柬媒:挂羊头卖狗肉!巴域一赌场假借“装修”暗中充当近300人网诈窝点 柬媒报道,位于柴桢省巴域市占地5公顷、高7层(769间房)的“Golden Galaxy”金银河赌场,此前以“装修”为伪装掩人耳目,暗中充当网络诈骗窝点。 在柬埔寨筹备“打击网络诈骗国际会议”之际,柬新闻部于9月21日组织39家机构78名中外记者实地采风。 今年4月7日,柬埔寨警方查封了该窝点,逮捕3名主犯送交法办,并将抓获的275名外籍涉案人员(含25名中国人)移交移民总局驱逐出境。

Channel
全球大事件|新闻|曝光
@QQDS999
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
176,108subscribers
-70,772 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001270195621 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @QQDS999 @top999 |
| Description | 商务接广告: @QQSW999 禁言双向机器人: @SWGG999BOT |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QQDS999 |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 176,108 | no change |
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 176,108 | -1,067 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 177,175 | -52 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 177,227 | -1,884 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 179,111 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 179,111 | -1,823 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 180,934 | no change |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 180,934 | -2,226 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 183,160 | -68 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 183,228 | -2,032 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:15 | 185,260 | -76 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 185,336 | -20,207 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 205,543 | -489 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 206,032 | -886 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 206,918 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:11 | 206,918 | -1,172 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:29 | 208,090 | -181 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:31 | 208,271 | -723 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 208,994 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 208,994 | first reading |
Engagement
337 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.291%
- avg views ÷ 176,108 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 513
- 237 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.116%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 237
- of 337 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 237 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 337 (5 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 121,608 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 07:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈50,100
- Videos
- ≈7,920
- Links
- ≈17,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 57m 38s
- Average length
- 39s
Measured directly from 89 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 85.7% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 337 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 337 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#网友反馈:西港一打野地点被围,里边是一群印尼人,刚刚还在谈判,现在直接拉上车带走~ ☎️投稿爆料: @daxiner001 ✈️新闻曝光: @QQDS999
