⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 😀😀😀😀😀😀 ➡️ 全网已押千万u点击传送门 👈 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️数字网投领导者! ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 始终坚持“用户至上,信誉为本”的运营理念,力求为玩家带来公平公正、真实专业的高品质游戏竞技,让你体验顶级博彩乐趣! 【🇺🇦:🇺🇦😻🤔🥴🤧😷👿,创造人生新财富!】 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣选择 ⚡️⚡️ 必须发 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 顶级博彩娱乐尽在⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🙄😶😄😶 😀体育官方合作品牌, 为荣耀而战 让梦想实现😀 😀 新人六重豪礼 😀代理八重扶持 😀 每日专属优惠活动 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ : @bifagj 🐋🐋🐋🐋 : ht

Channel
今日东南亚大事件曝光-悬赏
@jrdnyxs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
65,982subscribers
+7,930 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001501199191 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jrdnyxs |
| Description | #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #泰国 今日东南亚大事件频道致力维护所有在外的兄弟姐妹利益,遭受任何不公对待请及时曝光或投稿!希望在外的兄弟顺风顺水 注:本频道没有任何小频道,所有看到的都是模仿和假频道请各位厂商仔细查阅 投稿爆料: @qllty001 商务合作: @qllty001 |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jrdnyxs |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 65,982 | -3,283 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 69,265 | -1,299 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 70,564 | -1,264 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 71,828 | +2,904 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 68,924 | +4,749 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:35 | 64,175 | +5,407 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 58,768 | -1,759 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 60,527 | +46 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:04 | 60,481 | -66 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:46 | 60,547 | -139 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 60,686 | -81 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 60,767 | +2,156 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 58,611 | -53 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 58,664 | +55 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 58,609 | -173 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 58,782 | -341 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 59,123 | +1,424 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 57,699 | -137 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 57,836 | +306 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 57,530 | first reading |
Engagement
703 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.55%
- avg views ÷ 65,982 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,000
- 490 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.053%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 490
- of 703 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 490 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 703 (8 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,470,660 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 01:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈24,100
- Videos
- ≈2,350
- Links
- ≈1,830
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 35m
- Average length
- 49s
Measured directly from 262 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,038 reactions across 98 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 756 | 24.9% | |
