亚美尼亚警方展开大规模突袭!65处地点遭搜查,36人卷入重大经济犯罪调查,知名商人被捕 11月5日,据亚美尼亚媒体报道,亚美尼亚调查委员会于11月4日针对电力企业“亚美尼亚电力网络公司”(Electric Networks of Armenia,简称ENA)涉嫌重大经济犯罪一案,展开大规模执法行动。 此次行动涉及首都埃里温及其他地区,执法人员同步搜查65处地点,包括住宅、企业办公室及相关人员经营场所。案件共涉及36名被刑事追诉人员,其中包括知名商人、Tashir集团创始人萨姆韦尔·卡拉佩强(Samvel Karapetyan)。 调查人员指控,相关人员涉嫌滥用职权、侵占受托管理的财产以及大规模洗钱,并通过关联企业资金往来、商业交易及其他方式转移和掩盖资金。 根据调查委员会公布的数据,此案涉嫌造成的经济损失超过645.85亿亚美尼亚德拉姆,约合1.8亿美元。 其中,萨姆韦尔·卡拉佩强已于11月4日被捕。11月5日,法院裁…

Channel
东南亚大曝光-悬赏-骗子频道
@gzhrsb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
44,997subscribers
+15,065 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001449309096 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gzhrsb |
| Description | 东南亚行走指南-揭秘大事件-寻人-悬赏-曝光 #东南亚 #马来西亚 #越南 #老挝 #缅北 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #迪拜 #泰国 #曝光 #悬赏 ✍🏻投稿/爆料/悬赏/商务合作: @DNYnn911 欢迎大家订阅,频道内容发布均为投稿,揭露事实,曝光真相! |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 53 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gzhrsb |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 00:10 | 44,997 | -240 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 01:20 | 45,237 | -103 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:26 | 45,340 | -137 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:29 | 45,477 | -72 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:51 | 45,549 | +654 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:00 | 44,895 | -449 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 45,344 | -761 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 46,105 | +376 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 20:09 | 45,729 | -556 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 46,285 | +1,376 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 44,909 | -892 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:00 | 45,801 | -367 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:15 | 46,168 | +1,044 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:38 | 45,124 | +2,563 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:18 | 42,561 | -747 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:57 | 43,308 | -907 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 44,215 | -454 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:26 | 44,669 | -42 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:08 | 44,711 | +2,369 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:07 | 42,342 | first reading |
Engagement
555 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 172 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.29%
- avg views ÷ 44,997 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,830
- 193 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 5.80%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 193
- of 555 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 91 of 193 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 555 (8 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 545,856 |
