Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 缅甸新闻大事件

Channel

缅甸新闻大事件

@MB104

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

88,871subscribers

-786 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001877243169
TypeChannel
Username@MB104
Description👉缅甸新闻大事件,疑难杂症来问我 👉本频道只负责相关发布信息,真假自行甄别 ☎️曝光 悬赏 广告: @yantou 为全球华人分享缅甸文化,一起看最美的缅甸 Hello @Telegram My channel has not violated the rules and policy of using Telegram.
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held19
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MB104

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@MB104/101060 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC@uae918/863057 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC1.00under a minute
@MB104/101063 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC@uae918/863097 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC1.00under a minute
@MB104/101064 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC@uae918/863107 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC1.00under a minute
@MB104/101070 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC@uae918/863167 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC1.00under a minute
@MB104/101071 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC@uae918/863177 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC1.00under a minute
@MB104/101074 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC@uae918/863207 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@uae91816 (6/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (151)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @MB104 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

88,87196,96392,9177 August 2026 — 89,657 subscribers7 August 2026 — 89,657 subscribers8 August 2026 — 89,511 subscribers9 August 2026 — 96,963 subscribers10 August 2026 — 96,480 subscribers10 August 2026 — 96,016 subscribers12 August 2026 — 95,543 subscribers13 August 2026 — 95,348 subscribers14 August 2026 — 95,062 subscribers15 August 2026 — 94,734 subscribers17 August 2026 — 94,235 subscribers18 August 2026 — 93,862 subscribers19 August 2026 — 93,054 subscribers20 August 2026 — 89,748 subscribers21 August 2026 — 89,549 subscribers22 August 2026 — 89,355 subscribers24 August 2026 — 89,156 subscribers25 August 2026 — 88,977 subscribers26 August 2026 — 88,871 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
19 measurements spanning 19 days, net -786. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 87,657–98,177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 13:2288,871-106
25 Aug 2026, 13:2988,977-179
24 Aug 2026, 10:0289,156-199
22 Aug 2026, 19:2989,355-194
21 Aug 2026, 08:3789,549-199
20 Aug 2026, 10:0289,748-3,306
19 Aug 2026, 09:5293,054-808
18 Aug 2026, 09:2893,862-373
17 Aug 2026, 09:2894,235-499
15 Aug 2026, 20:1494,734-328
14 Aug 2026, 08:0695,062-286
13 Aug 2026, 02:2395,348-195
12 Aug 2026, 01:2295,543-473
10 Aug 2026, 22:3396,016-464
10 Aug 2026, 00:4296,480-483
9 Aug 2026, 03:5396,963+7,452
8 Aug 2026, 00:2289,511-146
7 Aug 2026, 17:1589,657no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:0789,657first reading

Engagement

589 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.08%
avg views ÷ 88,871 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,730
589 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
589
of 589 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held589 (7 August 202626 August 2026)
Views total1,610,298
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 00:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
60,900
Videos
11,300
Links
38,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 42m
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 194 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Advertising

Ad load
2.38%
14 of 589 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1,250
over 14 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,380
over 575 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Measured over the 589 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 26 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,910 viewsread 27 August 2026
AdvertisementVideo

【182体育】TG全网最大信誉台|千万无忧 东南亚顶级线上娱乐 🤪🤪🤪🤪 #东南亚盘总首选最权威综合人民币台 全网每月投流费用高达千万U 182体育无处不在 ⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩 1821575.com TG玩家首选人民币台 全球不限ip 不用实名绑卡手机号 🤩🤩🤩🤩 Y31193.com TG玩家首选U台 U存U提出款最稳 福利好返水无上限 #大户首选 支持任意平台vip等级平移,平台支持 USDT 👌微信 👌支付宝 K豆等100多种钱包,首复存均送每日存每日送。 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 😘182体育精彩爆奖时刻: 😫 大哥PG电子麻将胡单笔提1094万 😫 马来盘总极速糖果单笔提532万 😫 柬埔寨西港盘总麻将赢684万 😫 泰国老板麻将胡了提款615万 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ⚡️182体育欢迎各大老板盘总娱乐 #东南亚超高爆率电

26 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC345 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

