🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬

Channel
中文曝光吧 安危头条吃瓜(接广告合作)🫥
@ZLWBG
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
104,893subscribers
-2,798 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001988183330 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZLWBG |
| Description | 本群内容:🏆曝光频道🏆 广告投放 投诉建议 请联系: @tingnuan1 @ck2019 众联商务合作中心 @SWZLW 众联站群 https://t.me/SWZLW 🌈曝光信息一定要真实。我们也没办法去调查信息的真假。如果有误联系管理删除就行。请不要纠结我们。谢谢 ⚠️频道广告不作担保,上门探访过属于担保,如有担保会进行备注:认证广告!!! |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZLWBG |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 22:16 | 104,893 | +18,973 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:06 | 85,920 | -876 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:00 | 86,796 | -298 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:06 | 87,094 | -562 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 01:21 | 87,656 | -192 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:59 | 87,848 | -160 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:50 | 88,008 | -213 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:21 | 88,221 | -170 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:30 | 88,391 | -159 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:29 | 88,550 | -147 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:50 | 88,697 | -125 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:34 | 88,822 | -168 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 88,990 | -146 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:34 | 89,136 | -230 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:06 | 89,366 | -149 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 18:56 | 89,515 | -174 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:29 | 89,689 | -129 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:49 | 89,818 | -86 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:39 | 89,904 | -97 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:00 | 90,001 | first reading |
Engagement
1,509 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 204 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.175%
- avg views ÷ 104,893 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 184
- 442 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.979%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 442
- of 1,509 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 227 of 442 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,509 (7 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 81,228 |
| Reactions total | 307 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 02:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈58,100
- Videos
- ≈9,110
- Links
- ≈26,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 30m
- Average length
- 31s
Measured directly from 407 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
515 reactions across 394 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 142 | 27.6% | |
| 👏 | 56 | 10.9% | |
| ❤ | 53 | 10.3% | |
| 🎉 | 50 | 9.71% | |
| 🤩 | 48 | 9.32% | |
| ⚡ | 47 | 9.13% | |
| 🥰 | 47 | 9.13% | |
| 🔥 | 42 | 8.16% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 5.24% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.194% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.194% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.194% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 399 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 515 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 4 September 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 442 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