| Reactions total | 3,500 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 06:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11,000
- Videos
- ≈1,700
- Links
- ≈5,850
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 23m
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 141 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,349 reactions across 262 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.42% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😈 | 881 | 9.42% | |
| 👎 | 863 | 9.23% | |
| 💔 | 856 | 9.16% | |
| 🤬 | 846 | 9.05% | |
| 🍌 | 845 | 9.04% | |
| 💩 | 831 | 8.89% | |
| 🖕 | 823 | 8.80% | |
| 🥱 | 821 | 8.78% | |
| 🤮 | 812 | 8.69% | |
| 😡 | 811 | 8.67% | |
| 😢 | 776 | 8.30% | |
| 👍 | 46 | 0.492% | |
| 🥰 | 25 | 0.267% | |
| ⚡ | 22 | 0.235% | |
| 🎉 | 21 | 0.225% | |
| 🤩 | 19 | 0.203% | |
| 👏 | 18 | 0.193% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 0.16% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 0.128% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 0.064% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 262 of the 555 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,349 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 555 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 193 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#泰国资讯::泰老警方联手打击跨国电诈团伙,32人遭签发逮捕令,17名嫌疑人落网 11月5日,泰国网络安全警察分局(ACSC)宣布,成功破获一起涉及泰国与老挝的跨国电信诈骗案件,共有32名嫌疑人被法院签发逮捕令,目前已有17人被警方抓获。 据泰国警方通报,此案源于老挝波乔省(Bokeo)警方此前开展的打击网络诈骗行动。老挝警方在顿蓬县(Ton Pheung)查获相关诈骗人员及作案设备后,将案件线索移交泰国方面,双方随后展开跨境警务合作。 调查发现,该犯罪团伙组织严密、分工明确,长期利用境外窝点实施电话诈骗。团伙成员首先冒充移动通信运营商工作人员,谎称受害人的电话号码涉嫌违法犯罪,随后将电话转接给冒充普吉府市警局警察的诈骗人员。 诈骗人员通过LINE视频通话与受害者联系,穿着类似警察制服的服装,并使用伪造的政府文件、法院命令及银行账户资料,制造受害人涉嫌犯罪的假象,进一步威胁恐吓受害人,要求将资金转入指定的傀儡账户。 泰…
#群友投稿:昨晚西港某会所发生一起令人气愤的事件。会所消费后拒不付款,竟然还抢走小妹手机和现金! 两名男的来到会所,点了一名女工作人员提供服务。双方按照约定进行消费,结束后,对方却拒绝支付相关费用。 更过分的是,对方不仅不给钱,还涉嫌将小妹的手机及身上现金全部抢走!现在柬埔寨真的是做到了四个人都想跑路跑单 妹妹工作也不容易你们就想跑路,你也跟我说一下 消费可以协商,费用可以沟通,但消费后拒不付款,甚至涉嫌抢夺他人财物,这种行为已经严重影响工作人员的人身及财产安全。 现将此事公开曝光,希望知情人士提供线索,也提醒东南亚各地会所及从业人员提高警惕,避免类似事情再次发生。 希望当事人能够站出来说明情况,也希望涉事人员尽快妥善处理此事! 订阅 全球通缉-曝光-悬赏-骗子频道 ↓ 👉 https://t.me/gzhrsb ☎️投稿爆料,商务合作:@DNYnn911
💩7👎5💔5😡5🤬4😈4🤮3😢3
西港警方昨晚继续夜查 昨晚,西港警方出动武器弹药管理、抗毒品、交通、刑警及特警等多个部门开展联合行动,在西哈努克市主要公共道路实施严格查缉,重点排查非法枪支弹药及各类违法犯罪行为。 订阅 全球通缉-曝光-悬赏-骗子频道 ↓ 👉 https://t.me/gzhrsb ☎️投稿爆料,商务合作:@DNYnn911
🥱8😈6🖕4🤬4🍌3💔3💩3🤮3
昨晚西港枪击案发生后, 苏诺塔坐镇现场指挥, 连夜破案,3名凶徒悉数被抓。 警察一如惯常,微笑着和凶徒们合影, 脸上洋溢着破案的喜悦~~ 遭枪击的中国女子, 状态似乎不错, 在急救室里面还可以玩手机 经此一役,如大难不死 也算在西港立了棍儿 毕竟,在西港遭枪打而不死 还是一位女子 怎么着 也得分得点江湖地位~~ 订阅 全球通缉-曝光-悬赏-骗子频道 ↓ 👉 https://t.me/gzhrsb ☎️投稿爆料,商务合作:@DNYnn911
#国内资讯:山西太原“最稳取现车队”覆灭 9人落网 山西太原警方近日打掉一个号称“最稳、最安全、最快”的取现团伙。该团伙专门为诈骗、违法资金转账取现、走流水,被称作“取现车队”。 此次行动共有9人落网,其中6人被刑拘、2人被捕、1人被行政处罚。 所谓“稳”,并不是真的安全,而是帮违法犯罪资金过账洗白。帮人转账、取现、走流水均属违法犯罪,再好听的名头也逃不过法律制裁。 订阅 全球通缉-曝光-悬赏-骗子频道 ↓ 👉 https://t.me/gzhrsb ☎️投稿爆料,商务合作:@DNYnn911
💩5😡5🖕4🤮4😈4💔3🤬3🍌2
