🌚🌚
👍4❤1

Channel
@achiguao
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
81,250subscribers
-964 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001905442401 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @achiguao |
| Description | 吃瓜尽在 @achigua 绅士联盟 @tddk7 色瓜 正在创建 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/achiguao |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 04:19 | 81,250 | -11 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 05:01 | 81,261 | -31 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:10 | 81,292 | -7 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:34 | 81,299 | +9 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:17 | 81,290 | -16 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:58 | 81,306 | -35 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:31 | 81,341 | -23 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:28 | 81,364 | -14 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:46 | 81,378 | -30 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:19 | 81,408 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:09 | 81,417 | -23 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:56 | 81,440 | -33 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 81,473 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:06 | 81,472 | -41 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 81,513 | -55 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:55 | 81,568 | -16 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:59 | 81,584 | -12 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 81,596 | -8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 81,604 | -9 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 81,613 | first reading |
1,594 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 188 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 360 of 514 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,594 (6 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 221,442 |
| Reactions total | 666 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 20:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 963 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
852 reactions across 479 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 708 | 83.1% | |
| ❤ | 107 | 12.6% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 1.64% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 0.469% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.469% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.352% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2 | 0.235% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.117% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 510 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 852 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 September 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 516 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🌚🌚
👍4❤1
美国再制裁太子集团:陈波妻子何雨静、庞伟志及23家柬埔寨企业上榜 美国11月5日宣布新一轮针对柬埔寨太子集团的制裁,新增4名个人及41家企业。其中23家企业注册于柬埔寨,涉及航空、保险、建筑、酒店、物流、科技等多个行业。 此次制裁名单中,两名加入柬埔寨籍的人士值得关注:一人是此前遭美国制裁的太子集团高管陈波的妻子何雨静(He Yujing),另一人此前被英国制裁,与小易支付(CoolCash)等企业有关联的庞伟志(Pang Visal)。 美国财政部指出,太子集团相关人员在此前遭到制裁后,仍通过转移资产、控制关联企业等方式,试图规避制裁并维持商业及金融活动。 美国财政部披露,自2025年10月美国首次对太子集团实施制裁以来,陈波已将其位于日本东京的一处豪宅转移至妻子何雨静(He Yujing)名下。 据了解,何雨静就是此前在网上炫富引发舆论关注的网红“静仙女”。此前舆论曾怀疑其是陈志妻子,但据《凤凰周刊》等报道,她其实…
👍3❤1
卧槽,武汉停车场,这才几点啊,就开始了👀
👍3
🌚
👍2
刚刚在太原杏花岭区上空,看到疑似奇异现象 ,还谁看到?
👍2
事教人... ...论文明行车的重要性
👍2
8K国际 🌈🌈🌈🌈 信誉至上·财富相伴 东南亚盘总首选U投 8k国际U台官网 : 8k2590.com TG玩家首选U台 全网最高反水 反水3%每日无上限 2028体育官网 : 20280443.com TG玩家首选人民币台 不限ip 免实名免绑卡手机号码 #东南亚盘总首选最权威综合😃台 集团耗资2亿美金 打造全网最牛逼的线上娱乐平台。😄😄😄😄 #大户首选 免实名 免手机号 电子可3000U一拉 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ⚡⚡⚡⚡ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 1、PG电子 · 水果丛林这一转怒提78万U 2、百家乐战神 大哥一天时间狂砍102万U 3、星光公主超级闪耀一路爆发提现75万U 4、PP电子「狂野骷髅」火力拉满带走52万U 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 #全网福利天花板 1、单笔提款50万U+ ,赠送5888U-88888U额外奖励 2、支持任意平台vip等级平移 3、每日存款彩金每…
👍2
🤩🤩🤩🤩 Y3国际 品牌铸就非凡 · 实力绝非偶然 🔈超级玩家赌神附体,狂揽1.6亿,可自行验证真伪 2028体育官网: 20280443.com TG玩家首选人民币台 不限ip 免实名 电子爆率超高 Y3国际官网: y3263.com TG玩家首选U台 全网最高反水 反水3% 每日无上限 #Y3国际 全网最权威综合U台 全网广告费每月投入高达1000万U+,Y3 无处不在 #大户首选 免实名 免手机号 电子可3000U一拉 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 1、 真人百家乐大放水,20万赢走600万U 2、 大哥《d***5》PA真人狂揽300万u,成功提款350万u 3、 大哥z**1索莱尔视讯30连中,盈利140万U,提走160万u 4、 百家乐实力选手8万一口平推连中8口,怒提60万U 5、大哥 状态拉满!一周内拉 麻…
👍2
🇨🇳官方担保全国学生妹嫩模兼职约炮❤️长期稳定经营❤️见面满意付款❤️包赔付放心约❤️ —————————————— 一,联系方式重要提示:由于QQ微信封控推荐大家在浏览器或应用商店搜索(lolo洛洛app)安装好加我立即可约 lolo洛洛号:50614054 火鱼号:y1685191 与你号:qw5599 —————————————— 二,郑重声明:价格800元-1280元,诚信经营15年老字号,为了各位帅哥大佬的支持找我约妹优惠减200元 —————————————— 三,服务项目:全新京莞服务,鸳鸯浴, 蚂蚁上树,冰火两重天,69式,舌吻,滴蜡,毒龙,口交,肛交,内射,毒龙,双飞,无套内射,等等…… —————————————— 四,私密安全 (有自己的课室小区房也可安排上门外出)一手资源丰富,沟通好所在城市(预计需要之城市),我们会提供当日实时可接单女孩,在线挑选本人照片,精选推荐数据资料详细,您可以挑选合适女孩类型,确…
👍2
香港情侣三周年纪念日出轨🍉
👍4
商南命案嫌犯孙某自杀身亡 警方通报商南致3死2伤命案...
👍3
网友反馈:金边桑园区附近一栋大楼,一中国男子不知道是上头了,还是逃跑出来,坐在两栋楼之间,情况十分危急,楼下聚集了不少
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,594 posts we hold for @achiguao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@achiguao named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吃瓜🍉群众” (@achiguao), 81,250 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/achiguao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.