博彩黑平台曝光: 启航电子游戏现在开始收网了,已经曝光了几次,我就没有充值了,直到今天我才确定是真的,周彩金从原来一倍流水改到五倍,而且只进不出就算出款也会根据你最近输得多才让你赢一点回本。大家避雷。他会告诉我客户我是假客户套取福利的。我这等级像是套取福利的吗? #博彩新闻 #启航娱乐 #黑平台 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➡持续关注博彩资讯 专注曝光 ➡投稿 & 商务 @fuyanboss
👍102🔥94❤90🎉89😁76

Channel
@uuuuuf
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
244,570subscribers
+206,389 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001971227656 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uuuuuf |
| Description | 🎰 欢迎加入『博彩黑平台曝光吧』 投稿 & 商务 @fuyanboss |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uuuuuf |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 244,570 | -5,932 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 250,502 | -1,598 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 252,100 | -1,662 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 253,762 | -816 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 254,578 | -1,880 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 256,458 | -1,231 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:42 | 257,689 | +28,403 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:16 | 229,286 | -691 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 229,977 | -564 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 230,541 | -868 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 231,409 | -698 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 232,107 | -720 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 232,827 | -738 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 233,565 | -171 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 233,736 | -735 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:41 | 234,471 | -713 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 235,184 | -830 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 236,014 | +39,283 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 196,731 | +48,985 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 147,746 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (15 July 2026 – 16 September 2026) |
| Views total | 92,510 |
| Reactions total | 9,494 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 10:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11,018 reactions across 36 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎉 | 2,218 | 20.1% | |
