#网友吐槽:此一时彼一时,求职者屁事多就送两句——要不你自己开盘。 此一时彼一时,求职者屁事多,就送两句,要不你自己开盘,你找公司其他招聘,我忙。 是不是发现没什么公司了?最近全是找工作的,适合的岗位和国家就先干,先苟着。除非你特别优秀,不然你连挑的资格都没有。 现在还有叼毛跟前几年一样思维,我有手能打字,跟大爷一样,自我感觉良好,还挑岗位和国家。这夜班不做,这时间长不做,那个国家蚊子多不去。兄弟,你都找了2-3个月还在到处问,泰国有岗位吗?叼毛,自己开盘还找什么工作。 博彩公司同行招聘,以前卑微的你,腰杆子可以硬起来了。 今天我又拒绝三个找工作的,屁事多又不配合面试,让他去找其他招聘。 现在大把咨询工作的,本来都忙不过来,就连兰卡客服一个多月都二千多份简历,还要找关系私下给面试官300-400U,你的人选才有资格约面。叼毛些,时代变了,现在做推广都是有要求的。 很多公司离职了,找了一两个月工作,只有更差,开始后悔怀…

Channel
东南亚华人新闻曝光
@bgdsj26
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
120,707subscribers
-2,187 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001388397218 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bgdsj26 |
| Description | #东南亚实时 及时追踪曝光有关东南亚一切新闻,在这里你可以看到真正的东南亚,让我们一起维护东南亚仅存的净土 ❤️❤️❤️曝光投稿: @AbrrahamMurphy_yq |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bgdsj26 |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 120,707 | +5,164 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 115,543 | -364 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 115,907 | -521 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 116,428 | +2,319 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 114,109 | +911 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 113,198 | -5,994 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:15 | 119,192 | -1,523 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 120,715 | -878 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:11 | 121,593 | -259 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:46 | 121,852 | -1,017 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 122,869 | -346 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 123,215 | -372 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 123,587 | -265 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 123,852 | -56 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 123,908 | -107 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 124,015 | -196 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 124,211 | +2,163 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 122,048 | -123 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 122,171 | -93 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 122,264 | first reading |
Engagement
817 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.63%
- avg views ÷ 120,707 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,590
- 501 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.023%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 501
- of 817 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 501 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 817 (8 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,799,040 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 09:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈22,000
- Videos
- ≈2,190
- Links
- ≈1,970
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4h 54m
- Average length
- 46s
Measured directly from 380 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 22 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 5 | 22.7% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 22.7% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 18.2% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 9.09% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 9.09% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 817 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 817 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#网友反馈 金边“黄山国际” 有人要跳楼,楼下都是围观群众
