National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 15 days, net +27,411. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 163,795–199,554 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 17:07
195,379
+6
22 Aug 2026, 14:32
195,373
-55
22 Aug 2026, 10:03
195,428
+307
21 Aug 2026, 14:35
195,121
+834
21 Aug 2026, 12:58
194,287
+3,138
21 Aug 2026, 08:43
191,149
-3
21 Aug 2026, 02:45
191,152
-127
21 Aug 2026, 01:43
191,279
-2,506
20 Aug 2026, 15:42
193,785
-714
20 Aug 2026, 09:22
194,499
-119
20 Aug 2026, 07:42
194,618
+468
19 Aug 2026, 23:16
194,150
no change
19 Aug 2026, 22:11
194,150
-59
19 Aug 2026, 14:28
194,209
+533
19 Aug 2026, 09:54
193,676
-63
19 Aug 2026, 07:56
193,739
-37
19 Aug 2026, 01:34
193,776
-103
18 Aug 2026, 20:08
193,879
-229
18 Aug 2026, 14:12
194,108
-105
18 Aug 2026, 12:52
194,213
first reading
Engagement
358 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.18%
avg views ÷ 195,379 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,260
357 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
358
of 358 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 354 of 357 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
358 (7 August 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
1,521,164
Reactions total
44,819
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 24m
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 104 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
44,819 reactions across 354 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
7,968
17.8%
🎉
7,697
17.2%
👍
7,549
16.8%
❤
7,256
16.2%
😁
6,192
13.8%
🤩
1,840
4.11%
🥰
1,801
4.02%
❤🔥
1,183
2.64%
😍
1,142
2.55%
💯
1,095
2.44%
👏
616
1.37%
⚡
480
1.07%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 354 of the 358 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44,819reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 358 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Showing the 12 most recent of 358 posts we hold for @db933. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 145,050 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
菲律宾大事件 @PHDA15 · 97,915 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
头条快报 @ttkb0 · 113,919 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚大事件|曝光|悬赏|投稿🏆 @dyy83 · 111,643 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
迪拜大事件|东南亚新闻 @YYL333 · 81,577 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 August 2026
全球大事件|新闻|曝光 @QQDS999 · 222,402 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
今日全网曝光频道 @bg833 · 308,095 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 10 August 2026
泰国大事件|全球大事件曝光 悬赏 @xinwen0888 · 72,643 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 August 2026
东南亚华人大事件 @DNY181 · 59,281 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
斯里兰卡头条新闻曝光 @baoguangee · 211,082 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 11 August 2026
中文曝光吧 安危头条吃瓜(接广告合作)🫥 @ZLWBG · 81,725 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
全网曝光 @quanwangbaoguang0 · 93,621 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
Друзья Дональда @steven_bb · 651,974 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
TG第一曝光频道 @tg88f · 111,115 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
东南亚热点资讯 @rdzx0 · 113,569 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
Солодовников. Кратко @solodovnikovia · 158,120 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Тенденции эпохи @eratrends · 137,295 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Собственный корреспондент @zovgrad · 128,186 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Распутица @rasputicaa · 124,091 Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚(有话说)|曝光日记” (@db933), 195,379 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/db933.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.