Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 28 days, net +7,692. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 101,952–117,061 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 07:54
112,165
-72
5 Sept 2026, 06:17
112,237
-1,156
3 Sept 2026, 10:47
113,393
-1,598
2 Sept 2026, 02:26
114,991
-327
1 Sept 2026, 05:45
115,318
+402
31 Aug 2026, 09:14
114,916
+1,926
30 Aug 2026, 12:37
112,990
-480
29 Aug 2026, 12:38
113,470
-1,061
28 Aug 2026, 11:14
114,531
+138
27 Aug 2026, 08:06
114,393
+283
26 Aug 2026, 08:53
114,110
+422
25 Aug 2026, 05:33
113,688
+1,088
24 Aug 2026, 05:06
112,600
+1,173
22 Aug 2026, 13:34
111,427
+1,218
21 Aug 2026, 01:42
110,209
+1,300
19 Aug 2026, 22:24
108,909
-358
18 Aug 2026, 19:36
109,267
+1,443
17 Aug 2026, 18:33
107,824
-479
16 Aug 2026, 14:18
108,303
+1,769
14 Aug 2026, 20:35
106,534
first reading
Engagement
409 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.33%
avg views ÷ 112,165 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,110
405 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
405
of 409 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 361 of 405 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held
409 (10 August 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Views total
2,877,774
Reactions total
8,231
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 19:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈21,700
Videos
≈2,890
Links
≈20
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 19m
Average length
1m 04s
Measured directly from 74 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,264 reactions across 364 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,011
12.2%
❤
995
12.0%
🎉
929
11.2%
👍
925
11.2%
🥰
900
10.9%
💯
862
10.4%
❤🔥
861
10.4%
😍
855
10.3%
🤩
833
10.1%
👏
91
1.10%
😁
2
0.024%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 365 of the 409 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 409 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
华硕送大礼:指定笔电免费享3个月Google AI高级版
华硕马来西亚宣布,凡购买指定华硕及ROG笔电型号的用户,可免费获赠3个月Google AI Pro或AI Plus订阅,价值最高达293.97令吉。Google AI Pro每月原价97.99令吉,提供5TB云存储、4倍使用上限及Gemini Pro等高级功能;AI Plus则每月23.99令吉,含400GB存储和2倍使用上限。符合条件的用户可前往华硕官网查询并领取,名额有限,先到先得!
Capcom快闪店重返吉隆坡LaLaport,9月24日开幕,持续三个月
卡普空(Capcom)快闪店将于9月24日至12月27日重返吉隆坡LaLaport Bukit Bintang的ACG Base区域,此次营业时长近三个月,远超此前短暂活动。主办方Justdan表示,延长展期旨在方便外州游客规划行程,并将定期更新官方周边产品线。本次首度推出马来西亚限定商品,包括开幕日起发售的宽松版型限量T恤,以及活动中期推出的环保托特包,均数量有限。此外,单笔消费满100令吉即可获赠专属明信片一张,送完即止。详情可关注官方社交媒体。
Showing the 12 most recent of 409 posts we hold for @dsj665. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
dnydh @cc199 · 68,698 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
迪拜新闻大事件-马来西亚吉隆坡吃瓜 @dnyuuu88 · 130,198 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚华人漂泊日记-柬埔寨大事件曝光 @GGooGG66 · 142,576 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
菲律宾大事件-东南亚曝光吃瓜记 @bx66664 · 130,747 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
东南亚新闻-通缉-曝光社🌏 @dnyxinwen668 · 51,218 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
柬埔寨新闻头条【体育资讯】 @TTDR8 · 118,252 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
东南亚头条曝光 @QQ888880000 · 105,261 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
全球|大事件|新闻|曝光|吃瓜 @bgtjt · 105,358 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
东南亚新闻头条|东南亚热点资讯 @jiandan8884 · 132,024 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 13 August 2026
今日东南亚大事件曝光-悬赏 @jrdnyxs · 64,175 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
全球华人新闻吃瓜头条大曝光 @dnyqqbj · 111,489 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚曝光-新闻快报-吃瓜-悬赏 @dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 56,128 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
东南亚大事件-曝光-黑料 @DNYzzz6 · 55,154 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
东南亚华人新闻曝光 @bgdsj26 · 113,198 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚骗子曝光吧 @pianzi1 · 55,035 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
东南亚黑暗事件 @aq7777 · 55,345 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
东南亚头条 @nb688 · 349,495 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 13 August 2026
柬埔寨大事件/曝光 @jpz0123 · 51,632 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 24 August 2026
缅甸缅北东南亚新闻曝光 @nx123 · 774,263 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
东南亚柬埔寨菲律宾华人新闻骗子曝光 @db2023dbg · 88,364 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
东南亚新闻头条(曝光) @dnyxwtt · 53,159 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
迪拜新闻🇦🇪 @dubaixinwen2 · 217,746 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全球大事件曝光❖东南亚吃瓜新闻” (@dsj665), 112,165 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dsj665.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.