估计被叫下架视频

Channel
吃瓜 看戏
@cg000009
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,994subscribers
+59 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002039804309 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cg000009 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cg000009 |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 10,994 | +2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 10,992 | +12 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 10,980 | +6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 10,974 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 10,975 | +1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 10,974 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 10,975 | +11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:33 | 10,964 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 10,962 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:09 | 10,957 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 10,956 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:49 | 10,966 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 10,968 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:11 | 10,967 | +9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 10,958 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 10,963 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 10,958 | +7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 10,951 | +6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 10,945 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 10,941 | first reading |
Engagement
273 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.567%
- avg views ÷ 10,994 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 62.4
- 101 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.09%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 101
- of 273 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 101 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 273 (7 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 6,300 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 02:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3h 08m
- Average length
- 47s
Measured directly from 242 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 273 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 273 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
年纪轻轻就是基佬
9月1日,山东东营河口实验小学,一名学生家长带着坐在轮椅上的女儿到校维权,多名警察在现场维持秩序。 孩子父亲称,女儿在校期间疑因不堪老师体罚和苛责,于2025年6月5日从学校四楼卫生间跳楼,造成身体受伤,此后一直需要坐轮椅。 家长称,事发后学校一直逃避责任,相关问题至今未得到妥善解决。
惠州年纪轻轻干嘛想不开
这种纯粹找死的
广州白云站,大型车祸,遍地尸体🙏🙏🙏心痛小孩 #严重车祸
【高志凯上印度节目谈中尼洪灾,现场吵翻】灾难初期,8月28日,高志凯现身印度辩论节目,就中尼边境洪灾责任与主持人、嘉宾激烈交锋。 高志凯认为,这场灾害主要涉及中国和尼泊尔,印度不应过度介入;同时否认中国会利用上游水文条件威胁下游国家。 印度主持人和嘉宾则反击称,印度也是下游国家,而且已经有人死亡,当然有权发声,并批评高志凯的说法“冷血”“双重标准”。 争论最激烈时,主持人阿纳布翻出高志凯过去谈巴基斯坦和上游河流的言论,质疑中国是否也可能把水资源当成对付邻国的工具。高志凯多次打断,指责对方“说谎”“把话硬塞到我嘴里”。 整场节目几乎一路互相抢话,火药味十足。
感受一下夜间大排档的烟火气
全部都是酒引起的 集美互撕 #吃瓜 #撕逼
今天下午广州鹤洞路,大树倒了压到人
天气热火气大 #吃瓜 #街头比赛
尼泊尔热传视频:洪灾过后,在尼泊尔努瓦科特(Nuwakot)的贝特拉瓦蒂(Betravati),一栋房屋内发现了24具遗体。
Showing the 12 most recent of 273 posts we hold for @cg000009. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吃瓜 看戏” (@cg000009), 10,994 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cg000009.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.