对星汇·海景湾的一次执法行动中被抓,被关押进西港省警察局至今。 该爆料人表示,发生人员死亡事故的房间,并非他所处的房间,而是他所在房间对面的“号子”。 昨天晚些时候,社交平台上流传出照片,并配文称,一名中国男子因涉嫌电诈犯罪被西港警方逮捕,随后被执法人员殴打致死在西港省警察局拘留室内。据称,死者随后被抬走,“睡过的席子”都被扔了。 目前,暂未有权威媒体或官方渠道发布有关新闻或通报佐证上述事件真实性。 订阅➡️@DNYXW008 投稿联系➡️ @fafa79900

👍1

8 Nov 2026, 05:38 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

金边今天早上又发现一具浮尸,目前身份信息尚未确认,还没有相关执法人员前来将其尸体捞起 背影看起来就很像中国人,有看背影能认出来的朋友吗? 订阅➡️@DNYXW008 投稿联系➡️ @fafa79900

❤1

8 Nov 2026, 04:54 UTC≈1,220 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#畜生 恶劣诱骗性侵案曝光!男子假意邀约用餐 将七旬老妇带至树林施暴被捕 2026年11月7日,泰国彭世洛府警方对外通报一起性质恶劣的性侵犯罪案件。当地一名33岁男子利用虚假善意诱骗高龄老人,将74岁老妇带至偏僻树林实施性侵,行径极度恶劣引发社会谴责,目前涉案嫌疑人已被警方成功抓捕归案,案件进入依法侦办流程。 据警方详细披露,该案事发于彭世洛府直辖县辖区。涉案男子在受害老妇住宅附近主动搭讪搭讪,以邀约外出用餐为善意借口,哄骗年迈老人搭乘自己的摩托车。得手后嫌疑人并未按照承诺前往餐馆,而是刻意驱车前往楠河沿岸一处荒僻树林,利用地点偏僻无人的环境,对七旬老妇实施性侵犯罪。 案件曝光后,当地警方迅速启动侦查溯源工作,调取事发沿线道路闭路监控影像。监控画面清晰记录下嫌疑人骑摩托车搭载老妇驶入树林区域,后续却独自驾车折返的反常轨迹。警方凭借关键监控线索精准锁定嫌疑人身份,迅速落地实施抓捕行动。 经警方核实,落网33岁涉案男子为当…

👏1

8 Nov 2026, 04:32 UTC≈1,120 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#缅甸资讯:妙瓦底网络诈骗园区救出1名印度籍受害者,另有21名乌干达公民获救等待遣返 11月8日,缅甸克伦邦妙瓦底一处网络诈骗园区内,一名遭人口贩卖和强迫劳动的印度籍男子 Anmol Senchewry 成功获救,但因遭受殴打导致手臂骨折、头部受伤及多处伤势,目前正在印度新德里医院接受治疗。 据悉,该男子此前通过网络应聘呼叫中心工作,8月22日前往泰国后,被中介人员带至缅甸并转交诈骗团伙,期间每天被迫工作17至18小时,护照和SIM卡遭扣押,团伙还向其索要60万印度卢比赎金。 在家属向印度议员及外交部门求助后,印度驻缅甸使馆与缅甸相关部门展开协调,最终成功营救该男子,并经泰国转送回印度,于10月29日抵达新德里。 与此同时,乌干达政府宣布,已成功营救21名在缅甸网络诈骗园区遭人口贩卖和强迫劳动的乌干达公民,目前正与缅甸方面进行最后阶段的协调,计划于下周安排他们从仰光启程回国。 乌干达政府表示,受害者大多是被高薪工作诱骗…

👍1

8 Nov 2026, 04:32 UTC≈1,030 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

沈良西到了日本 昨天,流亡的柬埔寨前反对派领袖沈良西抵达日本,部分支持者在机场迎接。据悉,沈良西此次到日本,是出席反对派在当地举办的相关活动。 洪森:有种飞金边来! 订阅➡️@DNYXW008 投稿联系➡️ @fafa79900