| ❤ | 2,174 | 19.7% | |
| 🔥 | 2,164 | 19.6% | |
| 👍 | 2,133 | 19.4% | |
| 😁 | 2,084 | 18.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 51 | 0.463% | |
| 🥰 | 51 | 0.463% | |
| 💯 | 48 | 0.436% | |
| 🤩 | 47 | 0.427% | |
| 😍 | 45 | 0.408% | |
| 🎃 | 1 | 0.009% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.009% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.009% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,018 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @uuuuuf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 36 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 16 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
博彩黑平台曝光: 启航电子游戏现在开始收网了,已经曝光了几次,我就没有充值了,直到今天我才确定是真的,周彩金从原来一倍流水改到五倍,而且只进不出就算出款也会根据你最近输得多才让你赢一点回本。大家避雷。他会告诉我客户我是假客户套取福利的。我这等级像是套取福利的吗? #博彩新闻 #启航娱乐 #黑平台 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➡持续关注博彩资讯 专注曝光 ➡投稿 & 商务 @fuyanboss
👍102🔥94❤90🎉89😁76
😭😤😠😡🤬🤯😳🥵🥶😶🌫️😱 安全公平|透明可靠|😰😥😓🤗🤔🫣🤭 😀😇🙂🙃😉😌😍🥰😘😗 出入金快速稳定😭😤😠😡 😀😃😄😁😆🥹😅😂🤣🥲☺️😊 😀通过 TG 一键进入平台,直接畅玩各类游戏 🥴🤢🤮🤧😷🤒🤕🤑🤠😈👿👹👺 🎁豪华福利升级 - 每日首充最高 *588U😐 - 跳槽专属待遇😀 - 邀请好友无限返佣🥵🥶😶🌫️ - 投注奖励最高 *12888U😐 - 天天不定时红包雨😐 🤬🤯😳🥵🥶 ✅ 免注册|免实名|隐私无忧 点击【TG投注】即可即刻畅玩 🥹😅😂🤣🥲 @F1FF 😛😝😜🤪🤨 @F1Asia 😀😃😄😁😆 @F1TOP
👍97🎉95🔥95😁88❤75
博彩黑平台曝光: 启航娱乐野鸡平台,大家擦亮双眼,开始的时候在真人赢了点就禁止玩家玩真人轮盘,现在又说国内ip原因不让出款,让点链接解除,可能是最近大扫荡改行做道u了,外面的兄弟擦亮眼睛。 #博彩新闻 #启航娱乐 #黑平台 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➡持续关注博彩资讯 专注曝光 ➡投稿 & 商务 @fuyanboss
👍105🔥90❤86😁86🎉83
🥲🤣😉😌😍😍🥰😋 🀄️🀄️😀😀🤓🤓😀😀欢迎广大玩家前往监督 ⚡️#东南亚盘总共同选择的综合双币娱乐平台,集团储备资金上亿 ⚡️#七天娱乐城 全网福利天花板😀 😆😁😄😁😁🥹😃😆😄 🥸😛😛😍 ⚡️七天娱乐官方😔 :qitian.com ⚡️ 注册 RMB 币种: qt00021.com ⚡️ 注册 USDT币种 : qt00022.com 📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱➡️ @qt33 ⚡️客服 : @qt99 ⚡️招商 : @qitiandaili 🀄️🀄️担保1200万查询 真实力,不需要证明;稳定出款,才是最好的口碑
😁104👍96❤95🔥78🎉72
博彩黑平台曝光: 曝光一下,谢谢,好几个平台都合并成双狮了,我那些下线每天都有玩,现在搞的下级都没有了,而且佣金一分不给,一个集团的平台,用户数据合并一下,下级直接整没,千万不要和这种平台合作,吃人肉喝人血 #博彩新闻 #双狮国际 #代理纠纷 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➡持续关注博彩资讯 专注曝光 ➡投稿 & 商务 @fuyanboss
😁96❤90🔥90🎉87👍87
🥲🤣😉😌😍😍🥰😋 🀄️🀄️😀😀🤓🤓😀😀欢迎广大玩家前往监督 ⚡️#东南亚盘总共同选择的综合双币娱乐平台,集团储备资金上亿 ⚡️#七天娱乐城 全网福利天花板😀 😆😁😄😁😁🥹😃😆😄 🥸😛😛😍 ⚡️七天娱乐官方😔 :qitian.com ⚡️ 注册 RMB 币种: qt00021.com ⚡️ 注册 USDT币种 : qt00022.com 📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱➡️ @qt33 ⚡️客服 : @qt99 ⚡️招商 : @qitiandaili 🀄️🀄️担保1200万查询 真实力,不需要证明;稳定出款,才是最好的口碑
👍100🎉92🔥88😁87❤85
