#群友求助:各位东南亚的盘总,我是邹文韬的姐姐,这里面有一个是我的亲弟弟。他们一共8人,先被骗关押缅甸东部,妙瓦底。 人是5号晚上9点半在安徽合肥市蜀山区环湖东路环东小区上的,是一辆黑色的车。6号晚上11点到的昆明恒大城小区,我有定位。10号早上离开舌头(路路通),嘴巴里说的安全屋,被舌头(路路通)开车带到云南景栋,偷渡到老挝、泰国。目前这8个人在缅甸妙瓦地酒店关着。 前几天我弟弟有打电话联系家里人,但是打电话的中途,手机被人强制关机,导致现在联系不上。 8人当中有一个的舅舅是南方军区团长,现在国内已经报警立案,通知泰国、缅甸大使馆。 望贵公司见到此人,善待,或者不要收。这个事情我们肯定要把人弄回来,别影响各位老总发财。如果是哪个公司收到这些人,请于家属联系。 👑欢迎订阅东南亚头条大事件频道 🔗: t.me/+U0oW4guqFL03MjMy 1️⃣免费爆料投稿: @Y9527F

Channel
东南亚头条大事件
@tp111
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
46,877subscribers
-3,067 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001427381992 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tp111 |
| Description | #迪拜 #柬埔寨 #东南亚 #泰国 #缅甸 #金三角 东南亚头条大事件,专注于海外华人最新动态咨询,揭露事实! 本频道谢绝任何政治敏感新闻,新闻仅供参考,无刻意引导~~避免我们的评论区火药味变得更重。本频道鼓励尊重友好的交流方式,进一步发表有意义的评论内容。 投稿联系方式: @Y9527F 让你看尽海外华人大小事 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tp111 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 46,877 | -320 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 47,197 | -483 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 47,680 | -8,153 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 55,833 | -490 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 56,323 | +5,059 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 51,264 | -373 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 51,637 | +7,724 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 43,913 | -549 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 44,462 | -538 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 45,000 | -1,097 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 46,097 | -609 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 46,706 | -851 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 47,557 | -482 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 48,039 | -690 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 48,729 | -593 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 49,322 | -550 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 49,872 | -72 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 49,944 | first reading |
Engagement
382 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.8%
- avg views ÷ 46,877 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,900
- 382 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.065%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 382
- of 382 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 303 of 382 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 382 (8 August 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,017,268 |
| Reactions total | 1,588 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Aug 2026, 02:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈39,700
- Videos
- ≈8,380
- Links
- ≈24,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 25m
