Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东南亚无小事

Channel

东南亚无小事

@ll111

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

53,727subscribers

+1,460 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001074796551
TypeChannel
Username@ll111
Description⚡️ 东南亚无小事 全网首发!资讯快人一步 🚨 拒绝信息时差。第一时间推送东南亚突发事件、灰产内幕与最新政策。 【最新】 实时追踪区域动态 【最快】 突发新闻秒速直达 🌏 覆盖区域: #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #泰国 #缅甸 等 📡 功能板块: #爆料 #求助 #独家 #现场 Breaking News from Southeast Asia. Fastest updates, 24/7. 🤖 投稿联系: @LL111_1bot
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ll111

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ll111/39697 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC@dny558/462677 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@ll111/39699 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC@dny558/462687 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC1.00under a minute
@ll111/39701 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC@dny558/462707 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@ll111/39702 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC@dny558/462717 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC1.00under a minute
@dny558/462747 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC@ll111/39705 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC1.00under a minute
@dny558/462767 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC@ll111/39707 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@dny55810 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (100)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @dny558. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

52,26754,22153,2447 August 2026 — 52,267 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,267 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52,379 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,364 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52,477 subscribers11 August 2026 — 52,571 subscribers12 August 2026 — 52,669 subscribers13 August 2026 — 52,716 subscribers15 August 2026 — 52,845 subscribers16 August 2026 — 52,867 subscribers17 August 2026 — 52,898 subscribers18 August 2026 — 52,945 subscribers19 August 2026 — 53,001 subscribers20 August 2026 — 53,051 subscribers21 August 2026 — 53,063 subscribers23 August 2026 — 53,103 subscribers25 August 2026 — 54,135 subscribers25 August 2026 — 54,163 subscribers26 August 2026 — 54,221 subscribers27 August 2026 — 54,194 subscribers28 August 2026 — 54,191 subscribers29 August 2026 — 53,738 subscribers30 August 2026 — 53,789 subscribers31 August 2026 — 53,742 subscribers1 September 2026 — 53,725 subscribers2 September 2026 — 53,705 subscribers3 September 2026 — 53,727 subscribers53,7277 August 20263 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 27 days, net +1,460. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,974–54,514 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 18:2053,727+22
2 Sept 2026, 14:0653,705-20
1 Sept 2026, 16:0353,725-17
31 Aug 2026, 16:3353,742-47
30 Aug 2026, 19:0253,789+51
29 Aug 2026, 16:3553,738-453
28 Aug 2026, 18:4454,191-3
27 Aug 2026, 20:5654,194-27
26 Aug 2026, 22:0354,221+58
25 Aug 2026, 22:2754,163+28
25 Aug 2026, 00:3454,135+1,032
23 Aug 2026, 09:2853,103+40
21 Aug 2026, 23:3653,063+12
20 Aug 2026, 17:5453,051+50
19 Aug 2026, 17:5853,001+56
18 Aug 2026, 16:2852,945+47
17 Aug 2026, 17:2752,898+31
16 Aug 2026, 14:5752,867+22
15 Aug 2026, 00:2752,845+129
13 Aug 2026, 17:5352,716first reading

Engagement

664 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.34%
avg views ÷ 53,727 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,330
664 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.074%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
664
of 664 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 91 of 664 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held664 (7 August 20264 September 2026)
Views total1,548,254
Reactions total144
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Sept 2026, 06:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
33,100
Videos
7,640
Links
21,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 20m
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 200 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 87 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🎉11177.1%
🙏1611.1%
custom 545837641925395284953.47%
custom 606238302591464667042.78%
custom 631900465038098978132.08%
custom 606446179438087675421.39%
custom 629879590583534255721.39%
custom 623105785919124954210.694%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 664 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 664 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 05:45 UTC797 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

🇵🇰NCCIA捣毁“拉瓦尔品第”一诈骗窝点:28名本地狗推落网,幕后中国籍老板警方行动前潜逃! 据巴媒9月3日报道:近日,巴基斯坦国家网络犯罪调查局(NCCIA)在拉瓦尔品第开展突击行动,捣毁一处网络诈骗窝点,抓获28名嫌疑人,全部为巴基斯坦本地公民,包括24名男子、4名女子,年龄21‑26岁。 警方现场查获手机、笔记本电脑等作案电子设备。经查,该团伙利用Telegram以及伪造Facebook账号,以虚假电商、虚假投资对国内外民众实施诈骗。 报道提及,该窝点一名中国籍幕后主谋在警方突袭前已经潜逃,警方正展开追捕。 该案卷宗编号1916/2026,依据《电子犯罪法》及巴基斯坦刑法相关条文侦办,被捕嫌疑人将移交法庭申请还押,案件仍在进一步调查。 ✅ 东南亚无小事 :@LL111 ✅ 投稿澄清爆料: @PP111

