Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东南亚无小事

Channel

东南亚无小事

@dny558

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28,804subscribers

-1,131 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002480841681
TypeChannel
Username@dny558
Description📣 东南亚无小事 聚焦东南亚华人圈,揭秘灰产内幕,记录真实故事,追踪区域动态。 🌏 涵盖区域: #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #泰国 #缅甸 等 📬 功能板块: #爆料 #求助 #曝光,一应俱全 Public information channel. We follow Telegram community guidelines. 🔗 官网: dnywxs.com 🤖 投稿机器人: @LL111_1bot 东南亚无小事: @LL111
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dny558

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 30% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ll111/396977 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC@dny558/46267 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@ll111/396997 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC@dny558/46268 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC1.00under a minute
@ll111/397017 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC@dny558/46270 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@ll111/397027 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC@dny558/46271 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC1.00under a minute
@dny558/46274 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC@ll111/397057 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC1.00under a minute
@dny558/46276 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC@ll111/397077 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ll11110 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@ll111 (100)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 10 of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @dny558 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

28,80429,93529,369.57 August 2026 — 29,935 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,913 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,843 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,736 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,723 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,683 subscribers13 August 2026 — 29,574 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,501 subscribers16 August 2026 — 29,465 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,353 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29,252 subscribers19 August 2026 — 29,197 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,179 subscribers22 August 2026 — 29,164 subscribers24 August 2026 — 29,134 subscribers25 August 2026 — 29,103 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,064 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,060 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,053 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,044 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,022 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,924 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,862 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,824 subscribers3 September 2026 — 28,804 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 27 days, net -1,131. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,634–30,105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 21:5828,804-20
2 Sept 2026, 14:0528,824-38
1 Sept 2026, 11:4828,862-62
31 Aug 2026, 09:2528,924-98
30 Aug 2026, 06:1229,022-22
29 Aug 2026, 04:3529,044-9
28 Aug 2026, 06:5729,053-7
27 Aug 2026, 07:2529,060-4
26 Aug 2026, 07:5529,064-39
25 Aug 2026, 04:5829,103-31
24 Aug 2026, 00:1529,134-30
22 Aug 2026, 09:4529,164-15
20 Aug 2026, 22:1629,179-18
19 Aug 2026, 19:3629,197-55
18 Aug 2026, 16:4829,252-101
17 Aug 2026, 13:2429,353-112
16 Aug 2026, 02:3629,465-36
14 Aug 2026, 13:5729,501-73
13 Aug 2026, 03:3429,574-109
12 Aug 2026, 01:5229,683first reading

Engagement

660 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.294%
avg views ÷ 28,804 subscribers
Avg views / post
84.7
660 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
660
of 660 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 128 of 660 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held660 (7 August 20264 September 2026)
Views total55,871
Reactions total131
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Sept 2026, 12:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
38,700
Videos
8,180
Links
23,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 06m
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 187 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

131 reactions across 126 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12998.5%
🤡21.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 660 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 660 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTC16 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀 😀近亿域名价值 锚定品牌根基 😀百年雄心大计 建立长久信誉 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀新用户累计首周包赔突破1000万U 😀重磅福利投入,打造行业领先用户保障体系 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀NO钱包5000万U担保加持,雄厚实力护航,官网权威验证(NO.COM) 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀全球玩家信赖选择 平台实力持续领航 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀知名免费能量赞助商 @hu520 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀【9G.COM】 😀😀😀😀【@uu9g_bot】

4 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC29 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

🇨🇳陕西西安破特大行业内鬼电诈黑灰产案:41家公司伪装正规企业,查扣20万张手机卡 西安经开公安9月3日消息,警方于8月完成全链条攻坚,摧毁一条横跨陕粤多地、专为境外电诈团伙提供账号资源的特大黑灰产,该案是近年陕西省涉案卡量最大、行业内部人员参与层级最高的涉诈黑灰产案件。 这起案件的线索,源自一起163万余元虚假投资理财诈骗。8月9日接到受害者报警后,警方随即开展溯源工作,锁定电信业务经营者景某某具有重大作案嫌疑,并于当晚对其经营场所开展突击核查。现场核查发现,该团伙持有营业执照、经营许可、网站备案全套手续,对外呈现正规企业面貌,迷惑性极强。 经查,景某某实际控制41家企业。2026年1‑5月,从广东上线非法购入9500张手机卡,组织人员违规实名认证,私架接码设备抓取平台验证码,提取接码日志、跨境交割记录等证据,再把整套账号资源通过境外加密工具卖给境外诈骗团伙,用来开发诈骗引流APP。 陕粤两地警方同步收网,抓获景某某、

