Channel
@hyxw6
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
83,736subscribers
+49,936 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002175815388 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hyxw6 |
| Description | ✅迪拜新闻头条，疑难杂症来问我 ✅本频道只负责相关发布信息，真假自行甄别！ ✅为全球华人分享迪拜文化，一起看最美的迪拜！ 投稿、合作： @feihang |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hyxw6 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 83,736 | -28 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:02 | 83,764 | -8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 83,772 | -15 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:15 | 83,787 | -41 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 83,828 | -26 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 83,854 | +182 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 83,672 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:27 | 83,684 | -37 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:12 | 83,721 | -20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 83,741 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 83,751 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 83,767 | -21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 83,788 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 83,797 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 83,800 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 83,812 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 83,825 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 83,842 | -28 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 83,870 | -20 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 83,890 | first reading |
1,218 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 809 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,218 (8 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 681,276 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 23:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 256 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎉 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
勇闯东南亚之狗推重生 你不出去闯，不出去认识人，整天下班后窝在家里刷视频，守着自己那一亩三分地，日子看似安稳，其实是在慢慢把自己的路走窄。 这个世界上，很多机会并不是坐在家里等来的，而是你走出去、认识不同的人、接触不同的圈子之后，才一点点发现的。你不去尝试，就永远不知道自己还能做什么。 你可以没有背景，也可以暂时没有钱，但不能永远没有行动。真正改变一个人的，往往不是某一次突然的好运，而是你愿意踏出舒适圈，主动寻找机会，逼着自己成长。 想想父母，他们辛苦了一辈子，不是为了让你一直重复他们走过的路。如果你有能力让家里的生活好一点，就别把所有希望都寄托在“以后再说”上。 人这一辈子，怕的不是起点低，而是明明知道自己不甘心，却每天重复着同样的生活。趁年轻，多出去看看，多认识人，多学点东西，多给自己几条路。你走出去的每一步，都可能成为改变以后生活的伏笔。 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowY…
#国内新闻 “消灾”骗局骗了12年 女子每月交5.5万累计被骗800余万元 9月21日，广东警方公布一起持续12年的诈骗案。深圳一名女子被亲戚以“通灵消灾、请高僧做法事”为由长期索要钱款，累计被骗800余万元。 嫌疑人黄某是受害人吴女士的亲戚。黄某利用吴女士担心孩子的心理，冒充“通灵人”，声称可以请高僧做法事消灾，每月向她索要5.5万元，还用“不继续交钱会遭反噬”等说法让她持续付款。 为了让吴女士相信，黄某还编造请来台湾法师等说法，声称共有4名“大师”帮她做法事。这场骗局持续12年，涉案金额超过800万元。 吴女士报警后，深圳警方联合福建漳州警方展开抓捕，将黄某抓获。警方随后追回全部800余万元被骗资金，并返还给吴女士。黄某已被依法采取刑事强制措施。 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料：@feihang