#群友爆料:越南岘港皇冠赌场三楼明宇贵宾厅负责人陈前亮、冯书晴夫妻卷款跑路。 越南岘港皇冠赌场三楼明宇贵宾厅主负责人陈前亮,伙同其配偶冯书晴,利用赌场贵宾厅运营便利,恶意侵占本人资金,卷走本人共计2000万USDT(泰达币)后失联跑路。二人现已潜逃境外,下落不明。 二人长期以赌场贵宾厅资金周转、筹码兑换、代存资金为名义,取得本人信任。在完成资金接收后,蓄意转移全部资产,销毁联络方式,彻底失联,属于蓄意侵占他人财产的恶意诈骗行为。 该笔资金为本人合法个人资产,被二人非法侵占后,本人已蒙受巨大经济损失,家庭与个人生活遭受严重冲击。现全网通告二人身份信息,提醒所有在越南经商、务工、旅居的华人同胞警惕该二人,切勿与其产生任何资金往来,避免再次遭受财产损失。 同时,本人已整理全部转账记录、聊天凭证、往来单据,正式向国内公安经侦部门、越南当地警方报案,启动跨境追赃维权程序,必将追究二人全部法律责任,追查资金流向,绝不姑息。 也奉劝

26 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC345 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

#群友求助:跪求好心人转发!跪求绑匪手下留情! 我家人99,于本月24号凌晨1:22分,在柬埔寨西哈努克港离开蓝色海湾酒店后,不幸被人强行带走绑架。时至今日,已经失联许久,下落彻底不明,生死未卜。 这段时间里,我们一家人彻夜未眠、以泪洗面,整日活在无尽的恐惧和崩溃里。我们不知道他此刻身在何处,不知道他有没有挨饿受冻、有没有受到惊吓、有没有遭受委屈。一想到他孤身一人、孤立无援,在陌生的地方害怕、无助,我们的心就像被生生撕碎一样痛。 绑匪向我们索要了一笔高额赎金,这笔巨款对于我们普通的工薪家庭来说,简直就是天文数字。我们倾尽了家里所有的积蓄,四处低头借钱、四处求人求助,能想的办法全部想遍,能求的人全部求遍,早已负债累累、走投无路,实在没有任何能力承担后续的第二笔巨额赎金了。 我们只是最普通的老百姓,没有权势、没有财富,只有一颗想要他平安回家的真心。他年纪轻轻,性格善良乖巧,从来没有得罪过任何人,从来没有做过任何伤害别人的事情

26 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,670 viewsread 27 August 2026
Video

#巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡品第大楼被捕人员已启动遣返程序 🎬巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡品第大楼被捕人员已启动遣返程序,目前约有50余人已遣返回国。 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻事件 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+ozuMCipNLnA3NDQ1 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料:@yantou

26 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

#柬埔寨9月1日起5个省市严查交通违法 遵循洪玛耐总理的相关部署,柬埔寨警方将于9月1日启动严格交通执法,首批覆盖金边、西哈努克、实居、干拉、柴桢五省市。 目前金边日均至少1人死于交通事故,摩托事故占比80%、酒驾事故占比5%,本次行动重点整治摩托违规与酒驾问题,降低伤亡事故。 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻事件 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+ozuMCipNLnA3NDQ1 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料:@yantou

26 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC343 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

#网友曝光:这两个人,一开始对我和我一个哥挺好的,起初我感觉这两个人一个老实话说的直一些,叫做火龙,贵州口音(30岁的样子),还有一个是叫啊七,四川人口音叫火蛇,本来四个住一起也挺快乐的,我哪那时候不怎么喜欢说话,吹牛逼谈什么盘口啊,老板啊,玩大了在那跟我装社会,讲的很厉害,我提出要求见面解决当时你们两个拿着枪来找我的时候说拐弯到,拐个弯三十分钟,此人喜欢装逼,说狠话,此人有嫌疑卖人头去缅甸,当着我们的面问别人卖价格,也是人才.偷了什么东西,做了什么事情,太多太多,身上携带枪支弹药.偷东西,两个人互相假装发消息骗人钱。看到此人注意了 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻事件 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+ozuMCipNLnA3NDQ1 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料:@yantou

