#执法视频:11月4日晚,马来西亚沙巴移民局突袭亚庇一栋三层别墅,逮捕14名涉嫌从事网络诈骗活动的中国籍男子,年龄26至44岁。 执法人员现场查获75部手机、14台笔记本电脑、现金及网络设备。初步调查发现,13人涉嫌逾期居留,另1人没有合法居留准证。 关注大事件👉@dny181 投稿👉 @awen88

Channel
东南亚华人大事件
@DNY181
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,550subscribers
-16,846 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002151663143 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DNY181 |
| Description | 本频道专注于东南亚华人最新动态资讯,生活故事分享,海外华人求助,让你看尽海外华人大小事。 我们的TikTok公众号: tiktok.com/@dashijian91 投稿/求助/爆料: @awen88 #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #泰国 Public information channel. We follow Telegram community guidelines. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DNY181 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:39 | 43,550 | -36 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:29 | 43,586 | -85 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:01 | 43,671 | -39 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:15 | 43,710 | -33 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:06 | 43,743 | -89 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 22:44 | 43,832 | -356 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:01 | 44,188 | -441 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 44,629 | +3,850 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:59 | 40,779 | -229 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:07 | 41,008 | -197 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:10 | 41,205 | -439 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:27 | 41,644 | -195 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:59 | 41,839 | -296 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:50 | 42,135 | -177 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:50 | 42,312 | -264 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 42,576 | -192 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:01 | 42,768 | -796 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:46 | 43,564 | -132 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 43,696 | -81 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:57 | 43,777 | first reading |
Engagement
1,758 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 169 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.31%
- avg views ÷ 43,550 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,880
- 656 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.09%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 656
- of 1,758 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 136 of 656 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,758 (11 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,231,900 |
| Reactions total | 245 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 01:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈31,200
- Videos
- ≈6,830
- Links
- ≈6,630
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 6h 39m
- Average length
- 1m 21s
Measured directly from 296 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
443 reactions across 205 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 103 | 23.3% | |
| 🔥 | 75 | 16.9% | |
| 👍 | 45 | 10.2% | |
| 👏 | 36 | 8.13% | |
| 😢 | 35 | 7.90% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 4.74% | |
| 🎉 | 15 | 3.39% | |
| ⚡ | 9 | 2.03% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 2.03% | |
| 😨 | 8 | 1.81% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 1.58% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 1.58% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 1.35% | |
