⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 9999 全网独家公开官方验证渠道 以契约精神守护每一次选择 真实力不需要跨大包装来强调 PP\PG正版游戏,下注记录与开奖结果均可通过官方渠道查询核对。 拒绝私彩,拒绝双系统,拒绝暗箱操作。 玖玖久久 靠验证赢得信任。正规,经得起查;实力,看得见。 ✅ 100%正版授权 ✅ 官方数据可查询 ✅ 游戏结果可核验 ✅ 全程记录可追溯 ✅ 公开透明可验证 ⚡️ 9999官方数据建立信任用户亲自验证 ⚡ 官方客服: @L9999L ⚡ 商务洽谈: @SW9999 ⚡ 代理咨询: @TGCS9999 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡

Channel
东南亚头条
@nb688
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
350,528subscribers
-297 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001346880741 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @atmji @duidan @faquan @huohui @juejia @kejiao @nb688 @nbtoutiao @xuepa |
| Description | 东南亚头条每天发布要点资讯,时事新闻,社会热点,安危事件,曝光爆料,生活分享,华人求助,您的关心,才是头条。 广告投放商务洽谈 @NB288 24小时投稿机器人 @nb688Bot #东南亚 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #老挝 #斯里兰卡 #柬埔寨 #金三角 #泰国 #迪拜 #马来西亚 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 143 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nb688 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 350,528 | +483 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 350,045 | -262 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 350,307 | +183 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 350,124 | -4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 350,128 | -132 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 350,260 | +776 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 349,484 | no change |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:42 | 349,484 | -193 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 349,677 | -58 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 349,735 | -283 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 350,018 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:16 | 350,018 | -645 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:54 | 350,663 | -31 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:43 | 350,694 | +695 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 349,999 | no change |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:45 | 349,999 | -140 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 350,139 | +486 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:13 | 349,653 | -706 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:07 | 350,359 | -38 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:34 | 350,397 | first reading |
Engagement
804 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.12%
- avg views ÷ 350,528 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 21,500
- 761 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.32%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 761
- of 804 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 544 of 761 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 804 (7 August 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 16,331,384 |
| Reactions total | 37,820 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 14:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈25,500
- Videos
- ≈6,770
- Links
- ≈18,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2h 55m
- Average length
- 52s