26 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 27 August 2026
AdvertisementVideo

【2028体育】TG全网最大信誉台|玩家首选 东南亚顶级线上娱乐 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ #东南亚盘总首选最权威综合人民币台 集团耗资2亿美金 打造全网最牛逼的线上娱乐平台。⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️ 🤩🤩❤️🤩 2028725.com TG玩家首选人民币台 全球不限ip 不用实名绑卡手机号 ⭐🎰🤩🤩 8k3060.com TG玩家首选U台 U存U提出款最稳 福利好返水无上限 #大户首选 #ad 支持任意平台vip等级平移,平台支持 USDT 👌微信 👌支付宝 K豆等100多种钱包,首复存均送每日存每日送。 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 😘2028体育精彩爆奖时刻: 😫 泰国老板在PP麻将恭喜发财赢250万 😫 泰国盘总PP高爆奖星光公主豪炸532万 😫 西港极速糖果万倍高爆奖提款 858万 😫 缅甸大哥PG电子麻将1单笔提款2000万 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀

26 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

医院新生儿病房起火💔14 名婴儿没能活下来😭 巴基斯坦首都伊斯兰堡大型医院突发大火🔥 出事的是三楼新生儿病房,全是毫无自救能力的小宝宝! ⚠️起火原因:空调系统故障短路起火,浓烟瞬间灌满封闭病房 ☎️现场惨烈:一共 16 名新生儿,仅 1 人获救,14 名婴儿不幸遇难,9 人当场死亡,另外 5 人抢救无效离世 消防紧急赶到扑灭大火,全院病患紧急疏散。当地已经成立调查组彻查事故,追责消防安全隐患。 刚出生的小生命,还没好好看看世界,就葬送在设备故障引发的火情里 新生儿病房本应是最安全的地方,电器巡检、消防设施真的不能敷衍! #巴基斯坦医院火灾14名婴儿死亡 #伊斯兰堡医院火灾 #国际悲剧新闻 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻事件 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+ozuMCipNLnA3NDQ1 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料:@yantou

26 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC345 viewsread 27 August 2026
Video

#西藏泥石流 这是西藏的泥石流,瞬间全部毁灭,人根本来不及跑,这视频国内很多软件下架了 尼泊尔中国边境的热索瓦地区8月26日上午山洪泥石流。连接吉隆口岸的中方道路通信电力中断,有“重大人员伤亡、失联”。习大大指示李*批示,张国清率团赴现场。 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻事件 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+ozuMCipNLnA3NDQ1 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料:@yantou

26 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

7 万吨货轮孟加拉湾沉没 巴拿马籍散货船 “海洋赢家” 号,满载 7.12 万吨铁矿石, 近日 在孟加拉湾海域突发事故,船体急剧倾斜,仅 8 分钟就完全沉没环球网。船上共 24 名船员,20 名中国籍、3 名缅甸籍、1 名孟加拉籍,仅有 2 名中国船员被过路商船救起,剩余 22 人失踪,其中 18 名中国船员失联。 ⚠️船只从印度帕拉迪普港驶出,事发海域海况恶劣。印度海军、海岸警卫队出动舰艇飞机搜救,我国福建海事局成立协调搜救组,派遣船只赶赴现场参与搜寻,沉船具体原因暂未查明 #东南亚新闻 #18名中国船员失联 #货轮沉没 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻事件 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+ozuMCipNLnA3NDQ1 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料:@yantou

26 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

韩国济州岛发生安全警报 目前确认15人失踪,已发现4具尸体,韩国警方因处理最新案件失当而遭到大量批评。 有理论指向该地区可能存在一名连环杀手。 有人绘制了岛上失踪人员案件的地图。 一名当地人声称他们每周都会收到失踪人员警报。 #韩国新闻 #连环杀人案 #人员失踪 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻事件 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+ozuMCipNLnA3NDQ1 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料:@yantou