👍1

8 Nov 2026, 04:32 UTC≈1,700 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#国内资讯:江苏男子直播间投资尾货被骗17万元,警方追查牵出百万元诈骗案 11月7日,江苏连云港灌南县警方侦破一起网络投资诈骗案。一名男子通过直播间虚构库存尾货投资项目,先以小额返利取得信任,再诱骗受害人追加资金。警方进一步调查发现,该案涉及全国多地7名受害人,累计被骗100余万元。 4月21日,灌南县居民鲍某在直播间看到主播高某招募小商品库存尾货投资合伙人,宣称投资少、回报快。鲍某先投入少量资金并顺利收到返利,随后不断追加投资,累计转账17万余元。 当鲍某要求返利时,高某以商家未发货、尚未结算等理由拖延,随后将其拉黑。警方接报后抓获高某,但高某拒绝交代犯罪事实。 办案民警通过银行流水及聊天记录发现,鲍某的投资款并未用于商品经营,而是被转入第三方账户,部分资金流向网络赌博。 警方随后扩大调查,在浙江、安徽、河南等地又找到6名受害人,查明高某骗取的100余万元均被用于网络赌博或变现。 目前,高某已被灌南县检察院依法批准…

💔1

8 Nov 2026, 04:32 UTC9 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

金边一保安割喉自杀身亡 昨天深夜11时25分,金边市隆边区四臂湾分区苏他罗大道发生一起命案。一名负责看守某处废弃店铺的男性保安,不知何故用小刀割喉自杀,最终倒毙在自己值守的店铺门前,引发周边民众震惊。 接报后,当地警方迅速赶赴现场拉起警戒线封锁区域,并通知金边市警察局法医及技术鉴证专家到场进行勘验,目前正就具体原因展开进一步调查。 订阅➡️@DNYXW008 投稿联系➡️ @fafa79900

👏1

8 Nov 2026, 04:31 UTC≈1,130 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

#群友投稿:马来西亚槟城大山脚,凌晨时候抓了80多名印尼外劳和几个中国人。最近全马执法行动很频繁,各位狗推小心呀。 订阅➡️@DNYXW008 投稿联系➡️ @fafa79900

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,239 posts we hold for @DNYXW008. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@DNYXW008 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
27 October 2026
Most recent edit
27 October 2026

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

头条事件
@toutiaoshijian · 66,798
#1
菲律宾华人事件
@svip40 · 131,034
#2
安危事件
@anwei2 · 32,571
#3
菲龙网新闻中文媒体【官方】
@feilongwang · 69,953
#4
《今日新闻》
@cctvPH · 133,247
#5
东南亚沸点Time🥇
@vip35r · 26,128
#6
菲律宾⚜️大事件
@dashijian01 · 25,101
#7
热点新闻
@redian3 · 63,176
#8
今日头条
@jinritoutiao6 · 12,023
#9
东南亚大事件 @svip
@bx666 · 462,156
#10
全球大事件🌍 「TIKTOK官方」
@qqdsj · 172,046
#11
菲律宾大事件|菲律宾新闻|The Philippines生活资讯
@flb00 · 16,534
#12
斯里兰卡头条新闻曝光
@baoguangee · 203,498
#13
今日全网曝光频道
@bg855 · 344,483
#14
跑路人员曝光频道
@TG_368 · 10,600
#15
新华社丨新闻曝光
@iiiik · 33,702
#16
东南亚头条吃瓜
@svipzz · 61,332
#17
柬埔寨西港曝光吃瓜新闻
@kaleminews · 190,431
#18
菲律宾华人事件
@feilvbinghuarenriji · 14,745
#19
博度东南亚大事件 @bdtime
@bodutt · 66,539
#20
柬埔寨头条事件️🅥
@HR8877 · 321,889
#21
大象曝光|新闻
@dxdb001 · 4,757
#22
菲律宾头条爆料(Bole新闻)
@phnews · 17,123
#23
新闻早班车🐾
@tg04277 · 59,168
#24
最前线大事件曝光
@cctv_dy · 22,103
#25
东南亚吃瓜🍉
@dny1577 · 5,057
#26
东南亚头条曝光频道(菲龙网)
@bgxinwen200 · 26,442
#27
中文安危曝光🌸海外华人日记
@tghuarenba · 32,426
#28
菲律宾新闻|华人资讯曝光|philippine news
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 68,603
#29
东南亚曝光吧⚠️吃瓜爆料
@baoguangba088 · 235,247
#30
中文曝光吧 安危头条吃瓜(接广告合作)🫥
@ZLWBG · 102,495
#31
东南亚曝光网
@baoheitai · 1,106
#32
东南亚新闻|斑马曝光|news
@Banma_xinwen · 84,706
#33
新闻大白话
@HR1231111 · 953
#34
海外大事件(猎奇-吃瓜)
@aa144 · 34,680
#35
东南亚新闻💎
@vipn8888 · 58,017
#36
安危事件
@flbhuarenquan · 77,783
#37
东南亚🌍安危大事件 (💋菲 柬 迪 泰 缅 老挝💋)爆料
@quanqiubaoliao · 143,454
#38
新闻资讯
@BG_BG8 · 32,573
#39
菲律宾新闻频道
@baoguangqun999 · 68,190
#40
今日大事件
@uuu8u · 55,187
#41
狗仔爆料_吃瓜爆光新闻大事件
@gouzaibaoliao · 2,033
#42
迪拜新闻|华人资讯大曝光
@xinwen118 · 121,725
#43
heicaibaog
@heicaibaog · 10
#44
博彩新闻/今日头条/东南亚新闻
@xinhuaribao · 902
#45
吃瓜新闻大曝光
@jiuboo · 14,060
#46
博彩大事件-曝光
@dsj0161 · 1,980
#47
🇨🇳华人社东南亚大事件
@hrs166 · 37,782
#48
东南亚闯荡记🪐
@ac666 · 307,698
#49
亚太新闻 | 缅甸新闻 | 东南亚新闻 | 爆料 | 吃瓜
@ygxw3 · 147,912
#50
东南亚曝光/大事件
@dny099 · 204,737
#51
⚔️吃瓜曝光《缅北缅甸泰国》
@qqt13 · 202,840
#52
东南亚BC热点新闻
@baoguangqun110 · 69,095
#53
东南亚安危头条事件🅥
@AnWei08 · 61,655
#54
菲律宾大事件灰产新闻/曝光
@tg89aa · 116,876
#55
博彩曝光【菲行者】菲律宾新闻/黑台曝光/东南亚大事件❤️❤️
@feixingzhe0 · 46,494
#56
华人大事件-吃瓜新闻
@baoguang821 · 45,572
#57
【菲律宾新闻】最新爆光
@baoguang211 · 8,363
#58
阳光新闻|东南亚资讯
@xinwen1 · 97,059
#59
博度-东南亚曝光新闻
@bodu08 · 55,928
#60
迪拜新闻|东南亚大事件|曝光群
@baoguang032 · 28,896
#61
全网曝光
@quanwangbaoguangb · 127,350
#62
新闻曝光/菲律宾曝光/黑平台曝光
@xinwenTV5 · 6,667
#63
今日头条
@baoguang_g · 65,276
#64
东南亚大事件
@chadnag001 · 25,659
#65

