Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 六合彩社区-吃瓜 🍉中心

Channel

六合彩社区-吃瓜 🍉中心

@lhcsq

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

71,632subscribers

+8,349 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002164232188
TypeChannel
Username@lhcsq
Description#六合彩 #吃瓜 #曝光 #美女 #六合社群 六合彩社群联盟打造优质吃瓜曝光频道,一直被模仿从未被超越 商务合作: @LHCMX 聊天交流: @AWLHC 投稿曝光: @luowen 声明:频道只负责投稿发布信息,真假自行甄别,理性吃瓜,恶意投稿,后果自负!
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 October 2026
Measurements held50
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/lhcsq

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

50,51471,82761,170.57 August 2026 — 63,283 subscribers8 August 2026 — 63,029 subscribers9 August 2026 — 62,865 subscribers10 August 2026 — 62,744 subscribers11 August 2026 — 62,432 subscribers12 August 2026 — 62,338 subscribers13 August 2026 — 61,941 subscribers15 August 2026 — 61,905 subscribers16 August 2026 — 61,726 subscribers17 August 2026 — 61,483 subscribers18 August 2026 — 61,305 subscribers19 August 2026 — 61,165 subscribers20 August 2026 — 61,157 subscribers22 August 2026 — 61,133 subscribers23 August 2026 — 61,139 subscribers25 August 2026 — 61,039 subscribers25 August 2026 — 60,877 subscribers26 August 2026 — 60,908 subscribers27 August 2026 — 60,954 subscribers28 August 2026 — 61,095 subscribers29 August 2026 — 60,950 subscribers30 August 2026 — 60,876 subscribers31 August 2026 — 60,677 subscribers1 September 2026 — 60,585 subscribers3 September 2026 — 60,536 subscribers4 September 2026 — 60,600 subscribers7 September 2026 — 60,678 subscribers10 September 2026 — 60,758 subscribers12 September 2026 — 60,649 subscribers14 September 2026 — 60,671 subscribers15 September 2026 — 60,640 subscribers18 September 2026 — 60,656 subscribers1 October 2026 — 50,514 subscribers6 October 2026 — 70,844 subscribers10 October 2026 — 71,160 subscribers13 October 2026 — 71,388 subscribers15 October 2026 — 71,487 subscribers16 October 2026 — 71,532 subscribers17 October 2026 — 71,517 subscribers18 October 2026 — 71,673 subscribers19 October 2026 — 71,693 subscribers20 October 2026 — 71,663 subscribers21 October 2026 — 71,618 subscribers22 October 2026 — 71,750 subscribers23 October 2026 — 71,827 subscribers24 October 2026 — 71,750 subscribers25 October 2026 — 71,715 subscribers26 October 2026 — 71,704 subscribers27 October 2026 — 71,724 subscribers28 October 2026 — 71,632 subscribers71,6327 August 202628 October 2026
50 measurements spanning 82 days, net +8,349. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,317–75,024 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 50
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Oct 2026, 13:5971,632-92
27 Oct 2026, 17:0671,724+20
26 Oct 2026, 17:3971,704-11
25 Oct 2026, 15:1271,715-35
24 Oct 2026, 16:2771,750-77
23 Oct 2026, 18:2671,827+77
22 Oct 2026, 14:4771,750+132
21 Oct 2026, 07:0071,618-45
20 Oct 2026, 02:4771,663-30
19 Oct 2026, 03:1971,693+20
18 Oct 2026, 06:4071,673+156
17 Oct 2026, 07:0671,517-15
16 Oct 2026, 03:5771,532+45
15 Oct 2026, 00:2771,487+99
13 Oct 2026, 21:0571,388+228
10 Oct 2026, 10:5771,160+316
6 Oct 2026, 07:4170,844+20,330
1 Oct 2026, 02:0050,514-10,142
18 Sept 2026, 05:3860,656+16
15 Sept 2026, 21:1960,640first reading

Engagement

1,118 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 240 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.131%
avg views ÷ 71,632 subscribers
Avg views / post
94.1
397 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
397
of 1,118 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 397 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 October 2026
Posts held1,118 (6 August 2026 – 29 October 2026)
Views total37,343
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Oct 2026, 05:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,970
Videos
≈10,900
Links
≈584

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4h 57m
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 814 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

80 reactions across 74 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4151.2%
❤2328.7%
🔥56.25%
🎉33.75%
😁22.50%
🥰22.50%
⚡11.25%
👎11.25%
👏11.25%
🤩11.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 15 August 2026 to 29 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Oct 2026, 04:10 UTC21 viewsread 29 October 2026
Video

一台春风就能吸引这么多妹妹,怪不得现在这么多骑士! #摩托 #带妹

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,118 posts we hold for @lhcsq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“六合彩社区-吃瓜 🍉中心” (@lhcsq), 71,632 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lhcsq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.