Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 斯里兰卡新闻 马达加斯加大事件 泰国新闻

Channel

斯里兰卡新闻 马达加斯加大事件 泰国新闻

@baoliaoc

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

46,615subscribers

-23,282 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002004327088
TypeChannel
Username@baoliaoc
Description海外新闻求助曝光!🤝 吃瓜搞笑生活故事!🤝 免费投稿猛料有奖!👉 @Bnnc888 东南亚大事件 @kk777 东南亚吃瓜群 @kk999 东南亚素材库 @zhaopian
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/baoliaoc

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 9 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@yuenanU/578106 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC@baoliaoc/56673 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC1.0024 hours
@yuenanU/579647 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC@baoliaoc/56662 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuenanU/579687 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC@baoliaoc/56666 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuenanU/579707 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC@baoliaoc/56668 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuenanU/579737 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC@baoliaoc/56671 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuenanU/579747 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC@baoliaoc/56672 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@yuenanU9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (81)
@miandianQ8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 seconds@miandianQ (80)
@dibaif8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (80)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 9 of the 9 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 9, the earliest publisher we hold is @miandianQ. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 8 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

46,61569,89758,2567 August 2026 — 69,897 subscribers8 August 2026 — 69,282 subscribers9 August 2026 — 68,963 subscribers10 August 2026 — 68,387 subscribers11 August 2026 — 67,851 subscribers12 August 2026 — 67,544 subscribers13 August 2026 — 67,255 subscribers14 August 2026 — 67,035 subscribers16 August 2026 — 65,857 subscribers17 August 2026 — 65,279 subscribers18 August 2026 — 64,767 subscribers19 August 2026 — 64,523 subscribers20 August 2026 — 64,338 subscribers21 August 2026 — 56,487 subscribers23 August 2026 — 56,041 subscribers25 August 2026 — 55,457 subscribers26 August 2026 — 55,210 subscribers27 August 2026 — 50,144 subscribers28 August 2026 — 47,502 subscribers29 August 2026 — 46,615 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 22 days, net -23,282. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,123–73,389 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 07:0346,615-887
28 Aug 2026, 06:1647,502-2,642
27 Aug 2026, 04:0350,144-5,066
26 Aug 2026, 01:2355,210-247
25 Aug 2026, 01:2755,457-584
23 Aug 2026, 11:1956,041-446
21 Aug 2026, 21:2956,487-7,851
20 Aug 2026, 16:0564,338-185
19 Aug 2026, 18:4264,523-244
18 Aug 2026, 16:1864,767-512
17 Aug 2026, 12:4965,279-578
16 Aug 2026, 07:1665,857-1,178
14 Aug 2026, 18:4667,035-220
13 Aug 2026, 12:4867,255-289
12 Aug 2026, 14:1567,544-307
11 Aug 2026, 11:1367,851-536
10 Aug 2026, 09:0368,387-576
9 Aug 2026, 05:5268,963-319
8 Aug 2026, 08:1569,282-615
7 Aug 2026, 16:4869,897first reading

Engagement

538 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.036%
avg views ÷ 46,615 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.8
537 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
538
of 538 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 537 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held538 (7 August 202630 August 2026)
Views total9,046
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
42,300
Videos
16,400
Links
32,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 02m
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 235 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 538 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 538 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC3 viewsread 30 August 2026
Video

#马来西亚资讯:凌晨突袭!新山彩虹花园酒吧遭执法突检 多名女子被带走调查 马来西亚柔佛新山彩虹花园(Taman Pelangi)一带于8月30日凌晨发生执法行动,一家酒吧遭有关执法单位突击检查,现场多名女子被带走,接受进一步调查。 据了解,执法人员于凌晨时段展开行动,突击检查涉事酒吧。行动期间,现场气氛一度紧张,多名女子被执法人员带离现场,并被带往警局协助调查。 目前,相关人员被带走的具体原因,以及是否涉及任何违法活动,暂未有进一步官方说明。有关部门是否会对涉事场所采取进一步行动,以及被带走人员后续将如何处理,仍有待执法单位公布详情。 PS:看看有没有自己的女朋友被带走了🤣 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888

30 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC3 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#群友投稿:最近几个月大家千万不要回国,回去就出不来! 这两天我看到一个新闻应该是真的,好几个地方都有说!就是8/12号的时候,有一个航班是从上海飞日本的,200多个去日本的中国人,就他妈的上去两个!其他人都被卡了! 还有8/13号从成都飞美国的航班,卡了一半中国人。全部被要求接受检查电子设备,是所有电子设备,你不给锁屏密码就不给你登机牌,不让出境。 美国和日本又不是敏感国家,都卡成这逼样。那你们想想如果你回国了,再想出来去东南亚会怎么样?再加上你之前多年在东南亚的记录,那百分百会不让出,不止不让出,我觉得还会被剪护照,拉入入境黑名单 9月15还没到,但是国内各大机场已经开始执行出境管控政策了,大家不要撞枪口,先观望吧,近期没特殊事情别冒险回国。 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888