#网友投稿 2026年9月21日早上9点,有人在金边 昌瓦大桥下面的河里发现一具漂着的尸体,目前已经捞上来了。 ☎️投稿爆料: @daxiner001 ✈️新闻曝光: @QQDS999
#群友爆料:柬埔寨西港区域治安环境确实错综复杂。 不法分子潜伏在一个名叫五月特定酒店、酒店具体位置就在西港长城娱乐城附近。此酒店老板很有可能与绑匪狼狈为奸,专门收留了一群无护照团伙跨区域作案。 部分不良酒店老板为利益驱使纵容包庇、沦为犯罪帮凶的情况,高度契合当地突发恶性治安事件的潜在特征。西港的绑架、抢劫和非法拘禁团伙往往采用“长期踩点、精准锁定、结伙作案”的手段。 为确保广大在西港工作、生活、经商或旅游的同胞生命财产安全,请务必将人身安全放在第一位。其中部分人员名字与照片我已经知晓。 曝光酒店老板为一名光头,看起来很斯文,实际上为这群绑匪团伙提供住处,谋划作案手段。其心可诛。 其中绑匪中带头大哥称呼冲娃,四川人。飞机名称《陈明杰》。其中老二名为:玉虎,四川人,或许称为《棒老二》。飞机名称为《两只老虎》。 他们还招募了三名作案时行动的炮灰,存在雇佣关系。 这群团伙无恶不作,这次我直接曝光你们的照片与特征!在西港的朋…
涉外婚姻骗局频发 中国公民有人被骗钱甚至面临刑拘 9月20日,中国驻缅甸使领馆再次提醒,近期缅甸发生多起中国公民陷入涉外婚姻骗局案件,有人遭受财产损失,甚至面临刑拘等严重后果。 部分骗局以相亲、结婚为名吸引中国公民参与,背后可能涉及诈骗、非法婚介甚至人口贩卖。一旦通过非正规渠道办理跨国婚姻,不仅可能被骗钱,还可能因触犯当地法律被追究责任。 缅甸对外国人与本国公民结婚审核严格,通过支付高额费用、违规婚介等方式促成婚姻,存在较大法律风险。 中国法律禁止个人和婚介机构从事或变相从事涉外婚姻介绍。中国公民在缅办理结婚、居留等手续,应走正规渠道,避免因轻信“快速结婚”“低价跨国婚配”等信息陷入骗局。 ☎️投稿爆料: @daxiner001 ✈️新闻曝光: @QQDS999
#群友反馈:金边国金警察下午过来检查,这次是最后一次检查了,这次会比平时更仔细,没护照有设备的赶紧躲好。 ☎️投稿爆料: @daxiner001 ✈️新闻曝光: @QQDS999
#群友爆料:一家做资金盘黑公司,位于妙瓦底交克山。老板外号阿清、AK,公司管理三毛、富富、大牛,后勤山水。 这家公司原先就在柬埔寨做资金盘,巅峰时十几个盘口,去年才搬过来交克。现在盘口名字是云租讯,苹果手机可以直接 APP 下载。柬埔寨那么多个盘口结束,代理、员工全部不给工资,要求人员过来妙瓦底才结。 你们他妈的还是人吗?公司高压,天天电、打员工,结束还不给工资。柬埔寨大扫,我几个兄弟被抓也不处理,只顾自己赚钱。后面我会继续爆更多信息。 ☎️投稿爆料: @daxiner001 ✈️新闻曝光: @QQDS999
#国内资讯:敲诈上海科技公司负责人1亿元被曝光后,湖南邵阳两公安局长被免职 据媒体9月19日报道,上海麦丝科技实际控制人郑帅于2024年被湖南邵阳县警方跨省抓捕,办案人员以其开发的软件具备翻墙功能、涉嫌相关犯罪为由展开调查,报道将这类跨省抓捕称作“远洋捕捞”式办案。 郑帅家属称,时任邵阳县副县长、公安局长尹向锋当面提出,郑帅缴纳1亿元,便可为其办理指定居所监视居住、取保候审,并作出不起诉处理。郑帅筹措1亿元上交后,确实拿到取保候审,期间他曾被拘禁在邵阳县一家宾馆数月。后续办案人员又提出,想要为同案人员办理取保,还需要继续转账。郑帅拒绝继续付款,双方交涉的录音与监控视频随后在网络广泛传播。 在最高检、公安部2025年3月部署开展“远洋捕捞”专项整治行动的背景下,事件后续迎来追责。 2025年7月,邵阳县人大常委会表决通过,免去尹向锋邵阳县副县长、公安局长职务,县公安局副局长唐战雄也一同被免职。 邵阳县法院已经开庭审理郑帅…
#网友投稿:柬埔寨经商的华人老板驾车途经街头,偶遇一名浑身伤痕累累的中国流浪小伙。 老板顿生恻隐之心,不仅亲自为他清理伤口、涂抹药物,还塞给他2000元现金和一条烟,并询问是否愿意回国,承诺可协助联系大使馆。 谁知,小伙执意不愿回国,推测身上或许还牵扯着某些事端,只想先在这异国他乡保住性命。华人老板见状,也是无可奈何,能帮的忙已尽,只得挥手让他离去。 身处异国他乡,面对此类境遇,往往让人心生怜悯,却又深感有心无力。 ☎️投稿爆料: @daxiner001 ✈️新闻曝光: @QQDS999
中缅边境检查站查获一起偷渡未遂案 9月19日,缅甸第四特区勐拉检查站执勤人员在开展例行查验工作中,在一辆准备过关的车辆后备箱内查获一名中国籍男子。该男子蜷缩藏匿其中,企图搭乘车辆从口岸偷渡出境。 目前,后续相关处置工作正在进行中。 PS:你还假装听不见🤣 ☎️投稿爆料: @daxiner001 ✈️新闻曝光: @QQDS999
164名涉网诈及毒品违法犯罪中国籍人员被柬埔寨遣返回国 昨天,柬移民局调查与程序执行局在德崇国际机场通过包机将164名(含1名女性)中国籍人员遣返回国。 据悉,上述人员因涉嫌非法入境、非法务工、吸毒及从事违法网络诈骗等被查获。 ☎️投稿爆料: @daxiner001 ✈️新闻曝光: @QQDS999
蒙多基里省长督导缉查非法网诈 涉案赌场已被查封 昨天,蒙多基里省省长贡金尼率联合执法组,前往该省高西玛县拉帕克边境口岸的“TG Genting”赌场实地督导。此前,当局已查封该赌场并打掉其内部的网络诈骗团伙。 贡金尼强调,必须严厉打击跨国网诈犯罪,严禁合规赌场私下经营非法网赌,坚决落实总理洪玛奈的指令,确保蒙多基里省境内不再存在任何网诈窝点,全力保障边境安全与治安秩序。
Showing the 12 most recent of 337 posts we hold for @QQDS999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bx666 · 471,642#1
@bg833 · 300,112#2
@db933 · 199,757#3
@YYL333 · 96,484#4
@huaren_zixun · 91,317#5
@toutiaoshijian · 77,547#6
@pyzcn · 220,622#7
@chigua2022 · 201,027#8
@dubai0 · 77,364#9
@svip40 · 110,383#10
@ttkb0 · 120,417#11
@baoguangba088 · 240,574#12
@kanxia · 500,222#13
@feilongwang · 95,154#14
@Banma_xinwen · 92,372#15
@tp111 · 49,218#16
@heicaibaog · 84,935 (as read 11 August 2026)#17
@jpz_888 · 12,701#18
@xinwenTV5 · 8,510#19
@iiiik · 49,140#20
@xinwen118 · 114,190#21
@DNYXW008 · 86,205#22
@Dubaihuarenzixun · 67,684#23
@dny1577 · 5,364#24
@baoheitai · 1,136#25
@tghuarenba · 44,835#26
@BG_BG8 · 38,943#27
@tx100 · 161,401#28
