Channel
@NN342
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39,814subscribers
-2,674 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001714045133 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NN342 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NN342 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 39,814 | -28 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:05 | 39,842 | -130 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:24 | 39,972 | -232 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 40,204 | -166 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 40,370 | -36 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 40,406 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 40,418 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 40,420 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 40,421 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 40,433 | -135 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 40,568 | -79 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 40,647 | -28 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 40,675 | -18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 40,693 | -39 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 40,732 | -252 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 40,984 | -295 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 41,279 | -176 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 41,455 | -88 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 41,543 | -308 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 41,851 | first reading |
558 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 558 (7 August 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 340,217 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 08:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 162 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
泰国游客拟可持边境通行证赴景栋旅游14天 缅甸方面正与相关部门协商，计划允许泰国清莱府美塞居民持绿色边境通行证，经大其力前往景栋旅游14天。 目前出入境、行政及安全等部门仍在讨论具体规定，最终政策尚未正式确定 若政策实施，游客可前往农东湖、玛哈穆尼寺、景栋市市场及罗衣姆等景点，体验当地文化和美食 当地人士认为，美塞—大其力—景栋旅游线路恢复后，有望带动酒店、餐饮、交通和商品贸易等行业。 分析人士指出，此举也可能是缅甸方面希望改善边境地区受诈骗、赌场及走私活动影响的形象，推动合法旅游经济发展的措施。^^ 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @NN342 投稿：@kn8n8
高盛预计人民币持续升值，五年后或升至5.5兑1美元 人民币今年以来累计升值约4%，成为表现较好的亚洲货币之一。高盛报告认为，这轮升值并非短期现象，中国决策者未来可能继续引导人民币稳步走强。 目前人民币汇率约为6..66元兑1美元。高盛预计，人民币未来每年可能升值3%至5%，美元兑人民币汇率将在2028年底降至6.0，2031年底进一步降至5.5。 按照这一预测计算，人民币未来五年的潜在升幅约为22.2%。不过，实际走势仍会受到经济增长、利率政策及国际贸易环境等因素影响。 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @NN342 投稿：@kn8n8
#泰国资讯 捕获马来西亚籍UFA网络“一级代理” 查获现金超1600万泰铢 发现涉嫌关联足球赛事直播侵权网站 泰国中央调查局（CIB）下属的技术犯罪打击局（TCSD）成功逮捕了一名48岁的马来西亚籍犯罪嫌疑人德克先生（MR. TECK）。作为UFA博彩网络的高级代理，该嫌犯主要负责招揽客户及利用加密货币进行洗钱。 此前，警方在对违法宣传在线赌博及通过“LiveScoreThai”网站侵权盗播国外足球赛事的案件进行深入调查后，循线追踪并将其抓获，现场查获现金超1600万泰铢。 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @NN342 投稿：@kn8n8