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 134 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,588 reactions across 303 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 587 | 37.0% | |
| 🤣 | 282 | 17.8% | |
| 👍 | 210 | 13.2% | |
| 😢 | 178 | 11.2% | |
| 👀 | 62 | 3.90% | |
| 🔥 | 59 | 3.72% | |
| 🤡 | 59 | 3.72% | |
| 😭 | 33 | 2.08% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 1.20% | |
| 🥰 | 18 | 1.13% | |
| 💩 | 15 | 0.945% | |
| 🤬 | 14 | 0.882% | |
| 😡 | 12 | 0.756% | |
| 😱 | 12 | 0.756% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 0.441% | |
| 😨 | 6 | 0.378% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.189% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 0.126% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.126% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.126% | |
| 3 further kinds | 6 | 0.378% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 303 of the 382 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,588reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 382 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 5
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 382 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
- Most on one post
- 4
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tp111. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 382 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
西藏吉隆泥石流已致3人遇难265人失联! 2026年8月26日,西藏日喀则市吉隆县发生泥石流灾害。记者从前方指挥部获悉,截至8月26日20时,经初步核实统计,此次泥石流灾害已造成3人遇难,265人失联,具体伤亡人数还在进一步核查中,各项救援工作正有序开展。 👑欢迎订阅东南亚头条大事件频道 🔗: t.me/+U0oW4guqFL03MjMy 1️⃣免费爆料投稿: @Y9527F
❤1😢1😭1
🇲🇾马来西亚隆坡近期执法力度直接拉满! 吉隆坡移民局悄悄开启 Ops 1 Malaysia 两日专项大行动,全线严查一线违规问题,这次行动不玩虚的,全程严阵以待、多部门联手协作,执法标准直接拉满,专业又硬核。 官方态度超强硬:零妥协、零放宽!看来近期入境、外籍相关违规行为,都要被狠狠整治一波了! 👑欢迎订阅东南亚头条大事件频道 🔗: t.me/+U0oW4guqFL03MjMy 1️⃣免费爆料投稿: @Y9527F
缅军捣毁掸邦北部“孟崖”一电诈窝点,3名中国籍男子落网! 缅甸军方通报:8月26日,安全部队在掸邦孟崖镇区查处一处设置于简易棚屋之内的网络诈骗、网络赌博窝点,现场抓获3名中国籍男子。 据通报,该窝点位于孟崖镇东南约26公里、曼派(Man Phai)村以南约5公里。军方表示,3名涉案人员涉嫌非法越境入境缅甸,在此搭建临时建筑,开展网络诈骗与网络赌博犯罪活动。 行动现场,执法人员查获25部手机、5台一体机电脑、2套移动电源、1套星链(Starlink)卫星网络设备、10部对讲机以及其他涉案物证。现场还发现1处大型简易房屋以及多顶用于作业居住的临时帐篷。 军方称,后续将完成人员身份核实与案件调查,依照缅甸法律对涉案3人作出处置,扣押设备也将按规定流程处理,涉案的临时作业居住建筑将予以拆除。 👑欢迎订阅东南亚头条大事件频道 🔗: t.me/+U0oW4guqFL03MjMy 1️⃣免费爆料投稿: @Y9527F
❤2
#网友投稿:🇰🇭金边“黄山酒店”有人报警声称遭遇绑架,警察手持AK74已抵达现场,没护照的朋友快跑~ 👑欢迎订阅东南亚头条大事件频道 🔗: t.me/+U0oW4guqFL03MjMy 1️⃣免费爆料投稿: @Y9527F
❤2👍2🤣2
#网友投稿:🇰🇭金边永旺1附近有两帮人打群架,现场大概有100人左右,把一条街都占领了 具体什么情况暂时不是很清楚,可能是精神小伙之间谁也不服谁🤣 👑欢迎订阅东南亚头条大事件频道 🔗: t.me/+U0oW4guqFL03MjMy 1️⃣免费爆料投稿: @Y9527F
🤣6👀2👍2
#缅甸诈骗园区升级:全面引入 AI 技术,犯罪效率呈指数级暴增 近日,据量子位(QbitAI)及安全机构 C4ADS 披露,缅甸妙瓦底等地的“杀猪盘”与电信诈骗园区正全面借助 ChatGPT、Gemini 等 AI 工具实施跨国诈骗。 📌 核心要点总结: AI 扮演“效率倍增器”:目前诈骗分子主要利用 AI 进行多语言翻译、文本润色、话术生成及批量群聊,大幅提升作案效率。 AI 比人类更易骗取信任:研究显示,在 7 天的实验中,46% 的受害者下载了 AI 推荐的软件(人类推荐仅占 18%),AI 组的信任评分(3.78分)也高于人类组(3.31分),且 95% 的人无法辨别对方是 AI。 走向“工业化、全自动化”:不法分子通过数十个假账号同时操作,单人即可锁定上百目标。未来随着 AI 代理(AI Agents) 的普及,犯罪团伙对人工的依赖将减少,但受害者规模可能面临成倍激增的风险。 行业警示:网络犯罪、加密货币与 …
🔥4❤2🥰2
