Channel
@miandianQQQQ
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,541subscribers
-446 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002119717735 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miandianQQQQ |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miandianQQQQ |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 17,541 | -23 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 17,564 | -38 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 17,602 | -22 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 17,624 | -31 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 17,655 | -52 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 17,707 | -42 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 17,749 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:59 | 17,759 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:45 | 17,774 | -14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 17,788 | -20 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 17,808 | -15 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 17,823 | -20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 17,843 | -15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 17,858 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 17,859 | -18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 17,877 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 17,888 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 17,898 | -13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 17,911 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 17,922 | first reading |
501 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 501 (12 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,045 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 206 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 501 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 501 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀【金边娱乐城】长期储备资金10亿U，全网上押担保，资金有保障！广告费每月推广投入高达300万U+，打造全网U投综合盘N0.1 😀 【贵宾会 750.cc 】 强势启航 集团背书 信誉担保 全网首发，引爆彩票娱乐新纪元！六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 合营代理 独立后台 佣金周结 自主赚赔 层级保护，官方零接触用户 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀 😀 首存送 复存送 充值笔笔赠送3% 嫩模空姐女优空降 彩金大奖88888等你来拿! 🥰 狗庄落泪：东南亚神秘玩家打电子仅用300U爆140万U 秒出款 🥰 天选之人：柬埔寨狗推仅用返水4U炸了满倍10万U 秒出款 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀选对品牌，出款稳，福利好，反水高，盘总大哥首选盘口，电子超大水 电子真人 0审核0风控 包出款。 😀官方客服： @JBkefu8 😀官方招商： @JBDL6 😀官方频道：
#群友反馈：今天下午七星海也开始大检查啊 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888
#越南新闻 中国男子持刀抢劫海防市杂货店 张朋举（Zhang Peng Ju）供述称，因没有钱花，遂持刀进入杂货店威胁店员，抢走1.45亿越南盾。 海防市公安局于9月3日通报，犯罪嫌疑人张朋举（39岁，中国籍）在逃串多省潜逃4天多后，最终在山罗省被公安力量抓获。 此前，8月27日晚，在杜润（Đỗ Nhuận）路的一家杂货店内，一名蒙面男子闯入，持刀制服店员并拿走抽屉里的巨额现金后逃跑。 在追查过程中，警方确定犯罪嫌疑人为张朋举。今年6月，该男子入境越南寻找工作，并居住在海安坊杜润路。 据其供述，由于缺钱花销，加上看到该杂货店客流量大，遂萌生抢劫财物的念头。嫌疑人准备了裹得严严实实的服装，戴上手套、口罩并随身携带水果刀等待作案时机。 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888
