晚安💤兄弟们

Channel
吃瓜视频
@pdsss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
53,965subscribers
-6,159 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001806603157 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pdsss |
| Description | #新闻 #吃瓜 #TikTok #中国 @tvbao 看电影 @sbaaa 看新闻 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 19 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pdsss |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 53,965 | -110 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 54,075 | -112 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 54,187 | -217 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 54,404 | -306 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 54,710 | -445 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 55,155 | -241 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 55,396 | -186 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 55,582 | -278 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 55,860 | -332 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 56,192 | -695 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 56,887 | -504 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 57,391 | -393 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 57,784 | -282 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 58,066 | -611 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 58,677 | -420 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:11 | 59,097 | -332 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 59,429 | -432 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 59,861 | -263 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 60,124 | first reading |
Engagement
464 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.237%
- avg views ÷ 53,965 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 128
- 464 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.319%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 464
- of 464 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 464 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 464 (6 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 59,295 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈62,500
- Videos
- ≈90,500
- Links
- ≈14,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5h 42m
- Average length
- 56s
Measured directly from 364 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 90.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 464 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 464 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
SM
女朋友不听话怎么办
集美遇到阿三
看看屁股
Video, posted without a caption
在印度尼西亚的托拉贾地区,一位妇女将已故母亲的遗体用特殊药物保存在家中,每天都会带到花园里为她梳理头发。 托拉贾人不会立即将逝去的亲人下葬。去世的人被视为“生病”或“正在睡觉”。遗体会被保存在家中。
皮肤病? AI?
谁老婆又去参加同学聚会了
#球速 👍👍👍👍亚洲最大娱乐平台 U存U取(无须实名绑卡) 球速体育18年老品牌台子 电子百家乐 0风控 包出款 #亚洲顶级博彩盘口 😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳 😀😳😳 😀😀😀😀 👌👌👌👌👌🥳 平台支持 USDT存出款、微信、支付宝、银行卡以及多种电子钱包存取款。东南亚国家地区通通不限ip U存U取(无须实名绑卡) 逆天之举:1000赢走73万 👈点击 史无前例:球速大客户20天赢走1170万 👈点击 赌神附体:PG麻将大爆91万提款👈点击 再创新高:某盘口老板单笔提款207万 👈点击 怒杀狗庄: 某盘口管理怒提203万 👈点击 大额出款无忧 每日提款不限额度 欢迎各位金融分析师们 血战狗庄 💵福利频道: @PG153 📣包赔专员: @hraaaa 🏧注册网址: https://qsty1424.com
#景甜 #孙宇晨 #娱乐圈吃瓜 孙宇晨你真下得去手。景甜给你生孩子这事一传出来,满脑子都是那画面,胃都跟着拧。那可是别人心里的女神,你这一弄,粉丝只剩干瞪眼。一想到你的JB要插到景甜的b里我就难受 🙈 感谢家人们投稿!
【中国网红新加坡“文化输出”翻车:拿娘惹文化当布景,街头挥刀博眼球】8月下旬,中国网红街舞团“弗兰舞团”及领舞“神童童”在新加坡牛车水拍摄短视频,引发争议。 视频中,舞者穿着传统娘惹服饰在餐馆突然热舞,还在街头挥舞刀具道具、横穿马路。当地土生华人团体批评,这种拍法把传统文化当成博流量的背景板,不少当地网友质疑影响公共秩序和交通安全。 涉事餐馆随后回应称,拍摄属于舞者个人行程,并为现场管理疏漏致歉。 感谢家人们投稿!
Showing the 12 most recent of 464 posts we hold for @pdsss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@wnsgg · 46218 posts威尼斯人-优惠活动
@wnsrhd · 29718 postsY3国际 官方频道
@Y3guoji · 2,89618 posts赌王之王
@PG153 · 3614 posts182合营中心
@DLHY182 · 1,7006 posts182体育-官方频道
@TY_182 · 3,7966 posts🔍超级索引 @CJSY
@cjsy · 727,2424 posts成年人影库|高清资源每日更新
@cnryk · 1,7734 posts全网热榜吃瓜中心——-G7.COM独家冠名
@DJDNYBG · 9,5314 postsG7.COM 柬埔寨商家信息导航
@G7JPZSJ · 4,7494 posts8K国际官方
@PG8K8K · 4,3194 posts东南亚大事件|华人新闻|热点爆料
@SEAUPD · 32,8164 posts成人小说|情色小说|小说精选
@SYXS88 · 2,4114 posts搜女推广 / 推特粉丝 / Twitter粉丝 / X增粉
@zhuqiu88 · 174 posts招聘求职
@abcbm · 51,8051 post吃瓜怪诞录•色情版 🧭导航
@ddd2038 · 9,6501 postMK体育
@MK888bot · 15,9791 post东南亚大事件
@sssku · 54,7931 post灰产圈
@tv555 · 75,6151 postAV麻豆水果派
@TvLieQi · 57,3711 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bx666 · 476,165#1
@svip40 · 65,941#2
@cgbg8 · 109,024#3
@guagua · 74,902#4
@newszg_official · 164,604#5
@dubai0 · 78,809#6
@MrMaTong · 1,245#7
@chigua_a · 216,585#8
@GQSP9 · 116,696#9
@DNYTJL3 · 122,324#10
@chigua_e · 220,205#11
@pyzcn · 220,015#12
@woshadiao · 115,680#13
@achiguao · 82,079#14
@chiguahs · 111,493#15
@renrenchigua · 68,209#16
@onlychigua · 199,246#17
@chiguasucai · 12,220#18
@chesgk · 5,142#19
@baguabox · 33,572#20
@chigualaozu · 19,946#21
@douyinchigua1 · 22,248#22
@redian3 · 63,854#23
@SB919 · 114,456#24
@lsd62 · 25,696#25
@moyu2023 · 8,812#26
@mianbeiy · 67,681#27
@FLLCG · 40,174#28
@qqdsj · 194,614#29
@feilongwang · 72,948#30
@gaoxiao88 · 22,865#31
@chigua_07 · 7,111#32
@bodutt · 55,312#33
@GXduanzi1 · 118,766#34
@xinwenba · 3,864#35
@bg833 · 304,436#36
@wenanhs1 · 29,973#37
@juexinggonglue · 16,459#38
@HuiMouYiXiao2023 · 1,465#39
@baoguangee · 204,513#40
@tuigsc · 68,257#41
@feixingzhe_cgzx · 170,644#42
@qqvae · 31,818#43
@bx777 · 45,836#44
@baoguang · 26,535#45
@pipixia · 12,447#46
@cctv1 · 309,091#47
@meitian · 28,787#48
@DLGAT1 · 20,107#49
@wenan422 · 15,761#50
@MoiFunVideo · 6,296#51
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tuigsc · 68,257
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 21 August 2026
@achiguao · 82,079
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 18 August 2026
@GQSP9 · 116,696
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 14 August 2026
@cggxhhh · 271,115
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 August 2026
@chigua2022 · 202,140
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 11 August 2026
@onlychigua · 199,246
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吃瓜视频” (@pdsss), 53,965 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pdsss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.