#小姐姐爆料:这个男人是我以前男朋友,他是做绑架的,非常喜欢装逼,说自己很有钱。 他有个几把钱,跟他在一起快一年什么都没有给我,还喜欢打女人,把我拉到山上,让我打电话给自己的父母说自己不想活了,逼我自残。 我想跟他分手,他不放我走,撕我的护照,把我一个人锁在房间3天,不给我吃的喝的。自己拿手机去抵押了,然后骗我说只要我把他手机拿回来就放我走。 我一个女人跟他在一起,也不让我上班,我实在没有办法,找家里人凑了750u给他把手机拿回来,结果还是没有放我走。拿手铐把我铐在床上,逼我抽电子烟,要是不抽就拿电棍电我的小狗。 然后我跑了,他就发各种信息给我的父母,还有我身边的朋友,吓唬我朋友和威胁我朋友。这种男人有什么用,他妈的都不配做男人。 最要我气的是,他妈的他来强奸我,还有很多事情就不详细说了。 我只想说一句:你不要在逼我,要是在逼我,我就把你做的全部事情讲出来。我只是想好聚好散,就当没有认识过。 你到现在还拿着我所有的…

Channel
东南亚大事件-曝光-黑料
@DNYzzz6
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
59,369subscribers
+3,061 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001546752931 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DNYzzz6 |
| Description | #东南亚 看尽所有东南亚不为人知的一面,让出国淘金的朋友都能安全回家 投稿爆料➡️➡️➡️: @xiao888888hu |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DNYzzz6 |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 59,369 | -3,577 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 62,946 | -1,707 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 64,653 | -1,442 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 66,095 | +3,222 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 62,873 | +7,719 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 55,154 | -3,259 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 58,413 | -1,006 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:46 | 59,419 | -534 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:44 | 59,953 | -682 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:15 | 60,635 | -188 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 60,823 | +1,986 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 58,837 | -45 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 58,882 | +27 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 58,855 | +57 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 58,798 | -121 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 58,919 | -236 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 59,155 | +1,516 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 57,639 | -156 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:59 | 57,795 | +390 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 57,405 | first reading |
Engagement
704 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.34%
- avg views ÷ 59,369 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,170
- 463 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.033%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 463
- of 704 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 463 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 704 (8 August 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,468,309 |
| Reactions total | 30 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈23,300
- Videos
- ≈2,130
- Links
- ≈1,720
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 56m
- Average length
- 55s
Measured directly from 257 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
31 reactions across 30 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 16 | 51.6% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 9.68% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 704 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 704 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#网友爆料:上次曝光被抓的美国大区,格鲁吉亚、康伯大楼7-708办公室,老板叫豹子、福建人,股东啊青、湖南人、兼代理,总监叫阿天,福建人 公司被抓到现在公司老板,股东那叫一个忽悠,自己人全花钱保出去了,剩下我们这些代理50多号人,每天给我们各种洗脑,说在处理实际上就处理了,自己的亲戚和管理,我们剩下的都不管了。 豹子你们也赚了不少钱,给我们安全保出去,我们可以既往不咎,如果还是忽悠玩消失,回国你们一个都跑不了。看到主动联系我 不然后期曝光你们的照片还有家庭地址
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🤩NO钱包担保3亿U|可查验! 😀 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 📱官方频道:@DF78 ➡️关注领VIP 🔝大品牌,实力派:78.COM 本身就是最好的辨识度。 ✅️香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍,封顶赔率! 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩连码四中四🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 💥新人超会赢,精彩时刻分享: 🥇六合彩 玩家用7个号码组合下注连码三全中(35注)➕四全中(35注),每注100U,结果开出4个号码。命中4注878倍及一注10000倍大奖,稳稳落袋135万U; 🥈PG电子 9月4号,壹玩家游戏中爆出268万U大奖,本金仅用2.6万U; 🥉DB真人 玩百家乐的老板,第一天存款50万U,连续7天每日提款5…
#网友反馈:老挝特外平安村一带有一堆本地警察正在检查,还有1号卡口附近停了3辆大巴车和2辆老挝警车,不知道是不是为了抓人准备的,附近还在开工的推推小心点!!!