我的好兄弟,你当初绑架我时间已经过去一年了,你在越南当缩头乌龟是吧,你不回来就算了,这次我把你身份信息贴你们村电线杆子上,我让你们村里面的人看看你,你爷爷奶奶还要在这里受罪,你真他吗不是人啊,家附近认识你怎么多年的兄弟你也绑,你们村长说你爷爷的骨灰还没下葬,还在殡仪馆寄存,你家的祖坟我肯定是要挖的,你这个逼样,柬埔寨现在凉凉了,你这种人就得去要饭,你不是在柬埔寨挺有名的吗,大家也可以看看,他小名叫陆川或者啊川,现在就让大家见见你, 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
🎥曝光:#吐槽 #黑公司 #天下公寓 三楼 #水源集团 避坑避坑 整个公司都是些xidu玩意 还tm全是一起的 稽查每天跟sb一样 看到人家浏览资料群也是签罚款单 只要是他不认识的人基本上都死 都是他的业绩 和他认识的人一个个在那里抽大麻 上头电子烟 喝水水 每天闷得眼睛都不睁着 他就当没看见 太坑人了这公司 给算的提成还坑 里面的人全都说这个事情 每天粉没几个还一天天找事情 这个曝光只想让更多人知道这个公司可恶的一面 现在确实大环境不好了 大家都想挣钱 你也不能拿人家那点辛辛苦苦熬出来的时间去做你的业绩吧 人心不足蛇吞象 迟早要死 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
#越南 #胡志明3郡 一个家庭旅馆被警察包围了 里面都是打野团队。附近的当心点吧~~ 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
#百事通金总投稿 🎤 最后一站,最后一场!盆栽把巡演收官夜留给吉隆坡🔥 📍吉隆坡·武吉加里尔国家体育场 🏷2026年11月5日 The Weeknd「After Hours Til Dawn」巡演,今晚在吉隆坡迎来最后一场。 这一轮巡演的句号,就在马来西亚画下。 蓝绿灯光铺满场馆,舞台前是一片人海。平时在耳机里循环的歌,这次换成现场感受——最后一站的仪式感,真的不一样。 💬在吉隆坡生活,不只有上班、堵车和忙生意。偶尔留一个晚上给喜欢的音乐,也是认真生活的一部分。 今晚在现场的朋友,来报个到!🙌 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
❤1👍1
#币圈新闻:11月4日—5日,比特币升破80500美元,日内涨4.23%。 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
👍1
#群友投稿:昨晚西港某会所发生一起令人气愤的事件。会所消费后拒不付款,竟然还抢走小妹手机和现金! 两名男的来到会所,点了一名女工作人员提供服务。双方按照约定进行消费,结束后,对方却拒绝支付相关费用。 更过分的是,对方不仅不给钱,还涉嫌将小妹的手机及身上现金全部抢走!现在柬埔寨真的是做到了四个人都想跑路跑单 妹妹工作也不容易你们就想跑路,你也跟我说一下 消费可以协商,费用可以沟通,但消费后拒不付款,甚至涉嫌抢夺他人财物,这种行为已经严重影响工作人员的人身及财产安全。 现将此事公开曝光,希望知情人士提供线索,也提醒东南亚各地会所及从业人员提高警惕,避免类似事情再次发生。 希望当事人能够站出来说明情况,也希望涉事人员尽快妥善处理此事! 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
🎉2
金边金街人气回暖?生意仍冷清 11月3日,记者走访金边金街发现,街区人流较此前有所增加,多数餐饮、美容、服装及奶茶店正常营业,还有新店正在装修。部分商户表示,进入10月后,街上的中国面孔比前几个月多了。 今年5月,警方突袭金街一处非法赌场,带走100多人,此后多家娱乐场所关闭,街区生意明显下滑。 不过,记者回访3家餐厅发现,营业额仍处于较低水平。商户反映,虽然街上的人开始多了,但进店消费的顾客并未明显增加。 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
🔥1🥰1
優雅😋 #今日笑乜春 #吃瓜 #沙雕 #跳舞 #性感 #美女 #萌 #kawaii 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
木牌昨天又抓人了! 据柴桢省副省长孟英昨晚透露,昨天,柴桢省联合执法工作组继续突击搜查位于巴域的涉诈窝点,又查获了多名涉诈人员。 目前,具体行动详情暂时未正式对外发布。 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
🤩1
這樣好看嗎🥰 #今日笑乜春 #吃瓜 #沙雕 #性感 #美女 #萌 #kawaii 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
#网友反馈:西港好日子公寓被围了,正在检查中,在附近的注意。 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,509 posts we hold for @ZLWBG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 32 posts on @ZLWBG as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 25 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 13 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 14
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@tiyu_3 · 114,9371,469 posts体育直播吧 中文体育电竞推单交流 🫥
@zlw011 · 43,3861,371 posts九博国际 · 公群导航
@jbgj · 19,12287 posts🏆九博国际@JBGJ🏆上下分群 总押900万美金
@jiubovip · 8,65787 posts电竞体育推单 LPL中文赞助🫥
@duanzib · 111,31229 posts众联网商务
@SWZLW · 2,92029 posts吃瓜 中文反差萝莉学生曝光🫥
@tiyu1z · 20,63629 postsY3国际 官方频道
@ai038 · 1,50318 posts182体育-官方频道
@TY_182 · 1,75416 posts122体育-官方频道
@tz228 · 2,92616 posts2028体育 官方频道
@PGGF01 · 2,00210 postsY3国际 u台 福利中心 - 电子百家乐
@Y3111111 · 1,62310 posts2028122.COM- 2028体育官方频道
@pg115 · 15,6399 posts听雨楼/生活工作互助群
@Tingyu00001 · 7,9746 posts柬埔寨/东南亚/大事件曝光生活资讯攻略
@tingyu00002 · 20,7126 posts迪拜/东南亚/大事件曝光生活资讯攻略
@tingyu0002 · 227,4776 posts182体育 合营中心
@DLHY182 · 984 posts涩涩备用群💋(防丢失)
@SSBYQ · 4023 posts东南亚大事件 @svip
@bx666 · 462,5182 posts点亮曝光吧🔍
@DLBGB · 588,4262 postsSOSO搜搜
@souso · 592,2622 posts柬埔寨安全信息@axiaa
@axiaa · 9,2421 post东南亚无小事
@ll111 · 50,8101 post【122体育】官方合营
@QSTY7 · 4851 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@tiyu_3 · 114,937#1
@toutiaoshijian · 66,814#2
@svip40 · 131,769#3
@duanzib · 111,312#4
@bg855 · 334,097#5
@bx666 · 462,518#6
