Channel
@dny488
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,961subscribers
-68,136 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002193238211 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dny488 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 46 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dny488 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:46 | 13,961 | -835 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:00 | 14,796 | -1,152 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:01 | 15,948 | -635 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:21 | 16,583 | -304 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 16,887 | -668 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:34 | 17,555 | -422 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:45 | 17,977 | -72 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:39 | 18,049 | -250 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 16:14 | 18,299 | -174 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 18,473 | -205 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 06:55 | 18,678 | -445 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 03:39 | 19,123 | -1,813 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:19 | 20,936 | -3,993 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 24,929 | -6,303 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 31,232 | -2,332 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 33,564 | -8,899 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 42,463 | -24,833 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 67,296 | -9,389 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 76,685 | -790 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 77,475 | first reading |
324 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 59 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 324 (5 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 264,060 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Oct 2026, 07:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 86 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 50.0% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 324 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 324 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#小姐姐投稿： 我和我老公是23年在柬埔寨园区认识的。后面攒了点钱就回去结婚了，但是老公现在阳痿了，而且一点挣扎的迹象都没有。可能和之前他做狗推的时候压力大，天天打飞机有关系吧。现在结婚才一年多，小孩也没有，他不愿意和我发生亲密关系。 我说：“以后没有性生活怎么办？”他说：“可以让我去找别人，可以和别人聊，但是不要打扰我。”我说：“你不信了吗？” 他说：“是的。” 还要我以后就把他当女的看，也不狡辩，也不挣扎。 主要是我不想找别人呀！我使出浑身解数勾引他，一点作用没有。我160斤，穿那个吊带袜，勒都勒不进去，动一下就撑破了，他居然一点欲望都没有。无论我怎么坐他身上蹭，他眼里一点光都没有，只想逃跑。 睡觉也是，每次让我先睡，等我睡着了，就自己在沙发上睡。第二天一大早就跑去上班了。下班能加班就加班，到家了就一直躲在厕所，一个大便要拉三个小时。 真的是没招了，求求支个招吧！我还年轻，我还想有夫妻生活。给我想想办法吧。 P…
#网友澄清：此人叫，张意贵州遵义人，估计最近缺钱缺疯了跑过来诬陷我大哥，他到旧山顶不是到我大哥公司是到黑八公司，他们过来的介绍费跟平时用的生活费都是我大哥拿到他们，黑八刷单公司黑的要死。 那些组长乱扣上面的也不管几个月没业绩平时都领不到工资，都是我大哥接济他们，后面偷公司钱也是我大哥阿富汗去接他们下来，不然要被打的半死，平时也对他们不错，私底下都有给它们钱花。 到op解散的时候，我们这帮兄弟出尔反尔，导致公司没发工资也是我大哥拿钱出来垫，钱路费处理他们回去，动不动集团我大哥一个人的，都不经过脑子，后面我跟过来缅甸，并没有像他说的那样。 真的丢我们贵州人的脸，以上都是事实，如果骗人死全家那种，他说的那个腾腾也是我们老家家里房子买了奔驰买了，黑公司能回去，如果黑公司能回去！真丢贵州人的脸。 PS：又 是带同乡人出来赚钱 然后因为钱的事情闹翻互相曝光 ~~~ 关注东南亚娱乐曝光频道➡️ @dny488 投稿：@qq787
