东南亚华人新闻曝光 pinned a video

Channel
东南亚华人新闻曝光
@bgdsj26
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
94,855subscribers
-28,039 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001388397218 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bgdsj26 |
| Description | #东南亚实时 及时追踪曝光有关东南亚一切新闻,在这里你可以看到真正的东南亚,让我们一起维护东南亚仅存的净土 ❤️❤️❤️曝光投稿: @Xcss_59 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bgdsj26 |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:26 | 94,855 | +18,039 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:24 | 76,816 | +11,982 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:14 | 64,834 | -158 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:40 | 64,992 | +40 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:26 | 64,952 | -1,935 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:36 | 66,887 | -77 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:35 | 66,964 | +2,496 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 02:29 | 64,468 | -33,704 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:10 | 98,172 | -11,564 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:05 | 109,736 | -239 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:06 | 109,975 | -193 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 110,168 | -198 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:59 | 110,366 | -4,165 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:41 | 114,531 | -5,880 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:58 | 120,411 | -3,656 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:59 | 124,067 | +948 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:47 | 123,119 | -273 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:10 | 123,392 | -10,232 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 06:57 | 133,624 | -217 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 04:47 | 133,841 | first reading |
Engagement
1,622 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 191 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.74%
- avg views ÷ 94,855 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,450
- 468 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.209%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 501
- of 1,622 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 153 of 468 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,622 (8 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,549,710 |
| Reactions total | 1,479 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 03:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈23,300
- Videos
- ≈2,440
- Links
- ≈2,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5h 06m
- Average length
- 1m 05s
Measured directly from 283 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,574 reactions across 247 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👀 | 327 | 20.8% | |
| 👍 | 271 | 17.2% | |
| 🤔 | 194 | 12.3% | |
| 🔥 | 190 | 12.1% | |
| 👏 | 107 | 6.80% | |
