连肖系列
Signed 阿七

Channel
@xamlh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
55,137subscribers
+4,150 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002216829994 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xamlh |
| Description | 六合彩交流群( @AMLHCA ) 新澳资料频道 @xamlh 需要资料或投诉建议反馈: @rrrqj ===== ===== ===== ===== #六合彩 #六合彩内幕 #六合彩电报群 免费分享新澳门各种资料,新澳门六合彩资料,自由讨论交,永不解散 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xamlh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 55,137 | -38 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 55,175 | -34 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 55,209 | -35 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 55,244 | -74 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 55,318 | -111 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 55,429 | -148 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 55,577 | -112 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 55,689 | -63 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 55,752 | -161 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 55,913 | -76 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 55,989 | -184 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 56,173 | -131 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 56,304 | -159 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 56,463 | -52 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 56,515 | -112 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 56,627 | -48 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 56,675 | -38 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 56,713 | -107 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 56,820 | +5,922 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 50,898 | first reading |
437 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 437 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 437 (7 August 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,425 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
21 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 61.9% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 437 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 437 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
连肖系列
Signed 阿七
绝杀系列
Signed 阿七
老墨系列
Signed 阿七
有些资料的高光时刻已经过去,还需等待机会,有些资料还在高光时刻,明天卡时间更新了,提前看联系:阿七 @rrrqj ,包厢准备好,接着奏乐,接着舞 你在犹豫,别人都在发财,大点干早点散,错过了一些出货的高光时刻,你只能拍大腿后悔,也不用说我天天发的迟,我一直也说了, 有效下注资料提前看,拒绝白嫖❌,这不比跟着外面的烟雾弹舒服?一份好的资料,一个好的开端,一路顺势,注册平台有效下注,联系阿七 @rrrqj 好料提前看,这么多期的回顾相信兄弟们也明白稳定性,慕熙团队才是你最坚强的后盾 在平台充值有效下注,每天好料提前看到 满足流水联系 @rrrqj 平台链接👇👇👇…… 🌏注册网址:🔤🔤🔤🔤 😂😂😂😂😂😂😀 😂😂😂😂 https://b.cc/register?code=a1367267025 😂😂😂😂 国内用 http://6888b.cc/register?code=a1367267025
Signed 阿七
🀄️ 杀码全中
Signed 阿七
自动定时广告商:新澳提现最快的平台 😊😊😊u充u提 🌌🌌🌌彩票类:新澳门六合彩/三分六合彩/赛车/澳门全系列 加拿大28 🌌🌌🌌产品类:PG电子 💲全面支持usdt存取款 💲不限地区IP,无需实名,东南亚均可娱乐 💲六合系列47.5倍 10分封盘稳台,新澳门彩指定平台 💎💎💎💎 🎁国内线路: https://6888b.cc/register?code=a1367267025 🎁国内线路: https://9888b.cc/register?code=a1367267025 🎁全球国内进不去线路:https://b.cc/register?code=a1367267025 😀🤣😀官方客服:@uuuuu 😀🤣😀官方频道:@uuuuuu 🤛🤜🫷🫸炸弹靓号价值百万 💎💎💎 域名一位数B.cc 不是普通的野鸡台能比较的 价格超过千万元 提现速度平均30秒到账😀😀😀
Signed 阿七
日历 第241期
Signed 阿七
开奖提醒
Signed 阿七
二尾十码直接稳吃,有些资料的高光时刻已经过去,还需等待机会,有些资料还在高光时刻,明天卡时间更新了,提前看联系:阿七 @rrrqj ,包厢准备好,接着奏乐,接着舞 你在犹豫,别人都在发财,大点干早点散,错过了一些出货的高光时刻,你只能拍大腿后悔,也不用说我天天发的迟,我一直也说了, 有效下注资料提前看,拒绝白嫖❌,这不比跟着外面的烟雾弹舒服?一份好的资料,一个好的开端,一路顺势,注册平台有效下注,联系阿七 @rrrqj 好料提前看,这么多期的回顾相信兄弟们也明白稳定性,慕熙团队才是你最坚强的后盾 在平台充值有效下注,每天好料提前看到 满足流水联系 @rrrqj 平台链接👇👇👇…… 🌏注册网址:🔤🔤🔤🔤 😂😂😂😂😂😂😀 😂😂😂😂 https://b.cc/register?code=a1367267025 😂😂😂😂 国内用 http://6888b.cc/register?code=a1367267025
Signed 阿七
🀄️
Signed 阿七
🀄️
Signed 阿七
🀄️ 杀码依旧全中
Signed 阿七
Showing the 12 most recent of 437 posts we hold for @xamlh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 861,325 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“新澳门六合彩【资料库】” (@xamlh), 55,137 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xamlh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.