“所有选择漂的人 在走出家门的那一刻就要知道 往后 你就是自己的家了”

Channel
🍓文案小商铺
@wenan422
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,375subscribers
+3,392 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001629417349 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wenan422 |
| Description | #文案 #壁纸 #感情 “若君为我赠玉簪,我便为君绾长发。洗尽铅华,从此以后,日暮天涯“ 商务合作: @duoduoo3 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wenan422 |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:01 | 14,375 | -44 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:47 | 14,419 | -402 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:26 | 14,821 | -102 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:48 | 14,923 | -10 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:46 | 14,933 | -56 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:27 | 14,989 | -130 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 15,119 | -164 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:10 | 15,283 | -147 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:10 | 15,430 | -83 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:20 | 15,513 | -137 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:48 | 15,650 | -155 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:26 | 15,805 | -147 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 15,952 | -100 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:58 | 16,052 | -246 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:20 | 16,298 | -137 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 16,435 | -200 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:51 | 16,635 | -112 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:55 | 16,747 | -165 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 06:16 | 16,912 | -141 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 17,053 | first reading |
Engagement
119 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.01%
- avg views ÷ 14,375 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 577
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.084%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 119 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 119 (3 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 8,655 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 17:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,870
- Videos
- ≈3,090
- Links
- ≈1,060
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 15m 57s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 94 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 85.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 119 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 119 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
我从不虚假的对待身边任何人,可惜呀,这个世界有太多人不真诚,每个人都昧着良心耍花招,人心这东西像黑暗里看不清的陷阱,可交不可信,任何关系都不例外
“也许真的长大了 从某次困难没和家里人说之后 再也没有我做不了的决定”
“路还长 别失望 当生活压得喘不出气的时候 记得给自己点掌声”
❤1
如果你连开始的勇气都没有 那你怎么可能会赢呢
我不想再遇这么多的露水情缘 我只想奇迹般的遇见一位觉得我可爱的人 维持一段永久的感情
人的真心只有两次,一次是情窦初开。一次是明知不可为而为之。
这个时代你会发现你学会了换位思考 你就是学会了帮别人欺负自己
如果背井离乡不是为了挣更多的钱,那将毫无意义
你以为时间是最好的偏方 结果治好的全是皮外伤
天下没有不散的宴席 但你别怕 人生何处不相逢
靠自己虽然很慢 ,但很稳,这个世界从来不缺漂亮的女人,也没有人会一直为你着迷,所以你要独立,经济独立,思想独立。
Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @wenan422. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @wenan422 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 13 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 19 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 2 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@wenan888 · 61,069
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 August 2026
@chigua6680 · 234,283
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 11 August 2026
@wenanku · 60,423
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 21 August 2026
@YTT786 · 101,769
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
@AQzx_7 · 67,449
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 23 August 2026
@miandianDS · 41,838
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 27 August 2026
@pdsss · 53,323
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 August 2026
@kz692nn · 124,815
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
@tg88f · 121,470
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🍓文案小商铺” (@wenan422), 14,375 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wenan422.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.