Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
7,570 average views per post against 10,492 subscribers — an engagement rate of 72.2%. Across the 1,916 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,002–31,616 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 1.57% and 8.26%, with a median of 3.53%.
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 21 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Engagement
55 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 72.2%
- avg views ÷ 10,492 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,570
- 30 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 30
- of 55 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
2 Sept 2026, 23:51 UTC≈4,620 viewsread 3 September 2026 🚀加入极搜互推一起赚钱🚀
车队:博彩专用
8.28k 🍉吃瓜新闻🍉
1.01k 东南亚吃瓜与技术交流
364 精仿1:1 “汇旺”“新币”“币安”假押 /灿灿
1.01k 🔞做爱丨口交丨吞精玩
582 USDT中国商会供需频道 限时1U发布
1.45w 大千新闻网
1.39w 吃瓜爆料|娱乐八卦【沙雕日常】
2.11w 阿森源头一手数据 网贷 公积金 渗透 sdk dp...
5.37w 老程 WD数据/贷款数据/企业贷款/公积金数据/助...
7.22k 🔥蚂蚁数据🔥网提🔥sdk🔥渗透🔥
2.31k 体育赛事 红单推荐 备战2026 世界杯
1.81w 🏪【官方指定】天眼查-源头开户-价格最低-效率高...
4.09w 【太子数据】 贷款数据 网贷 公积金 企业 银行
3.15k 高颜值妹子裸聊
5.97k 欧博假网亚星假网皇冠体育皇冠足球环球360一比一
1.1w 亚星私网🅰️欧博私网🅰️皇冠…
2 Sept 2026, 15:19 UTC≈7,250 viewsread 3 September 2026 巴西杯
—————————————--
维多利亚 vs 瓦斯科达伽马
巴西杯
09/03 08:30
让球[欧洲盘]
维多利亚 [email protected]
—————————————--
桑托斯SP vs 帕尔梅拉斯
巴西杯
09/03 08:30
让球[欧洲盘]
桑托斯SP [email protected]
—————————————--
赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
2 Sept 2026, 07:52 UTC≈9,360 viewsread 3 September 2026 德国足协杯
—————————————--
奥斯纳布吕克 1899 vs 拜仁慕尼黑
德国足协杯
09/03 02:45
让球[欧洲盘]
拜仁慕尼黑 [email protected]
—————————————--
赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
2 Sept 2026, 07:37 UTC≈8,380 viewsread 3 September 2026 意大利杯
—————————————--
萨索洛 vs 弗罗西诺内
意大利杯
09/02 21:00
让球[欧洲盘]
萨索洛 [email protected]
—————————————--
乌迪内斯 vs 威尼斯
意大利杯
09/03 00:00
让球[欧洲盘]
威尼斯 [email protected]
—————————————--
赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
2 Sept 2026, 07:36 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 3 September 2026 中国足协杯
—————————————--
云南玉昆 vs 重庆铜梁龙
中国足协杯
09/02 20:00
让球[欧洲盘]
云南玉昆 -0.5/[email protected]
—————————————--
赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
2 Sept 2026, 07:34 UTC≈7,980 viewsread 3 September 2026 日本甲级联赛
—————————————--
水户蜀葵 vs 鹿岛鹿角
日本甲级联赛
09/02 18:00
让球[欧洲盘]
鹿岛鹿角 -0.5/[email protected]
—————————————--
千叶市原 vs 冈山绿雉
日本甲级联赛
09/02 18:00
让球[欧洲盘]
冈山绿雉 [email protected]
—————————————--
东京绿茵 vs 神户胜利船
日本甲级联赛
09/02 18:00
让球[欧洲盘]
东京绿茵 [email protected]
—————————————--
町田泽维亚 vs 川崎前锋
日本甲级联赛
09/02 18:00
让球[欧洲盘]
町田泽维亚 [email protected]
—————————————--
横滨水手 vs 京都不死鸟
日本甲级联赛
09/02 18:00
让球[欧洲盘]
横滨水手 [email protected]
—————————————--
清水心跳 vs 东京
日本甲级联赛
09/02 18:00
让球[欧洲盘…
1 Sept 2026, 13:35 UTC≈6,810 viewsread 3 September 2026 巴西杯
—————————————--
米内罗竞技 vs 克鲁塞罗MG
巴西杯
09/02 08:00
让球[欧洲盘]
米内罗竞技 [email protected]
—————————————--
赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
1 Sept 2026, 13:34 UTC≈6,980 viewsread 3 September 2026 意大利杯
—————————————--
帕尔马 vs 克雷莫纳
意大利杯
09/02 00:00
让球[欧洲盘]
帕尔马 -0/[email protected]
—————————————--
都灵 vs 蒙扎
意大利杯
09/02 03:00
让球[欧洲盘]
都灵 -0.5/[email protected]
—————————————--
赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
31 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC≈8,060 viewsread 3 September 2026 西班牙甲级联赛
—————————————--
奥萨苏纳 vs 赫塔菲
西班牙甲级联赛
09/01 01:30
让球[欧洲盘]
赫塔菲 +0/[email protected]
—————————————--
巴塞罗那 vs 巴列卡诺
西班牙甲级联赛
09/01 03:30
让球[欧洲盘]
巴塞罗那 -2.5/[email protected]
—————————————--
赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
31 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC≈8,120 viewsread 3 September 2026 意大利甲级联赛
—————————————--
莱切 vs 罗马
意大利甲级联赛
09/01 00:30
大/小[欧洲盘]
大 [email protected]
—————————————--
亚特兰大 vs 博洛尼亚
意大利甲级联赛
09/01 02:45
让球[欧洲盘]
亚特兰大 [email protected]
—————————————--
赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
31 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC≈7,400 viewsread 3 September 2026 英格兰超级联赛
—————————————--
阿斯顿维拉 vs 阿森纳
英格兰超级联赛
09/01 03:00
让球[欧洲盘]
阿森纳 [email protected]
—————————————--
赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
30 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC≈7,940 viewsread 3 September 2026 西班牙甲级联赛
—————————————--
皇家马德里 vs 马拉加
西班牙甲级联赛
08/30 23:00
让球[欧洲盘]
皇家马德里 -2.5/[email protected]
—————————————--
拉科鲁尼亚 vs 瓦伦西亚
西班牙甲级联赛
08/31 01:30
让球[欧洲盘]
拉科鲁尼亚 [email protected]
—————————————--
维戈塞尔塔 vs 毕尔巴鄂竞技
西班牙甲级联赛
08/31 03:30
大/小[欧洲盘]
大 2/[email protected]
—————————————--
赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @TYtuijian8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Y3国际 五大联赛 推单频道” (@TYtuijian8), 10,492 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TYtuijian8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.