👏👊👊🗒资料正在更新中... 🥰🥰🥰🥰会员资料整合群 进会员群联系: @laotie888 @mm9363 @agua831013 进入会员群提前看各种稳料
Signed 老铁

Channel
@xam49
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
101,343subscribers
-4,094 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001867685037 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xam49 |
| Description | 新澳门六合彩资料库(49图库开奖) 六合彩交流群: @amlhc0 新澳门资料库: @xam49 新澳门资料库 https://t.me/XAMlHC0 澳门六合资料库: @amlh1 香港六合资料库: @xamlh 每日21*00前更新完毕澳门六合资料 ===== ===== ===== ===== #六合彩 #六合彩内幕 #六合彩电报群 免费分享新澳门各种资料,新澳门六合彩资料,自由讨论交,永不解散 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xam49 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 101,343 | +9,368 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:48 | 91,975 | -360 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:24 | 92,335 | -2,602 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 94,937 | -5,465 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 100,402 | -206 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 100,608 | -178 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 100,786 | -131 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 100,917 | -64 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 100,981 | -74 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 101,055 | -186 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 101,241 | -243 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 101,484 | -266 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 101,750 | -195 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 101,945 | -298 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 102,243 | -169 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 102,412 | -344 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 102,756 | -499 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 103,255 | -481 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 103,736 | -162 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 103,898 | first reading |
476 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 476 (7 August 2026 – 5 September 2026) |
| Views total | 150,278 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 04:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
👏👊👊🗒资料正在更新中... 🥰🥰🥰🥰会员资料整合群 进会员群联系: @laotie888 @mm9363 @agua831013 进入会员群提前看各种稳料
Signed 老铁
新澳门六合彩 pinned a photo
👏👊👊🗒资料正在更新中... 🥰🥰🥰🥰会员资料整合群 进会员群联系: @laotie888 @mm9363 @agua831013 进入会员群提前看各种稳料
Signed 老铁
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 阿聪 六合资料小栈
今年以来受整体大环境的影响,我们各项成本、风险剧增,在管理组不断权衡利弊、探讨无数次之后我们不得不做出涨价的决定: 新进168/月(进群一路发),后续续费128/月(相对原先98/月每天只增加一块钱)RMB!!! 未来的日子很长,慕熙管理组全体成员将竭尽所能寻找更好的资料让群友提高中奖概率; 我们做不到让所有人都满意, 但,“不作恶”将成为我们的座右铭! 再次感谢各位的支持与厚爱,祝愿各位长久吃肉、开心中大奖! 进群联系 喜儿 @xe365 老铁 @laotie888 毛毛 @mm9363 投诉、建议、广告 慕熙 @lhcmx
Signed 老铁
🔥慕熙团队携手B.CC再战六合彩 🔥慕熙团队2026重磅项目 发财链接:https://b.cc/register?code=LHCMX 发财链接:http://6888b.cc/register?code=LHCMX 😀😀😀😀深耕会员资料整合多年,专业沉淀只为省心而来! 新澳门六合彩😄😁😁😁😁😄😁,收集各大精准且稳定料子经过验证然后发布在会员群里,资料记录都是真实记录不改料,每天稳定更新,比你自己在满飞机,去网站瞎鸡巴乱看的好,实话实说,资料都是我们精挑细选的,😁😁的齐全大家也能看见,海量😁😁任君挑选,不光有常规资料,还有版主个人心水 进会员群的老总 联系以下管理 🥰🥰🥰@laotie888 老铁 🥰🥰🥰@mm9363 毛毛 🥰🥰🥰@agua831013 喜儿 TG六合圈最具权威性团队 慕熙团队 资源导航 关注本频道,即可订阅本团队所有资料频道 😀https://t.me/liuhecaiai 一直被模仿,从未被
Signed 老铁
准
Signed vip会员群-瓜瓜 @xe365
准
Signed vip会员群-瓜瓜 @xe365
准
Signed vip会员群-瓜瓜 @xe365
准
Signed vip会员群-瓜瓜 @xe365
准
Signed vip会员群-瓜瓜 @xe365
👏👊👊🗒资料正在更新中... 🥰🥰🥰🥰会员资料整合群 进会员群联系: @laotie888 @mm9363 @agua831013 进入会员群提前看各种稳料
Signed 老铁
Showing the 12 most recent of 476 posts we hold for @xam49. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“新澳门六合彩” (@xam49), 101,343 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xam49.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.