4 Sept 2026, 05:27 UTC≈2,910 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

#老挝资讯:第七批移交ST Vegas案嫌犯 34名泰籍嫌疑人移交泰国 9月2日——老挝当局在万象—廊开第一老泰友谊大桥,将34名涉嫌参与ST Vegas网络犯罪案的泰国籍嫌疑人移交泰国当局。这是老挝方面针对该案开展的第七批泰籍嫌疑人移交行动。 据老挝有关部门消息,此次移交人员均来自今年7月18日老挝当局对万象市哈赛丰县Dongphosy村一处出租综合体开展的突袭行动。行动中,当局捣毁了由ST Vegas有限公司运营的一个涉嫌涉及网络赌博和电信诈骗的犯罪团伙,并现场拘留589名嫌疑人。 在被拘留的589人中,373人为泰国籍。 截至目前,老挝方面已分批向泰国移交该案366名泰国籍嫌疑人,另有7名泰国籍嫌疑人仍被老挝警方拘留接受调查。 博胶省同步展开跨境移交 就在此前一天,老挝博胶省当局也开展了一次类似的跨境移交行动。在位于泰国清莱府方向的第四老泰友谊大桥,老方将92名泰国籍人员移交泰国当局。 据调查人员介绍,这批人员中

4 Sept 2026, 05:04 UTC≈3,020 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

#柬妹投稿:我男朋友说,每次我们做爱他都会存下50美金,这样“我能从他那里拿多少钱,全凭我自己”。 我男友跟我说,每次我们发生关系,他就会存起一笔钱,所以“我能从他那里得到多少钱,取决于我自己”。 我们在一起刚满一年多一点。听到这话我惊呆了,但我一开始以为他在开玩笑,因为之前他(今年第二次)说他某个女朋友比我漂亮时,我曾(开玩笑地)说要罚他100美金。 说实话,我一开始确实只是随口开玩笑,但越想就越觉得心里不舒服。而我越不舒服,我认为他应该每次给我存100美金,我该怎么去和他沟通这件事? PS:哪个提款机认领下自己的女朋友 ✅ 东南亚无小事 :@LL111 ✅ 投稿澄清爆料: @PP111

4 Sept 2026, 04:41 UTC≈3,050 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

美驻柬使馆倡议加强执法合作 共同打击电诈及跨国犯罪 美国驻柬埔寨使馆临时代办亚历克斯·齐特尔近日拜会柬埔寨副总理兼内政部长苏速卡,双方就深化执法合作及打击跨国犯罪深入交换意见。 美方强调执法合作的重要性,鼓励柬方加大对涉及电诈等犯罪集团的调查与起诉力度,并指出许多团伙与跨国犯罪网络有关。 双方还探讨了信息共享及美方提供技术援助等事宜,以提升柬埔寨刑事司法应对能力,保护两国公民安全。 ✅ 东南亚无小事 :@LL111 ✅ 投稿澄清爆料: @PP111

4 Sept 2026, 04:15 UTC≈3,130 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

台湾夫妻涉嫌操控恋爱诈骗团伙 骗逾2万人3600万新元 台湾一对夫妻涉嫌操控大型恋爱诈骗团伙,利用美女照片、AI变声技术在交友软件上冒充女性,与男性受害者建立感情关系,再以购买商品、赠送礼物及支付生活费等名义骗取钱财。 据台湾检方调查,该团伙自2022年开始运作,分为“引流”“新客”“养客”“公关”等多个小组,涉嫌诈骗超过2万人,涉案金额至少9亿新台币(约3600万新元)。 调查还发现,团伙成员会与部分受害者线下见面,甚至发生性关系,并收取现金、手机及家电等财物。团伙内部据报还存在严厉管理,对业绩不达标成员实施电击及强迫性行为等惩罚。 9月2日,台湾共有57人因涉嫌参与案件被起诉。其中,检方建议对涉案夫妻分别判处至少25年及18年有期徒刑。案件目前进入司法程序。 ✅ 东南亚无小事 :@LL111 ✅ 投稿澄清爆料: @PP111

4 Sept 2026, 03:46 UTC≈3,160 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

#群友反馈:金边星辉和太子要大检查不知道是不是真的,在那边的还是多多注意点吧。 ✅ 东南亚无小事 :@LL111 ✅ 投稿澄清爆料: @PP111

4 Sept 2026, 03:26 UTC≈3,200 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

一名中国公民在菲被羁押期间不幸离世,中使馆向菲方提出严正交涉! “中国驻菲律宾大使馆”微信公号:9月1日,一名中国公民在菲律宾移民局拘留所被羁押等待遣返期间不幸离世。中国驻菲律宾大使馆对此深感震惊和痛惜,已第一时间向菲方提出严正交涉。 需要强调的是,中国使馆此前已提醒菲拘留所,该中国公民身患严重基础疾病,健康状况存在较大风险,明确要求菲拘留所予以高度重视,密切关注其身体状况,并及时采取必要的医疗救治措施。中国使馆已要求菲方立即对事件展开全面、公正的调查,尽快查明事实真相,并向使馆作出全面、客观的通报。对于调查发现的失职、渎职行为,必须严肃追究有关人员责任。 生命安全是最基本的人权。无论何种身份、是否处于羁押状态,生命和基本人道权益都应得到保障。中方敦促菲方立即采取有效措施,确保被羁押人员获得必要的医疗保障和人道主义待遇,坚决防止类似悲剧再次发生。 ✅ 东南亚无小事 :@LL111 ✅ 投稿澄清爆料: @PP111