4 Sept 2026, 11:26 UTC38 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

🇨🇳 53名新加坡人涉传销在中国广西被捕 联合早报报道,中国警方在广西打击传销行动中逮捕52名新加坡公民,系近年来涉单一次事件海外被捕人数最多的一次。 新加坡外交部与警方于9月4日证实,驻华使领馆已3次探视被捕人员,新外交部兼内政部第二部长沈颖也已慰问多数家属并提供领事协助。 据悉,涉案传销或与打着“国家暗中支持”旗号的“1040阳光工程”有关。新方表示尊重中方司法主权,呼吁按法律正当程序处理,同时提醒公民警惕境外传销陷阱。 是在北海被抓的吧~~😄 ✅ 东南亚无小事 :@LL111 ✅ 投稿澄清爆料: @PP111

4 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC52 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

#国际新闻 拆是真拆……但看到的未必是全部?新报告质疑“水沟谷拆除行动” 缅甸军政府高调宣布的打击水沟谷(Shwe Kokko)电诈园区行动,可能并没有官方媒体极力呈现的那么简单直接。 缅甸调查机构“Myanmar Witness”于2026年8月10日发布了题为《水沟谷:备受审查的打击行动》(Shwe Kokko: A Crackdown Under Scrutiny)的最新报告。该报告通过地理定位(Geolocation)、卫星图像以及数字图像核验技术对拆除照片进行了对比分析,发现官方发布的信息与可核实证据之间存在多处“不一致”。 事情起于2026年5月25日,缅甸军政府在克伦民族军(KNA,前身为BGF)的支持下,开始对水沟谷的建筑进行拆除。官方声称共发现322处违法建筑,并选择拆除其中77处(57处使用重型机械拆除,20处使用炸药爆破)。 然而,当 Myanmar Witness 对证据进行逐一核对时,却发现了多

4 Sept 2026, 10:40 UTC49 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

特邦克蒙省警方回应“拦车找中国人”视频:配合追查网络诈骗逃犯 特邦克蒙省警察局发言人表示,警方近日开展的交通检查,是在打击网络诈骗犯罪行动中进行的。 当天,一段视频在社交媒体上流传。视频显示,交通警察拦下路上行驶的车辆,并询问车内是否有中国人,引发不少网友批评。 对此,特邦克蒙省警方作出说明: 第一,为什么拦车? 此次拦车检查属于特邦克蒙省行政统一指挥委员会联合相关部门开展的行动。8月27日,警方在波涅克雷县特拉彭普隆乡普雷帕村打击网络诈骗时,有外国嫌疑人从现场逃走,因此警方将相关车辆信息通报给沿线执勤人员,要求对目标车辆进行拦截检查。 第二,检查点是做什么的? 视频中的地点位于波涅克雷县贡康乡胡奇勒村,平时主要负责为领导出行疏导交通,同时负责交通事故应急处置,并协助预防和打击刑事犯罪、毒品犯罪等。 第三,并非随意拦车。 警方表示,当时只检查车辆品牌和颜色与此前获得的信息相符的车辆,拦车只是请求配合检查,不会进行罚款。

4 Sept 2026, 10:19 UTC64 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

#越南新闻 犯下重罪后想潜逃到越南?绝对是个糟糕至极的选择。 一名涉嫌在中国广西参与一起致人死亡袭击案的中国籍男子,据称非法越境逃往越南,企图躲避缉捕。 但他根本没走多远。 接到中方通报后,高平省警方在越中边境附近展开追踪,仅用 14 个小时就将其抓获归案。 9 月 2 日,这名 49 岁 的犯罪嫌疑人在理国社(Lý Quốc)潜逃时被发现,并于次日通过理万口岸(Lý Vạn)被移交给中国警方。 越境潜逃以为能销声匿迹, 14 个小时内就被查获, 随即被直接押解出境。 越南:旅游、生活和品尝美食的好去处;但显然,绝不是个藏匿逃亡的好地方。 ✅ 东南亚无小事 :@LL111 ✅ 投稿澄清爆料: @PP111