🥰1
赴泰收款却被卖进电诈园区 38岁男子失联79天后获救回国 9月21日,38岁的四川绵竹男子刘修洪讲述自己赴泰收款后,被转卖进缅甸电诈园区,失联79天后获救回国的经历。 6月9日,刘修洪从广州飞往泰国曼谷,准备当面结算一笔生意回款。抵达后,他被人接走,当晚一路被带往泰缅边境。 途中,他被持枪人员控制,手机被收走,眼睛被蒙住、嘴被封住,随后被押过界河进入缅甸,并辗转多个关押点。 6月14日,刘修洪失联后,姐姐赶到泰国寻找。 6月17日,四川绵竹警方以非法拘禁立案调查。 6月19日,泰国中央调查局以人口贩运立案。 被控制期间,刘修洪因为已经38岁,超过当地一些园区偏好的招人年龄,一直没人愿意买走。后来一名园区老板买下另一名被控制人员时,他也被一起带走,刘修洪形容自己成了“买一送一”。 进入电诈园区后,他被要求背300多页诈骗话术,包装成“军官”,专门针对离异和年龄较大的女性实施诈骗。因为不愿配合、背不下话术,他多次遭到…
1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣—1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣ 游戏机器人:@feitou(👈点击进入) 正版厂商 · 盘总首选 · 商会保障 · 大额无忧 飞投娱乐 · 妈祖庇佑 · 商会护航 · 一起玩赢 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ U充U提不限iP 多重炸裂活动持续上线 官方频道每天发6个红包 游戏多福利好 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣:@fjsh 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣:@usdb 🐋🐋🐋🐋: fjsh.com 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣:@feitou
#网友反馈:富力检查的浩浩荡荡去B11了 公寓里面打野的兄弟们赶紧走消防通道遛吧
👏1
媒体记者进入财通“金湾园区”采风 今天,在柬埔寨打击网络诈骗专项委员会与柬新闻部组织下,42家机构的75名国内外记者前往干拉省财通县“金湾园区”网诈旧址采风。 据悉,该园区占地51公顷(含55栋大楼、113栋别墅及4,707间房),该园区与已被遣返回中国的太子集团头目陈志有关。 今年1月20日,金湾园区被警方捣毁。目前该地已被切断水电气网并全面封锁;法院已对主犯Chhiv Yin-Oo和Jon Riskin发出逮捕令,并申请国际刑警组织红色通报进行全球通缉。
#网友投稿:持续转移的电诈人员和阵地 8至9月陆续有爆出来一些关于在缅甸交克山和妙瓦底区域之间的电诈园区继续在运营的帖子,说那边还一些高压迫害人的2至3千人的大型园区。 据我们近段时间送生活物资进山里的交克本地司机观察,千人的电诈规模人数他们没有看见,目测3至5百人数的规模还是有。这些电诈集团近期一直在采购大型野外工作的帐篷⛺️用来作为向外转移临时的电诈窝点。交克镇区里面的电诈集团目前已经明显的少了很多。 因为承受了近期太多的曝光和各界人士政府的关注,山里面的电诈大部队在向外面的山区持续转移人员阵地,有转移到高加力山区和更外围的高本山区。被骗进卖进交克高加力这些地方的人要救人出来的话最好不要随便去找飞机抖音上这些说能救人的中介,不管是不是骗子多数都是花了赎金连人影子都见不到的更不要提能救出人来。 唯一有大希望能救出人的方式方法就是:通过政府大使馆的帮忙引荐认识本地有点影响力的居民,让本地的居民去联系保护电诈集团的本地军阀…
🎉1
🇺🇸 美国宣布制裁32人 美国国务院9月21日宣布,根据《移民与国籍法》对32名涉嫌参与网络诈骗及相关犯罪的个人实施签证限制,其持有的有效美国签证已被撤销。受制裁人员大多与跨国犯罪组织“太子集团(Prince Group)”相关,但官方未公布具体名单及国籍。 此前美国财政部已于2025年10月及2026年6月,先后制裁了与太子集团相关的146个及35个个人与实体。美方表示将持续打击利用网络犯罪诈骗美国人的行为。
👏1
🎬某男子在洗浴中心消费过程中突发意外死亡!女技师被警方带走调查。 听说是帮客户打飞机,在过程中,客人被打死了。😂 PS:这大爷这下真的是,玫瑰花下死,做鬼都风流了,果然男人在没有挂到墙上的时候,永远都是这么放荡不羁的😂
#2026世界杯 #美加墨世界杯 #体育内幕 #足球包赢 #协议足球 🚨迎战2026世界杯,四年一次的机会,有人发财,有人洗白,抓住机会你就能上岸发财,公司世界杯渠道已经全部对接好,有资源来打爆狗庄‼️ 💎全网寻找大量的赌博平台下注合作,我们做的是协议球,协议球的意思就是假球,所有足球比赛都有内幕‼️ 🔈我们公司专注协议球渠道,只要你手上有资源,有赌博平台、体育盘口下注,我这边给你提供足球或者其他体育内幕料,只要你能下注成功,能出款就是捡钱,比赛做了协议就是包赢。 如果比赛输了,我们公司包赔下注本金,比赛赢了盈利五五交收‼️ 🌐合作进频道联系财神:https://t.me/+J60FmYP9PqNjNDU1
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 😀😀😀😀😀😀 ➡️ 全网已押千万u点击传送门 👈 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️数字网投领导者! ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 始终坚持“用户至上,信誉为本”的运营理念,力求为玩家带来公平公正、真实专业的高品质游戏竞技,让你体验顶级博彩乐趣! 【🇺🇦:🇺🇦😻🤔🥴🤧😷👿,创造人生新财富!】 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 顶级博彩娱乐尽在⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🙄😶😄😶 😀全网诚邀:个人代理,SEO,技术/劫持/主播/推广团队,最高顶级福利待遇。😀 💎代理扶持计划 😀 会员注册即可申请赠送彩金【18u-888u】 😀 新人首存即可申请首存百…
泰国议员质疑封锁缅甸边境通信能否真正打击电诈:犯罪集团已转用Starlink 9月21日,据报道,泰国参议员此前在国会会议上就泰缅边境打击电诈措施提出质询,要求政府说明限制手机及互联网信号后,究竟在多大程度上减少了跨境网络诈骗活动。 她要求泰国数字经济与社会部及国家广播电视和电信委员会(NBTC)拿出具体数据,评估通信封锁措施的实际成效。 她指出,如果措施无法有效切断诈骗集团运作,却影响边境居民以及医院、学校和政府机构正常使用通信服务,就需要重新评估执行方式。 同时表示,在传统通信线路受到限制后,部分跨境犯罪集团已经转向使用Starlink等卫星互联网技术, 因此单纯切断地面通信未必能够彻底阻止相关活动。她要求有关部门说明,是否具备快速发现、追踪和阻断这些新型通信方式的技术能力。
🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 817 posts we hold for @bgdsj26. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@pg115 · 13,65873 postsN1娱乐城-赌王之王
@N1YLC8 · 6,21051 postsN1118.COM- N1国际官方频道
@pg100 · 2,17651 posts【2028126.com】赌王之王
@pgdzr · 7,38151 posts78.COM-官方频道@DF78
@tg78com · 31,09148 posts182体育官方频道
@ty182gf · 5,83939 posts必发国际官方频道
@bifagj · 4,83927 posts182280.COM- 182体育官方频道