#网友投稿：缅甸木姐，是不是又有大佬开几百万的大单了，烟花都放了十几分钟，不知是哪个家庭，支离破碎了。 关注东南亚娱乐曝光频道➡️ @dny488 投稿：@qq787
#温馨提示：此类小广告都是搞诈骗的，专门针对那些没护照的小朋友们。警防上当受骗。 另外那种小陆回国的或者是出国的小广告千万别相信，否则直接把你们卖去缅甸山里的园区，耶稣来了都救不了你。 关注东南亚娱乐曝光频道➡️ @dny488 投稿：@qq787
#网友吐槽：今天离开柬埔寨。 来这里5个月，这5个月里，听得最多的就是失踪人口、绑架、跑路、被抓。很多人入境柬埔寨，最初都是奔着赚钱来的，可真正能赚到钱的，永远就那么少数几个人，而且收入还极其不稳定。 这边现在连最基本的生存空间都越来越少了，没有稳定的人事岗位，也没有多少真正能赚钱的机会。偶尔有人打打野，也很难真正存下钱。说实话，这个行业已经没有什么生存的地方了。冒着这么大的风险，付出和得到根本不成正比。 更让人难受的是，在这里不只是担心被抓，有时候还要担心遇到警察敲诈、索要钱财。每天都提心吊胆，生怕自己哪天莫名其妙就出问题。 很多在柬埔寨的中国人，根本不敢轻易跳槽，也不敢随便换公司。不是不想走，而是大环境摆在那里，谁都怕换个地方又掉进另一个坑里。 等到回国，可能还要面临询问。算来算去，为了这点不稳定的钱，承担这么大的风险，真的不划算。 来了5个月，今天终于离开。柬埔寨这个地方，对有些人来说是机会，对更多普通人来说，…
#小姐姐投稿：东南亚的爱情 2023年，我在KK认识了前男友，那时候我才19岁。他是江西人，我当时有很多选择，但因为他对我好，我还是选择了他。可在一起后，他什么都要控制，连社交账号都不让我自由使用。那时候我很爱他，他对我做什么，我都愿意接受。 他每个月最多给我两三万泰铢，但这笔钱是我们两个人一起花的，连去酒店开房的钱也从里面出。在一起一年多后，他问我钱都花到哪里去了，我不知道该怎么回答。 他经常骂我，也打过我。那时候我一直以为他只有我一个人。我还怀过他的孩子，可他不想要，让我打掉。那时我连去医院的钱都没有，打掉孩子后只休息了一个星期，就得继续上班。 后来10月份KK没了，我们分开了，但并没有分手。之后他还给了我1.8万，我以为他很爱我，还是相信他。 2026年2月，我找到工作开始上班，他却开始不怎么理我了，态度也跟以前不一样。我还没弄明白怎么回事，过了几天，他就提出分手。我不同意，问他是不是因为没钱了。他说没钱给我花，…
#网友投稿：金三角特区“壹号公馆”刚刚治安局又来抓人了，一期四栋楼下，抓走了一个中国人。 现在现场还有很多警察在，估计行动还没有结束。今天是第四天，壹号连续查了四天了，真是不让人活了！昨天壹号公馆二期也抓走了10多个人，听说还抓了一个盘总。 关注东南亚娱乐曝光频道➡️ @dny488 投稿：@qq787
两名越南“反对派”人物在柬埔寨被绑架？ 流亡的越南反对派团体“越新党”指控越南当局在柬埔寨绑架其两名成员——50岁墨尔本男子陈协及52岁挪威籍同事阮德顺，并将其强行带回越南，称此举为跨国镇压。 据媒体报道，上述两人于9月15日飞抵金边会见人权活动家，18日失联且未登上次日回曼谷的航班。 不过，越媒报道称两人因“非法越境”被捕；越新党则坚称两人无意入境越南，系在柬埔寨被绑架后被强行送过边境。 胆子真大，在金边搞会见 在金边的越南情报系统很发达 被绑走不意外～～ 关注东南亚娱乐曝光频道➡️ @dny488 投稿：@qq787
蒙多基里省联合突查边境场所 严打非法网赌与违法博彩 近日，蒙多基里省政府联合执法部门对边境3处场所展开专项检查，要求其立即停止一切未经许可的非法网络赌博活动。 其中1处已被核实停业逾3个月，1处锁门无人，另1处正接受重点监控。该省副省长强调，未获商业博彩管理委员会（CGMC）许可的企业须立即关停。 截至2026年9月，柬全国已有18家涉及电诈的赌场被吊销许可证、9家被暂停执照接受调查，边境博彩监管正全面升级。 关注东南亚娱乐曝光频道➡️ @dny488 投稿：@qq787
东南亚娱乐曝光💠 @dny488 pinned a video
💎 金貝娱乐 💎 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎰 顶级品牌游戏，正版授权 🔥 彩票游戏 官方公彩，无私彩 💰 百万秒出款，奖池千万U！ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎮 游戏产品 📌 PC28 | 哈希 | 电子 | 棋牌 | 体育 | 视讯 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💥 平台优势 💥 ✅ 新会员注册赠送 🎁 最高 18888U ✅ 新会员首充豪礼 💰 50U 送 18U 100U 送 38U 💰 300U 送 88U 500U 送 188U 💰 1000U 送 288U 5000U 送 588U 💰 10000U 送 1288U 50000U 送 3688U ✅ 每日翻盘金 🎉 最高 3888U ✅ 全网最高反水3.99% ✅ 每周礼金奖励 🎁 最高 12888U ✅ 每日充值加赠 🎁 最高 588.88U ✅ 每日充值回馈 📈 充值 100U，次日领 188888U ━━━━━━━…
蒙多基里省联合突查边境场所 严打非法网赌与违法博彩 近日，蒙多基里省政府联合执法部门对边境3处场所展开专项检查，要求其立即停止一切未经许可的非法网络赌博活动。 其中1处已被核实停业逾3个月，1处锁门无人，另1处正接受重点监控。该省副省长强调，未获商业博彩管理委员会（CGMC）许可的企业须立即关停。 截至2026年9月，柬全国已有18家涉及电诈的赌场被吊销许可证、9家被暂停执照接受调查，边境博彩监管正全面升级。 关注东南亚娱乐曝光频道➡️ @dny488 投稿：@qq787
Showing the 12 most recent of 324 posts we hold for @dny488. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚娱乐曝光💠 @dny488” (@dny488), 13,961 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dny488.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.