🇲🇲 佤邦司法委向中方移交72名涉诈嫌疑人 8月26日,佤邦司法委与中方执法机关在云南省普洱市孟连县勐啊口岸,依照双边警务合作机制,逐人核验涉案人员身份、固定案件证据,依法完成72名中国籍电诈嫌疑人及大批作案工具的交接工作。 此前,佤邦司法委通过情报研判与常态化巡查,精准锁定上述跨境电诈团伙藏匿窝点,经周密侦查布控后开展突击收网,成功将72名涉案人员全部抓获。 此次移交是中佤双边警务协作的重要成果,彰显了双方打击跨境电诈的坚定决心。佤邦方面表示,将持续保持高压打击态势,深化与中方执法合作,严厉整治跨境违法犯罪。 👑欢迎订阅东南亚头条大事件频道 🔗: t.me/+U0oW4guqFL03MjMy 1️⃣免费爆料投稿: @Y9527F
👍7❤3🕊1
#付费广告 💎🎰🙌💵 😀💰💸💸 💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳 💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳 🧐专业服务 超高限红 毫秒出款 ❤️视讯 — 索莱尔/DB/CQ9高限红 ❤️电子 — PG/PP/CQ9 一注2000 ❤️彩票 — 独家综艺28/哈希区块彩 🏆OK游戏中心 公群9 入驻300万U 🏆新币担保 公群999 入驻100万U 官方网址 ➔ 9Y.COM 官方飞投 ➔ @GF9Y 官方唯一客服 ➔ @KF9Y 官方唯一频道 ➔ @WWW9YCOM 💎🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋💎
#付费广告 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🤑 铂莱娱乐 8年老品牌 广告费每月投入高达500万U,全网担保上押1300万U,送“野鸡黑台”一句话,勿伤玩家利益,勿毁博彩信誉。 🫢 【贵宾会 750.cc 】 强势启航,集团背书,信誉担保,全网首发,引爆彩票娱乐新纪元!六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 全民代理全民收单 助您白手起家 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 🏃♀️ 很多平台热衷于宣传玩家中奖,却对中奖后的“漫长审核”“异常冻结”闭口不谈。 😀 就在本月,PG电子爆出200万u巨奖。本金仅为5000u…… 😎 截至目前:200万U 已极速下发,单笔提款百万u秒出,亿级储备金硬核坐镇,不要去考验小盘的良心,要选就选大盘的实力。 🌟 当无数野鸡网在生灭中挣扎时,铂莱始终屹立不倒。这就是我们送给全行业最响亮的耳光! 😀😀😀😀: @BLKF0 😀😀😀😀: @bolaidaili 🟢🟢😀😄: @bolaiyl…
广州男子网恋“姐妹花”半年被骗18万 两个“老婆”竟是同一名男子假扮 8月25日,广州警方公布一起网恋诈骗案。一名男子半年内同时和一对“亲姐妹”谈恋爱,前后转账181040元,直到两个“老婆”一起失联,才发现所谓姐妹花根本不存在。 今年7月5日,男子到广州荔湾警方报案。过去近半年,他先后在网上认识“小慧”和“小敏”,两人自称是亲姐妹,还分别和他发展成恋爱关系。男子平时直接喊两人“老婆”,但双方一直只靠文字和图片联系,每次提出语音或视频,对方都会找理由拒绝。 交往期间,两名“姐妹”不断以创业、看病、急用钱等理由开口要钱,男子一次次转账,累计被骗181040元。直到“小慧”和“小敏”突然同时失联,他才察觉不对。 警方顺着两个账号调查,很快发现所谓“姐妹”其实都是同一个人在操作。7月23日,民警赶赴外省,将嫌疑人雷某抓获。 雷某先把自己包装成女性酒水销售人员“小慧”,在社交平台吸引男子接触。眼看对方越来越投入,他又虚构出“妹…
🤣6
#网友爆料:第2期来了,关于实名举报柒喜团队和他的幕后几个老板。 公司人员架构:三个幕后老板,江苏商会会长(大三、小三等等)。柒喜是台前的老板,三个总监分别为:一个精聊总监(小凯);一个互转币总监(老嫖);一个台湾空降总监(啊文)。 你们的护照信息、真实名字我就不写了。还有柒喜老婆,住在金边的一个公寓里,也是实名登记入住。柒喜使用的 ABA 账户也是实名开卡。 柒喜团队每年的诈骗金额不低于1000万美元。团队最开始在金边的幸运园区,后来被冲,搬到了拜林新园区。中间又搬到了西港的航空楼,后面又回到了拜林。 在拜林期间,有一次被抓了100多人。后来他选择性地把有用的人花钱捞了出来(因为整理护照资料的人就是我,他给我的名单)。没有出来的人,被遣送回国。 当时他答应被遣送的人,每个月可以领取生活费。但据我了解,生活费只发了两个月,只是为了暂时安抚家人的情绪而已。 如今,该团队已经搬到东帝汶继续诈骗。希望柬埔寨大使馆或者东帝汶…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 382 posts we hold for @tp111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,508,333 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@tp111 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 9 posts, 10 August 2026 – 26 August 2026 · confirmed gone 17 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@pp854 · 80,374#1
@bx666 · 476,141#2
@pyzcn · 224,996#3
@guawa9 · 91,060#4
@DNY181 · 50,326#5
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 45,553#6
@dubai0 · 78,883#7
@cgbg8 · 109,032#8
@jpz_888 · 12,859#9
@svip40 · 66,045#10
@DNYTJL3 · 122,529#11
@usd1 · 253,826 (as read 23 August 2026)#12
@sucai177 · 111,532#13
@wgsb · 197,561 (as read 23 August 2026)#14
@baoguangba088 · 241,252#15
@feilongwang · 73,296#16
@aa144 · 35,305#17
@HH9915 · 134,317#18
@Gaosl · 1,181#19
@ygxw3 · 144,687#20
@telonews_cn · 85,459#21
@DNYQWCG · 82,128#22
@Banma_xinwen · 95,643#23
@SB919 · 112,287#24
@huaren_zixun · 96,470#25