超400名印尼电诈人员滞留金边旧机场 呼吁使馆介入协助回国 柬媒报道，475名（含48名女性）因非法在柬从事网络诈骗的印尼籍人员，目前被集中安置于金边旧机场货运区临时居留点。 该批人员系柬政府此前打击电诈时自行脱离窝点并向印尼驻柬使馆求助者，大多缺乏护照、非法居留或无力购买机票。 据悉，印尼使馆此前曾协助提供膳食及通行文件，但自8月30日起因资金耗尽停止资助。滞留人员生活陷入困境，急切呼吁印尼政府及使馆协助办理旅行证件并安排回国。 印尼狗推再忍忍吧 印尼政府没预算了～～ 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @NN342 投稿：@kn8n8
#马来资讯 9月4日中午，马来西亚吉隆坡甲洞（Kepong）鱼塘附近，已经有警车和移民车抵达现场了，请大家提高警惕、注意安全。 附近从事相关工作或活动的人员，如果现在准备离开的话，最好尽快离开。。 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @NN342 投稿：@kn8n8
木牌双赢赌场继续搞电诈，3栋楼被封 9月3日，柴桢省执法人员突查巴域木牌的双赢赌场（Win Win）赌场及另外两处可疑地点。 警方检查赌场4栋建筑时发现，现场电力、监控、空调及网络仍在运行，大量桌椅被布置成办公区域，疑似用于网络诈骗活动。 警方随后暂时查封其中A2、B、C三栋楼，但未发现其他物证或违法行为。 另外两处民宅共有4名中国人、2名缅甸人及6名巴基斯坦人，所有人证件合法，警方称未发现他们涉及网络诈骗。 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @NN342 投稿：@kn8n8
柬埔寨就泰国军用直升机侵犯领空提出严正抗议 柬埔寨政府就泰国皇家空军直升机未经授权侵入柬领空提出严正抗议，指责其严重侵犯柬埔寨主权，违反国际法及双边协议。 通告显示，该直升机于9月3日侵入马德望省蒙多雷西县多恩国际口岸附近的柬领空约400米。柬方强调此举违反《芝加哥公约》及两国于2025年12月签署的联合声明，要求泰方立即停止此类行为，共同维护边境和平稳定。&& 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @NN342 投稿：@kn8n8
#网友投稿：刚刚西港红灯笼附近发生车祸，司机下车后跑路，跑进了帝豪国际ktv。 PS：估计又上头了 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @NN342 投稿：@kn8n8
#网友投稿 不按规矩早晚会送命 我们的队伍从西港赌场到吉隆坡赌场出码有大半年的时间，在吉隆坡这几个月见到的中国人确实是越来越多，也侧面反应了今年在东南亚缅老柬这些国家开盘的公司不好做，故而不少非法诈骗盘公司选择搬到了马来吉隆坡。 七月份一个之前在西港找我拿过码的小盘总老朋友他们公司也搬到了吉隆坡，八月份底他找到我在云顶打牌借了二十二万码的马币给他，输完后当场还了十六万给我，出于信任和之前在西港也有此类事情发生他都还清了给我，剩余的六万马币我们就商定好在九月一号他从他们公司分到红后再还我。 到一号中午这个小盘总联系我还钱因为在睡觉就没接到他的电话，他就先去了赌场等我，哪里知道他遇见了我一个同事被我同事一顿忽悠又跟我同事拿码在赌场输掉了，世人千万不要学这样的赌鬼。小盘总输掉后把他从我同事这里借的码是全部还了，就剩我的六万没有钱还了，我同事还跟这个小盘总担保说欠我的六万不要紧，我同事会跟我说再缓几天还，小盘总也如实全部告诉我了。…
#群友投稿：我13岁出社会，16岁去了越南。 这几年，我去过柬埔寨、马来西亚、泰国、缅甸。我把最好的青春交给了东南亚。我常常告诉我，没关系的。有些事，没有原因，没有道理。它发生了，我感受了，经历了，就是全部。 记得我刚到越南的时候，第一次看见美金，那时候还以为我来对了地方。后来才知道，广东变成了我很难回去的家乡。当我知道我一天花的钱，比我父母几个月花的都多，我会怀疑努力奋斗的意义。我改变不了他们的消费习惯，就说服自己，丰俭由人。 每天都有人跟我说严打，我经常跟他们说句话：高风险，高回报。说完，我都会去看东南亚太阳很大，白色耐晒，我也就没买过其他颜色的衣服。好像穿白的，人就没那么脏，心也没有那么脏了。 如果要写东南亚，你就不能写他的纸醉金迷。你应该写异国他乡的冷清和不讲人情的社会。你要勇闯东南亚，你就要学会适应动荡的环境，接受每个无法团聚的日子，以及独自漂泊的孤独。东南亚，让我活成一个随时跑路的人。我很少买东西，因为离开的…
#巴基斯坦资讯：拉瓦尔品第破获网络诈骗呼叫中心 28名嫌疑人落网 9月3日消息，巴基斯坦国家网络犯罪调查局（NCCIA）在拉瓦尔品第展开行动，成功捣毁一处涉嫌从事网络诈骗活动的呼叫中心，共逮捕28名嫌疑人，其中包括24名男性和4名女性。 据NCCIA介绍，该团伙涉嫌通过Telegram以及虚假Facebook账号开展网络诈骗活动，并利用网络平台与受害者取得联系。目前，案件仍在进一步调查之中，当局正对涉案人员及其组织网络展开深入追查。 调查人员表示，该诈骗网络疑似由一名中国籍男子负责运营，并被认为是该团伙的幕后主要运营人员。据称，该男子在执法部门展开突袭行动前逃离现场，目前仍在追捕之中。 NCCIA表示，执法部门正在进一步调查该男子与被捕嫌疑人之间的关系，以及该诈骗网络可能涉及的其他人员和资金流向，并将继续追查可能隐藏在幕后、负责组织和运营该网络的主要人员。 目前，案件仍处于调查阶段，相关嫌疑人的具体犯罪事实及责任，有待…
柴桢省巴域市严打网络诈骗 查获559名涉案外籍人员 今天，柴桢省初级法院检察官康苏法里主持跨部门会议，部署巴域市打诈及加强法治建设工作。 巴域市长报告显示，自6月4日至8月31日，当局开展公开行政检查，共清查255处公寓、酒店等据点，打击73处网络诈骗窝点，查获559名（女90人）涉电诈外籍人员，涉及9个国籍。检方及省领导要求各部门持续严查外籍人员入住情况，依法严惩网络犯罪。&& 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @NN342 投稿：@kn8n8
Showing the 12 most recent of 558 posts we hold for @NN342. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大事件 海外大事件 头条事件” (@NN342), 39,814 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NN342.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.