Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
香港六合彩资料
@XGLHCB
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
55,934subscribers
-10,888 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001952898431 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XGLHCB |
| Description | 香港六合彩资料更新库 六合彩交流群: @amlhc0 澳门六合资料库: @amlh1 香港六合资料库: @LHCXGQ 新澳门资料库: @xam49 21*00前更新完毕香港六合资料 ===== ===== ===== ===== #香港 #香港六合彩 #六合彩内幕 #六合彩电报群 免费分享香港各种资料,香港六合彩资料,自由讨论交,永不解散 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 20 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XGLHCB |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 55,934 | -21 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 55,955 | -60 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 56,015 | -32 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 56,047 | -211 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 56,258 | -229 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 56,487 | -90 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 56,577 | -121 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 56,698 | -2,901 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 59,599 | -102 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 59,701 | -926 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 60,627 | -4,891 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 65,518 | -144 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 65,662 | -194 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 65,856 | -142 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 65,998 | -137 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:11 | 66,135 | -118 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 66,253 | -359 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 66,612 | -138 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 66,750 | -72 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 66,822 | first reading |
Engagement
162 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.418%
- avg views ÷ 55,934 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 234
- 161 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.308%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 162
- of 162 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 161 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 162 (6 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 37,655 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈51,800
- Videos
- ≈111
- Links
- ≈414
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
26 reactions across 22 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 84.6% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 3.85% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 162 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 162 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
全球入口:https://b.cc/register?code=LHCMM 国内入口:http://6888b.cc/register?code=LHCMM
#六合彩 #香港六合彩 第095期一肖平特 【平特一肖】值得关注 095期平特一肖『猴猴猴』开00准 092期平特一肖『羊羊羊』开12准 091期平特一肖『鼠鼠鼠』开07准 088期平特一肖『狗狗狗』开21准 087期平特一肖『马马马』开13准 085期平特一肖『牛牛牛』开42准
#六合彩 #香港六合彩 第095期 菜肉草生肖 【菜肉草肖】 吃肉肖:(虎蛇龙狗) 吃菜肖:(猪鼠鸡猴) 吃草肖:(牛羊马兔) 095期菜肉草肖【吃菜吃肉】开?00准 094期菜肉草肖【吃菜吃肉】开猴35准 093期菜肉草肖【吃菜吃肉】开鼠07准 092期菜肉草肖【吃草吃肉】开虎29准 091期菜肉草肖【吃菜吃草】开鸡34准 088期菜肉草肖【吃菜吃肉】开猴23准 087期菜肉草肖【吃草吃肉】开马13准 086期菜肉草肖【吃菜吃草】开猴47准 085期菜肉草肖【吃肉吃草】开龙03准
#六合彩 #香港六合彩 第095期平特一尾中特 【平特一尾】 095期平特一尾『777尾』开00准 093期平特一尾『111尾』开01准 091期平特一尾『999尾』开09准 089期平特一尾『888尾』开28准 088期平特一尾『555尾』开35准 086期平特一尾『222尾』开32准 085期平特一尾『000尾』开30准 084期平特一尾『888尾』开38准 083期平特一尾『333尾』开23准 082期平特一尾『111尾』开01准 081期平特一尾『777尾』开07准 080期平特一尾『555尾』开05准 079期平特一尾『333尾』开23准
