⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 😀😀😀😀😀😀 ➡️ 全网已押千万u点击传送门 👈 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️数字网投领导者! ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 始终坚持“用户至上,信誉为本”的运营理念,力求为玩家带来公平公正、真实专业的高品质游戏竞技,让你体验顶级博彩乐趣! 【🇺🇦:🇺🇦😻🤔🥴🤧😷👿,创造人生新财富!】 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 顶级博彩娱乐尽在⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🙄😶😄😶 😀全网诚邀:个人代理,SEO,技术/劫持/主播/推广团队,最高顶级福利待遇。😀 💎代理扶持计划 😀 会员注册即可申请赠送彩金【18u-888u】 😀 新人首存即可申请首存百…

Channel
全球华人新闻吃瓜头条大曝光
@dnyqqbj
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
121,897subscribers
+8,845 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001177631396 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dnyqqbj |
| Description | 本群内容:🏆曝光频道🏆 广告投放 投诉建议 🌈🌈🌈请联系: @Xcss_59 🌈曝光信息一定要真实。我们也没办法去调查信息的真假。如果有误联系管理就行。请不要纠结我们。谢谢 ⚠️频道广告不作担保,上门探访过属于担保,如有担保会进行备注:认证广告!!! |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dnyqqbj |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 121,897 | +5,268 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 116,629 | -312 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 116,941 | +2,970 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 113,971 | +2,953 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 111,018 | -471 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 111,489 | -2,841 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 114,330 | -286 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 114,616 | -126 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:24 | 114,742 | -174 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:46 | 114,916 | -132 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 115,048 | -110 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 115,158 | -140 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 115,298 | -125 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 115,423 | -34 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 115,457 | -135 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 115,592 | -310 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 115,902 | -217 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 116,119 | -155 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 116,274 | -130 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 116,404 | first reading |
Engagement
695 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.47%
- avg views ÷ 121,897 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,450
- 492 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.023%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 492
- of 695 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 79 of 492 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 695 (12 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,680,424 |
| Reactions total | 86 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 20:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈19,900
- Videos
- ≈2,180
- Links
- ≈1,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 57m
- Average length
- 45s
Measured directly from 314 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
95 reactions across 88 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 26.3% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 12.6% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 10.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 7.37% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 7.37% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 7.37% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 6.32% | |