| 🌚 | 5 | 1.13% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 1.13% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.13% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 1.13% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 0.903% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 0.903% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.903% | |
| 24 further kinds | 35 | 7.90% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 229 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 443 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 19 September 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 50 of 656 posts held from the last 30 days (7.62%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#马来西亚资讯:沙巴突袭网络诈骗窝点,14名中国籍男子被捕,查获75部手机及14台电脑 11月5日,马来西亚沙巴消息: 11月4日晚间,沙巴移民局联合执法人员突击检查亚庇一栋三层独立式别墅,捣毁一个涉嫌从事网络诈骗活动的窝点,现场逮捕14名中国籍男子,年龄介于26岁至44岁。 沙巴移民局表示,此次行动属于“突击逮捕行动”(Ops Serkap)。执法人员经过约一周的情报搜集后,于11月4日晚上约11时展开突击检查。 初步调查发现,14名嫌疑人涉嫌以社交访问准证入境马来西亚,其中13人涉嫌逾期居留,另有1人没有合法居留准证。 调查还发现,嫌疑人通过不同路线进入沙巴,其中5人直接从中国入境,5人经吉隆坡国际机场转机,另外4人则经柬埔寨进入沙巴。 此次行动中,执法人员查获: 14台笔记本电脑; 75部手机; 现金3,742令吉及560元人民币; 网络设备及其他相关物品。 目前,14名中国籍男子已被带往移民局扣留中心接受进一…
❤1👏1🔥1
#网友投稿:注意一种名为uCreator的中国间谍软件套件隐藏在重新打包的Telegram、微信和GCash应用程序中。 研究人员Ovi发现,在Telegram中它可以读取聊天记录并以明文形式获取2FA密码。其开发者将后端和大约三打开发人员的姓名留在了开放的GitLab服务器上。 关注大事件👉@dny181 投稿👉 @awen88
判决案例:男子在东南亚园区负责养号引流 被警察带回国获刑六个月 2025年11月,丁某出境加入境外电信诈骗窝点。在2025年11月至2026年4月期间,他辗转多个窝点担任业务员,负责养号、引流,通过社交软件使用投资话术,诈骗境内及境外人员。案发后,丁某被公安机关从境外带回,检察机关以诈骗罪对其提起公诉。 法院审理认定,丁某以非法占有为目的参与境外诈骗团伙,在共同犯罪中系从犯,具有坦白、自愿认罪认罚情节,依法予以减轻处罚,以诈骗罪判处其有期徒刑六个月,并处罚金。 消息来源: 山东省济南市槐荫区人民法院 10月27日对外披露 关注大事件👉@dny181 投稿👉 @awen88
#群友反馈:今晚吉隆坡过12点大检查,各单位注意了! 关注大事件👉@dny181 投稿👉 @awen88
🇱🇦老挝万象市赛塔尼县昌库村查获一网络犯罪团伙 逮捕27名犯罪嫌疑人 11 月 5 日,老挝公安部专项特勤小组对位于老挝万象市赛塔尼县昌库村(Ban Changkhou)第 24 组的一处出租屋展开突击行动,成功捣毁一个从事网络犯罪及非法网络赌博的犯罪团伙, 现场逮捕 27 名涉案犯罪嫌疑人。其中,中国籍 26 人,泰国籍 1 人;现场查获扣押作案工具包括手机 805 部、台式电脑 32 台以及笔记本电脑 3 台。 行动结束后,一名女子主动联系执法人员,试图办理取保候审将上述犯罪团伙人员保释出狱。执法人员随即将其控制并展开调查审讯。经查,该名女子名为普维(Nang Pouvieng),现年 31 岁,职业为翻译,户籍位于万象省开乌多姆县萨马基赛村,现居住于万象市西科达崩县拉欣村。 目前,警方正对该案作进一步深入侦查与扩线深挖,全力追查其同伙及幕后主脑。 关注大事件👉@dny181 投稿👉 @awen88
缅甸交克园区再曝恶性事件!炮弹坑(青松园区)年轻人惨遭暴力致死,家属苦苦申诉,谁来为逝去的生命讨回公道? 据相关消息透露,缅甸交克园区(炮弹坑、青松园区)再次被卷入严重暴力事件的舆论风波。该园区长期受到外界质疑,相关人员的处境及园区内部管理问题也引发关注。 据称,今年10月中旬,园区内部发生一起令人震惊的暴力事件,一名正值青春年华的年轻人疑似遭到严重殴打,最终不幸身亡。 一个原本拥有美好未来的年轻生命,就这样戛然而止。他的父母失去了孩子,整个家庭也因此陷入无法言说的悲痛之中。 更令人揪心的是,据相关消息称,事发后,园区安保人员迅速采取封锁措施,对相关区域进行管控。 而在事件另一端,是心急如焚、四处奔走的受害者家属。据称,孩子的父母为了寻找真相、为儿子讨回公道,已经前往中国驻当地使领馆持续求助,甚至不惜放下尊严,跪地恳求,希望有关方面能够关注此事,帮助他们寻找失去孩子的真相。 白发人送黑发人,已经是世间最令人心碎的悲剧…
金边市长下令全面清除网赌与电诈 部署法语国家组织峰会安保 11月4日下午,金边市长兼行政指挥部主席坤盛召集警方、宪兵及14区政府官员举行会议。 坤盛下令必须全面根除辖区内所有非法赌博及网络诈骗犯罪,确保民众安全与社会治安。 此外,坤盛特别强调,各部门须全力保障将于11月13日至17日在金边举办的第20届法语国家组织(Francophonie)峰会安保工作,确保峰会顺利举行。 关注大事件👉@dny181 投稿👉 @awen88
苏诺塔与柯学举行工作会谈 今天下午,柬埔寨国家警察总署副总监兼西港省警察局局长苏诺塔,在省警察局会议室会见了中国驻西哈努克领事办公室主任柯学一行。 双方进行了礼节性拜会,并就相关工作事务展开了深入的交流与讨论。 领事挺严肃的,苏二却似乎在强压着上翘的嘴角~~ 关注大事件👉@dny181 投稿👉 @awen88
#网友求助:我的朋友叫“小k”(05年的,湖北黄冈英山人),10月27号报平安说已经从柬埔寨到越南胡志明了,10月29 号还在回复朋友消息。从那天之后,所有人都联系不上她,电话不接、消息不回,给她男朋友发抖音私信也没有任何回复,至今失联快一周,家里人已经急到崩溃。 她是过去找男朋友的。她男朋友好像叫夺宝吧。如果有朋友见过她、知道她最近去了哪里,或者有任何线索,请立刻联系我! 家里人非常担心她的安全,拜托大家帮忙转发扩散,万分感谢! 关注大事件👉@dny181 投稿👉 @awen88
#网友爆料:柬埔寨金边黄山国际酒店股东、太子集团“刘忍团伙”核心骨干“刘丰”。 你说要做股转大区,我这里出钱给你去做,一波做完,完盈收以后,该给的分红一毛不分,本金全吃。卷着客户入金的所有钱直接跑路,员工出事情你也不管。 你现在人在马来西亚,我知道。你如果现在出来,把我们这200万美元还回来,事情就算了。 如果不解决,我就把你最早在8号园区做美股、买人口,以及被你叫督导打死的人的名单都公布出去。再多花一百,叫人去抓你和你的家里人,到时候黑白两道一起找你,你看看你和你家里人能好好活下去不? 关注大事件👉@dny181 投稿👉 @awen88
巴基斯坦卡拉奇诈骗呼叫中心遭突袭,员工被困超过24小时,家属门外抗议要求放人 11月4日至5日,巴基斯坦国家网络犯罪调查局(NCCIA)在卡拉奇Tipu Sultan地区一处呼叫中心展开突击执法行动,多名男女员工被带走调查,现场行动持续超过24小时,引发员工家属不满。 据当地媒体报道,执法人员展开行动后,大批员工家属及亲友聚集在呼叫中心外,要求当局允许他们与被留置的员工见面或通话。部分家属声称,现场甚至有未成年人在内,其中一名家长表示,自己17岁的儿子才刚入职两天,另一名家长则称其14岁的孩子也在该处工作。 由于迟迟无法与员工取得联系,家属随后在沙赫拉·费萨尔大道(Shahrah-e-Faisal)举行抗议,一度封锁部分道路。经过警方与抗议者协商,示威活动最终结束。 11月5日,随着调查继续推进,部分接受询问的人员获准离开,另有多人继续被拘留调查。执法人员同时扣押了笔记本电脑及其他电子设备。 NCCIA卡拉奇分区随后确…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,758 posts we hold for @DNY181. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@PG8K8K · 3,35746 posts【2028126.com】赌王之王
