National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 14 days, net +5,749. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79,040–109,322 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 07:04
105,828
+2,093
26 Aug 2026, 08:04
103,735
+2,274
25 Aug 2026, 07:34
101,461
+7,451
24 Aug 2026, 09:56
94,010
-556
22 Aug 2026, 17:44
94,566
+1,918
21 Aug 2026, 05:39
92,648
+7,985
20 Aug 2026, 05:34
84,663
+495
19 Aug 2026, 02:45
84,168
+992
17 Aug 2026, 23:13
83,176
+642
16 Aug 2026, 20:48
82,534
-4,545
15 Aug 2026, 14:28
87,079
-5,350
14 Aug 2026, 01:28
92,429
-7,650
13 Aug 2026, 02:02
100,079
first reading
Engagement
277 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.63%
avg views ÷ 105,828 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,840
271 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.632%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
277
of 277 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
277 (12 August 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
1,041,429
Reactions total
6,578
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,000
Videos
≈1,910
Links
≈4,170
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 24m
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 120 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,578 reactions across 271 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,358
20.6%
🎉
1,345
20.4%
🔥
1,341
20.4%
👍
1,270
19.3%
👏
1,264
19.2%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 271 of the 277 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,578reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 277 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Showing the 12 most recent of 277 posts we hold for @TTDR8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@TTDR8 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@jvip8888 named in 3 posts, 25 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
全球|大事件|新闻|曝光|吃瓜 @bgtjt · 70,669 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
东南亚新闻头条|东南亚热点资讯 @jiandan8884 · 123,236 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 13 August 2026
东南亚头条|悬赏曝光 @QQ888880000 · 94,884 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
全球大事件曝光❖东南亚吃瓜新闻 @dsj665 · 114,393 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
迪拜新闻大事件-马来西亚华人吃瓜 @dnyuuu88 · 133,166 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚华人新闻曝光 @bgdsj26 · 123,908 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚曝光-新闻快报-吃瓜-悬赏 @dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 54,862 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
东南亚华人漂泊日记-柬埔寨大事件曝光 @GGooGG66 · 142,125 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
全球华人新闻吃瓜头条大曝光 @dnyqqbj · 115,457 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚大事件-曝光-黑料 @DNYzzz6 · 58,798 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
今日东南亚大事件曝光-悬赏 @jrdnyxs · 58,609 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
菲律宾大事件-东南亚曝光吃瓜记 @bx66664 · 145,342 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
东南亚大事件曝光 @cc199 · 68,233 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
东南亚吃瓜日记 @dynnn · 129,101 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 13 August 2026
东南亚新闻-通缉-曝光社🌏 @dnyxinwen668 · 60,506 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
🎖东南亚曝光悬赏通缉🎖【9y.com冠名】 @dny88 · 62,137 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
东南亚骗子曝光吧 @pianzi1 · 56,560 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
东南亚柬埔寨菲律宾华人新闻骗子曝光 @db2023dbg · 120,883 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“柬埔寨新闻头条【体育资讯】” (@TTDR8), 105,828 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TTDR8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.