观片有感

Channel
(吃瓜)搞笑😐视频
@cgbg8
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
107,027subscribers
+1,239 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001538812715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cgbg8 |
| Description | 吃瓜 搞笑 视频 投稿广告联系机器人 👉 @DiDiwbot 飞机切换为中文点击安装中文👇👇👇👇 👉 tg://setlanguage?lang=zhcncc 👈 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cgbg8 |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 107,027 | -527 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 107,554 | -138 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 107,692 | -207 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 107,899 | -219 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 108,118 | -255 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 108,373 | -127 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 108,500 | -75 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:34 | 108,575 | -82 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 108,657 | -106 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 108,763 | -81 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 108,844 | -82 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 108,926 | -98 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 109,024 | -35 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:39 | 109,059 | +27 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 109,032 | +38 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 108,994 | -38 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 109,032 | -48 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:09 | 109,080 | -260 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 109,340 | -4,631 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 113,971 | first reading |
Engagement
1,107 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.283%
- avg views ÷ 107,027 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 303
- 674 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.512%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 674
- of 1,107 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 259 of 674 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,107 (7 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 204,332 |
| Reactions total | 401 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 21:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈59,000
- Videos
- ≈84,000
- Links
- ≈18,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 9h 03m
- Average length
- 44s
Measured directly from 741 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
517 reactions across 305 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 202 | 39.1% | |
| ❤ | 107 | 20.7% | |
| 🥰 | 40 | 7.74% | |
| ⚡ | 34 | 6.58% | |
| 😁 | 32 | 6.19% | |
| 🤩 | 29 | 5.61% | |
| 🎉 | 27 | 5.22% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 4.26% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 3.68% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.193% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.193% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 334 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 517 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
打桩中,小忙一会
❤1
以防你没见过袋鼠撒娇😃
抢到就是赚到
给孩子喂奶 #gay
水母 👀
谁遛谁😅 #狗子 #机器狗
我悟了 ~#平胸 #vs 巨乳
独居,洗澡,叫了快递员,不锁门,这是什么操作??请君入瓮?
🥲 被耍了
Photo, posted without a caption
奶龙发了了朋友圈 !
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,107 posts we hold for @cgbg8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@xuanshangz · 47,82710 posts东南亚大事件
@yuenanU · 219,85210 posts东南亚素材库
@zhaopian · 25,23310 posts奇趣百科 导航
@QQmua · 39,4589 posts内涵搞笑🫥
@chiguahs · 110,0225 posts东南亚大事件 东南亚新闻 柬埔寨新闻
@kk777 · 163,8515 posts🔥开元棋牌-33.vip-🔥官方招商
@kyqp33vip · 1,5724 postsbolai.com铂莱世界杯冠名
@blzhaoshang · 5,0492 postsTG娱乐城-官方招商
@TGYLCzhaoshang · 1,4852 posts6G全球丨官方爆奖俱乐部
@WWW6G007COM · 2,0172 posts猎奇小屋 🔻 奇趣百科 导航
@btlot · 100,5061 post吃瓜大佬@Gdan21
@chiguadalao · 125,3201 post🔥金贝娱乐场-jinbei.com-【官方招商】🔥
@jbzhaoshang · 4,9831 post凯旋娱乐 官方频道
@kxggg · 6,4541 postМария Захарова
@mariavladimirovnazakharova · 463,5701 postQQ空间🍳
@qqxiha · 8,7451 post🔥西港娱乐城-xigang.com-🔥官方招商
@XGzhaoshang · 2,2411 post🔥西湖娱乐城-xihu.cc-【实力招商】🔥
@xihuzs · 4,9621 post新全迅网
@xinquanxunwang · 3,6421 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bx666 · 471,642#1
@MB_149 · 125,094#2
@chigua_e · 234,360#3
@DNYTJL3 · 95,275#4
@chiguahs · 110,022#5
@lsd62 · 25,101#6
@GQSP9 · 90,528#7
@onlychigua · 200,649#8
@chigua_a · 214,714#9
@gaoxiao88 · 22,328#10
@ay2028 · 79,466#11
@chiguasucai · 12,117#12
@newszg_official · 162,958#13
@pyzcn · 220,622#14
@usd1 · 252,985 (as read 15 August 2026)#15
@chiguadog · 154,050#16
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,905#17
@jpz_888 · 12,701#18
@guawa9 · 89,091#19
@ygxw3 · 143,983#20
@GXduanzi1 · 91,095#21
@dubai0 · 77,364#22
@guagua · 74,074#23
@hhdwag · 22,232#24
@toutiaoshijian · 77,547#25
@sucai177 · 111,407#26
@sucai277 · 111,782#27
@svip40 · 110,383#28
@neihanduanzi1 · 225,435#29
@qiqubk · 60,017#30
@chesgk · 5,119#31
@wenanhs1 · 30,878#32
@chigua278 · 40,604#33
@achiguao · 81,872#34
@cctv1 · 309,340#35
@aa144 · 35,337#36
@taiwansucai223 · 11,738#37
@tp111 · 49,218#38
@dj17 · 114,067#39
@wangyiy1 · 4,415#40
@dnyggg · 44,367#41
@MeiPinTu · 16,803#42
@chigua_08 · 21,740#43
@chigualaozu · 19,877#44
@pp854 · 65,908#45
@cggxhhh · 267,452#46
@nh888 · 175,539#47
@pipixia · 12,326#48
@woshadiao · 115,324#49
@wenanle · 5,047#50
@daxxx · 64,055#51
@bx777 · 43,911#52
@sucai1 · 104,758#53
@MoiFunVideo · 6,265#54
@wgsb · 211,133 (as read 15 August 2026)#55
@mianbeitongjiling · 30,602#56
@telonews_cn · 83,700#57
@meitian · 28,671#58
@meishisc · 30,528#59
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@chigua_007 · 57,006
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 15 here — alongside 14 others — read 25 August 2026
@lightrekt · 49,340
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 25 August 2026
@chiguadog · 154,050
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 12 August 2026
@xigang9918 · 67,385
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 24 August 2026
@newszg_official · 162,958
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
@pdsss · 54,442
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 August 2026
@GXduanzi1 · 91,095
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 13 August 2026
@chigua_a · 214,714
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 12 August 2026
@tuigsc · 69,020
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 21 August 2026
@chiguahs · 110,022
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 August 2026
@feixingzhe_cgzx · 164,713
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
@nh888 · 175,539
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 12 August 2026
@tp111 · 49,218
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 23 August 2026
@CG887 · 114,193
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@DNY181 · 50,098
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
@TwtVideoOfChina · 74,789
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 20 August 2026
@AQzx_7 · 38,133
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 23 August 2026
@wenan888 · 65,083
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 August 2026
@chiguak · 41,024
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 23 August 2026
@TRJ668899 · 44,812
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 27 August 2026
@sucai277 · 111,782
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 15 August 2026
@miandianDS · 45,525
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 27 August 2026
@tx100 · 161,401
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 August 2026
@TGBG01 · 54,868
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“(吃瓜)搞笑😐视频” (@cgbg8), 107,027 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cgbg8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.