@dj17 · 97,582#26
@jianpuzhaihuarenzixun · 82,612#27
@bx777 · 46,050#28
@meishisc · 28,374#29
@TG_DJ777 · 135,129#30
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 77,341#31
@kanxia · 476,053#32
@svipzz · 35,398#33
@dny1577 · 5,489#34
@chiguahs · 111,825#35
@xinwen811 · 216,087#36
@pp666 · 236,772#37
@baoguangee · 206,474#38
@dnyggg · 40,730#39
@jpz9118 · 110,470#40
@bvl222 · 56,947#41
@ab100 · 178,378#42
@dongnanya108 · 168,889#43
@cctvPH · 217,197#44
@chigua_e · 221,080#45
@Dubaihuarenzixun · 71,746#46
@bg833 · 304,509#47
@xigangz · 134,961#48
@ac666 · 325,893#49
@kk4568 · 106,418#50
@enooo · 56,194 (as read 23 August 2026)#51
@ay2028 · 71,197#52
@jinbianyy · 28,464#53
@chiguadog · 153,971#54
@cctv1 · 308,900#55
@kduzb · 821,257#56
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@DNY181 · 50,326
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
@DNYQWCG · 82,128
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 19 August 2026
@guawa9 · 91,060
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 17 August 2026
@pp854 · 80,374
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 19 August 2026
@pyzcn · 224,996
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 11 August 2026
@qiusu664 · 56,107
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 24 August 2026
@QQDS999 · 214,380
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
@TG_DJ777 · 135,129
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 August 2026
@pp666 · 236,772
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 11 August 2026
@sck888 · 77,369
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 19 August 2026
@ay2028 · 71,197
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 18 August 2026
@cggxhhh · 268,746
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 August 2026
@chigua_e · 221,080
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 11 August 2026
@jpz9118 · 110,470
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@jpz0123 · 52,658
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 24 August 2026
@onlychigua · 199,117
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 14 August 2026
@cgbg8 · 109,032
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
@HH9915 · 134,317
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
@ow333 · 74,199
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 August 2026
@JPZ990 · 92,004
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 15 August 2026
@nb688 · 350,821
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 13 August 2026
@chiguadog · 153,971
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 12 August 2026
@QQ888880000 · 94,884
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
@xigangz · 134,961
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚头条大事件” (@tp111), 46,877 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tp111.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.