26 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 27 August 2026
Video

#菩萨省5号公路查电诈 一名柬埔寨网友发帖称,车牌号为“金边 2CC-1919”的车主到底是什么人?竟在半夜开车拦停路过民众的车辆,盘问车上的中国人是不是搞网络诈骗的,还称如果是搞网诈的“可以私下协商解决”。 随后他竟还声称“新法律不允许外国人沿路通行”,这难道符合规定吗? 该事件发生在菩萨省5号国道沿线。网友请上级部门协助调查核实,此人究竟是执法人人员还是假警察? 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻事件 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+ozuMCipNLnA3NDQ1 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料:@yantou

Showing the 12 most recent of 589 posts we hold for @MB104. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

迪拜新闻大事件
@uae918 · 96,411
#1
亚太新闻 | 缅甸新闻 | 东南亚新闻 | 爆料 | 吃瓜
@ygxw3 · 144,687
#2
东南亚大事件(热点新闻)
@dnyshijian · 10,003
#3
柬埔寨新闻大事件
@jpz9118 · 110,470
#4
新闻资讯
@BG_BG8 · 24,287
#5
越南新闻大事件
@VN704 · 64,255
#6
菲律宾新闻大事件
@flb608 · 109,944
#7
马来西亚新闻大事件
@mlxy458 · 40,273
#8
东南亚大事件
@bx666 · 476,141
#9
缅甸新闻|华人资讯曝光|myanmar news
@miandianhuarenzixun · 78,145
#10
东南亚大事件-聚焦时事 @TX100
@tx100 · 166,776
#11
东南亚 亚太妙瓦底大事件投稿爆料娱乐
@shijie9996 · 5,035
#12
缅甸新闻 | 华人心声
@Ytzs_News · 3,970
#13
东南亚新闻|斑马曝光|news
@Banma_xinwen · 95,675
#14
菲律宾 早贴新闻 @ZaoTiePH
@ZaoTiePH · 3,481
#15
东南亚新闻头条曝光🅥
@dny718 · 13,983
#16
缅甸新闻 ‖ 亚太新闻 ‖ 东南亚新闻
@cn789 · 20,170
#17
东南亚大事件
@kanxia · 476,053
#18
曝光频道
@baoguang_w · 37,464
#19
全网曝光|东南亚日记
@bbb1b · 359,770
#20
迪拜新闻🇦🇪
@dubaixinwen2 · 223,719
#21
亚太朋友圈/缅甸新闻/东南亚新闻
@uuuat · 131,734
#22
全网曝光|东南亚大事件
@dnysj · 207,856
#23
缅甸今日头条 | 缅甸新闻 - 爆料 - 生活频道
@Ru_Yi88 · 157,389
#24
柬埔寨大事件|曝光|新闻|西港|金边|吃瓜
@v3903 · 37,422
#25
东南亚爆料/吃瓜/悬赏
@dnyblcg · 1,557
#26
世界TG华人曝光吧吃瓜社🇨🇳
@BG576 · 471,829
#27
东南亚安危头条事件🅥
@AnWei08 · 52,957
#28
东南亚曝光/大事件
@dny099 · 57,933
#29
🇰🇭柬埔寨新闻【转转娱乐赞助】
@jianpuzhaiFBI · 8,626
#30
缅北悬赏通缉令(吃瓜)❖盈丰娱乐冠名🅥
@DNYTJL3 · 122,529
#31
博彩曝光【菲行者】菲律宾新闻/黑台曝光/东南亚大事件❤️❤️
@feixingzhe0 · 75,721
#32
东南亚新闻大事件曝光
@XJ_6666 · 17,558
#33
东南亚大事件曝料
@baoliaodashijian · 14,797
#34
刁哈哈的碎碎念
@jsanj · 1,093
#35
博度东南亚大事件 博彩行业资讯
@bodutt · 55,697
#36
🍉吃瓜中心&搞笑日常
@cggx33 · 61,377
#37
缅北悬赏通缉令(曝光)
@xinwen811 · 216,087
#38
东南亚曝光联播-缅甸
@dnygplm1 · 28,616
#39
华人大事件-吃瓜新闻
@baoguang821 · 61,406
#40
迪拜新闻|海豹资讯曝光|dubai news
@dibai_01 · 115,105
#41
东南亚挨打日记
@pyzcn · 224,996
#42
全球曝光求职
@AirdropVerifieSdss · 40,837
#43
㊙️缅北东南亚AK天眼查档
@TY110110 · 2,638
#44
马来西亚新闻|老挝越南|金三角曝光
@miandianxinwen0 · 94,079
#45
东南亚大事件/曝光头条
@dnybgtt · 56,246
#46
博度-东南亚曝光新闻
@bodu08 · 62,078
#47
今日头条 曝光频道
@jrttbg · 167,996
#48
迪拜黑料大曝光 独家冠名50.com钱包
@kk4568 · 106,418
#49
东南亚今日头条.
@mbhl1 · 2,518
#50
博民网官方曝光频道
@bominwang18 · 4,745
#51
菲律宾今日新闻|海豹资讯曝光|philippine news
@baoguang_123 · 116,846
#52
东南亚曝光社
@Aa090100 · 866
#53
东南亚狗推(吃瓜)
@MB_149 · 68,630
#54
柬埔寨西港大事件
@BG423 · 34,027
#55
菲律宾华人大事件
@ke5689 · 176,178
#56
东南亚缅甸妙瓦底新闻|大事件|曝光|吃瓜|悬赏令
@qq2023bg · 127,574
#57
中文安危曝光🌸海外华人日记
@tghuarenba · 49,018
#58
东南亚头条资讯
@dongnanyatoutiaozixun1 · 982
#59
曝光|新闻|大事件
@TGBG8888 · 71,344
#60
soso东南亚-百科🌍
@ab100 · 178,378
#61
缅北大事件@木姐吃瓜频道
@miandianxinwen2023515 · 15,997
#62
迪拜新闻|东南亚大事件|曝光群
@baoguang032 · 19,324
#63
【菲律宾新闻】最新爆光
@baoguang211 · 24,372
#64
东南亚头条吃瓜
@svipzz · 35,398
#65
东南亚大事件/曝光/园区抓捕通知
@bc7890 · 4,063
#66
博彩黑平台曝光🔍
@uuuuuf · 233,736
#67
东南亚大事件·news channel
@gejige · 113,055
#68
东南亚中文网
@miandianzhilv · 12,768
#69
迪拜新闻|华人资讯曝光|dubai news
@Dubaihuarenzixun · 71,746
#70
⚔️吃瓜曝光《缅北缅甸泰国》
@qqt13 · 195,304
#71
东南亚曝光吧⚠️吃瓜爆料
@baoguangba088 · 241,252
#72
全球华人大事件曝光
@qqhrdsjbg · 210,352
#73
东南亚BC热点新闻
@baoguangqun110 · 39,622
#74
菲律宾新闻头条
@hyxw2 · 75,135
#75