| 😢 | 99 | 6.29% | |
| 🙏 | 61 | 3.88% | |
| 🎉 | 59 | 3.75% | |
| 💯 | 48 | 3.05% | |
| 🤩 | 35 | 2.22% | |
| 😱 | 27 | 1.72% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 1.59% | |
| 😭 | 25 | 1.59% | |
| 👎 | 20 | 1.27% | |
| 🥰 | 20 | 1.27% | |
| 😨 | 19 | 1.21% | |
| 🤬 | 13 | 0.826% | |
| 👌 | 12 | 0.762% | |
| 🤨 | 9 | 0.572% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 0.508% | |
| 2 further kinds | 5 | 0.318% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 248 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,574 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 September 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 501 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 😀😀😀😀😀😀 ➡️ 全网已押千万u点击传送门 👈 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️数字网投领导者! ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 始终坚持“用户至上,信誉为本”的运营理念,力求为玩家带来公平公正、真实专业的高品质游戏竞技,让你体验顶级博彩乐趣! 【🇺🇦:🇺🇦😻🤔🥴🤧😷👿,创造人生新财富!】 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 顶级博彩娱乐尽在⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🙄😶😄😶 😀全网诚邀:个人代理,SEO,技术/劫持/主播/推广团队,最高顶级福利待遇。😀 💎代理扶持计划 😀 会员注册即可申请赠送彩金【18u-888u】 😀 新人首存即可申请首存百…
🔥8👏1💯1
东南亚华人新闻曝光 pinned a video
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 0审核|包出款🤩🤩🤩 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🔝实力派:78.COM 数字够短 品牌够大 🔥香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高起步返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼起步返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆电子单注🤩🤩🤩🤩U一拉; ⭐️百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 🚩诚招代理合作(二选一): 1、打码返佣,限指定平台; 2、占成模式,可自由选择占成比例及游戏平台; 🤩🤩🤩🤩:@DL78 💥高额战绩,巅峰记录持续刷新: 🥇PP电子|极速糖果1000 玩家游戏中购买30000u超级免费旋转,高倍爆奖,最终拿下378万U,已出款; 🥈PG电子|麻将胡了 又又又欧气爆棚,3000U一拉,连番触发,单局斩获193万U; 🥉香港六合彩|特码49倍 爱拼才会赢,大佬单码下注18万U,一注直…
💯4🔥4🎉1👀1
网友投稿:泰缅边境距泰国约5公里处现大型工地,规模与位置引猜测 据网友投稿,泰缅边境达府湄拉玛县附近,距泰国仅约5公里,卫星图显示大片土地平整,多栋大型建筑在建,太阳能设施成片铺设,大量燃油桶频繁运输。 投稿称,该工地规模大、位置敏感,实际用途和运营方尚不明确。有消息怀疑,与近期沿泰缅边境活动的跨国诈骗网络有关。 工地还在施工,答案还没落地。 距泰国仅5公里、大片土地平整、多栋大型建筑、太阳能成片、燃油桶频繁运输——这几个细节拼在一起,确实不像普通工地。 太阳能加燃油桶,意味着这里对电力有持续、独立的需求,而边境地带、大面积平整、快速施工,又恰好符合近年来部分园区“远离城镇、自备供电、靠近边境便于转运”的选址特征。但“怀疑与诈骗网络有关”目前只是消息层面的推测,没有卫星图原图、没有运营方信息、没有官方确认,工地也可能属于正经基建或农业项目。 在泰缅边境一带的人来说,这个位置值得留意,但别急着下结论。工地还在施工,答案要…
👀5🤔3👍2
“稳赚不赔”的租客差点拿走11万现金,警方劝阻并抓获取钱车手 线上认识的租客突然热情起来,主动介绍“高回报投资项目”,反复保证稳赚不赔,风险说得很小。当事人信了,准备转出11万元现金。警方及时发现劝阻,顺线追查,把专门取钱的车手当场抓获。 所谓高回报、稳赚不赔,全是话术。熟人、网友、租客介绍投资,一律先核实。对方催着交现金、转账,立刻停手。发现可疑,报警并保留聊天记录、转账凭证。 钱没转出去,车手先进去了。“稳赚”两个字,最贵。 “租客”这个身份,是这套骗局里最巧的一环——线上认识、有过接触、看起来像正经人,主动介绍项目,还反复保证稳赚不赔。信任就是这么一点点建立起来的,等当事人准备转11万现金的时候,防备已经放下了。好在警方发现得早,钱没出门,顺线还抓到了取钱的车手。 这个案子最该记住的是两个动作:一是“催着交现金、转账”就该停手,真投资不会催你用现金;二是“车手”的存在说明,钱一旦交出去,追回来的难度比拦下来大得多…
👍7👀1👏1🤔1
网友反馈:妙瓦底检查带走两名缅华,称“13开头”家属可来认人 据网友反馈,昨晚妙瓦底检查,两名缅华被缅军带走,说是“13开头”,谁家的小娃、谁的朋友,可联系小编拿联系方式。有亲友失联的,可以试着核实这条线索。 提醒一句:网络信息鱼龙混杂,涉及转账、缴费,先辨真假,别盲目打钱。 “13开头”这个说法很模糊——是身份证号、手机号,还是别的编号,投稿人没讲清楚。妙瓦底这轮检查确实在持续,缅军带走人的情况也不止一次,但“可联系小编拿联系方式”这种表述,恰恰是需要警惕的地方:真有心帮家属认人,该说的是被带走者的姓名、体貌、关押地点,而不是留一个“找小编拿联系方式”的口子。 家属找人心切,最容易被这种模糊信息牵着走,下一步可能就是“交钱才能联系”“打点才能放人”。核实线索可以,但别急着转账,别把希望变成别人的生意。有官方通报或确切信息,本频道会持续跟进。