30 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC4 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

金边警方缴卡近2万张 主犯因泄密跑路 8月27日,金边警方在桑园区百色河分区展开针对网络诈骗的突袭行动,成功查获“环球科技”一物资仓库及一辆藏有近2万张涉案SIM卡的车辆,并扣押多名涉案人员。 据柬媒报道,此次行动中,由于桑园区政府数名合同制青年官员在跟踪监视时打草惊蛇、虚张声势,导致主要犯罪嫌疑人提前察觉并成功逃脱。目前,警方正进一步展开追查。 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888

30 Aug 2026, 02:55 UTC6 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#泰国资讯:甘烹碧府绑架案告破 中国女子获救回国 8月28日,泰国甘烹碧府警方通报,此前遭团伙绑架的中国女子已安全获救并启程回国。 8月23日,该女子在曼谷遭多名男子控制上车,被绑后试图开往达府湄索边境。途经甘烹碧府检查站时,女子曾呼救未果,嫌犯冲卡逃逸。女子伺机跳车向民众求助,警方随即将其送医并安排中文翻译协助。 警方先后逮捕多名嫌犯,均否认指控。目前案件仍在扩大调查,以追查幕后网络。当地警察局长还自掏腰包为受害者购买机票,助其顺利回国。 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888

30 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC8 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

柬埔寨的“电诈游击战”:刚刚开始 过去几年,一提到柬埔寨电诈,很多人脑海里出现的都是同一幅画面:高墙、铁丝网、保安、大楼,里面坐着成百上千人,一排排电脑和手机昼夜不停。 现在,这幅画面正在发生变化。 8月27日,柬埔寨官方通报,经过一年多持续清剿,目前境内大型电诈中心已经被清理。自2025年7月至2026年8月20日,执法部门共调查、检查793处涉嫌电诈地点,其中624处实施实际打击,行动中拘留来自39个国家的近3万名嫌疑人。 这是一个非常明显的变化。 但官方紧接着披露的另一个趋势,可能更值得关注:一些犯罪团伙正在转向旅馆、公寓、出租屋、车辆、咖啡店等小型、分散场所。 换句话说,大型“园区战”可能正在退场,但电诈未必就此消失。剩下的犯罪网络,正在变得更小、更散,也更隐蔽。 这种变化其实已经出现。 今年6月,金边警方在棉芷区一家手机店发现一处涉嫌用于网络诈骗的场所,现场控制3名嫌疑人,并查获电脑、手机等设备。从外面

30 Aug 2026, 01:43 UTC17 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#网友爆料:吴乐X,你老婆李X霖,龙岩人,本着诚信合作的态度,在跟你们合作。我们每天二十几个人24小时值班,每天几万美金在投流,出业绩了直接吃掉拉黑,你们是人吗? 你知道我有你所有的资料,你也跑掉了好几条线,在国内我要搞你有一万种方法,我知道是你底下的人做的,我不想把事做绝,你把底下的人信息拿来,我自己想办法要账回来,两天内没有收到你的反馈,我将曝光所有的信息。你的家人,你的公司,你的后台,全部都会受到影响。有你这些信息我足够让你全家鸡犬不宁! 你拿走你该拿的我没有怪你。把“白肚猫/黑猫”“来财”提供出来就行。两天之内没有处理,我会把所有材料线上曝光,线下你家人就不要过一天安稳的。 如果你不联系,第二天我会把你所有杀的记录发出来。第三天我就开始线上家属全面曝光,线下全面安排工作。 当我决定500万可以不要的时候,我什么事都做得出来。 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库:

29 Aug 2026, 23:41 UTC25 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🇱🇰科伦坡港口城绑架杀人案 两名中国籍嫌疑人在斯里兰卡落网,剩一人在逃! 根据斯里兰卡警方消息:犯罪调查科(CCD)于8月28日在锡吉里耶地区抓获两名中国籍嫌疑人,二人涉嫌参与今年7月发生在科伦坡港口城的一起中国公民遭绑架遇害案件。 据斯里兰卡警方通报,该案事发于7月23日。科伦坡港口城区域两伙中国公民爆发冲突,一名中国公民随后遭他人绑架,其遗体之后在埃赫利亚戈达的林区被发现。 案件发生后,斯里兰卡科伦坡犯罪调查科迅速启动专项调查,梳理涉案人员线索,持续追捕在逃涉案人员。为推进案件侦办,警方此前公开征集线索,追查三名涉案中国籍人员行踪。 经循线追踪,警方锁定锡吉里耶地区一处目标点位,于8月28日在当地一家餐馆内抓获两名涉案中国籍人员,年龄分别为35岁和43岁。 目前,两名嫌疑人已被科伦坡犯罪调查科依法拘留,正接受涉嫌袭击、绑架及谋杀相关讯问调查。警方透露,两名嫌疑人已于8月29日被依法移送法院审理。 截至目前,该案仍有