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

东南亚头条
@nb688 · 325,871
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 13 August 2026
柬埔寨头条事件️🅥
@HR8877 · 321,889
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
《今日新闻》
@cctvPH · 133,247
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 11 August 2026
卡斯兰卡大事件/马来西亚新闻
@YTT783 · 96,193
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
⚔️吃瓜曝光《缅北缅甸泰国》
@qqt13 · 202,840
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
东南亚大事件|柬埔寨新闻|头号玩家生活资讯
@dny12378 · 68,912
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026
全球大事件🌍 「TIKTOK官方」
@qqdsj · 172,046
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 11 August 2026
东南亚安危头条事件🅥
@AnWei08 · 61,655
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 24 August 2026
热点新闻
@redian3 · 63,176
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 23 August 2026
《今日热点》东南亚大事件
@dk789 · 143,986
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 24 August 2026
东南亚曝光吧⚠️吃瓜爆料
@baoguangba088 · 235,247
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
菲龙网新闻中文媒体【官方】
@feilongwang · 69,953
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 18 August 2026
全球华人大事件曝光
@qqhrdsjbg · 162,489
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
全球大事件|新闻|曝光
@QQDS999 · 156,791
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
东南亚头条曝光㊖
@bg888 · 315,545
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 10 August 2026
东南亚新闻大事件
@bvl222 · 43,348
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 August 2026
中文安危曝光🌸海外华人日记
@tghuarenba · 32,426
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 26 August 2026
斯里兰卡头条新闻曝光
@baoguangee · 203,498
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 11 August 2026
新华社丨新闻曝光
@iiiik · 33,702
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 26 August 2026
🇨🇳华人社东南亚大事件
@hrs166 · 37,782
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
TG招聘|东南亚新闻大事件‼️
@XMZPK · 62,860
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 August 2026
菲律宾华人事件
@svip40 · 131,034
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 17 August 2026
头条事件
@mv111 · 52,460
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
最前线大事件曝光
@cctv_dy · 22,103
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 98 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东南亚 曝光 悬赏 新闻” (@DNYXW008), 73,793 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DNYXW008.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.