#网友反馈:缅甸很多地方直接断网了??目前只能使用星链上网。

Channel
东南亚曝光-新闻快报-吃瓜-悬赏
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
48,931subscribers
-3,893 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001652820130 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dnanyakuaibaobgxs |
| Description | 本频道只负责曝光悬赏,真假自行甄别 如有恶意悬赏者,后果自己承担。 #菲律宾 #柬埔寨 #越南 #泰国 #缅甸 #老挝 #迪拜 欢迎加入 商务合作投稿: @G_D_ralgon |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dnanyakuaibaobgxs |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 48,931 | -6,979 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 55,910 | -2,365 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 58,275 | -2,701 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 60,976 | -1,516 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 62,492 | +3,070 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 59,422 | +3,294 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 56,128 | +3,665 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 52,463 | -1,222 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:19 | 53,685 | -1,396 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:52 | 55,081 | -2,400 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:13 | 57,481 | +144 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 57,337 | +293 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:59 | 57,044 | +1,502 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 55,542 | +255 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 55,287 | +425 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 54,862 | +68 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 54,794 | -295 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 55,089 | -227 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 55,316 | +1,974 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 53,342 | first reading |
Engagement
713 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.51%
- avg views ÷ 48,931 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,190
- 470 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.055%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 470
- of 713 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 470 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 713 (12 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,497,511 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 16:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈19,500
- Videos
- ≈1,220
- Links
- ≈1,420
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 45m
- Average length
- 53s
Measured directly from 254 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
31 reactions across 29 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 32.3% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 19.4% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 12.9% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 3.23% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 3.23% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 713 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 713 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#凤凰卫视:妙瓦底诈骗园区卷土重来 新据点不断出现 9月28日,凤凰卫视援引缅甸媒体报道,缅甸妙瓦底地区网络诈骗活动再次出现扩张迹象。 位于妙瓦底附近的水沟谷,过去曾多次遭到清剿并拆除部分诈骗园区,但今年初开始,当地又有新的园区陆续建设,部分已经投入使用,并通过社交平台公开招募人员。 除了水沟谷外,妙瓦底市区部分区域和山区也出现新的诈骗据点,部分此前停止运作的园区重新恢复活动。有缅甸议员表示,当局需要加强对地方行政部门的监督,推动各省邦持续打击网络诈骗活动。
#西港消息:西港警察局开展行动,逮捕了两名中国籍人士并扣押了一辆豪华车辆;具体涉案性质尚未披露,尚待省警方确认。
网友投稿:西港“星汇3-1” 目前有👮正在开展执法行动,带防弹衣了,应该是抓人的,注意待在房间,别影响执法!
#网友投稿:老挝万象街头奇事,女子全身赤裸坐皮卡车头拦车,周围路人驻足围观。 司机懵了车停原地不敢动。是情绪失控、纠纷讨说法、跟车上人有矛盾还是一时想不开?具体原因不清楚。希望人没事,有话好好说,别为难自己也别为难路人。
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🤩NO钱包担保3亿U|可查验! 😀 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 📱官方频道:@DF78 ➡️关注领VIP 🔝大品牌,实力派:78.COM 本身就是最好的辨识度。 ✅️香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍,封顶赔率! 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩连码四中四🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 💥新人超会赢,精彩时刻分享: 🥇六合彩 玩家用7个号码组合下注连码三全中(35注)➕四全中(35注),每注100U,结果开出4个号码。命中4注878倍及一注10000倍大奖,稳稳落袋135万U; 🥈PG电子 9月4号,壹玩家游戏中爆出268万U大奖,本金仅用2.6万U; 🥉DB真人 玩百家乐的老板,第一天存款50万U,连续7天每日提款…
#网友爆料:此致:四川省自贡市公安局反诈中心。本人实名举报:四川省自贡市富顺县人,外号:大军,真名王俊。四川省自贡市人,万丽珍,大家称呼:阿珍和珍姐。 此二人从18年到西港,最初从事赌博游戏机业务,后面遇到严打,开始在同乡万丽珍的介绍、帮助下从事电信诈骗行业,手下人数有几十个人,大多数为老家人。最初在中国城金水物业,带着家里来帮衬他的兄弟从事国内刷单诈骗,一年多将近2年的时间,从几个人发展成几十个。在这段时间里面,所有人加起来差不多做了2到3亿人民币的业绩。 后面又通过相好万丽珍结识其他大佬,调了一大部分人去做印度股转,马上快三年的时间,也做了不少业绩,差不多也有3到5亿人民币,涉案金额巨大!现因柬埔寨西港局势不稳定,又辗转流离,带着一些老家和其他的人员去了土耳其继续从事电信诈骗! 现在实名举报王俊和万丽珍,望往四川省省厅、自贡市市局反诈中心重点关注此二人,对二人实施立案侦查。这二人在老家富顺县的警务人员也是对他们王法宽裕…
#网友投稿:“西港”红灯笼隔壁,独牙附近,宪兵队正在沿街开展例行检查,途经人员以及附近的兄弟注意!