😭😤😠😡🤬🤯😳🥵🥶😶🌫️😱 安全公平|透明可靠|😰😥😓🤗🤔🫣🤭 😀😇🙂🙃😉😌😍🥰😘😗 出入金快速稳定😭😤😠😡 😀😃😄😁😆🥹😅😂🤣🥲☺️😊 😀通过 TG 一键进入平台,直接畅玩各类游戏 🥴🤢🤮🤧😷🤒🤕🤑🤠😈👿👹👺 🎁豪华福利升级 - 每日首充最高 *588U😐 - 跳槽专属待遇😀 - 邀请好友无限返佣🥵🥶😶🌫️ - 投注奖励最高 *12888U😐 - 天天不定时红包雨😐 🤬🤯😳🥵🥶 ✅ 免注册|免实名|隐私无忧 点击【TG投注】即可即刻畅玩 🥹😅😂🤣🥲 @F1FF 😛😝😜🤪🤨 @F1Asia 😀😃😄😁😆 @F1TOP
🔥107🎉87👍87😁87❤83
4500 万 USDT 被冻结:新币担保的时代,真的要结束了吗? 本台特约记者赵山河报道: 9月8日下午,TRON网络上出现了一轮异常集中的USDT冻结。最初公开监测到的冻结地址约10个,随后这一范围持续扩大。截至目前,多家安全机构监测显示,本轮相关地址已经达到50个,累计冻结资金超过4500万美元USDT。更值得关注的是,这50个地址并不是彼此孤立的风险地址。目前至少有22个地址与新币业务体系直接相关,其中包括新币担保业务地址、XPay相关地址,以及部分与新币存在业务往来的商户和关联地址。 也就是说,这一次发生的,可能已经不只是一次针对几个钱包地址的冻结。一个围绕担保、支付、商户和资金结算形成的业务网络,正在逐步暴露在链上风险之下。而这,可能比“4500万USDT被冻结”本身,更值得关注。 #东南亚头条 #新币担保 #冻结4500万U ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➡持续关注博彩资讯 专注曝光 ➡投稿 & 商务 @fuyan…
🎉109👍99🔥82❤79😁78
博彩黑平台曝光: 888集团 澳门新葡京黑款5400元 存款2000元下注百家乐盈利到5400 提款被黑 大家小心吧 黑款也是奇葩理由 不能在别家注册游戏账号 在别家注册了账号就是违规 #博彩新闻 #888集团 #黑平台 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➡持续关注博彩资讯 专注曝光 ➡投稿 & 商务 @fuyanboss
🎉96😁92👍89❤87🔥80🥰1
博彩黑平台曝光: 曝光超凡国际,这个tg搜索就能弹出的超凡国际是个黑平台,我玩快一年了,就这个星期赢了一点钱,今天早晨提现,我之前都是用虚拟币,今天第一次用二维码提现,他们内部工作人员知道我信息和收款码,就扫了一块钱给我,二维码给我留言,说拉群转账,拉群之后我不相信他们身份,他说叫我登陆平台,可以直接给我后台封控,我登上去看结果真被封控了,然后我就相信他们,就骗我2700。钱不是问题,我玩他们平台这么长时间相信他们,他们平台现在连两千多都骗。不要相信超凡国际以及它的子品牌了。然后祝个位老板发财,不要被这些黑平台骗了。为什么说是超凡国际,因为我平时提款都是虚拟币,今天唯一用二维码,对面能刚好从我二维码联系到我,而且知道我提现金额和平台名字。第二就是:我提款时间刚刚也联系到我,然后我不相信他们,他们还能从后台封控我的会员账号。现在超凡国际以及它们所有平台都是黑平台 #博彩新闻 #超凡国际 #黑平台 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➡持续关…
🎉93👍92🔥91❤90😁82
博彩黑平台曝光: 事情经过是这样玩家领的588人民币冲同等特邀,打了三倍流水后余额29000咨询了客服充值了29000进去,又打了三十四万流水,经客服同意提现183900,一天一宿过去了,一开始说审核两小时内提现到账,后面说等厂商发注单核对,招商和老板都在线不读信息没有管事人出来说话就一个客服,不停的说着不好意思,玩家怕最后赔了夫人又折兵本金都被吞掉,便表示可以退还本金其余的都好说,现在没有可以商量,管事依旧不予理会,直到玩家打听到老板不理人却在包厢吸毒潇洒,气不过联系代理表示要曝光,这才引得平台所谓的老板刀总出面联系,协商解决,先出款29000本金,后续盈利部分出10万半年内付清,两三天内先给第一笔,到约定时间迟迟不做反应,先表示是小钱地址发过去后又变脸哭穷,道德绑架,表示不是不想给就是没钱而已,你没钱你为什么开设平台为什么接受人充值打?是输了就算了赢了就告诉人家没钱出不起? 老板随即表示代理薅平台特邀彩金,拿不出任何证据,随…
🔥101😁96🎉92❤86👍71
博彩黑平台曝光: BET365黑盘口已各种理由拒绝出款,开始说注单异常罚8000流水,后面流水打够了,在次提款又说注单正常还要检测又要我打24000流水。大家注意这盘口不管赢了多少钱都不能出款,妥妥的杀猪盘。网址是798me #博彩新闻 #798me #黑平台 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➡持续关注博彩资讯 专注曝光 ➡投稿 & 商务 @fuyanboss
🔥98🎉96❤90😁87👍79
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @uuuuuf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 67 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“博彩黑平台曝光🔍” (@uuuuuf), 244,570 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uuuuuf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.