#网友反馈:西港红灯笼赌场目前正在检查,宪兵在门口守着,门口停了好几辆警车。 订阅 全球通缉-曝光-悬赏-骗子频道 ↓ 👉 https://t.me/gzhrsb ☎️投稿爆料,商务合作:@DNYnn911
#马来西亚资讯:砂拉越诗巫街头发生持械追车砸车事件,4名男子被捕,延扣3天助查 11月4日,马来西亚砂拉越州诗巫(Sibu)警方通报,当地发生一起街头追车及持械砸车事件。4名年龄介于26岁至36岁的本地男子涉嫌参与,目前已被警方逮捕,并被带往法庭申请延扣3天,以协助调查。 据了解,事件发生于11月3日,地点位于诗巫林开臻路一带。当天,4名男子乘坐一辆轿车前往兰岛邦章探访朋友,途中发现一辆停在路旁的银色Perodua Axia轿车,并怀疑该车曾多次出现在其中一名嫌疑人的住家附近。 随后,4名男子下车靠近该轿车,试图查看车内情况。不料,银色轿车司机倒车时撞上嫌疑人所乘坐的车辆,随后立即加速逃离。 4名男子随即驾车追赶,直至一处交通灯路口追上该车,并使用石块等物品砸毁车辆。其中一名嫌疑人承认曾用石块击打司机一侧的后视镜,另一人则砸碎轿车挡风玻璃。 诗巫警区主任阿邦再纳阿比丁(Abang Zainal Abidin Abang…
👎6😢6💔4🖕4🥱4😈4😡4🤬3
#网友投稿 #曝光杀猪盘 #乐邦体育 #黑款5966 前几个月狗代介绍来到这个叫乐邦体育玩,打的百家乐,刚开始玩输赢不大,也都正常出款了,昨天和今天一直在玩,处于盈利状态,玩了几个月赢利了一万来块吧,结果在今天凌晨充值5000提现5966一直不到账,问客服就是审核,问狗代就是无了,玩的乐邦百家乐和买的pg电子乐邦电子免费游戏,垃圾平台,还好没充值多 订阅 全球通缉-曝光-悬赏-骗子频道 ↓ 👉 https://t.me/gzhrsb ☎️投稿爆料,商务合作:@DNYnn911
😈7😢7🥱5💔4💩4🖕4👎3🍌2
凿墙、暗门、铁梯、幼儿园招牌——巴域木牌这两处电诈窝点,伪装得够深,还是被端了。 11月3日下午,柴桢省副省长孟英带队,多部门联合执法组突袭巴域市达包村两处窝点,查获26名中国籍嫌犯及2名柬埔寨籍清洁工,缴获笔记本电脑、一体机、数十部手机及车辆。 第一处以餐馆和旅馆为掩护,内部凿穿洗手间墙壁打通密道,备铁梯随时翻墙;第二处更绝,以幼儿园和酒店作招牌,用衣柜当暗门,后墙还设了“暗号逃生点”。骗局藏在孩子读书的地方背后,连逃跑路线都提前设计好——这不是临时窝点,是精心布置的“诈骗堡垒”。 伪装越精巧,查处越彻底。 幼儿园不是护身符,密道也通不过法网。目前所有嫌犯及物证已移交柴桢省警察局网络犯罪部门依法处理。藏得再深,深不过一次突击;跑得再快,快不过一副手铐。 订阅 全球通缉-曝光-悬赏-骗子频道 ↓ 👉 https://t.me/gzhrsb ☎️投稿爆料,商务合作:@DNYnn911
#菲律宾资讯:甲美地省警方围剿武装抢劫团伙,枪战击毙5人,2名嫌犯在逃 11月3日下午,菲律宾甲美地省描科沃市(Bacoor)发生一起警匪枪战事件。警方根据情报,对一个涉嫌策划入室抢劫的武装犯罪团伙展开围剿,双方在追车过程中多次交火,最终造成5名嫌疑人死亡,另有2人逃脱。 据警方通报,11月3日下午约1时,警方接获情报,称一伙武装人员计划闯入甲美地省Town and Country住宅区,对一名黄金交易商及当地富商实施抢劫。 警方随后部署情报人员、特警及巡逻警力展开监控。调查发现,嫌疑人分别乘坐摩托车及丰田Vios轿车活动,其中一人涉嫌穿着保安制服,试图伪装成小区保安进入住宅区踩点,但其服装与小区正规保安制服不符,引起警卫怀疑。 警方尝试拦截检查时,嫌疑人突然开枪,击中一辆警车,随后驾车逃窜,双方展开高速追逐,最终在Molino高架桥一带发生激烈枪战。 追捕过程中,嫌疑车辆失控翻覆,车内两名嫌疑人死亡。随后,部分嫌疑人…
#马来西亚资讯:吉打警方捣毁7个网络诈骗中心,87人落网,荒废酒店及度假村成据点 11月4日消息,吉打警方称,今年1月至10月间展开多项行动,捣毁7个网络诈骗中心及诈骗集团,逮捕87人。 州总警长阿兹里(Datuk Adzli Abu Shah)表示,被捕者包括27名马来西亚人、33名巴基斯坦人、15名中国人、8名印度人及4名孟加拉人,其中75男、12女。 调查发现,集团改租店屋、荒废酒店和经营不善的度假村设点,利用通讯及科技设备进行跨境诈骗。部分场所也用作成员住处,以减少外界察觉。 诈骗手法包括滥用银行交易、虚假网上万字投注、爱情诈骗、假招聘及冒充执法人员电话行骗。 警方起获手机、电脑、数据机、路由器、提款卡、预付卡、SIM卡、显示器及两套执法制服等,估值约30万令吉。 集团目标除马来西亚民众外,还包括泰国、日本、中国、澳大利亚、印度及孟加拉等地,涉及跨国犯罪网络。 警方表示,涉及本地受害者的案件可援引刑事法典第…
Showing the 12 most recent of 555 posts we hold for @gzhrsb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 8 posts on @gzhrsb as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 1 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 3 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 27 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 3
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@TTDR8 · 98,790
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@QQ888880000 · 97,938
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
@bgtjt · 103,999
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
@dsj665 · 119,135
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@dnyqqbj · 90,281
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大曝光-悬赏-骗子频道” (@gzhrsb), 44,997 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gzhrsb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.