@xpppp · 305,773#29
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 72,699#30
@uuuuuf · 244,570#31
@redian3 · 63,915#32
@tg89aa · 142,617#33
@tg04277 · 39,584#34
@svipzz · 89,708#35
@baoguangee · 179,061#36
@dny099 · 60,992#37
@bx777 · 43,911#38
@baoguang821 · 54,118#39
@dny718 · 13,308#40
@ygxw3 · 143,983#41
@dxdb001 · 7,904#42
@HR8877 · 320,634#43
@quanqiubaoliao · 186,631#44
@flb00 · 17,794#45
@vipn8888 · 72,207#46
@xinwen811 · 207,543#47
@gouzaibaoliao · 2,150#48
@HH9915 · 126,803#49
@kz692nn · 139,774#50
@Gaosl · 1,095#51
@xinwen1 · 95,932#52
@baoguangqun110 · 37,625#53
@aa144 · 35,337#54
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,905#55
@jianpuzhaihuarenzixun · 77,859#56
@th769 · 51,156#57
@feixingzhe0 · 58,575#58
@flbhuarenquan · 43,235#59
@miandianhuarenzixun · 73,859#60
@bodu08 · 58,568#61
@bvl222 · 54,541#62
@vjtyd · 62,777#63
@baoguangqun999 · 37,798#64
@dongnanya108 · 161,350#65
@quanwangbaoguangb · 149,935#66
@bominwang18 · 4,673#67
@qqt13 · 201,549#68
@phnews · 14,726#69
@shijiebei011 · 65,420#70
@rdzx0 · 109,241#71
@Cryptowhalepump_official · 23,409#72
@EvPanina · 136,450#73
@kazan_bass · 120,195#74
@solodovnikovia · 121,882#75
@sochyv · 8,087#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@xinwen0888 · 104,929
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 August 2026
@YYL333 · 96,484
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 August 2026
@db933 · 199,757
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026
@dnyqqbj · 121,897
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@Cryptowhalepump_official · 23,409
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 August 2026
@ttkb0 · 120,417
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
@kajal_online_hub · 98,508
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@chiguadog · 154,050
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 12 August 2026
@guawa9 · 89,091
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 17 August 2026
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 55,910
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@th769 · 51,156
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@huaren_zixun · 91,317
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnyxwtt · 52,489
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
@DNYzzz6 · 59,369
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
@ukr_shvydko · 311,405
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@tg88f · 122,531
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
@steven_bb · 702,168
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
@outsiderukraine · 43,007
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
@solodovnikovia · 121,882
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
@eratrends · 140,362
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
@rasputicaa · 124,370
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全球大事件|新闻|曝光” (@QQDS999), 176,108 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QQDS999.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.