Measured directly from 201 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
40,163 reactions across 576 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6255787829910052461 | 40,163 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 578 of the 804 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40,163 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 804 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存最高送😀😀😀😀 😀 MAGIC88 全网哈希综合盘公平哈希验证 敢不敢来挑战? 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 😀😀😀😀😀MGC88.cc 😀😀😀😀😀MGC88.cc 😀😀😀😀😀MGC88.cc #哈希 #体育 #真人 #电子 #彩票 #棋牌 #MGC88
#网友曝光:寻找云南“屠夫”——欠蛇头路费玩消失。 现紧急寻找屠夫(云南人)。屠夫你的照片已经发给佤邦司法委了,至今没有任何消息。电话不接、信息不回,躲着就有用了吗? 你从柬埔寨到邦康的路费,欠蛇头的钱现在不给,玩消失。 除非你死了,这个钱我们可以垫上。现在这个形势,真的人已经不当人了。 自己在外面说口口声声出来做事,你忘了在立马高园区团队被吃了,自己跟狗一样自己去金边富力自己租房子到处借钱的时候了吗? 屠夫一直在做资金盘的通道,至于和你有合作的人就要注意了。你老婆孩子的照片我们也有,你自己出来丢人也就算了,还要带着家里人出来丢人吗? 有些事情要面对,逃避是没有用的。人家蛇头一直在追着要钱,现在你玩消失,那么下次见面就是仇人了。这篇帖子不回复,马上把你老婆和你照片贴出来。古语说过:眼斜心不正,果然不错。 失联时间:2026年6月17日 失联地点:佤邦 📣 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 ❤️ https://t.me/nb688 😍…
#台湾资讯:AI诈骗集团5年骗2万人,业绩不行电击伺候、精液漱口。 台湾一对夫妻领导的AI爱情诈骗集团被警方破获。主犯黄建豪与妻子许湘琦从2019年起组建诈骗集团,5年内诈骗超过2万名受害者,涉案金额超过9亿新台币(约人民币2亿元)。台北检方9月2日起诉57人,对黄建豪求刑25年以上,许湘琦求刑18年以上。 该团伙利用AI变声技术,在交友平台伪装女性接近受害者,诱导购买商品后以生活费、医药费等名义持续索财。团伙内部实行严格的绩效考核,未达标的成员会遭受电击惩罚,甚至被强迫当众互相舔肛门、舔性器官,拿他人精液漱口,精神肉体双重折磨。 📣 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 ❤️ https://t.me/nb688 😍 投稿爆料:@nb288 👉加入东南亚华人交流群
#台湾资讯:17岁少女带2名14岁女学生当车手,百货取款被警压制。 9月4日,高雄前镇区梦时代百货发生警方逮捕车手案。一名17岁辍学少女及两名14岁初中女生因担任诈骗集团车手被锁定,在百货内无卡取款时被便衣警员压制逮捕。警方现场查扣手机3支及刚提领的新台币7万5000元现金。 经查,该名17岁少女9月1日就曾在同一百货以无卡提款方式取款4万元,当时已被警方锁定。警方分析情资后研判她会再次现身,于9月4日晚间6时30分许发现她带着2名14岁少女再度出现,立即上前将3人压制。 3名少女均加入同一诈骗通联群组,依上游指示在ATM待命,等候传送无卡提款序号与密码取款。她们供称因想利用课余打工赚钱,在社群网站看到兼职广告才接下取款差事,以为百货公司人潮多“比较不容易被怀疑”。 三人辩称仅应征工作不知是诈团,全案依诈欺、洗钱防制法等罪嫌移送高雄少年及家事法院侦办,警方将持续向上溯源追缉幕后诈骗集团核心成员。 📣 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 ❤️…
【000体育】数字网投领导者! 🙂↕️😜😘🔤🔤😀🤩💎😆🤩🔤🤩🤩🤩 000体育 始终坚持“用户至上,信誉为本”的运营理念,力求为玩家带来公平公正、真实专业的高品质游戏竞技,让你体验顶级博彩乐趣! 【1️⃣:1️⃣USDT投注,创造人生新财富!】 【真人游戏】请选择🙂↕️😜😘! 【电子娱乐】请选择🙂↕️😜😘! 【体育游戏】请选择🙂↕️😜😘! 【棋牌游戏】请选择🙂↕️😜😘! 【捕鱼游戏】请选择🙂↕️😜😘! 【彩票游戏】请选择🙂↕️😜😘! 一站式综合体验顶级博彩娱乐尽在🙂↕️😜😘🔤🔤😀🤩! 支持USDT✅ 存取、大额无忧,提款秒到! 🏆体育官方合作品牌🏆 💹 为荣耀而战 让梦想实现💹 【点击下方官网即玩】 以服务赢得信赖: 【000体育】官方网址:000.com 以专业打造体验: 免费观看各类高清赛事直播: 000.live 🎅 新人六重豪礼 💎 代理八重扶持 ⚽️ 全球热门赛事覆盖 🎉 …
#小菲投稿:老公,对不起,让你受累了! 老公,对不起,让你受累了,也让你感到那么累。 我先回菲律宾休息一段时间。我知道现在我们都需要空间和时间去冷静,但我希望你知道,我的心依然牵挂着你。 请你一定要好好照顾自己,按时吃饭,好好休息。不管需要多久,我都会在家里等你的。要保重,照顾好自己。🥺❤️ 希望以后我们还能把一切都解决好……老公,对不起,之前是我没有听你的话。虽然现在我们暂时分开,但你一定要多保重,照顾好自己。😔 希望你不要轻易放弃我们过去的感情。🥺 📣 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 ❤️ https://t.me/nb688 😍 投稿爆料:@nb288 👉加入东南亚华人交流群
#越南资讯:冒充企业家交友诈骗,跨国团伙2个月骗走445亿越南盾。 越南海防警方近日侦破一起跨国高科技诈骗案,44名涉案人员被起诉并暂时羁押,初步查明该团伙已骗取受害者超过445亿越南盾(约合人民币1280万元)。 据调查,该团伙由中国籍人员幕后组织和操控,最初在柬埔寨活动,遭当地执法部门打击后转移至老挝波乔省,通过租用当地土地搭建窝点,专门针对越南公民实施诈骗。 今年3月至6月,团伙通过Facebook、TikTok、Telegram等社交平台,以“高薪轻松工作”为诱饵招募越南人员,并将其送往老挝。 进入窝点后,诈骗人员使用提前准备好的虚假社交账号,冒充事业有成的企业家,与越南女性建立联系、培养感情。取得信任后,便诱导受害者进入所谓的网络博彩网站,并以“IP错误”“系统故障”“账户验证”“缴税”等借口,让受害者不断充值。 网站初期甚至会让受害者成功提现,以进一步取得信任;一旦受害者投入大笔资金,提现功能便会被关闭,随…
😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存最高送😀😀😀😀 😀 MAGIC88 全网哈希综合盘公平哈希验证 敢不敢来挑战? 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 😀😀😀😀😀MGC88.cc 😀😀😀😀😀MGC88.cc 😀😀😀😀😀MGC88.cc #哈希 #体育 #真人 #电子 #彩票 #棋牌 #MGC88