#群友反馈：蓝湾现在进入了很多宪兵队开始检查了 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888
#老挝快讯：老挝金三角特内桐琴和万国公寓都有警察，据说是来检查办公的， 没有查护照 现在桐琴已经进入D栋检查，治安局和中国成龙一起的，物业老板都过来了，万国公寓已经上楼检查，楼下电梯口还有几个治安局在守着 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888
#群友爆料：我被柬埔寨无良律师坑了2.8万$ 差点命丧监狱 此人是个柬埔寨无良律师，坑蒙拐骗，丧尽天良。律师事务所在海豚警察局附近。 2023年12月底，经本地房东介绍接了我的案子，以帮我保释为名骗取我2.8W美金。我本身只是吸D，因为其拿钱不办事。害我错过黄金时间，最后多花了几倍的代价才得以出来，差点命丧监狱。 本人今年初出狱后联系房东、律师全都置之不理。此人常以警局、监狱、移民局捞人为名，行诈骗之实。本人对被骗之钱已不抱希望，曝光只为揭发其丑恶嘴脸并提醒广大同胞切勿踩雷。 图1：律师，本地房东 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888
🦉🐶🐭🐭🐹🐰🐰🦊🐽🐸🙈🦆🦉 😀 西港娱乐城集团投资10个亿打造全网最牛线上USDT娱乐城，只有你想不到的，没有我们西港娱乐城做不到的，业界龙头 东南亚的神话！ 😒 【贵宾会 750.cc 】 强势启航 集团背书 信誉担保 全网首发，引爆彩票娱乐新纪元！六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 合营代理 独立后台 佣金周结 自主赚赔 层级保护，官方零接触用户 😀😀😀😀 【神秘大哥绝地翻盘】 曾经狂输300万U，本以为彻底凉凉，没想到短短几天竟连续爆奖、疯狂连红！ 从深渊一路杀回巅峰，账户数字一路狂飙，最终成功提款335万U 不仅全部回血，还直接反超盈利，强势逆转局势，庄家都看傻了！ “原本只是想回一点，结果越打越顺，根本停不下来！”这一波操作，直接封神！完成惊人回血 😘 别人怕你赢，我们怕你不敢赢！亿级储备金硬核坐镇，稳定出款就是最大底气。今天赢多少，今天就安全带走多少！ 🐊官方飞投 : @XG…
#网友投稿：金三角特区孟赛物业今天半夜被突袭是因为有人举报 地址在鑫城对面【图1】，原唐人国际4幢老板，大金主，大表哥，原名：李志勤，2024年，大表哥”曾出资购买唐人国际2栋，并参与建设老缅新村对面的明丰大厦、众合公寓。 重点来了：金三角特区正在实行相关禁令和清理行动，但据爆料，其旗下部分业务仍未完全停止，目前仍有泰国精聊、缅甸精聊、商城刷单等项目运作。 办公地点据称在新城红楼对面1号楼酒店公寓12楼、16楼部分房间，以及特区外也存在其他办公据点。 PS：听说是因为纠纷，然后就被举报了， 地址位置都标记出来了！下午的事情！ 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888
#纯干货海外华人必看被盗U风险规避 你的USDT为什么会被盗？以下这些情况都可能导致资产损失： 🔑 助记词 / 私钥泄露 🎣 钓鱼网站 / 假钱包 📝 恶意授权 / Approve ✍️ 恶意签名 / Permit 🦠 木马 / 病毒 / 剪贴板劫持 📱 手机 / 电脑被控 📲 交易所账号被盗 📞 SIM卡 / 短信劫持 📋 地址投毒 / 地址替换 💻 假交易 / 假TXID 🏦 假投资 / 假平台诈骗 🌉 跨链桥 / DeFi漏洞 🧩 恶意DApp / 假空投 ☁️ 云端备份 / 助记词截图泄露 总结： ⚠️ 安全提醒： ❌ 不泄露助记词 ❌ 不随便授权 ❌ 不点陌生链接 ❌ 不相信所谓“客服” ✅ 转账前仔细核对地址 ✅ 大额资金做好分散与安全备份 🔐 保护好私钥，才是真正的资产安全 👉东南亚大事件: @kk88…
波贝警察局副局长被停职 据柬埔寨内政部可靠消息来源透露，柬埔寨副总理兼内政部长苏速卡已决定暂停波贝市警察局副局长任苏帕的职务，并要求其在每个工作日到卜迭棉芷省警察局人事科签到报到。 此前，任苏帕因为私自占用在打诈行动中缴获的跑车、摩托车等问题，受到社会广泛关注，随后被调查。 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888
新全迅网 · 娱乐平台风向标 💎查信誉 · 看曝光 · 找优惠 🥇新全迅网致力于打造公开、公正、透明的娱乐平台信息服务体系，依托全网数据监测、真实用户反馈及多维度数据分析，为广大用户提供平台信誉查询、风险预警、黑平台曝光、优惠信息整合等一站式服务。 🥈我们坚持以真实评价为依据，以数据分析为支撑，持续完善平台信誉评级与风险预警机制，让每一位用户都能获得更加真实、可靠的参考信息。 🥉同时，汇聚全网真实优惠资源，精选各大平台优质福利，拒绝虚假宣传与噱头，让每一份优惠都真实可查、一目了然。 我们的使命 ✅ 选平台，先查信誉，选择更放心。 ✅ 避风险，先看曝光，远离黑平台。 ✅ 找优惠，真实精选，拒绝套路。 ✅ 查数据、看口碑、享福利，一站式解决娱乐信息需求。 新全迅网——让数据说话，让信誉可查，让每一次选择都更加安心。 ✅你了解娱乐平台信息的第一站 关注新全迅网➡️ @xqxw 收录/投稿➡️@qxwkefu
🎬视频中被绑架的女孩是之前在天空里面上班的扶手，被绑匪出去了。后面发生的事情惨不忍睹。 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888
Showing the 12 most recent of 501 posts we hold for @miandianQQQQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“缅甸新闻|缅甸大事件|东南亚大事件” (@miandianQQQQ), 17,541 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miandianQQQQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.