| 🔥 | 461 | 15.2% | |
| ❤ | 305 | 10.0% | |
| 😍 | 301 | 9.91% | |
| 💯 | 295 | 9.71% | |
| 🥰 | 256 | 8.43% | |
| 👀 | 222 | 7.31% | |
| 😡 | 93 | 3.06% | |
| ⚡ | 74 | 2.44% | |
| 😱 | 71 | 2.34% | |
| 👏 | 48 | 1.58% | |
| 🙏 | 41 | 1.35% | |
| 🤬 | 35 | 1.15% | |
| 😢 | 30 | 0.987% | |
| 👎 | 27 | 0.889% | |
| 💔 | 11 | 0.362% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 0.23% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 0.132% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.033% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 703 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,038 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 703 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#群友投稿:金边金街某盘口的一位离职狗推,在离职后不知道什么原因跑到宿舍去把人捅死了,目前已经被宪兵抓了,具体情况暂时还不清楚,看看后面官方会不会通报! PS:欠钱不还?还是职场霸凌?😂
#群友爆料:老挝金三角“特外”,洪门国际酒店里面的酒吧,买卖人口,强迫人员诈骗。 酒吧老板,假借酒吧名义,顶风作案,(把酒吧装修成暗间,入口在吧台后面,里面做诈骗工作室),自称关系通天,在东鹏公安局副局长保护下,无恶不作,压榨员工。 酒吧园区内至少有100多人,其中数十人并非自愿,其业务涉及“国盘”、“军包”、“精聊”等针对国内的大额诈骗项目,全天24小时缅甸内保,手持电棍看守,员工稍有不从,或者上班状态不好,即被保安抓至小黑屋,吊起严刑拷打。 酒吧老板是盘口股东,提供保护是东鹏公安局副局长。每个月按照每人3500元,收取保护费。 望老挝政府及中国政府早日抓捕酒吧老板,解放里面被买卖来的人员。
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🤩NO钱包担保3亿U|可查验! 😀 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 📱官方频道:@DF78 ➡️关注领VIP 🔝大品牌,实力派:78.COM 本身就是最好的辨识度。 ✅️香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍,封顶赔率! 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩连码四中四🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 💥新人超会赢,精彩时刻分享: 🥇六合彩 玩家用7个号码组合下注连码三全中(35注)➕四全中(35注),每注100U,结果开出4个号码。命中4注878倍及一注10000倍大奖,稳稳落袋135万U; 🥈PG电子 9月4号,壹玩家游戏中爆出268万U大奖,本金仅用2.6万U; 🥉DB真人 玩百家乐的老板,第一天存款50万U,连续7天每日提款…
#抓捕视频:伊斯兰堡国家网络犯罪部门展开大规模行动,对E11/3一处呼叫中心突击检查,逮捕了100多名人员。
#突发:西港一打野地点被围,里边是一群印尼人,刚刚还在谈判,现在直接拉上车带走~
老挝今年已查处6500余名涉诈人员,反诈行动扩大至多地经济特区 老挝方面近日公布反网络犯罪阶段性数据。 根据老挝公安部门相关信息,2026年1月至9月中旬,全国在打击呼叫中心诈骗、网络诈骗及跨境网络赌博行动中累计控制涉案人员6508人。 数据显示,今年前6个月累计查处4482人,行动覆盖博胶、沙耶武里、万象、甘蒙、沙湾拿吉、色贡、占巴塞、琅南塔、乌多姆赛及川圹等多个省份。 7月至8月,执法行动进一步扩大至部分经济特区及重点区域,又查处约1718人,前8个月累计达到6200人。 进入9月后,截至月中又有308人在相关行动中被控制。 相关信息称,随着部分涉诈团伙从集中场所向地方分散转移,老挝执法部门正在扩大排查范围并持续开展突击检查。
#巴基斯坦资讯:伊斯兰堡突查涉嫌网络犯罪呼叫中心 9月20日,巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡消息称,当地国家网络犯罪调查局(NCCIA)针对涉嫌网络犯罪活动的呼叫中心展开行动,对位于E-11/3区域的一处呼叫中心进行突击检查。 据消息人士透露,此次行动由NCCIA伊斯兰堡部门SHO Shafqat Faiz带队执行。行动期间,执法人员对现场人员及相关设备进行检查,并对部分人员采取控制措施,案件后续调查工作正在进行。 据悉,此次行动主要针对涉嫌利用呼叫中心从事网络犯罪及相关非法活动的行为。目前,关于现场具体查获物品、被带走人员数量以及是否正式立案等详细信息,官方尚未公布完整通报。 值得注意的是,巴基斯坦近期持续加强对非法呼叫中心及网络犯罪活动的打击力度,NCCIA已在伊斯兰堡等地针对涉嫌诈骗、非法网络活动的场所展开多次行动。 目前,案件仍在进一步调查之中,后续是否会公布更多涉案人员及相关犯罪细节,有待巴基斯坦执法部门进一步通报。 P…
广宁警方查获跨境走私二手iPhone,共计1217台,货值90亿越南盾! 越媒9月19日报道: 8月29日,越南广宁省经济警察支队在海防至芒街高速收费站开展检查,拦停一辆货运车辆,当场查获1217台二手iPhone。 现场核查发现,这批货物没有报关凭证,无法证明合法来源。 经审讯,嫌疑人许文玉交代,其受雇跨境运货,将这批源自中国的二手手机偷运至越南境内,每运送一台手机可获8万越盾酬劳,为规避关卡检查,走私团伙人员分工,经由边境小道转运货物。 目前,调查机关已对7名涉案人员提起诉讼,继续深挖该走私链条。
柬埔寨又一家银行出事了! 柬埔寨国家银行今天发布通告,因致富银行(Chief Bank)未遵守现行监管规定,决定自即日起对其实施为期3个月的临时接管,并指定Baker Tilly事务所担任临时管理人。 在接管期间,管理人将评估银行状况并提交报告以供后续决策。此外,管理人有权暂停该银行的存款支付及部分非必要支出,但国家银行强调,所有贷款客户仍须按期正常履行还款义务。
#网友反馈:金边国金警察下午过来检查,这次是最后一次检查了,这次会比平时更仔细,没护照有设备的赶紧躲好。
金边警方检查查获的网络诈骗相关设备 9月21日上午,国家警察副总监兼金边市警察局局长中将Choun Narind前往检查金边市各网络诈骗窝点查获的设备和物品。目前,这些物品正存放在金边市警察局仓库,警方将按照相关程序进行处理。
Showing the 12 most recent of 703 posts we hold for @jrdnyxs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@jiandan8884 · 127,199#1
