秘密花园㊙️ https://t.me/+gv81XRX9toViNDlh
❤1

Channel
@QQmua
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
39,458subscribers
-102 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001979822607 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @QQmua |
| Description | 奇趣百科 吃瓜爆料 猎奇小屋 t.me/qiqubaike 关注导航不迷路 :搜索 @qqmua @btlot |
| Created | 2 April 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QQmua |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 39,458 | +16 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:42 | 39,442 | +13 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 39,429 | -11 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 39,440 | -14 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:00 | 39,454 | -36 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 39,490 | -29 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:02 | 39,519 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:33 | 39,521 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:33 | 39,531 | +6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 39,525 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 39,535 | +8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 39,527 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 39,525 | +18 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 39,507 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 39,503 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 39,504 | +15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 39,489 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 39,490 | -14 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 39,504 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 39,514 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 2 April 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (2 April 2023 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 7,450 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Sept 2026, 22:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,581 reactions across 12 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,174 | 45.5% | |
| ❤ | 854 | 33.1% | |
| 😁 | 128 | 4.96% | |
| 👎 | 116 | 4.49% | |
| 👏 | 64 | 2.48% | |
| 🔥 | 59 | 2.29% | |
| 💩 | 45 | 1.74% | |
| 🥰 | 43 | 1.67% | |
| 🗿 | 29 | 1.12% | |
| 🤡 | 22 | 0.852% | |
| 🤯 | 19 | 0.736% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 0.426% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 0.232% | |
| 🤗 | 6 | 0.232% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.077% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.039% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.039% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.039% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,581 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2023 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
秘密花园㊙️ https://t.me/+gv81XRX9toViNDlh
❤1
新群聊 @xihaok
大便百科 @dbbk4 💩 化粪池 群聊:https://t.me/+TiS9_zyBOu85YzNl 导航 @btlot @qqmua
❤20👎1
夏夜淫梦🍃👇👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/+jVtey_K9_9gxYzI1 导航: https://t.me/xyokx 🌿 @btlot 超级现场🚷意外车祸监控 t.me/kxiha QQ空间 https://t.me/qqxiha 奇趣百科💥 @qiqubaike 吃瓜爆料🍉 @xihaok 夏夜淫梦🍑 @xyokx 猎奇小屋👽 @btlot 大便百科💩 @dbbk4 猎奇蘑菇😈 不公开 淫民星空🐳 @Airooa 彩虹城堡🌈 @Airaoo AV-NO.1 🔞 @AVqqc 探花主播📸 @Thxiha 每日趣闻🌀 @qqvae 奇趣百科🐼 @qiqubk 猎奇小屋👽 https://t.me/+PcXmznGC7ZUyYzc1 秘密花园㊙️ https://t.me/+gv81XRX9toViNDlh 猎奇坚果🌵 https://t.me/+lRAwtykCg9UwMjlh 夏夜淫梦 🍃 https:/…
❤70😁4🥰2
奇趣百科 备份群 地址:@qqxiha 群聊:@xiha13 疑似电报修改 规则 敏感群限制 转发 关注导航不迷路 @btlot @qqmua
❤20💯1
🍸 #友情链接 ✅ 中文汉化‼️ ❌ 广告 ⚡️导航 👉 解除敏感权限
❤38
新客服 @qqbkab
💩11👎7❤3
客服 @qqbkab ✅ 中文 汉化 补丁 ⭐️
👍37❤30👎11
🔰导航 💪 投稿🔻#频道 #链接 🧐 客服 吃瓜爆料🍉 https://t.me/+TXA2KFbi0r9HrB31 奇趣百科💥 https://t.me/+TYS0rZ4xsT4A6qP8 秘密花园🤡 https://t.me/+uHBZ3WY-liAyNTg1 猎奇蘑菇🍄 https://t.me/+3Gx3FgiWnr5iMTdl 夏夜淫梦🍑 https://t.me/+8Xuot8lIlL45NTY1 猎奇小屋👽 https://t.me/+kTBa05lDXjAyMWM9 猎奇坚果🌵 https://t.me/+fxx4noTbn-cwYmI5 大便百科💩 https://t.me/+KhQZZgMZNwQwYjZl 奇趣百科🐼 https://t.me/+MG1njsD4jiViOWI1 吃瓜中心🍒 https://t.me/+Y_eCstNaYuwzOTY1 淫民星空🐳 https://t.me/+XNGRIl1W…
👍312❤169👎21😁21👏16🥰16🤯15👌11
📍 猎奇小屋👽 @btloe ⭐️ 每日趣闻⭐ @qqvae 🔴 一键关注
👍72❤47👎11😁11🔥10🤯4👏2
解除 敏感内容 限制: 必须先设置用户名id Telegram 手机版 @qqmua https://web.telegram.org 浏览器打开官网 登陆账号 (验证码 在app内) 成功登入Telegram 网页版后,点选左上角“选单”按钮 👉 点选“Settings” 👉 Privacy and Security 👉 Sensitive Content 👉 开启Disable filtering √ 👉 重启app 重新加群 (迪拜号码无选项)
👍335❤168👏30😁26🔥23🤡22🥰18👎16
奇趣百科 秘密花园㊙️ https://t.me/+SVnSoibKf-swNDQx 夏夜淫梦🍑 @xyokx 奇趣百科💥 @qiqubaike 奇趣百科🐼 @qiqubk 吃瓜爆料🍉 @qiqubook 淫民星空🐳 @Airooa 彩虹城堡🌈 @Airaoo AV-NO.1🔞 @AVqqc 探花主播📸 @Thxiha 街拍学院💓 @Tpqcc 猎奇小屋👽 @BTlot 猎奇坚果🌵 @btbaa 每日趣闻🌀 @qqvae 大便百科💩 @dbbk0 导航频道🔰 @qqmua 👨🏻🚀 @qqmua @btlot 无法访问✅👉解除敏感权限👈 中文汉化||管理||投稿🤖||备用 频道 管理员:@qqbkab
👍234❤226💩34😁33👎17👏16🔥9🥰7
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @QQmua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@QQmua edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 58 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@QQmua named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“奇趣百科 导航” (@QQmua), 39,458 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QQmua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.