4 Sept 2026, 03:04 UTC≈3,190 viewsread 4 September 2026
Video

#网友反馈:老挝金三角特内的凤凰城一大早就有本地警察和移民局的人开始检查了 ✅ 东南亚无小事 :@LL111 ✅ 投稿澄清爆料: @PP111

3 Sept 2026, 16:34 UTC≈3,680 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

#网友投稿 不按规矩早晚会送命 我们的队伍从西港赌场到吉隆坡赌场出码有大半年的时间,在吉隆坡这几个月见到的中国人确实是越来越多,也侧面反应了今年在东南亚缅老柬这些国家开盘的公司不好做,故而不少非法诈骗盘公司选择搬到了马来吉隆坡。 七月份一个之前在西港找我拿过码的小盘总老朋友他们公司也搬到了吉隆坡,八月份底他找到我在云顶打牌借了二十二万码的马币给他,输完后当场还了十六万给我,出于信任和之前在西港也有此类事情发生他都还清了给我,剩余的六万马币我们就商定好在九月一号他从他们公司分到红后再还我。 到一号中午这个小盘总联系我还钱因为在睡觉就没接到他的电话,他就先去了赌场等我,哪里知道他遇见了我一个同事被我同事一顿忽悠又跟我同事拿码在赌场输掉了,世人千万不要学这样的赌鬼。小盘总输掉后把他从我同事这里借的码是全部还了,就剩我的六万没有钱还了,我同事还跟这个小盘总担保说欠我的六万不要紧,我同事会跟我说再缓几天还,小盘总也如实全部告诉我了。

3 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC≈2,380 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ 👩‍❤️‍👨👩‍❤️‍👩💑👨‍❤️‍👨👩‍❤️‍💋‍👨🪢🧶🧵🪡🧥 🌟 官方网址: 6G.com 📌柬埔寨地区专用域名 6G.VIP 😀 6G 全球娱乐|资金安全 🈴 百亿护航 · 全球公认最稳 🔥 上押1000万U + 💵亿万储备金 🌊 大额秒提,放心赢 🔎点击查验 🈴 代理全线抽水+负盈返佣高达50% 👍 电子每日狂送16% 加赠福利 😀 官网数据同步 · 公平 · 公正 · 公开 · 无私彩 🔤 新人 · 首存豪礼返利 · 每月逢 6 现金大反馈 😃 爆庄实录|3天狂揽1086万U 😃 新客首存6万U,豪提209万U 😃 500一拉,PG实力兑现133万U 🇭🇰 彩票入口: 6G123.com 😀 加拿大 · PC28 · 超高赔率 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 6G.com 😕1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ @AA6G 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ @KF6G 🔓 真正的实力,不需

3 Sept 2026, 15:50 UTC≈3,260 viewsread 4 September 2026
Video

#群友投稿:我13岁出社会,16岁去了越南。 这几年,我去过柬埔寨、马来西亚、泰国、缅甸。我把最好的青春交给了东南亚。我常常告诉我,没关系的。有些事,没有原因,没有道理。它发生了,我感受了,经历了,就是全部。 记得我刚到越南的时候,第一次看见美金,那时候还以为我来对了地方。后来才知道,广东变成了我很难回去的家乡。当我知道我一天花的钱,比我父母几个月花的都多,我会怀疑努力奋斗的意义。我改变不了他们的消费习惯,就说服自己,丰俭由人。 每天都有人跟我说严打,我经常跟他们说句话:高风险,高回报。说完,我都会去看东南亚太阳很大,白色耐晒,我也就没买过其他颜色的衣服。好像穿白的,人就没那么脏,心也没有那么脏了。 如果要写东南亚,你就不能写他的纸醉金迷。你应该写异国他乡的冷清和不讲人情的社会。你要勇闯东南亚,你就要学会适应动荡的环境,接受每个无法团聚的日子,以及独自漂泊的孤独。东南亚,让我活成一个随时跑路的人。我很少买东西,因为离开的

3 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC≈3,340 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 😃🤩🤩🤩🤩⚡️⚡️⚡️🤩 东南亚无小事上押❤️❤️❤️⚡️❤️ 【51U集团|代理双享模式重磅来袭】 诚邀各位精英加入、强强联合共赢未来! 😀净盈利分红 + 流水返佣 1️⃣ 流水返佣最高 1%|1人起 2️⃣ 净盈利分红最高 55%|3人起 ⚡️ 新人专属福利 🤩 注册免充值即送 51U【可提现】:@TG51U 👍 🤩 新人首存50U送18U 最高赠送18888U 🤩 PG电子返水全网最高起步 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 独家明牌百家乐|一箭双雕捕鱼 🤩 会员秒提款,代理秒结账 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩:@DL51U 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩:@KF51U 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩:@GF51U 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩: 51U.COM

Showing the 12 most recent of 664 posts we hold for @ll111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ll111 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东南亚无小事” (@ll111), 53,727 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ll111.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.