International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 90 days, net -654. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,154–13,004 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 15:00
12,252
-4
4 Nov 2026, 15:04
12,256
-6
3 Nov 2026, 15:51
12,262
-7
2 Nov 2026, 13:39
12,269
-6
1 Nov 2026, 10:51
12,275
-21
31 Oct 2026, 09:09
12,296
-5
30 Oct 2026, 09:01
12,301
-19
29 Oct 2026, 09:17
12,320
-5
28 Oct 2026, 05:16
12,325
-10
27 Oct 2026, 07:29
12,335
-13
26 Oct 2026, 07:31
12,348
-7
25 Oct 2026, 04:37
12,355
-9
24 Oct 2026, 05:11
12,364
-13
23 Oct 2026, 07:15
12,377
-21
22 Oct 2026, 10:20
12,398
-8
21 Oct 2026, 05:45
12,406
-8
20 Oct 2026, 05:26
12,414
-8
19 Oct 2026, 07:01
12,422
-13
18 Oct 2026, 06:27
12,435
+2
17 Oct 2026, 05:18
12,433
first reading
Engagement
118 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.0%
avg views ÷ 12,252 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,230
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.101%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 118 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held
118 (3 August 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total
17,230
Reactions total
13
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 19:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈19,200
Videos
≈1,030
Links
≈6,770
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
81 reactions across 51 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
65
80.2%
👍
5
6.17%
👎
3
3.70%
🔥
2
2.47%
😡
2
2.47%
😁
1
1.23%
😢
1
1.23%
🤣
1
1.23%
🥰
1
1.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 118 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (42.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @jpz_888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@jpz_888 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
东南亚新闻大事件 @XJ_6666 · 35,833 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 16 here — alongside 15 others — read 13 September 2026
海外大事件(猎奇-吃瓜) @aa144 · 34,770 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 14 here — alongside 13 others — read 2 September 2026
西港日记|柬埔寨大事件 @jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,174 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 27 August 2026
东南亚|曝光|吃瓜|寻人 @jinbian8 · 44,196 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 25 August 2026
泰国新闻大事件🇹🇭 @fzjt0 · 125,327 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 15 August 2026
东南亚新闻|海豹资讯曝光|news @JXBGW · 170,301 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 13 August 2026
东南亚闯荡记🪐 @ac666 · 308,291 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 10 August 2026
东南亚大事件 东南亚新闻 东南亚曝光 @jpzso · 190,900 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 18 here — alongside 17 others — read 16 September 2026
东南亚那些事儿(曝光-吃瓜) @mianbeichigua1349 · 31,470 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 13 here — alongside 12 others — read 4 September 2026
金边日记|西港|暹粒|吴哥|木牌 @jinbian818 · 44,464 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 25 August 2026
西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 @xigang8I8 · 146,623 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 24 August 2026
西港日记-柬埔寨通@NMSL @baoguang7 · 39,372 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 24 August 2026
东南亚新闻|缅北|金三角 @xigang1 · 40,509 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 24 August 2026
TG招聘|东南亚新闻大事件‼️ @XMZPK · 64,053 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 August 2026
柬埔寨新闻|华人资讯曝光|cambodia news @jianpuzhaihuarenzixun · 73,265 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
西港日记|柬埔寨大事件 @xgrj0 · 137,929 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 12 August 2026
东南亚大事件-情报局 @p5559 · 188,016 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 11 August 2026
东南亚大事件 @svip @bx666 · 462,518 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 10 August 2026
东南亚大事件 东南亚新闻 东南亚爆料 @jpzvo · 188,009 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 17 here — alongside 16 others — read 17 September 2026
东南亚曝光 @TRJ668899 · 53,404 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 27 August 2026
海华大事件❖6U.com娱乐首选🅥 @bx777 · 30,218 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 27 August 2026
今日曝光 @TGBG01 · 53,439 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 26 August 2026
东南亚大事件/新闻曝光 @dnyl1 · 46,754 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 11 here — alongside 10 others — read 21 August 2026
东南亚大新闻 @HYY3333 · 106,112 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 86 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“柬埔寨華人信息” (@jpz_888), 12,252 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jpz_888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.