👍4👀3👏2🤔1
网友反馈:西港OB今早又被宪兵包围,传位置系提前摸准 据网友反馈,西港OB今天早上宪兵又来了,直接包围。抓了多少人不清楚,但据说位置是提前摸准的,不是路过。提醒在附近的别以为躲屋里就没事,被盯上,门迟早响。 “提前摸准的,不是路过”——这句话如果属实,说明这轮行动不是随机巡查,是有备而来。OB这一片,此前OB3、OB4、OB5都查过,这次又轮到OB,宪兵反复上门,说明这片区域的排查是持续性的。在附近的兄弟,证件带好,待在屋里也别掉以轻心,遇到检查配合就是,别围观、别拍摄。具体抓了多少、哪个点位,目前没有官方说法。有最新进展,本频道会持续跟进。
👀6👍2🤔2
目前,抓捕现场已曝光,案件正在进一步调查。 岘港警方突查奠盘东坊一栋别墅,发现外籍人士藏身其中搞网络诈骗 岘港警方在奠盘东坊一栋隐蔽别墅内,发现一群外籍人士藏身其中搞网络诈骗。他们用“存钱给佣金”的话术,诱骗受害者不断入金。所谓高回报,只是引你上钩的饵。目前,抓捕现场已曝光,案件正在进一步调查。 别墅、外籍人士、“存钱给佣金”——这三个元素凑在一起,说明这伙人把“打野”从公寓搬到了更隐蔽的地方。岘港是旅游城市,别墅区平时不惹眼,可一旦被盯上,藏得再深也会被翻出来。“存钱给佣金”这套话术不新鲜,本质就是拿小利当饵,让受害者一笔接一笔往里存,存到拿不回来为止。 被抓的是现场的人,接下来要查的是这栋别墅谁租的、资金流向哪、背后还有没有更大的组织。越南近期从胡志明到岘港,针对外籍人员窝点的清查一直在推进,别墅不是避风港。案子还在调查,具体人数和国籍待官方通报。
👍5👀3🤔2
网友反馈:金边市警察局集合,警车列队准备出发 据网友反馈,金边市警察局集合,准备前往各个地方开展打击行动。提醒在金边的注意,证件收好,少凑热闹。车一出发,门就要敲。 警车列队、准备出发——这个画面说明行动已经进入部署阶段,不是临时起意。金边近期从中央市场、公寓、排屋小区到KTV、餐厅,清查一直没停,警察局集合再分头出动,意味着今天可能多点同时动手。在金边的兄弟,证件随身带好,能不出门就别出门,遇到检查配合就是,别围观、别拍摄。 具体查哪里、什么规模,目前没有官方说法。有最新进展,本频道会持续跟进。
👍4👀3🤔3
网友提醒:uCreator间谍软件藏身TG修改版,可明文读取2FA密码 据网友提醒,一款名为uCreator的间谍软件套件,被指藏在重新打包的Telegram、微信和GCash应用里。研究人员Ovi发现,在Telegram中,它能读取聊天记录,还能以明文形式拿到2FA密码。开发者把后端和大约三打开发人员的姓名,留在了开放的GitLab服务器上。 “修改版”“增强版”这类词,在聊天软件上从来不是“更好用”的意思,而是“被人动过手脚”。uCreator这套东西,藏在重新打包的TG里,能读聊天记录,还能明文拿到2FA——2FA本来是账号最后一道锁,明文了,等于锁还在,钥匙已经被人配好了。更讽刺的是,开发者把后端和几十个开发人员的名字留在公开的GitLab上,说明这伙人连基本的遮掩都懒得做。对用户来说,记住一句就够:聊天软件只从官方渠道装,来路不明的修改版、增强版,别碰。 账号被拿走聊天记录是小事,2FA一漏,绑定的钱包、邮箱、社…
😨4😱4👀2
金边公寓楼间一中国男子哭喊求救,原因不明 据消息,金边一处公寓大楼之间,一名中国男子坐在那里,哭喊着求救,似乎在寻求帮助。原因不明。 在异国他乡,一个人坐在楼与楼之间哭喊求救,不管是什么原因,都已经到了撑不住的地步。是被人控制、被欠薪、被骗,还是别的事,目前没有说法。 在附近的同胞,看到这种情况,第一反应应该是报警,而不是举着手机拍。拍照传播解决不了他的困境,警察到场才可能。希望有人真的帮了他,也希望他平安。有后续消息,本频道会持续跟进。
👀4🤔3👍2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,622 posts we hold for @bgdsj26. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 15 posts on @bgdsj26 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 5 October 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 22 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 13 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 9
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@pg115 · 15,54673 posts必发国际官方频道
@bifagj · 5,28967 posts78.COM-官方频道@DF78
@tg78com · 29,39765 postsN1娱乐城-赌王之王
@N1YLC8 · 5,00351 postsN1118.COM- N1国际官方频道
@pg100 · 1,34351 posts【2028126.com】赌王之王
@pgdzr · 6,13851 posts一元云购 · VIP交流群
@yyygjlq · 5,04440 posts一元云购 · 官方导航
@yyygpd · 6,80140 posts182体育官方频道
@ty182gf · 4,57439 posts8K国际 官方频道
@SSVIP8K · 21,36123 posts8k国际官方频道
@vip8k090 · 3,38823 posts182280.COM- 182体育官方频道
@VIP182PG · 7,68222 postsV6娱乐
@HT_V6 · 1,38115 posts柬埔寨大事件/西港金边新闻
@sssvip4 · 239,6487 postsU8国际充值送彩金
@laibadbeu · 656 posts8K国际U台官方频道
@vipgjc · 15,4242 posts东南亚大事件-聚焦时事 @TX100
@tx100 · 148,7021 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@jiandan8884 · 104,813#1
@jrdnyxs · 69,684#2
@DNYzzz6 · 67,908#3
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 61,519#4
@dnyqqbj · 90,281#5
@TTDR8 · 98,340#6
@bx66664 · 139,328#7
@cc199 · 99,716#8
@BGS8989 · 95,961#9
@bgtjt · 103,999#10
@xigang13 · 58,172#11
@aq7777 · 50,330#12