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

菲律宾新闻头条
@hyxw2 · 75,135
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 19 August 2026
迪拜新闻大事件
@uae918 · 96,411
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 August 2026
泰国新闻大事件
@th769 · 54,314
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
越南新闻大事件
@VN704 · 64,255
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026
马来西亚新闻|老挝越南|金三角曝光
@miandianxinwen0 · 94,079
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 17 August 2026
柬埔寨新闻大事件
@jpz9118 · 110,470
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
菲律宾新闻大事件
@flb608 · 109,944
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
迪拜新闻🇦🇪
@dubaixinwen2 · 223,719
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
全网曝光|东南亚大事件
@dnysj · 207,856
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 13 August 2026
缅甸新闻头条
@hyxw4 · 77,485
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 19 August 2026
东南亚缅甸妙瓦底新闻|大事件|曝光|吃瓜|悬赏令
@qq2023bg · 127,574
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 August 2026
迪拜新闻|海豹资讯曝光|dubai news
@dibai_01 · 115,105
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 15 August 2026
迪拜新闻头条
@hyxw6 · 83,812
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
缅甸新闻|华人资讯曝光|myanmar news
@miandianhuarenzixun · 78,145
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
🍉吃瓜中心&搞笑日常
@cggx33 · 61,377
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
菲律宾今日新闻|海豹资讯曝光|philippine news
@baoguang_123 · 116,846
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚缅北菲律宾迪拜大曝光|大事件|悬赏令
@dny2023dbg · 112,324
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
东南亚曝光(吃瓜)
@dongnanya108 · 168,889
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“缅甸新闻大事件” (@MB104), 88,871 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MB104.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.