泰国博通寺惊现巨鳄!重逾400公斤🐊 9月27日,泰国巴真府西玛哈波县博通寺附近发现一条体重超过400公斤的巨型鳄鱼。 受近期洪水泛滥影响,水位不断上涨,连鳄鱼都坐不住了,直接顺着洪水“出门逛街”。😂当地工作人员紧急出动进行控制,并加强周边安全防范。 看来这场洪水不光是路没了,连“水路交通工具”都自己跑出来了……再这么下去,出门可能真的得先看看水里有没有东西在游。🐊🌊
🇮🇹 AI冒充高管克隆声音 意大利一银行被骗9500万欧元 据消息人士披露,诈骗分子利用AI技术冒充高管,从意大利最大银行Intesa Sanpaolo旗下的私人银行Fideuram盗走9500万欧元(约1.08亿美元)。 今年2月,诈骗团伙伪造集团CEO的即时通讯信息,并利用AI深度克隆知名律师声音拨打电话,诱导时任Fideuram董事长保罗·莫莱西尼安排向中国内地及香港等地的海外账户转账。 银行随后发现异常并报警,经多国执法合作成功追回约5300万欧元,但仍有约3600万欧元经多国账户清洗并兑换为加密货币后下落不明。高管团队未被调查,莫莱西尼已于3月辞职。米兰检方目前已对一名涉案的外籍嫌疑人展开调查。
😃😃😃😃 经典品牌,返水高、出款快,热门游戏应有尽有!别人赢的不是运气,是敢上桌;你不来,永远只看别人爆。 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 😖 做代理,佣金稳定,靠谱!!! 😒 没有不负责的平台只有不负责的上级 😫 给我一分信任,我还你十分满意! 😎 一线传三代,人走线还在,造福后代你只差一个靠谱的平台 🎁全网最燃福利盛宴,与😃😃😃并肩,踏上辉煌征程!尊享时刻,独一无二,每步璀璨,每秒传奇。速来加入,共铸不朽荣耀!🎁 群主担保链接 r6503.top 🥰 官方招商专员: @kyqp00002 ✅
#网友反馈:🇰🇭西港万龙公寓刚刚来了一群宪兵队,精准定位,直接把房门撞开抓了几个人走。据说搜出来了枪。
Showing the 12 most recent of 713 posts we hold for @dnanyakuaibaobgxs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@dnyqqbj · 120,578#1
@jiandan8884 · 127,089#2
@DNYzzz6 · 46,891#3
@jrdnyxs · 60,168#4
@bgdsj26 · 120,707#5
@BGS8989 · 89,871#6
@TTDR8 · 88,323#7
@bx66664 · 135,881#8
@dnyuuu88 · 125,961#9
@GGooGG66 · 150,280#10
@nx123 · 771,520#11
@bgtjt · 104,598#12
@DNYBG234 · 86,663#13
@baoguangba088 · 236,958#14
@cctv_dy · 36,686#15
@DNYXSTJL6668 · 10,055#16
@cc199 · 74,129#17
@dny88 · 65,507#18
@TGPG999 · 4,714#19
@gtkx1 · 164,479#20
@dsj665 · 113,606#21
@heicaibaog · 82,407 (as read 24 August 2026)#22
@BGSS8 · 1,029#23
@pianzi1 · 53,362#24
@dnyxst · 70,799#25
@Kolebule8119 · 3,816#26
@dnydxw · 71,142#27
@ChiGua8999 · 11,870#28
@Cukicnk777 · 2,861#29
@DNYBGT · 6,027#30
@bodu08 · 58,821#31
@bx666 · 467,845#32
@bvl222 · 45,237#33
@baoguang988 · 97,903#34
@dnyxwtt · 52,104#35
@db2023dbg · 76,486#36
@vipoo5 · 10,198#37
@TXJT_01 · 3,893#38
@XMZPH · 17,251#39
@dnyxinwen668 · 48,041#40
@BG576 · 376,817#41
@chigu0777 · 55,944#42
@bg888 · 343,655#43
@vjtyd · 72,407#44
@bg833 · 322,837#45
@YYL333 · 89,772#46
@dny2023dbg · 77,822#47
@DNYKX · 60,054#48
@tghuarenba · 44,364#49
@jpz0123 · 50,556#50
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 72,699#51
@QQDS999 · 176,108#52
@DNYTJL3 · 93,598#53
@oxkkk · 11,358#54
@rdzx0 · 108,708#55
@DNYXW008 · 79,700#56
@redian3 · 59,837#57
@phnews · 14,671#58
@BG2288 · 81,773#59
@zovgrad · 128,138#60
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dnyqqbj · 120,578
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@DNYzzz6 · 46,891
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
@bgdsj26 · 120,707
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@jrdnyxs · 60,168
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@QQ888880000 · 106,341
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
@TTDR8 · 88,323
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@dnyuuu88 · 125,961
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@GGooGG66 · 150,280
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
@jiandan8884 · 127,089
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 13 August 2026
@bgtjt · 104,598
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
@bx66664 · 135,881
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
@dsj665 · 113,606
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@cc199 · 74,129
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
@dnyxinwen668 · 48,041
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
@pianzi1 · 53,362
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@nx123 · 771,520
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
@kajal_online_hub · 97,159
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnyxwtt · 52,104
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
@dny88 · 65,507
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
@Cryptowhalepump_official · 21,473
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 August 2026
@db2023dbg · 76,486
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚曝光-新闻快报-吃瓜-悬赏” (@dnanyakuaibaobgxs), 48,931 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnanyakuaibaobgxs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.