29 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC44 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

阿联酋总统外交顾问:媒体把造谣的钱花在发展上不好吗? 面对一波接一波的媒体攻击,阿联酋总统外交顾问安瓦尔·加尔加什博士用一段简短有力的表态,给出了阿联酋的回应方式。 他在X平台账号上写道: “针对阿联酋的媒体攻击是绝望之举;面对阿联酋的意志和成就,这些攻击依靠歪曲事实和散布谣言。而行动的力量远胜于反应,正如这些攻击的始作俑者无法撼动阿联酋的成功模式一样。” 这段话没有点名,也没有展开细节,但立场足够清晰:在阿联酋看来,那些持续不断的舆论攻击,不是自信的表现,而是一种无力撼动现实后的“绝望”。真正的底气,来自行动和成果,而不是靠谣言堆出来的叙事。 加尔加什随后又补了一句,更像是一次冷静的提醒: “与其将精力和金钱浪费在攻击阿联酋上,不如将其用于建设和发展,这岂不是浪费吗?” 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888

29 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC36 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

#实时消息:金三角“特区” 治安局半夜在唐人一带开展突击检查,目前检查到梅花苑了,附近的兄弟,注意! 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888

29 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC6 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

8⃣🔤🔤🔤✅东南亚大事件上押100万U✅ 🥰 【贵宾会 750.cc 】 强势启航,集团背书,信誉担保,全网首发,引爆彩票娱乐新纪元!六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 全民代理全民收单 助您白手起家 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 😍千万域名 百亿大盘 顶奢品牌 大户首选 🤘全网福利天花板👍 👍入款笔笔送3⃣% 😍全网召集【老玩家入驻】VIP等级1:1平移 🥰强大资金储备随时支持 👍 1⃣0⃣倍验资 😁😁😁😁😁 【传奇真实战报】 有时候,人生只差一把“胡了”。一局改命!直接改写人生剧本!2000U进场,PG电子麻将胡了狂爆113万U,目前已成功提款236万U,彻底实现人生逆袭! 😁😁😁😁😁 【战绩见证实力】 39,000U本金,30天横扫bbin真人百家乐战场!累计盈利出款342万U,从五位数到七位数,一路势如破竹。实力从来不是说出来的,到账才是最有力的语言。 🤜百亿打造只做行业第一品牌,我们承诺绝不卡款,绝不黑款,因

29 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC17 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#老挝新闻:南塔省发布洪水预警,29日至30日需防范积水和河流水位上涨 老挝有关部门发布预警称,8月29日至30日,南塔省需重点防范洪涝和积水风险。 受持续降雨及河流水位变化影响,部分低洼地区、沿河村庄及排水能力较弱区域可能出现积水或局部洪水。 老挝气象与水文部门提醒,当地居民应密切关注最新天气和水位信息,尤其是居住在河岸、山谷和低洼区域的民众,应提前做好人员和物资转移准备,并避免在强降雨期间进入河道、涉水路段及易发生山洪的区域。 此次预警信息由老挝气象与水文部门,以及农业与环境部门相关信息技术单位发布。 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888

29 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC23 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#群友爆料:西港赢家出码团队,几个河南出码的人。 前不久,我弟弟在赢家拿码5千赢了,不让退码,非要做思想工作,输了才放人。朋友后来去拿,也是这种情况。 现在西港打击这么厉害,赢家老板还纵容这些害群之马留在赌场害人吗?拿码赌博是我不对,但是我赢了要我走呀。后来朋友才跟我说,赢了不让你走就报警,报了警他们必定会放你。 赢家出码河南几个人,本来现在西港大环境就卷,想着赢点生活费,你这几个逼还恐吓。你们出门小心点。还有,我呼吁去赢家拿码的赌徒们,只要输了就叫朋友报警,他们必定会放你。不要再去赢家拿码。 几个河南狗杂种还在赢家出码害人,下次曝光这几个河南逼的照片,直接抖音传送到你们河南总部去。 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @Bnnc888

Showing the 12 most recent of 538 posts we hold for @baoliaoc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,333,057 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“斯里兰卡新闻 马达加斯加大事件 泰国新闻” (@baoliaoc), 46,615 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baoliaoc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.