置顶广告位出租💗联系 @kmf689
👍1

Channel
@aimeinv88
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,855subscribers
+1,102 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001263742675 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aimeinv88 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aimeinv88 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:01 | 23,855 | +11 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:17 | 23,844 | +11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:50 | 23,833 | +26 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:26 | 23,807 | +10 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:10 | 23,797 | +1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:55 | 23,796 | +18 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:50 | 23,778 | +27 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:49 | 23,751 | +19 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:25 | 23,732 | +11 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:45 | 23,721 | +23 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 23,698 | +23 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 23,675 | +16 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 23,659 | +21 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:29 | 23,638 | +30 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:45 | 23,608 | +20 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:08 | 23,588 | +6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 23,582 | +2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 23,580 | +20 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 06:46 | 23,560 | -3 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 06:45 | 23,563 | first reading |
455 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 115 of 185 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 455 (7 August 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 32,406 |
| Reactions total | 190 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 11:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 298 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
311 reactions across 196 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 231 | 74.3% | |
| ❤ | 43 | 13.8% | |
| 👀 | 8 | 2.57% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 1.93% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.29% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 1.29% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.965% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.965% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 0.965% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.643% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.643% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.322% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.322% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 200 of the 455 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 311 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 455 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 185 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
置顶广告位出租💗联系 @kmf689
👍1
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🔝实力派:78.COM 数字够短 品牌够大 🔥香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高起步返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼起步返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆电子单注🤩🤩🤩🤩U一拉; ⭐️百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 🚩诚招代理合作: 1.打码返佣,限指定平台; 2.可叠加占成,自选占成比例及游戏平台; 🤩🤩🤩🤩:@DL78 💥高额战绩,巅峰记录持续刷新: 🥇PP电子|极速糖果1000 玩家游戏中购买30000u超级免费旋转,高倍爆奖,最终拿下378万U,已出款; 🥈PG电子|麻将胡了 又又又欧气爆棚,5000U一拉,连番触发,单局斩获193万U; 🥉香港六合彩|特码49倍 爱拼才会赢,大佬单码下注18万U,一注直接拿下本期最高派彩 …
👍1
南gay与北gay的不同之处
👍1
这是什么东西?
❤1👍1
感觉这群人脑袋多少有点毛病
👍1
🤷♂️
👍1
虽然说大概率是科技型美女,但这种草起来既有娃娃的视觉冲击,又有真人的爽感,也是两全其美了
👍1
网传 武汉一小区住户为报复社会,诱杀外卖员
👍1
女武士
👍1
技术又菜,脾气又大
👍1
尼泊尔珠峰地区两直升机试图同时降落而相撞,一名印度乘客身亡,至少一名尼泊尔人受伤
👍1
赴港追星低保女孩事件最新进展:低保已被取消
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 455 posts we hold for @aimeinv88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“文明观球理性吃瓜” (@aimeinv88), 23,855 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aimeinv88.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.