柬埔寨严打二手手机对讲机!60天整改令,逾期必查 卖二手手机、对讲机的老板们注意啦!柬埔寨电信监管机构(TRC)已下达“最后通牒”:立即停止进口和销售假冒及二手电信设备,违者将面临严厉查处。 9月23日,TRC发布通告指出,不少商家通过网站和社交媒体非法转售未经认证的手机、平板、电脑和对讲机。这些行为严重违反《电信法》第15条和第16条,必须立刻叫停。 ⚠️ 干扰关键通信,后果很严重 未经授权的设备,尤其是境外流入的二手货,极易对公共安全、应急服务、航空海事及国防无线电造成射频干扰。简单说,可能直接威胁国家安全! 🔧 安全隐患大,还可能涉诈 被篡改频率或硬件修改的设备不仅不达标,还伴随电池过热、火灾风险及电磁辐射超标等隐患。更可怕的是,这类设备常被用于网络诈骗等犯罪活动,同时产生大量电子垃圾。 📅 60天缓冲期,合规是关键 想继续做生意?商家必须在60天内申请合格代理商证书,并全面转为销售全新、合规设备。逾期未改?TR…
#网友投稿:我们公司回菲4个月了,一切顺利 兜兜转转去第三国两年,前几个月又回菲律宾来了。菲律宾还是熟悉的味道。不是居家办公啊,在大楼办公。关系都打点好了,一点问题没有。 菲律宾现在风向变了,只要给保护费,在大楼办公真的很安全。这个大楼现在不止我们一家公司,我知道的最少还有6家。 毕竟菲律宾也需要经济复苏,前两年收割的太狠了。未来一年到小马下台前,应该都是没问题的。
X被曝接入比特币购买功能,用户可在应用内买BTC 最新消息称,马斯克旗下X开始向用户开放比特币购买入口,意味着X Money可能正式向加密资产交易扩张。 不过,目前尚未看到X发布完整公告,具体由哪家机构提供交易、开放地区、手续费及能否提币仍不明确。此前X Money上线时主要提供钱包、转账及Visa卡服务,并未接入加密货币。
#2026世界杯 #美加墨世界杯 #体育内幕 #足球包赢 #协议足球 🚨迎战2026世界杯,四年一次的机会,有人发财,有人洗白,抓住机会你就能上岸发财,公司世界杯渠道已经全部对接好,有资源来打爆狗庄‼️ 💎全网寻找大量的赌博平台下注合作,我们做的是协议球,协议球的意思就是假球,所有足球比赛都有内幕‼️ 🔈我们公司专注协议球渠道,只要你手上有资源,有赌博平台、体育盘口下注,我这边给你提供足球或者其他体育内幕料,只要你能下注成功,能出款就是捡钱,比赛做了协议就是包赢。 如果比赛输了,我们公司包赔下注本金,比赛赢了盈利五五交收‼️ 🌐合作进频道联系财神:https://t.me/+J60FmYP9PqNjNDU1
👍1
#最新消息:西港南海的A栋宿舍楼现在已经检查完毕了,宪兵准备去南海酒店检查了,还在酒店的注意了!!!
#网友投稿:今天上午,南海客房让联合执法一个个房间查,没护照,都不行,很多人走了出来。老子睡着觉给酒店经理敲醒了~~反诈大会还在开,查房依然不能停,西港不给人生存了吗?