@pgdzr · 6,18742 postsN1娱乐城-赌王之王
@N1YLC8 · 5,00319 posts2028122.COM- 2028体育官方频道
@pg115 · 15,63918 postsN1官方频道
@N1gjpdd · 3,64010 postsN1118.COM- N1国际官方频道
@pg100 · 1,34210 posts2028体育PG电子爆分大赏
@TY2028PG · 1,81610 posts2028234.COM-2028体育官方频道
@pg121 · 6,7325 posts奇趣百科(吃瓜)
@chigua1178 · 35,8341 post西港日记|柬埔寨大事件
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,1741 postSpam Info Bot
@SpamBot · 34,601,9241 post东南亚大事件-聚焦时事 @TX100
@tx100 · 148,7471 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@tp111 · 46,343#1
@bx666 · 462,518#2
@pyzcn · 216,998#3
@guawa9 · 85,142#4
@pp666 · 193,884#5
@DNYQWCG · 74,424#6
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,174#7
@dny1577 · 5,057#8
@jpz0123 · 50,077#9
@Cukicnk777 · 2,786#10
@cgbg8 · 107,547#11
@svip40 · 131,769#12
@jianpuzhaihuarenzixun · 73,154#13
@xigang13 · 58,202#14
@jpz9118 · 73,624#15
@ow333 · 51,413#16
@dubai0 · 89,041#17
@DNYTT888 · 475#18
@tx100 · 148,747#19
@baoguangba088 · 234,344#20
@flbhuarenquan · 79,251#21
@DNYBG234 · 89,056#22
@feilongwang · 70,883#23
@aa144 · 34,726#24
@dongnanya108 · 109,478#25
@huaren_zixun · 83,775#26
@Gaosl · 1,008#27
@usd1 · 253,842 (as read 22 August 2026)#28
@chiguadog · 155,758#29
@bg888 · 319,077#30
@db933 · 10,351#31
@Kolebule8119 · 3,462#32
@dj17 · 71,534#33
@BGS8989 · 96,211#34
@HH9915 · 135,812#35
@bvl222 · 43,386#36
@Banma_xinwen · 85,103#37
@qzzpfabu888 · 607,992#38
@kanxia · 438,518#39
@Dubaihuarenzixun · 65,229#40
@dny88 · 57,220#41
@bodu08 · 54,822#42
@DNYXSTJL6668 · 8,932#43
@qqt13 · 199,609#44
@JYGJBG · 41,775#45
@dnyuuu88 · 125,967#46
@xinwen811 · 206,048#47
@DNYXW008 · 73,964#48
@HR8877 · 325,701#49
@uae918 · 78,024#50
@xigangz · 94,513#51
@SriLanka_news1 · 27,286#52
@DNYTJL3 · 86,023#53
@kz692nn · 125,013#54
@nx123 · 762,619#55
@TGshibao · 61,702#56
@cc199 · 99,716#57
@ytxw88 · 23,717#58
@chiguahs · 109,220#59
@jpz887 · 434#60
@pianzi1 · 49,740#61
@miandianhuarenzixun · 69,115#62
@djaaa · 20,607#63
@dubaixinwen2 · 203,122#64
@pyzcgsp1 · 1,229#65
@dibai2025 · 301,435#66
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@DNYQWCG · 74,424
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 19 August 2026
@tp111 · 46,343
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 23 August 2026
@guawa9 · 85,142
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 17 August 2026
@pp666 · 193,884
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 11 August 2026
@chiguadog · 155,758
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 12 August 2026
@jpz0123 · 50,077
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 24 August 2026
@JPZ990 · 92,836
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 15 August 2026
@pyzcn · 216,998
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 11 August 2026
@jrdnyxs · 70,542
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@dnyxinwen668 · 13,772
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
@ow333 · 51,413
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 August 2026
@aq7777 · 50,474
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
@dnyuuu88 · 125,967
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@jpz9118 · 73,624
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@bgtjt · 103,999
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
@cc199 · 99,716
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
@xigang13 · 58,202
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚华人大事件” (@DNY181), 43,550 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DNY181.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.