@dnyuuu88 · 125,898#13
@iiiik · 33,755#14
@hrs166 · 37,812#15
@xinhuaribao · 912#16
@bodu08 · 54,662#17
@Banma_xinwen · 84,942#18
@dny1577 · 5,057#19
@GGooGG66 · 119,844 (as read 14 August 2026)#20
@heicaibaog · 10#21
@baoguangba088 · 234,344#22
@nx123 · 760,103#23
@dnyxst · 68,999#24
@dnyawtt · 48,286#25
@cctv_dy · 23,060#26
@tghuarenba · 20,354#27
@a0159 · 87,417#28
@dny099 · 202,347#29
@dsj665 · 117,811#30
@dnyxinwen668 · 13,762#31
@uuuuuf · 179,217#32
@makatinews · 67,648#33
@xinwen118 · 121,802#34
@dubaixinwen2 · 200,508#35
@miandianhuarenzixun · 68,971#36
@bx666 · 462,295#37
@BG_BG8 · 32,579#38
@svipzz · 61,332#39
@DNYXSTJL6668 · 8,932#40
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 68,766#41
@feilvbinghuarenriji · 14,854#42
@tg89aa · 117,264#43
@vipn8888 · 58,030#44
@quanqiubaoliao · 133,192#45
@quanwangbaoguangb · 127,488#46
@bvl222 · 43,371#47
@dongnanya108 · 109,323#48
@TGPG999 · 4,570#49
@DNYKX · 53,088#50
@huaren_zixun · 83,605#51
@DNYXW008 · 73,884#52
@DNYBGT · 6,071#53
@dnybgtt · 49,531#54
@xinwenTV5 · 6,667#55
@gejige · 174,397#56
@kz692nn · 124,815#57
@davydovin · 1,803,422#58
@russianonwars · 102,525#59
@busuzimacalls · 1,603 (as read 14 August 2026)#60
@XmindsCoin · 3,222#61
@chadnag001 · 26,012#62
@ukr_shvydko · 313,932#63
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@jrdnyxs · 69,684
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@DNYzzz6 · 67,908
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
@dnyqqbj · 90,281
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@jiandan8884 · 104,813
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 13 August 2026
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 61,519
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@bgtjt · 103,999
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
@TTDR8 · 98,340
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@QQ888880000 · 97,698
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
@bx66664 · 139,328
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
@cc199 · 99,716
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
@aq7777 · 50,330
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
@pianzi1 · 49,740
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@dnyuuu88 · 125,898
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnyxinwen668 · 13,762
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
@xigang13 · 58,172
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
@visual_hedonist · 326,050
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 August 2026
@dsj665 · 117,811
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@ukr_shvydko · 313,932
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@davydovin · 1,803,422
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 19 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚华人新闻曝光” (@bgdsj26), 94,855 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bgdsj26.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.