@VIP182PG · 8,01322 posts8K国际 官方频道
@SSVIP8K · 16,90515 posts8k国际官方频道
@vip8k090 · 5,31215 posts柬埔寨大事件/西港金边新闻
@sssvip4 · 231,0816 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@jiandan8884 · 127,199#1
@jrdnyxs · 65,982#2
@DNYzzz6 · 59,369#3
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 55,910#4
@dnyqqbj · 121,897#5
@TTDR8 · 94,923#6
@bx66664 · 135,881#7
@cc199 · 70,476#8
@BGS8989 · 94,660#9
@bgtjt · 104,598#10
@xigang13 · 63,441#11
@aq7777 · 54,495#12
@dnyuuu88 · 137,239#13
@iiiik · 49,140#14
@hrs166 · 50,473#15
@xinhuaribao · 939#16
@bodu08 · 58,568#17
@Banma_xinwen · 92,372#18
@dny1577 · 5,364#19
@GGooGG66 · 149,708#20
@heicaibaog · 83,806 (as read 14 August 2026)#21
@baoguangba088 · 240,574#22
@nx123 · 771,520#23
@dnyxst · 81,683#24
@dnyawtt · 51,445#25
@cctv_dy · 39,682#26
@tghuarenba · 44,835#27
@a0159 · 128,519#28
@dny099 · 60,992#29
@dsj665 · 113,606#30
@dnyxinwen668 · 48,041#31
@uuuuuf · 244,570#32
@makatinews · 34,540#33
@xinwen118 · 114,190#34
@dubaixinwen2 · 215,460#35
@miandianhuarenzixun · 73,859#36
@bx666 · 471,642#37
@BG_BG8 · 38,943#38
@svipzz · 89,708#39
@DNYXSTJL6668 · 10,193#40
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 72,699#41
@feilvbinghuarenriji · 16,900#42
@tg89aa · 142,617#43
@vipn8888 · 72,207#44
@quanqiubaoliao · 186,631#45
@quanwangbaoguangb · 149,935#46
@bvl222 · 54,541#47
@dongnanya108 · 161,350#48
@TGPG999 · 4,748#49
@DNYKX · 60,054#50
@huaren_zixun · 91,317#51
@DNYXW008 · 86,205#52
@DNYBGT · 6,027#53
@dnybgtt · 53,254#54
@xinwenTV5 · 8,510#55
@gejige · 137,512#56
@kz692nn · 139,774#57
@davydovin · 1,889,362#58
@russianonwars · 102,399#59
@busuzimacalls · 1,603 (as read 14 August 2026)#60
@XmindsCoin · 3,297#61
@chadnag001 · 56,674#62
@ukr_shvydko · 311,405#63
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@jrdnyxs · 65,982
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@DNYzzz6 · 59,369
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
@dnyqqbj · 121,897
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@jiandan8884 · 127,199
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 13 August 2026
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 55,910
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@bgtjt · 104,598
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
@TTDR8 · 94,923
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@QQ888880000 · 103,044
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
@bx66664 · 135,881
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
@cc199 · 70,476
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
@aq7777 · 54,495
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
@pianzi1 · 53,258
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@dnyuuu88 · 137,239
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnyxinwen668 · 48,041
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
@GGooGG66 · 149,708
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
@xigang13 · 63,441
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
@visual_hedonist · 312,529
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 August 2026
@dsj665 · 113,606
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@ukr_shvydko · 311,405
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@davydovin · 1,889,362
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚华人新闻曝光” (@bgdsj26), 120,707 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bgdsj26.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.