Channel
@TGPG999
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,748subscribers
-166 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001413318464 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TGPG999 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TGPG999 |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 4,748 | -31 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 4,779 | -20 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 4,799 | -15 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:02 | 4,814 | -25 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:33 | 4,839 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 4,857 | -14 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 4,871 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 4,879 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 4,885 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 4,894 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 4,896 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 4,899 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 4,911 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 4,914 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 4,914 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 17 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#21名中国人非常聚赌被抓 泰国警方6月17日凌晨 #在芭提雅邦拉蒙县公寓赌场突袭中抓获21名中国籍涉赌人员 缴获赌具及电子设备，现场遗留的电脑显示器引发与电诈团伙关联调查，初步判断该窝点可能涉及跨国犯罪网络并与近期多起中国人涉赌诈案件存在业务交叉 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🔔 订阅亚太新闻频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+cc29sJCYychlYzhl ☎️ 欢迎爆料： @yt1338 🥇亚太导航🎖亚太吃瓜🥇二手市场
《真正解决犯罪的方式：不是打压，而是治根》 我们都知道：犯罪不是凭空发生的。 很多人走到那一步，并不是天生恶，而是因为被逼到了绝路。 所以，想真正解决犯罪，不是靠高压打击，而是应该解决它的根源： 让社会变得更公平 缩小贫富差距 让普通人看到希望，而不是绝望 如果一个国家能做到： 百姓不用资不抵债， 年轻人找得到方向， 劳动付出和生活回报对等， 那么——谁愿意铤而走险？谁愿意放弃稳定去“干票大的”？ 不是他们“道德缺失”，而是现实逼得他们别无选择。 但讽刺的是，我们有些所谓的“专家”却说： “低收入群体可以出租闲置房、开私家车拉活来增加收入。” “农民应到县城买房，开车回乡种地。” “年轻人暂时找不到工作，可以先结婚生子。” 这些话，说得轻飘飘，却从没踩过普通人的生活地面。 他们拿着高薪，站在象牙塔里，远离烟火气，却主导着政策、影响着舆论。 在他们眼里，最穷的人也有车有房，普通人的工资都“太高”。 那么，请问： 出生寒门…
#网友分享 #柬埔寨西港 昨天晚上巴基斯坦或者印度人跟本地人干架，然后被本地人追下去海里。 📣
#群友爆料：名字刚子.，江西人，诈骗+绑架犯，年龄36-40左右，诈骗公司地址，芒果园区篮球场对面。 经历在西港诈骗一朋友到家里合伙几个人一起绑架威胁3万美金，不然就杀人灭口，已报警处理，现在全网通缉，中国也已报案。如有知此人下落立即通报奖励。
泰国再出招！禁止泰国人前往波贝的赌场等娱乐场所工作 今天上午，一份由泰国Burapha特遣部队发出的命令显示，泰国将在沙缴府边境地区加强对泰国公民的出境管控，特别是那些在柬埔寨波贝的赌场和娱乐场所工作的人员。 该文件要求加强对泰国公民的审查，尤其是在赌场和娱乐场所工作的员工，这些员工试图从沙缴府的任何过境点进入柬埔寨波贝。 文件显示，这些措施于2025年6月17日上午8 点生效，直到收到进一步通知。 对波贝来说，算个大招儿～～互相伤害呗
遭恶意造谣贩卖人口，陈宝荣：遗憾、痛心！ 近日，柬埔寨一则涉及援助与诬陷的事件引发在柬华人圈广泛关注。多年来一直帮助陷入困境的在柬中国人而广受尊敬的热心人士陈宝荣，竟遭一名曾受其救助的遣返人员“小强”（化名）恶意造谣，诬称其“以每人3000美元的价格贩卖中国人至柬埔寨”，严重损害陈宝荣个人声誉。事件曝光后，众多在柬华人纷纷为陈宝荣发声，驳斥不实言论。 据悉，小强曾身陷“园区”，在陈宝荣的帮助下，被柬埔寨警方解救，随后被移送至移民局等待遣返。 按照相关规定，遣返人员需自费承担包括机票与行政开支在内的费用，总计约10700元人民币。陈宝荣得知情况后，主动协助协调相关事宜，并在一个专门帮助中国公民遣返的微信群中配合确认支付情况。 当时一同等待遣返的共有三人，另外两人均已通过支付宝支付费用并上传截图，而小强却谎称自己已付款，并伪造一张转账截图意图蒙混过关。陈宝荣在与中介核实过程中发现异常，确认其并未付款，遂决定中止对其的援助安排…
泰国没有响应洪森的24小时通牒 昨天上午，柬埔寨参议院主席洪森向泰国发出通牒，要求其24小时内必须全面开放边境口岸，否则，柬埔寨将对泰国的蔬菜、水果等农产品进入柬埔寨予以全面禁止。 不过，目前距离洪森的通牒已经过去24小时，但泰国方面似乎对其通牒不为所动，依然在继续关闭（有限度开放）泰柬众多边境口岸。 #因此今天起，柬埔寨各边境口岸将开始全面禁止所有来自泰国的水果蔬菜。据柬媒报道，今天上午国公省口岸已经禁止泰国的蔬菜和水果通过该口岸进入柬埔寨。
#马来西亚新闻：昨天晚上吉隆坡紫禁城下面 有人雇凶杀人把死者当场枪杀。至少死亡2人。
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @TGPG999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TGPG999 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 63 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚曝光黑平台灰产绑架吃瓜” (@TGPG999), 4,748 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TGPG999.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.