@cctvPH · 133,697#7
@baoguangee · 198,093#8
@qqdsj · 174,839#9
@redian3 · 64,386#10
@anwei2 · 32,820#11
@feilongwang · 70,883#12
@tiyuquan · 105,214#13
@SB919 · 123,406#14
@jinritoutiao6 · 12,182#15
@vip35r · 29,311#16
@phnews · 17,185#17
@svipzz · 62,253#18
@pzbgfabu666 · 288,697#19
@baoguang_g · 65,645#20
@MB_149 · 131,807#21
@flb00 · 16,643#22
@iiiik · 33,854#23
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,108#24
@feilvbinghuarenriji · 14,872#25
@tghuarenba · 20,552#26
@tg04277 · 61,147#27
@bodutt · 66,879#28
@BG886 · 53,092#29
@baoheitai · 1,106#30
@uuu8u · 55,664#31
@DNYXW008 · 73,964#32
@quanwangbaoguang0 · 174,612#33
@DNYTJL3 · 86,023#34
@db933 · 189,743#35
@heicaibaog · 10#36
@bominwang18 · 4,554#37
@toutiao_4 · 1,087#38
@Banma_xinwen · 85,103#39
@jiuboo · 14,092#40
@dny1577 · 5,057#41
@quanqiubaoliao · 121,864#42
@bgxinwen200 · 26,589#43
@uuuuuf · 180,811#44
@gouzaibaoliao · 2,033#45
@a0159 · 88,732#46
@aa144 · 34,726#47
@JD_9Dynasty · 7,772#48
@dianjingtuidan1 · 102,497#49
@jrttbg · 108,447#50
@dubai0 · 89,041#51
@ke5689 · 254,653#52
@baoguang212 · 4,624#53
@qqt13 · 199,609#54
@quanwangbaoguangb · 127,623#55
@baoguang2022 · 133,611#56
@feixingzhe0 · 46,616#57
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 68,766#58
@vipn8888 · 57,998#59
@baoguang821 · 45,748#60
@AnWei08 · 62,826#61
@dxdb001 · 4,757#62
@baoguang008 · 3,602 (as read 15 August 2026)#63
@xinwen811 · 206,048#64
@BG_BG8 · 32,595#65
@baoguang_w · 74,697#66
@dianjingtuijian · 12,998#67
@lufa61888 · 3,038#68
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@pzbgfabu666 · 288,697
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
@duanzib · 111,312
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 15 August 2026
@tiyu_3 · 114,937
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnyxsp · 48,007
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 16 August 2026
@db933 · 189,743
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026
@tiyuquan · 105,214
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@dianjingtuidan1 · 102,497
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
@quanwangbaoguang0 · 174,612
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
@chigua_a · 201,925
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 12 August 2026
@svip40 · 131,769
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 17 August 2026
@aichiguaba · 246,506
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 14 August 2026
@baoguangba0 · 120,694
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
@TGBG8888 · 82,209
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
@bodutt · 66,879
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
@flwph99 · 97,637
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@DNYXW008 · 73,964
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
@flb608 · 70,950
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
@baoguang2022 · 133,611
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 August 2026
@jrttbg · 108,447
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
@nx123 · 762,619
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
@tg04277 · 61,147
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
@quanwangbaoguangb · 127,623
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
@mianbeiy · 58,482
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 August 2026
@SB919 · 123,406
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“中文曝光吧 安危头条吃瓜(接广告合作)🫥” (@ZLWBG), 104,893 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZLWBG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.