| 🍌 | 5 | 5.26% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 4.21% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 4.21% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 3.16% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.16% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.05% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 695 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 695 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
泰国议员质疑封锁缅甸边境通信能否真正打击电诈:犯罪集团已转用Starlink 9月21日,据报道,泰国参议员此前在国会会议上就泰缅边境打击电诈措施提出质询,要求政府说明限制手机及互联网信号后,究竟在多大程度上减少了跨境网络诈骗活动。 她要求泰国数字经济与社会部及国家广播电视和电信委员会(NBTC)拿出具体数据,评估通信封锁措施的实际成效。 她指出,如果措施无法有效切断诈骗集团运作,却影响边境居民以及医院、学校和政府机构正常使用通信服务,就需要重新评估执行方式。 同时表示,在传统通信线路受到限制后,部分跨境犯罪集团已经转向使用Starlink等卫星互联网技术, 因此单纯切断地面通信未必能够彻底阻止相关活动。她要求有关部门说明,是否具备快速发现、追踪和阻断这些新型通信方式的技术能力。
闲鱼涉黄产业链曝光:最小涉事者仅 14 岁 闲鱼平台再次被曝暗藏涉黄产业链,部分涉事服务涉及未成年人,最小年龄仅 14 岁。商家以“模特上门约拍”等旗号发布商品,通过隐晦暗示引导用户至线下交易。 对此,闲鱼客服回应称平台对违规行为零容忍。数据显示,2026 年 1 月至今,闲鱼累计处置色情引流风险账号 98358 个,并主动移送线索配合公安打击色情团伙 15 个。 PS:都这么卷了吗😭
#柬埔寨新闻 【柬埔寨卫生部长慰问边境部队官兵】 2026年9月19日,柬埔寨卫生部长秦拉率卫生部各单位前往边境地区,慰问驻扎在边境的第51步兵旅司令部官兵,并赠送礼物。 秦拉转达了洪森亲王、洪玛奈首相等领导人对官兵的问候,高度赞赏他们为保卫国家主权和领土完整所作出的牺牲。他表示,此次活动体现“战后支援前线”的团结精神,卫生部作为后方医疗队,始终与士兵并肩,提供医疗设备和药品,守护官兵健康。秦拉提醒官兵重视健康,预防食物中毒和酒精中毒,注意个人卫生,少吃高盐高油高糖食物,避免吸烟饮酒,如有健康问题及时就医。卫生部已运送药品、医疗设备、食品和资金支援前线。此举体现了政府和人民对边防部队的关怀。 ——————————————————— #柬埔寨拥军 #边境部队 #军民团结
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 0审核|包出款🤩🤩🤩 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🤩NO钱包担保3亿U|可查验 😀 📱官方频道:@DF78 ➡️关注领VIP 😀 🔝好品牌,实力派: 78.COM 无需标签,本身便是最好的辨识度 🔥香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩连码四中四🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 💥新人超会赢,精彩时刻: 🥇六合彩 玩家用7个号码组合下注连码三全中➕四全中,每注100U,开出4个号码。7000U的本钱,命中4注878倍及一注10000倍大奖,稳稳落袋135万U; 🥈PG电子 客户充150U,狂赚79万U,已提款50万U 🥉DB真人 玩百家乐的老板,第一天存款50万U,连续7天每日提款500万…
⚡️8K国际⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️🌈🌈🌈🌈 #东南亚盘总首选最权威综合⚡️ 台 扎根东南亚,面向全世界,携 Solaire千亿美金实体入场 菲律宾索莱尔官方直营! ⚡️🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 8k2934.com #大户首选 支持任意平台vip等级平移,不限ip免实名 免手机号 U存U取 首复存均送每日存每日送。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ⚡⚡⚡⚡ 182450.com TG玩家首选人民币台不限ip 无需手机号无需绑卡 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ⚡️⚡️ 😀%⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 百家乐战神 真人收割机 一天时间狂砍183万U💥 气运之子 PP极速糖果 30U爆25000倍满倍75万U💥 电子大水 PG电子赏金大对决 免费旋转爆96万U💥 PG持续大水 PG电子黄金摇钱树 免费旋转爆81万U💥 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ⚡️8K国际欢迎各大老板盘总娱乐 #东南亚超高爆率电子U台 PG电子单注可3000U一转 真人视…
🔥东南亚线路专业团队 柬埔寨🛩越南🛩缅甸🛩老挝🛩泰国🛩回国🛩特外🏎保安全💯 😄飞机:@Ay12252 💯正规老挝牌办理,老挝驾驶证办理! 🔈各国车辆牌照可转老挝牌照 🔈特区临牌可上老挝正规牌照 🔈可上公安系统查询,保真价格低 🔈正规渠道保真! 😄唯一联系:@Ay12252
#柬埔寨新闻 【柬埔寨波贝市视察洪灾 调集设备排水救援】 2026年9月19日,柬埔寨皇家政府波贝市救灾队队长潘肯·本通率队视察班迭棉吉省波贝市沿河地区洪水情况及居民生活。波贝市长吉赫尔、省水资源厅厅长及相关部门参加。 潘肯·本通检查了受泰国洪水影响的居民房屋、斯通博寺和部分学校,随即下令调集机械设备泄洪排水,使受灾地区水位迅速下降。他要求地方当局、人民国防军和青年做好准备,随时介入救援。潘肯·本通表示将在波贝市24小时值班,并继续视察其他受洪水和山体滑坡影响地区,确保人民安全和及时救援。此次行动体现了政府对受灾民众的关怀和高效应急响应。 ——————————————————— #柬埔寨洪灾 #应急救援 #波贝市
#泰国资讯:16岁少年庆生次日载15岁女友雨中撞货车身亡。 9月20日14时,泰国罗勇府玛普卡红灯路口前,一辆摩托车追尾撞上卡车。车上16岁少年与15岁少女重伤,少女被送医,少年经抢救无效身亡。初步调查显示,事发时正下大雨,两人身穿雨衣骑行,疑因视线不佳撞上前方卡车。 死者姐姐称,弟弟前一天刚庆祝16岁生日,自己常提醒他小心驾驶。
班迭棉吉省突查一处疑似网络诈骗窝点,发现3名涉案人员 9月21日,班迭棉吉省副省长Hul Raya代表省长、兼省行政联合指挥部主席Um Ratry,率队前往诗梳风市一处出租屋,检查一处涉嫌从事网络诈骗的地点。 此次行动由诗梳风市市长兼市联合指挥部主席Sreng Sophal陪同,省警察局、诗梳风市警察局、省宪兵队及诗梳风市宪兵队派员参加,并由省初级法院检察机关副检察官Sao Vuthy负责司法程序协调。 检查地点位于诗梳风市普雷蓬分区4号村的一处出租屋,现场发现3名相关人员。
1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣—1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣ 游戏机器人:@feitou(👈点击进入) 正版厂商 · 盘总首选 · 商会保障 · 大额无忧 飞投娱乐 · 妈祖庇佑 · 商会护航 · 一起玩赢 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ U充U提不限iP 多重炸裂活动持续上线 官方频道每天发6个红包 游戏多福利好 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣:@fjsh 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣:@usdb 🐋🐋🐋🐋: fjsh.com 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣:@feitou
#柬埔寨新闻 【柬埔寨人民党磅士威县强调团结备战选举】 2026年9月19日,柬埔寨人民党中央委员、磅士威县基层工作组组长昆昆迪在甘榜斯瓦伊县党部召开会议,总结县党工作并展望未来方向。 昆昆迪强调,保持高度内部团结是党组取得胜利的关键。她指出,目标一致,遇到的问题须共同思考解决,避免互相指责,尤其要鼓励地方党组加强团结。她提到需联系外出务工移民,确保其拥有选举证件,以积极投票。她还感谢各工作组的合作和负责任的资金使用。关于柬泰边境问题,她表示两国领导人正按国际机制和平解决。会后,昆昆迪视察了县党部大楼建设进展,目前完成50%。此次会议旨在凝聚党员力量,为2027年乡选举做好准备。 ——————————————————— #柬埔寨人民党 #基层党建 #选举准备