@bgdsj26 · 120,707#2
@DNYzzz6 · 59,369#3
@huich79 · 51,597#4
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 55,910#5
@bx66664 · 135,881#6
@QQ888880000 · 103,044#7
@dnyqqbj · 121,897#8
@cc199 · 70,476#9
@BGS8989 · 94,660#10
@TTDR8 · 94,923#11
@xigang13 · 63,441#12
@pianzi1 · 53,258#13
@aq7777 · 54,495#14
@bgtjt · 104,598#15
@dnyuuu88 · 137,239#16
@dsj665 · 113,606#17
@bx666 · 471,642#18
@GGooGG66 · 149,708#19
@jpz0123 · 50,902#20
@nx123 · 771,520#21
@kanxia · 500,222#22
@bodu08 · 58,568#23
@DNYXSTJL6668 · 10,193#24
@Kolebule8119 · 3,976#25
@dnybgtt · 53,254#26
@dnyxinwen668 · 48,041#27
@dny88 · 65,507#28
@YYL333 · 96,484#29
@kk4568 · 128,782#30
@TGBG8888 · 87,077#31
@AQzx_3 · 93,113#32
@DNYTJL3 · 95,275#33
@DNYBG234 · 88,578#34
@dashijianbot1 · 269#35
@vjtyd · 62,777#36
@kz692nn · 139,774#37
@AQzx_2 · 89,932#38
@bg833 · 300,112#39
@zdhqxw · 717#40
@db933 · 199,757#41
@baoguangba088 · 240,574#42
@DNYBGT · 6,027#43
@DNY181 · 50,098#44
@qqt13 · 201,549#45
@quanwangbaoguangb · 149,935#46
@AQzx_1 · 180,899#47
@pyzcn · 220,622#48
@huaren_zixun · 91,317#49
@ttkb0 · 120,417#50
@bc7890 · 3,940#51
@aa144 · 35,337#52
@dnyxwtt · 52,489#53
@bx777 · 43,911#54
@Cukicnk777 · 2,855#55
@cgbg8 · 107,027#56
@jsj62 · 22,986#57
@dubaixinwen2 · 215,460#58
@davydovin · 1,889,362#59
@XmindsCoin · 3,297#60
@russianonwars · 102,399#61
@redacted6 · 1,067,107#62
@visual_hedonist · 312,529#63
@ukr_shvydko · 311,405#64
@adelimkhanov_95 · 1,850,125#65
@Akatsuki_Calls_x1000 · 12,126#66
@Cryptowhalepump_official · 23,409#67
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@DNYzzz6 · 59,369
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
@bgdsj26 · 120,707
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 55,910
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@jiandan8884 · 127,199
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 13 August 2026
@dnyqqbj · 121,897
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@bx66664 · 135,881
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
@cc199 · 70,476
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
@QQ888880000 · 103,044
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
@TTDR8 · 94,923
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@bgtjt · 104,598
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
@aq7777 · 54,495
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
@pianzi1 · 53,258
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@dnyuuu88 · 137,239
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@xigang13 · 63,441
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
@dsj665 · 113,606
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@GGooGG66 · 149,708
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
@visual_hedonist · 312,529
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 August 2026
@dnyxinwen668 · 48,041
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
@Cryptowhalepump_official · 23,409
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 August 2026
@ukr_shvydko · 311,405
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@davydovin · 1,889,362
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“今日东南亚大事件曝光-悬赏” (@jrdnyxs), 65,982 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jrdnyxs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.