#网友爆料:被骗进缅东新泰昌园区,两年地狱生活,花45万才出来。 我在2023年三月份去的老挝金三角,在特区待了半年,后面老板安排我去看人,相当于软禁。因为他欠了老板一百多个,我们三个人轮流看他,他还有一个朋友叫大雷,他的名字是张磊。他们是从万象到特区的,后来被老板的人看见了,就开始派人看着他们。我们三个人每人看八个小时,相当于不让他出特区。在特区内,他都可以去。 后面这个逼养的一直带我打K、喝开心水,然后差不多看了他半个月。到晚上我看他的时候,他说特区内不好玩,让我们去特区外面玩。我当时就相信他了,我说天亮前就要回去,不然上面要怪我了。然后就是在特区我们打K,他又找了很大妹子和我玩,我也上头了。兜了一圈,这个逼养的和大雷就跑路了。我清醒的时候联系他,他说已经偷渡到泰国了。我说我怎么办?我要是回特区,肯定被老板卖到大其力去了。他就说让我去万象等他。 我当时没办法了,回特区肯定死定了,所以我就去万象等他了。我们到万象又天天打…
#马来资讯:七旬老人遭冒充警察电信诈骗,损失190万令吉。 9月5日,霹雳州一名78岁老人遭冒充警察的诈骗分子恐吓,称其卷入调查案件,指示其将钱款转入指定账户,共计损失190万令吉。 霹雳州总警长莫哈末阿兹里表示,受害者接到一名自称警官的来电,告知其涉及刑事案件,嫌疑人通过恐吓手段令老人慌乱中依指示转账。此案援引《刑事法典》第420条(欺骗及不诚实引诱交付财产)调查。 霹州警方提醒,警方绝不会为调查目的要求任何人转账到特定账户,公众勿轻信自称警察、银行或执法机构代表的来电,应立即挂断可疑电话,切勿透露TAC/OTP验证码、密码或银行资料。诈骗分子常使用伪造来电显示和极具说服力的“诈骗剧本”进行恐吓行骗。 📣 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 ❤️ https://t.me/nb688 😍 投稿爆料:@nb288 👉加入东南亚华人交流群。
#国内资讯:手机蓝牙勿长期开启,陌生配对存窃听、定位与信息泄露风险。 近期,多地公安、国安部门发布安全提示,手机蓝牙长期保持开启状态暗藏风险。 不法分子可能利用蓝牙技术漏洞,非法窃取个人信息,甚至实施窃密行为,既威胁公民个人隐私,也会对国家秘密安全构成风险。 据央视报道,不法分子会在公共场所假借会议信号广播、协议认证、免费Wi‑Fi等名义,诱导群众连接陌生设备。一旦建立连接,就可能出现通话被远程窃听、设备定位遭获取、各类个人敏感信息被盗取等安全隐患。 网络安全专家指出,蓝牙攻击主要有三种手法: ⚠️ 静默配对 如果手机或耳机存在蓝牙漏洞,攻击者在几秒钟内即可完成自动配对,无需用户点击任何同意按钮,便能激活麦克风监听对话。 📍 行踪追踪 手机蓝牙开启后会持续向外广播信号,不法分子可据此判断目标是否出现在附近,实现轨迹追踪。 🎣 钓鱼窃取 在公共场所可能收到陌生蓝牙配对请求。一旦点击同意,对方可能立即发送带木马的…
Showing the 12 most recent of 804 posts we hold for @nb688. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bx666 · 474,232#1
@dny2023dbg · 110,385#2
@qq2023bg · 125,413#3
@toutiaoshijian · 78,177#4
@jpz0123 · 51,883#5
@DNYXW008 · 105,003#6
@baoguangba088 · 243,044#7
@kanxia · 484,823#8
@flbhuarenquan · 29,220#9
@jpz9118 · 105,923#10
@huarenvvip · 37,613#11
@dnyggg · 42,981#12
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 45,328#13
@feilongwang · 71,964#14
@hyxw4 · 77,270#15
@bvl222 · 56,081#16
@ow333 · 67,193#17
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 75,080#18
@xigang13 · 64,622#19
@aa144 · 35,269#20
@flb00 · 13,104#21
@bodu08 · 60,925#22
@bg888 · 345,430#23
@HH9915 · 125,070#24
@bx777 · 45,058#25
@dubaixinwen2 · 215,451#26
@flbxinwen01 · 21,843#27
@tingyu0002 · 215,460#28
@tiyutuidan08 · 18,964#29
@pp666 · 223,267#30
@pyzcn · 218,576#31
@jiandan8884 · 131,598#32
@bodutt · 44,540#33
@xpppp · 307,110#34
@dnyuuu88 · 129,090#35
@dsj0161 · 2,040#36
@ac666 · 322,605#37
@dsj665 · 112,237#38
@huaren_zixun · 94,396#39
@vjtyd · 55,908#40
@tp111 · 51,704#41
@HR8877 · 317,557#42
@jpzso · 16,653#43
@LadyofcryptoCommunity · 107,355#44
@dnyxwen988 · 1,093#45
@nokazan · 17,206#46
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@LadyofcryptoCommunity · 107,355
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 15 August 2026
@hyxw4 · 77,270
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 19 August 2026
@DNYQWCG · 80,847
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 19 August 2026
@qq2023bg · 125,413
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
4 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚头条” (@nb688), 350,528 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nb688.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.