Channel
@chiguak
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
74,071subscribers
+5,952 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002035889505 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chiguak |
| Description | 👉聚焦东南亚热点事件、国际新闻、社会动态、华人关注资讯，第一时间更新柬埔寨、斯里兰卡、缅甸、迪拜、泰国、越南、老挝等地区消息 东南亚大事件 @kk777 东南亚吃瓜群 @kk999 东南亚素材库 @zhaopian |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 51 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chiguak |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 28% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 6 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 9 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @yuenanE/169436 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC | @chiguak/70610 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuenanE/169556 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC | @chiguak/70622 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @yuenanE/169576 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC | @chiguak/70624 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuenanE/169586 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC | @chiguak/70625 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuenanE/169656 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC | @chiguak/70632 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuenanE/170897 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC | @chiguak/70756 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @yuenanE | 22 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (21–1) |
| @xigangz | 22 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @xigangz (21–1) |
| @Bx666x | 22 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 72 seconds | @Bx666x (19–3) |
| @yuenanU | 18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (15–3) |
| @jinbiany | 18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (18–0) |
| @miandianQ | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @miandianQ (13–4) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 57 of the 57 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 36 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 9, the earliest publisher we hold is @miandianQ. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 8 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:21 | 74,071 | +2,870 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 71,201 | +14,391 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:05 | 56,810 | +20,192 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:35 | 36,618 | +991 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:34 | 35,627 | -511 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:47 | 36,138 | -298 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 36,436 | -381 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:17 | 36,817 | -127 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 06:55 | 36,944 | -174 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 08:31 | 37,118 | -166 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 11:44 | 37,284 | -215 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 08:16 | 37,499 | -157 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 10:17 | 37,656 | -374 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 21:37 | 38,030 | -495 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 10:00 | 38,525 | -612 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 21:00 | 39,137 | -762 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 02:02 | 39,899 | -1,125 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 41,024 | -435 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 41,459 | -686 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 42,145 | first reading |
2,034 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 156 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 818 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,034 (6 August 2026 – 26 October 2026) |
| Views total | 27,572 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Oct 2026, 11:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 344 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14 reactions across 14 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 19 September 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#老挝新闻 社会各界共同参与，打击和整治网络犯罪及网络赌博 2026年1月至9月16日，万象首都共捣毁和查处网络犯罪活动窝点153起，抓获犯罪嫌疑人10,651人，涉及31个国籍，包括老挝、中国、越南、泰国、缅甸、俄罗斯、巴西、埃塞俄比亚、乌干达、卢旺达等国家。 其中，有4起重大案件引起了社会广泛关注，充分体现了打击和整治网络犯罪、网络赌博（诈骗园区、网络诈骗团伙）以及开展枪支收缴工作的成效，为维护社会安宁稳定发挥了积极作用。 这4起重大案件包括： 第一，警方突击捣毁位于哈赛丰县（Hadxaifong）的ST Vegas大楼内的犯罪团伙，共抓获589人，并查获电脑设备及手机等物品超过10,000件。 第二，警方突击搜查位于赛色塔县（Xaysettha）塔銮湖经济特区内的一栋建筑，成功捣毁一个跨国犯罪团伙，抓获261名中国籍和越南籍人员。 第三，警方在万象首都同时对6个主要地点开展联合行动，查获3,300多部用于实施网…
#菲律宾资讯：POGO犯罪集团或为2028年大选提供资金 菲律宾众议院调查委员会（House）检方顾问阿塞·巴伯斯（Ace Barbers）呼吁执法部门和金融情报机构，调查非法菲律宾离岸博彩运营商（POGO）与政治资金之间是否存在关联。 他警告称，犯罪集团可能利用非法所得资助政治人物，以换取政治庇护。 巴伯斯表示：“如果这些报道属实，我们就必须立即采取行动。追踪资金流向，查明出资人，揭露他们的政治关系，并针对所有参与这一计划的人建立证据确凿、无懈可击的案件。” 他援引了菲律宾娱乐博彩公司（PAGCOR）发言人温斯顿·卡西奥（Winston Casio）此前发出的警告。卡西奥指出，残存的非法POGO运营网络可能会为候选人提供资金，以换取对其非法活动的保护。 巴伯斯呼吁菲律宾国家警察、国家调查局、菲律宾武装部队（AFP）情报部门、总统反有组织犯罪委员会、反洗钱委员会以及选举委员会加强协调，共同追踪涉嫌非法资金，并调查有组织…
高危职业，非孤勇者请勿当反诈博主 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 8⃣🔤🔤🔤亿级域名 上押担保300万美金 实力派 数字够短 品牌够大 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
#网友吐槽：亚博开云部门风控一群连话都说不清楚的越南人，字都不会打，都看不懂。 男的拼命巴结二审、助长，搞关系；女的也一样，巴结二审、巴结助长，甚至陪睡，只为了发群能扣到拦截，靠关系、靠下水道。 我就不明白了，风控怎么变成关系户才能扣到拦截？没关系的基本是屌都不叼。基本是亚博风控，已经腐败了，长期杀真实会员，只因为赢钱了。他们都该死，不然怎么发绩效、怎么发工资？ 推广线、代理线、无代理，疯狂到什么地步？大客都杀，只为业绩。一群越南仔、越南女，大杀特杀，都他妈的该死，是吗？赢就套利？殊不知，越南人前面人家嬉皮笑脸巴结你，背后就是越南语草尼玛币、傻币、中国佬、大傻逼。 推广线会员盈利，就安排刷水套彩金，批量同玩法，死了几年的会员硬凑，无辜躺枪。充值那么大，就为套几千块彩金吗？信誉平台？信誉是什么，各位？一审、二审、助长、主管、总监。 无代理的会员，不管玩什么，盈利照样死。不管玩什么，风控总能找一样的三四个账号，一批杀，躺了…
