德里机场大厅里的流浪狗 在印度的中国网友被德里国际机场的管理震惊了。 机场大厅里竟然有好多流浪狗,还到处狂吠,不过当地人好像早就习以为常了。. 😁投稿爆料:@geren ❤️订阅频道:@kanxia 😀便民信息: 【华人互助群】【导航频道】【档案查询】

Channel
🍉东南亚の小视频「VIP」
@dnyxsp
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
53,251subscribers
-42,570 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001725004752 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dnyxsp |
| Description | #东南亚 #吃瓜 #娱乐 #短视频 #美女 ✅发布信息联系: @zhuanren 商务合作: @geren 🗓 每 日 精 彩 推 送 🗓 吃瓜 | 新闻 | 娱乐 | 搞笑 |美女 | |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 48 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dnyxsp |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:58 | 53,251 | -3,977 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:08 | 57,228 | -70 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 57,298 | -42 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 57,340 | -29 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:57 | 57,369 | -115 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:27 | 57,484 | -32 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:58 | 57,516 | -135 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 57,651 | -47 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 11:36 | 57,698 | -88 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:31 | 57,786 | -123 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 10:05 | 57,909 | -717 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 19:49 | 58,626 | -7,463 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 10:42 | 66,089 | -720 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 02:01 | 66,809 | -1,122 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 67,931 | +8,751 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 59,180 | -965 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 60,145 | -853 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 60,998 | -1,488 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 62,486 | -4,083 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 66,569 | first reading |
Engagement
2,043 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 160 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.84%
- avg views ÷ 53,251 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,040
- 751 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.032%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 751
- of 2,043 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 751 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,043 (7 August 2026 – 25 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,534,837 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Oct 2026, 09:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈9,640
- Videos
- ≈27,200
- Links
- ≈1,590
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5h 50m
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 840 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 83.3% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 September 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
小红书集美日常,自信就完了 😁投稿爆料:@geren ❤️订阅频道:@kanxia 😀便民信息: 【华人互助群】【导航频道】【档案查询】
地上不让睡觉🤣 😁投稿爆料:@geren ❤️订阅频道:@kanxia 😀便民信息: 【华人互助群】【导航频道】【档案查询】
看到结局我就放心了 😁投稿爆料:@geren ❤️订阅频道:@kanxia 😀便民信息: 【华人互助群】【导航频道】【档案查询】
🇿🇼🇿🇲🇾🇪🇪🇭🇼🇫🇻🇳🇻🇪🇺🇿🇻🇮🇺🇾 🥚 8T娱乐城 · 全球数字网投领导者 🥚 实力老品牌 · 信誉保障 · 放心赢 🥚 NO钱包担保1000万U—实力雄厚 🚗 官网:8T.COM 【 铸就人生奇迹】 😀经过多年稳定运营、已成为玩家信赖的首选平台 😀东南亚线上第一盘口、公开透明、高额返水 😀官方游戏+极速出款、认准信誉实力老平台 😀选平台不必四处观望、选我们就是最稳的答案 😁😅😂😇🙃😉🥰😘😛🤪 ♠️ 首存最高赠送 18888U ♠️ 二存三存相赠 8888U ♠️ 大额提款加赠 18888U ♠️每月逢8必发尊享豪礼 ♠️ APP每日抢红包不停! ♠️亿U现金大回馈天天领豪礼 ♠️尊享会员等级+周俸禄+月俸禄 🍏🍎🍐🍊🍋🍋🟩🍌🍉🍇 🔠8T.COM|实力铸就信誉,品质赢取未来 🔠8T.COM|公正公平无私彩,华人首选娱乐 🔠8T.COM|一站式顶级体验,尊享非凡品牌 4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣7️⃣ 8T.CO…
手机玩多了,产生幻觉了……🤨 😁投稿爆料:@geren ❤️订阅频道:@kanxia 😀便民信息: 【华人互助群】【导航频道】【档案查询】
你听到啥声了吗 😁投稿爆料:@geren ❤️订阅频道:@kanxia 😀便民信息: 【华人互助群】【导航频道】【档案查询】
可乐瓶手搓航母 😁投稿爆料:@geren ❤️订阅频道:@kanxia 😀便民信息: 【华人互助群】【导航频道】【档案查询】
抱着集美摔一跤 献丑了 😁投稿爆料:@geren ❤️订阅频道:@kanxia 😀便民信息: 【华人互助群】【导航频道】【档案查询】
宠物闯祸瞬间 😁投稿爆料:@geren ❤️订阅频道:@kanxia 😀便民信息: 【华人互助群】【导航频道】【档案查询】
群友喜欢这样的吗 😁投稿爆料:@geren ❤️订阅频道:@kanxia 😀便民信息: 【华人互助群】【供需资源】【档案查询】
那个地方很尊重女性 😁投稿爆料:@geren ❤️订阅频道:@kanxia 😀便民信息: 【华人互助群】【供需资源】【档案查询】
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,043 posts we hold for @dnyxsp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@dnyxsp edited 13 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 5 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 7 October 2026
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@kanxia · 459,431#1
@bx666 · 463,020#2
@MB_149 · 127,122#3
@dnyxst · 54,148#4
@dubai0 · 91,354#5
@DNYTJL3 · 89,365#6
@aa144 · 34,917#7
@jpz_888 · 12,355#8
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,486#9
@dnyggg · 41,925#10
@tx100 · 150,502#11
@ZLWBG · 88,990#12
@SB919 · 121,958#13
@usd1 · 253,064 (as read 16 August 2026)#14
@toutiaoshijian · 67,674#15
@mianbeitongjiling · 29,057#16
@svip40 · 126,751#17
@pyzcn · 223,370#18
@bx777 · 32,674#19
@cctv1 · 308,081#20
@tiyu_3 · 87,374#21
@ygxw3 · 147,063#22
@ac666 · 339,126#23
@MGHDSJ · 13,775#24
@DNY_hasj · 200,317#25
@chiguahs · 111,369#26
@dj17 · 97,363#27
@chigua_a · 207,174#28
@PG151 · 2,101#29
@ab100 · 135,630#30
@duanzib · 84,143#31
@bodutt · 68,620#32
@blj77 · 170,963#33
@sii76 · 204,570#34
@xinwen1 · 107,706#35
@sucai177 · 99,064#36
@xinwen811 · 208,243#37
@DNY0027 · 2,691#38
@gedan · 10,466#39
@sucai1 · 59,445#40
@CG887 · 99,489#41
@chigua_e · 224,980#42
@pyzcgsp1 · 1,243#43
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dnyxst · 54,148
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
@aichiguaba · 210,186
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 14 August 2026
@tuigsc · 69,885
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 21 August 2026
@MB_149 · 127,122
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 16 August 2026
@CG887 · 99,489
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🍉东南亚の小视频「VIP」” (@dnyxsp), 53,251 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnyxsp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.