#六合彩 #香港六合彩 第095期 大小中特 【大小中特】 095期大小中特『大大大』开?00准 091期大小中特『大大大』开鸡34准 090期大小中特『大大大』开马49准 088期大小中特『小小小』开猴23准 087期大小中特『小小小』开马13准 084期大小中特『大大大』开蛇38准 084期大小中特『大大大』开蛇38准 083期大小中特『小小小』开猴23准 082期大小中特『大大大』开羊48准 081期大小中特『大大大』开鸡34准
#六合彩 #香港六合彩 第095期 绝杀三肖 【绝杀三肖】 095期绝杀三肖『羊猪马』开?00准 094期绝杀三肖『虎羊鼠』开猴35准 092期绝杀三肖『鸡牛狗』开虎29准 089期绝杀三肖『羊马猪』开蛇14准 088期绝杀三肖『蛇马狗』开猴23准 085期绝杀三肖『猪马鼠』开龙03准 084期绝杀三肖『牛猪狗』开蛇38准 082期绝杀三肖『鸡鼠马』开羊48准 081期绝杀三肖『兔牛鼠』开鸡34准 080期绝杀三肖『兔狗鼠』开猴11准
#六合彩 #香港六合彩 第095期 家禽野兽 【家野中特】 095期家野中特〖野兽野兽〗开?00准 093期家野中特〖野兽野兽〗开鼠07准 092期家野中特〖野兽野兽〗开虎29准 091期家野中特〖家禽家禽〗开鸡34准 090期家野中特〖家禽家禽〗开马49准 089期家野中特〖野兽野兽〗开蛇14准 088期家野中特〖野兽野兽〗开猴23准 087期家野中特〖家禽家禽〗开马13准 084期家野中特〖野兽野兽〗开蛇38准 083期家野中特〖野兽野兽〗开猴23准 082期家野中特〖家禽家禽〗开羊48准
#六合彩 #香港六合彩 第095期 绝杀二尾 【绝杀二尾】 095期绝杀二尾【2尾3尾】开?00 094期绝杀二尾【3尾7尾】开猴35 093期绝杀二尾【4尾6尾】开鼠07 092期绝杀二尾【6尾2尾】开?00 091期绝杀二尾【2尾5尾】开鸡34 090期绝杀二尾【7尾0尾】开马49 089期绝杀二尾【1尾8尾】开蛇14 088期绝杀二尾【5尾6尾】开猴23 087期绝杀二尾【8尾6尾】开马13 086期绝杀二尾【3尾6尾】开猴47 085期绝杀二尾【9尾4尾】开龙03 084期绝杀二尾【9尾3尾】开蛇38 083期绝杀二尾【1尾2尾】开猴23 081期绝杀二尾【2尾5尾】开鸡34
#六合彩 #香港六合彩 第095期公开资料特码 087期稳中双波【红波绿波】开马13准 088期稳中双波【红波绿波】开猴23准 090期稳中双波【红波绿波】开马49准 091期稳中双波【红波绿波】开鸡34准 092期稳中双波【红波绿波】开虎29准 094期稳中双波【蓝波绿波】开猴35准 095期稳中双波【蓝波绿波】开?00准
#六合彩 #香港六合彩 第095期单双四肖中特 【单双四肖】值得跟踪 【单双四肖】 095期鼠狗猴龙 猪鸡蛇牛 开?00 094期鼠狗猴虎 猪蛇兔牛 开猴35 093期鼠狗马龙 猪鸡兔牛 开鼠07 091期狗马猴龙 鸡蛇兔牛 开鸡34 090期鼠狗马猴 猪鸡兔牛 开马49 089期狗马猴虎 猪鸡蛇牛 开蛇14 088期鼠马猴虎 鸡蛇兔羊 开猴23 086期猴狗鼠龙 蛇猪兔羊 开猴47 084期虎鼠狗马 牛羊蛇猪 开蛇38 082期猴马狗虎 蛇兔牛羊 开羊48 081期狗虎马龙 牛蛇鸡猪 开鸡34 080期鼠龙马猴 蛇鸡猪羊 开猴11
#六合彩 #香港六合彩 第095期一肖一码 【一肖一码】 095期:①码12 095期:③码12.24.48 095期:⑤码12.24.48.15.27 095期:⑧码12.24.48.15.27.39.26.38 095期:①肖羊 095期:②肖羊龙 095期:③肖羊龙蛇 095期:④肖羊龙蛇牛 095期:⑤肖羊龙蛇牛兔 095期:⑥肖羊龙蛇牛兔马 095期:⑦肖羊龙蛇牛兔马鼠 095期:⑨肖羊龙蛇牛兔马鼠猪虎 095期一肖平特:兔 095期单双:双数+龙马 095期家野:家禽+龙蛇 095期波色:红波+绿波 历史记录: 093期:②肖虎鼠(开鼠准) 092期:②肖兔虎(开虎准) 090期:①肖马(开马准) 089期:③肖狗兔蛇(开蛇准) 088期:⑨肖马虎龙狗牛猪羊兔猴(开猴准) 086期:⑨肖马虎龙狗牛猪羊兔猴(开猴准) 085期:⑦肖蛇兔马猪牛狗龙(开龙准) 084期:③肖马鼠蛇(…
Showing the 12 most recent of 162 posts we hold for @XGLHCB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 924,763 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@xam49 · 100,786#1
@dkjaskgb · 6,974#2
@lhcbb · 2,929#3
@sisi5188 · 8,910#4
@amlh1 · 63,842#5
@AMLH49 · 24,403#6
@Jktiyu1 · 4,898#7
@XAMlHC0 · 65,665#8
@hklhcgg · 1,765#9
@AMLH8 · 3,716#10
@amlh168 · 10,052#11
@TG994 · 5,779#12
@aokkodo · 17,502#13
@cp618 · 13,182#14
@US168 · 5,628#15
@xinaomem888 · 471#16
@xglhckj · 5,028#17
@xinam169 · 2,025 (as read 25 August 2026)#18
@ellen8520 · 67#19
@xglh168 · 3,016#20
@lusjka881 · 4,783#21
@Ssssss12302 · 114#22
@amlhcq · 15,712#23
@GTY888LH · 13,790#24
@XMF1188 · 10,213#25
@KY99886 · 1,637#26
@q2002kk · 238,814#27
@xgam6 · 374#28
@amlhckj · 7,023#29
@xinaomei · 5,513#30
@xinao22222 · 747#31
@xianggangkai · 3,036#32
@lshouma1887 · 401#33
@SF4SE · 1,273#34
@aQiREwOPaR80OGM5 · 64#35
@ysty001 · 526#36
@lg668888899 · 140#37
@J16888J · 185#38
@neimu666999 · 74#39
@amlhc_bot · 7,736#40
@jvguiful · 5,425#41
@LHC97 · 36,373#42
@jiuzhouxinaomenneimu1 · 2,422 (as read 25 August 2026)#43
@Sjdhccj · 386#44
@paLiWkL3bs05NjB · 4,567#45
@temafenxiang · 277#46
@tiyu_13 · 912#47
@safsaf23211 · 6,295#48
@XGLH49 · 4,015#49
@hdajbf · 6,450#50
@liuhecai520140 · 3,698#51
@liuhecai558 · 1,788#52
@scb886 · 1,283#53
@TGMacao · 448#54
@cxxam9 · 918#55
@zmjs888 · 1,007#56
@KY16668 · 454#57
@liuhecaimoni1 · 231#58
@Yb33333888 · 2,775#59
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@amlh1 · 63,842
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 25 August 2026
@XAMlHC0 · 65,665
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 25 August 2026
@xam49 · 100,786
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“香港六合彩资料” (@XGLHCB), 55,934 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XGLHCB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.