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 👍👍👍👍👍 😘 【贵宾会 750.cc 】 强势启航 集团背书 信誉担保 全网首发，引爆彩票娱乐新纪元！六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 合营代理 独立后台 佣金周结 自主赚赔 层级保护，官方零接触用户 ⚡⚡⚡👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 👍扎根东南亚，面向全世界，打造东南亚华人的专属银行，携 Solaire 千亿实体资本入场，菲律宾索莱尔 · 官方直营，欢迎盘总挑战狗庄。 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡👍👍👍👍👍 😘PG娱乐城大客户再创新高： 👍天之骄子：日本神秘大佬PG电子麻将胡了爆大奖出款176万U👈点击 👍重磅来袭：新加坡盘口老板百家乐1条天路喜提320万U👈点击 👍空前绝后：缅甸某园区股东9天赢走192万U 单笔提款百万u财务秒出款👈点击 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 ⚡⚡PG集团耗资百亿打造全网最顶级线上娱乐城，业界龙头行业第一，PG直营仅此一站! 😀😀😀😀😀 @PGyx8_…
国内反诈App被指监测境外财经网站访问记录，超2亿部手机安装引发隐私争议 据相关媒体2026年10月22日报道，外媒再次关注中国国家反诈中心App的监测权限及隐私争议。相关报道援引《金融时报》此前的调查称，该应用在2021年已安装于超过2亿部手机，部分用户在访问境外财经新闻网站后，曾接到警方电话或被询问相关情况。 报道提到，一名上海用户称，自己访问美国财经新闻网站后接到警方联系，并被询问是否有海外联系人、是否经常浏览境外网站。山东一名用户则表示，访问彭博社等境外信息平台后，曾连续多日接到警方电话。 据受访者反映，该应用曾被要求获取多项手机权限，包括通话记录、短信等相关信息，引发部分用户对个人隐私及数据安全的担忧。 国家反诈中心App推出的主要目的是识别涉诈电话、短信及恶意软件。不过，相关案例也引发外界对反诈技术使用范围及个人信息保护的讨论。 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金…
#群友爆料：刚刚在金边钻石岛那边不知 去哪个楼里抓的 一队警车大概有20辆左右。 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 8⃣🔤🔤🔤亿级域名 上押担保300万美金 实力派 数字够短 品牌够大 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
网友投稿：“西港”大西港酒店往上一点的华美达酒店，这边抓了不少人，刚刚我路过看到的，不知道是抓的打野的还是抓没护照的，在附近的注意！ 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 8⃣🔤🔤🔤亿级域名 上押担保300万美金 实力派 数字够短 品牌够大 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀【贵宾会 750.cc 】 强势启航 集团背书 信誉担保 全网首发，引爆彩票娱乐新纪元！六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 合营代理 独立后台 佣金周结 自主赚赔 层级保护，官方零接触用户 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀【辉煌】业界最高返水 1.6%无上限 😀【辉煌】免实名不限地区 日提千万U 😀【辉煌】网投第一品牌 公正公平无私彩 😀【辉煌】10亿😂奖池 大奖根本爆不停 😀【辉煌】福利天花板 入款笔笔赠送3% 😀【辉煌】盘总首选娱乐城 创造新辉煌 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😕助您辉煌人生，雪中送炭不如锦上添花： 😀单笔出款😀😀😀万 额外奖励18888 😀单笔出款😀😀😀万 额外奖励58888 😘狗庄落泪：昨日幸运玩家仅用800u返水爆庄193万u，0审核0卡款 财务秒出 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😘官方招商: @HHDL8888 😘官方飞
💎彩票168统一开奖，公平公开公正【计划群】 无视任何彩种 专业带赢 💎翻身致富: @SGcaipiao168 ✅幸运飞艇，北京赛车，澳洲幸运10，大发快三，幸运时时彩，香港/澳门六合彩等精准包赢计划 ✅合理规划本金，理性下注，日进斗金，双赢旗航 168官方开奖 全网中奖率最高 专业团队研究计划走势! ✅支持 usdt 汇旺 存取款 大额无忧 ✅群计划24小时火热进行，实现财富实时增长，万人交流，福利不停 🔥万人交流: @SGcaipiao168 🏆包赢计划 日赚20万 全网唯一官彩168双赢台子 加入我们 干倒狗庄 🏆打工翻不了身 横财才能暴富 🏆首存赠送100%，福利天花板 💎彩金专员: @xd650cc 💎包赢计划: @SGcaipiao168 💎官方网址： 751477.com ✅全网独家官方彩票万人交流大群
#网友爆料：缅甸妙瓦底梅拉园区有一家叫“汇金集团”的公司，老大叫侯哥，总监叫林泽，团长叫16，人事叫金水。 就是他们把我弟弟阿磊从国内骗到了园区，每天逼他工作16到18个小时，不愿意干就打人。就算交了赔付，也照样把人卖掉。 我们家人已经报警，所有录音和视频证据也都提交了。等着吧。 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 8⃣🔤🔤🔤亿级域名 上押担保300万美金 实力派 数字够短 品牌够大 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
麻将包厢偷拍牌局诈赌！ 株洲、长沙、湘潭等地33人落网，查获针孔摄像头165个 天元公安10月25日消息： 近日，湖南省株洲市公安局天元分局成功打掉4个利用窃听窃照设备诈赌涉案团伙，抓获犯罪嫌疑人33名，查获窃听、窃照设备一批。 2026年年初，株洲市公安局天元分局在日常工作中发现，有犯罪团伙专门选择私密性强的茶楼、茶餐厅包厢，在灯具、墙角、装饰缝隙等隐蔽位置秘密安装隐形摄像头，偷拍牌局过程，实施诈骗。 民警立即深入调查，经数个月缜密侦查，逐步查清分别以阳某某、杨某、何某、马某某为首的4个犯罪团伙。团伙内分工明确：有在包厢隐蔽位置安装窃听窃照设备的人员，有负责邀约参赌人员入局的人员，还有在后台实时观看画面、分析牌局，同步指挥桌上同伙出牌的人员，团伙配合紧密，靠这种方式在牌局中骗取钱财。 时机成熟后，天元公安组织百余民警，在株洲、长沙、湘潭多地同步开展收网行动，打掉4个涉案团伙，抓获犯罪嫌疑人33名，其中12人被批准逮捕，…
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,034 posts we hold for @chiguak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大事件 吃瓜新闻 马来西亚” (@chiguak), 74,071 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chiguak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.