4 Sept 2026, 09:48 UTC72 viewsread 4 September 2026
Video

#网友投稿:刚才在宿舍上厕所,刚要脱裤子,猛然看见蹲坑里面窜出来一条辣条,幸亏我刚才没玩手机,正好看见了,不然今天少说要被咬掉一个蛋! 最近柬埔寨正值雨季,雨水淹没野外巢穴,致使蛇类频繁出没。蛇会顺着民房下水道、排水管道钻进卫生间,住在本地人自建房打野的兄弟们,上厕所前务必先看一眼蹲坑! Ps:祖宗保佑啊 差点断了香火😂 ✅ 东南亚无小事 :@LL111 ✅ 投稿澄清爆料: @PP111

4 Sept 2026, 09:30 UTC81 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

#网友投稿:刚刚在西港骑摩托车,被交警拦下,一看我戴头盔了,就查驾照,说没有驾照,罚款500$...他妈的,专查中国人,本地人一个也不查! ✅ 东南亚无小事 :@LL111 ✅ 投稿澄清爆料: @PP111

4 Sept 2026, 09:11 UTC80 viewsread 4 September 2026
Video

一位柬埔寨本地司机的吐槽: 柬埔寨交通警察一伸手就问是不是载了中国人,得知载的是柬埔寨人后,就说:“那没事了,兄弟走吧”🤣 👉 这就是所谓的依法执勤吗???? 难道只要载中国人就统统算违法?我真是百思不得其解?? 你一个本地人, 按道理应该熟悉国情 装什么外宾? ✅ 东南亚无小事 :@LL111 ✅ 投稿澄清爆料: @PP111

4 Sept 2026, 08:57 UTC79 viewsread 4 September 2026
Video

#网友投稿 🇰🇭西港“蓝色海湾”正在搬家,估计是收到风声了,现在才开始撤离,看来这次西港是真的要翻天了。 ✅ 东南亚无小事 :@LL111 ✅ 投稿澄清爆料: @PP111

4 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC74 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

#柬埔寨资讯 干拉省省长下令关闭5家偷偷经营非法网络赌博的赌场,限9月底前停止 干拉省省长高其春下令,位于勒克代克县和萨姆佩奥蓬市的5家赌场,如果存在偷偷经营非法网络赌博业务的情况,必须在2026年9月底前彻底停止相关活动。 这项命令于9月3日下午在干拉省政府举行的一场会议上作出,当地政府、相关部门以及5家赌场的代表参加了会议。 省长强调,必须严厉打击各种形式的非法赌博,尤其是网络赌博,以维护当地治安、社会秩序以及民众生活。 最后期限定为2026年9月30日。从10月1日起,相关部门将直接对这些赌场进行检查,并依法处理,不再给予任何宽限。今后,干拉省的赌场只允许接待亲自到场的客人,不得经营网络下注业务。 高其春同时要求勒克代克县、萨姆佩奥蓬市以及各级执法部门持续跟进和搜集信息,确保9月底之后,干拉省成为一个没有网络赌博活动的示范省份。 此次严厉执法,旨在维护公共秩序,改善当地社会环境和民众生活。 ✅ 东南亚无小事

4 Sept 2026, 08:31 UTC78 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

泰国游客拟可持边境通行证赴景栋旅游14天 缅甸方面正与相关部门协商,计划允许泰国清莱府美塞居民持绿色边境通行证,经大其力前往景栋旅游14天。 目前出入境、行政及安全等部门仍在讨论具体规定,最终政策尚未正式确定 若政策实施,游客可前往农东湖、玛哈穆尼寺、景栋市市场及罗衣姆等景点,体验当地文化和美食 当地人士认为,美塞—大其力—景栋旅游线路恢复后,有望带动酒店、餐饮、交通和商品贸易等行业。 分析人士指出,此举也可能是缅甸方面希望改善边境地区受诈骗、赌场及走私活动影响的形象,推动合法旅游经济发展的措施。 ✅ 东南亚无小事 :@LL111 ✅ 投稿澄清爆料: @PP111

Showing the 12 most recent of 660 posts we hold for @dny558. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东南亚无小事” (@dny558), 28,804 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dny558.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.