今年8月底，我在特区一家会所消费时认识了一名女子。当时她提出无需采取通常的安全措施，随后我们发生了性关系。 当天晚上休息期间，她联系了几名朋友来到现场，并声称我在未经她同意的情况下发生了无保护性行为。随后，在对方多人施压的情况下，我为了避免事情进一步扩大，最终支付了2万元人民币，双方当时私下进行了处理。 没想到大约半个月后，我发现自己的身体出现多处红色斑点，并伴有明显瘙痒。前往医院检查后，被告知感染了性传播疾病。至于感染的具体来源以及相关责任，还需要通过正规的医学检查和相关证据进一步确认。 这次经历也给我敲响了警钟。希望大家在外消费和发生亲密关系时，一定要提高安全意识，做好必要的防护，不要因为一时疏忽给自己带来身体和经济上的风险。 PS:梅逝的～ 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料：@feihang
洪森吐槽网络乞讨：有人找我索要数万美金 今晚，柬埔寨参议院主席洪森在社交媒体发文，表达对频繁收到私信索要钱财及求见消息的不满。 洪森透露，今天适逢孙辈满月，却收到近20条请求求见或资助的求助信息，有人甚至开口索要数万美元用于购房、买车及供子女出国留学，严重打扰其日常生活。 洪森强调，以往虽曾向贫困学生提供数百至数千美元的资助，但如今部分人的索求已远超合理范围，甚至频繁发信骚扰。他表示将清理并删除未经许可联系其账号的联系人，并呼吁公众保持边界感。 洪森指出，公开此事旨在制止愈演愈烈的乞讨风气。他同时表达了对无法安排私下会面者的歉意，并呼吁公众切勿继续发送无关信息。 原来我和将军一个待遇 都被人找着要钱？😄 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料：@feihang
#网友投稿：越南胡志明6郡Galaxy Truong Chin电影院，开启了专场，两对情侣组团来打野战了 推荐大家带着女朋友来这里加入战斗🤣 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料：@feihang
#网友爆料：前公司，公司名聚兴，坐标巴域木牌，盛世恒河三期。后搬到AI港，解散后现在位于马来西亚。 我先联系前公司股东兼代理，后听说他回国被抓，然后我便联系前公司老板天道。天道得知消息后，飞机直接弃用不上线。 这种行为让我感觉到非常的愤怒。本人在公司工作兢兢业业，做事从来不打马虎，没想到公司在解散之时背刺我，工资不发也罢，后带着我的客户跑去马来西亚开了几十万U，没给我一分钱。联系你也视而不见。 我希望你看见这个帖子后自己联系我，要不然下一步就会把你的资料、照片全部曝光，并发布给中国警方。 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料：@feihang
#网友投稿：打着鼎盛园区标识，一群女的蹂躏一个男的，这么会玩的吗，是道德的沦丧，还是人性的扭曲。 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料：@feihang
柴桢省警方捣毁巴域市一隐蔽网诈窝点 今天，柴桢省警方突查位于巴域市巴域分区的一处出租别墅。 行动中，警方成功破获该隐蔽网络诈骗窝点，抓获14名越南籍涉案人员（含6名女性），查获一体机电脑、CPU主机、显示器及手机等作案工具。 目前，涉案人员及物证已移交柴桢省警察局科技犯罪打击局处理，涉案别墅已被依法临时封锁。 这两天开反诈大会 警方抓到诈骗犯额外重奖 你们咋顶风作案呢～～ 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料：@feihang
菲律宾警方屏蔽2个涉嫌传播暴力内容的网站 菲律宾国家警察（PNP）9月21日表示，已协调国家电信委员会（NTC），在菲律宾境内屏蔽2个涉嫌传播现实暴力、性侵及网络诱骗内容的网站。 PNP称，警方调查发现，部分线上平台可能与诱导年轻人参与危险行为有关，相关内容可能从网络上的“任务”逐步发展为现实暴力。 由于涉及网站名称可能进一步增加平台曝光和流量，警方暂未公开具体名称。按照菲律宾《 #网络犯罪预防法》，网站封锁需依法取得法院命令。 此次行动发生在近期多起校园暴力事件受到关注之际。PNP同时提醒家长、学校和社区，加强对未成年人网络活动的关注，并及时向警方报告可信的安全威胁。 #菲律宾网络监管 #暴力网站封禁 #网络安全资讯 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料：@feihang
手握日月摘赏金，世间无我这般人。 赌天赌地何人挡，贸然一人弑PG。 血路凋零残花亡，再持神印杀四方。 怀古烁今无人敌，九字真言口中哧。 脚踏星河行万里，诸般控制奈我何。 欲登凌霄傲苍穹，俯瞰苍穹皆蝼蚁。 残躯镇世仍为皇，荒古至今我为尊。 世间万象皆可灭，唯我赌狗不死鸟。 一念起兮风云变，一手落兮天地惊。 输尽千金心不死，赢来万贯笑苍生。 左手香烟烧岁月，右手筹码定乾坤。 纵使满盘皆败局，我亦提刀再入门。 曾踏深渊无人问，归来依旧少年身。 三分天命七分赌，剩下全靠硬撑魂。 若问此生何所惧，输过输赢又何妨。 江湖路远风浪恶，赌狗一生不低头。 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料：@feihang
道长今天没算出有血光之灾🤓🤓 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料：@feihang
#群友投稿：你总是急着赚大钱，急着翻身，急着在十九二十岁的年纪，就在东南亚挣到别人几辈子都不敢想的钱。 刚出国的时候，总觉得这里遍地都是机会，工资几千美金，吃顿饭几百块，住着高档公寓，身边的人一个个都说自己赚了多少、买了什么、准备什么时候回国。 你看着别人晒出来的光鲜亮丽，心里开始发慌。怕自己赚得不够多，怕自己混得不够好，怕再不拼命，就真的被时代甩在后面。 于是你换了一个又一个国家，缅甸去了，柬埔寨去了，泰国去了，马来西亚也待过。白天想着怎么赚钱，晚上想着怎么翻身，手里握着手机，脑子里全是U、工资、提成和下个月的目标。 可你有没有想过，你其实也才刚刚开始。 你之所以这么累，不是因为你不够努力，而是因为你太早就背上了“必须成功”的枷锁。 总觉得二十岁就应该赚到第一桶金，二十五岁就应该买房买车，三十岁就应该功成名就。 可后来你才明白，东南亚的夜晚很长，路也很长。 有的人赚到了钱，有的人被骗光了，有的人回了国，有的人还…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,218 posts we hold for @hyxw6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“迪拜新闻头条” (@hyxw6), 83,736 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hyxw6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.