Showing the 12 most recent of 695 posts we hold for @dnyqqbj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@pg115 · 13,65863 posts78.COM-官方频道@DF78
@tg78com · 31,09148 postsN1娱乐城-赌王之王
@N1YLC8 · 6,21046 postsN1118.COM- N1国际官方频道
@pg100 · 2,17646 posts【2028126.com】赌王之王
@pgdzr · 7,38142 posts182体育官方频道
@ty182gf · 5,83929 posts必发国际官方频道
@bifagj · 4,83927 posts182280.COM- 182体育官方频道
@VIP182PG · 8,01321 posts柬埔寨大事件/西港金边新闻
@sssvip4 · 231,0815 posts8K国际U台官方频道
@VIPGJC888 · 20,0145 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@huich79 · 51,597#1
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 55,910#2
@bgdsj26 · 120,707#3
@DNYzzz6 · 59,369#4
@jiandan8884 · 127,199#5
@jrdnyxs · 65,982#6
@QQ888880000 · 103,044#7
@TTDR8 · 94,923#8
@bx66664 · 135,881#9
@bgtjt · 104,598#10
@w1666 · 102,034#11
@gzhrsb · 46,905#12
@qiuzhi0999 · 68,259#13
@YYL333 · 96,484#14
@dnyuuu88 · 137,239#15
@mv111 · 51,852#16
@QQDS999 · 176,108#17
@a0159 · 128,519#18
@bx666 · 471,642#19
@dsj665 · 113,606#20
@GGooGG66 · 149,708#21
@dnybgtt · 53,254#22
@f_kbg · 147,727#23
@jpz0123 · 50,902#24
@DNYBGT · 6,027#25
@baoguangba0 · 157,783#26
@pianzi1 · 53,258#27
@heicaibaog · 83,751 (as read 14 August 2026)#28
@dny88 · 65,507#29
@chigu0777 · 56,892#30
@xinwen0888 · 104,929#31
@ChiGua8999 · 11,955#32
@HH9915 · 126,803#33
@xinwen811 · 207,543#34
@nx123 · 771,520#35
@dnyxwtt · 52,489#36
@XMZPK · 92,960#37
@DNYXSTJL6668 · 10,193#38
@dny099 · 60,992#39
@feixingzhe0 · 58,575#40
@BGSS8 · 1,040#41
@jsj62 · 22,986#42
@baogua · 641#43
@HQDSJ · 13,428#44
@bodu08 · 58,568#45
@cc199 · 70,476#46
@dnydxw · 86,987#47
@qq2023bg · 63,892#48
@Cambodia15 · 54,536#49
@pzbgfabu666 · 354,924#50
@DB405 · 59,728#51
@baoguangba088 · 240,574#52
@aa144 · 35,337#53
@dnyggg · 44,367#54
@bx777 · 43,911#55
@kanxia · 500,222#56
@rjjjj · 43,080#57
@DNYTJL3 · 95,275#58
@pyzcn · 220,622#59
@jianpuzhaihuarenzixun · 77,859#60
@EvPanina · 136,450#61
@kazan_bass · 120,195#62
@mavie_news · 47,221#63
@Cryptowhalepump_official · 23,409#64
@kajal_online_hub · 98,508#65
@zovgrad · 128,138#66
@politkremlin · 185,716#67
@proof24_ua · 162,871#68
@lottoday_official · 9,951#69
@hellotransfer · 423,472#70
@rasputicaa · 124,370#71
@kievteme · 24,179#72
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 55,910
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@bgdsj26 · 120,707
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@DNYzzz6 · 59,369
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
@jrdnyxs · 65,982
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@QQ888880000 · 103,044
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
@TTDR8 · 94,923
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@bgtjt · 104,598
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
@jiandan8884 · 127,199
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 13 August 2026
@kajal_online_hub · 98,508
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@bx66664 · 135,881
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
@xinwen0888 · 104,929
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 August 2026
@dnyuuu88 · 137,239
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@w1666 · 102,034
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
@Cryptowhalepump_official · 23,409
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 August 2026
@mavie_news · 47,221
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026
@dsj665 · 113,606
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全球华人新闻吃瓜头条大曝光” (@dnyqqbj), 121,897 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnyqqbj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.