群友反馈:近期马来西亚不少盘口面临检查,有些盘口已经通知停工了。
75岁老翁与残疾女子同居致怀孕,女方求助:马上要生了,生活困难 柬埔寨磅湛省一名75岁男子盛辛(音译)与一名36岁天生残疾(侏儒)女子欧索帕同居,致其怀孕7个月。 该女子为孤儿,不识字,与姐姐同住。她称同居始于男子的引诱,男子已在当局笔录中承认双方确有同居关系。女子已向各级当局、妇女事务部及残疾人保护组织求助,希望获得公道和帮助,因预产期已到,生活困难且身有残疾。 地方当局曾试图调解但双方未达成一致。目前,媒体尚未联系到盛辛本人置评。 人老了,心还不老,但是钱包空了🤣 🤣
Showing the 12 most recent of 704 posts we hold for @DNYzzz6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@jiandan8884 · 127,089#1
@jrdnyxs · 65,982#2
@bgdsj26 · 120,707#3
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 55,910#4
@huich79 · 51,597#5
@dnyqqbj · 121,897#6
@QQ888880000 · 103,044#7
@bx66664 · 135,881#8
@BGS8989 · 94,660#9
@TTDR8 · 88,323#10
@cc199 · 70,476#11
@xigang13 · 63,441#12
@bgtjt · 104,598#13
@aq7777 · 54,495#14
@pianzi1 · 53,258#15
@dnyuuu88 · 137,239#16
@dny1577 · 5,364#17
@cctv_dy · 39,682#18
@DNYBG234 · 88,578#19
@iiiik · 49,140#20
@GGooGG66 · 149,708#21
@baoguangba088 · 240,574#22
@nx123 · 771,520#23
@dsj665 · 113,606#24
@anwei2 · 34,467#25
@TGPG999 · 4,748#26
@kz692nn · 139,774#27
@xbbg8 · 280#28
@xuanshangP · 1,686#29
@dny88 · 65,507#30
@heicaibaog · 82,598 (as read 23 August 2026)#31
@ChiGua8999 · 11,955#32
@dnyxst · 81,683#33
@BGSS8 · 1,040#34
@dnyxinwen668 · 48,041#35
@DNYBGT · 6,027#36
@bx666 · 471,642#37
@hrs166 · 50,473#38
@quanwangbaoguangb · 149,935#39
@tghuarenba · 44,835#40
@xinwen118 · 114,190#41
@db933 · 199,757#42
@jpz0123 · 50,902#43
@DNYXSTJL6668 · 10,193#44
@tg89aa · 142,617#45
@vipn8888 · 72,207#46
@bbb1b · 348,524#47
@BG423 · 33,388#48
@quanqiubaoliao · 186,631#49
@dongnanya108 · 161,350#50
@bg833 · 288,823#51
@BG886 · 54,835#52
@taiguohuarenzixun · 78,974#53
@huaren_zixun · 91,317#54
@miandianhuarenzixun · 73,859#55
@bodu08 · 58,821#56
@gtkx1 · 168,299#57
@YYL333 · 96,484#58
@baoguang821 · 54,118#59
@baoguang032 · 21,224#60
@ttkb0 · 120,417#61
@QQDS999 · 176,108#62
@russianonwars · 102,399#63
@davydovin · 1,889,362#64
@ukr_shvydko · 310,572#65
@EvPanina · 136,450#66
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 55,910
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@jrdnyxs · 65,982
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@bgdsj26 · 120,707
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnyqqbj · 121,897
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@bgtjt · 104,598
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
@jiandan8884 · 127,089
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 13 August 2026
@bx66664 · 135,881
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
@QQ888880000 · 103,044
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
@TTDR8 · 88,323
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@cc199 · 70,476
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
@aq7777 · 54,495
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
@xigang13 · 63,441
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
@pianzi1 · 53,258
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@dnyuuu88 · 137,239
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnyxinwen668 · 48,041
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
@GGooGG66 · 149,708
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
@dsj665 · 113,606
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@visual_hedonist · 312,529
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 August 2026
@Cryptowhalepump_official · 23,409
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 August 2026
@ukr_shvydko · 310,572
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@davydovin · 1,889,362
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大事件-曝光-黑料” (@DNYzzz6), 59,369 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DNYzzz6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.