“把白砂糖还给我们”,果葡糖浆比白砂糖坏多少? 交流讨论加电报人群: @three001

Channel
电报时报
@times001
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
84,914subscribers
-256 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001295722188 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @times001 |
| Description | 投稿点频道左下角对话图标 |
| Created | 4 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/times001 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 84,914 | -42 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 84,956 | +33 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 84,923 | +13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:35 | 84,910 | -19 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 84,929 | -27 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:54 | 84,956 | -65 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 85,021 | -33 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 85,054 | +9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 85,045 | +11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 85,034 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 85,045 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 85,044 | +7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 85,037 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 85,039 | +53 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 84,986 | +8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 84,978 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 84,983 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 85,000 | -22 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 85,022 | -20 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 85,042 | first reading |
Engagement
1,034 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.20%
- avg views ÷ 84,914 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,020
- 603 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.236%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 603
- of 1,034 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 274 of 603 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,034 (5 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 616,893 |
| Reactions total | 750 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 23:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈20,100
- Videos
- ≈10,900
- Links
- ≈24,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 29m
- Average length
- 40s
Measured directly from 134 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,186 reactions across 418 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 325 | 27.4% | |
| ❤ | 235 | 19.8% | |
| 💩 | 209 | 17.6% | |
| 😈 | 112 | 9.44% | |
| 🤡 | 86 | 7.25% | |
| 😁 | 70 | 5.90% | |
| 🤣 | 69 | 5.82% | |
| 👎 | 22 | 1.85% | |
| 😍 | 13 | 1.10% | |
| 😢 | 13 | 1.10% | |
| 💔 | 9 | 0.759% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 0.675% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 0.675% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.337% | |
| 🥱 | 3 | 0.253% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 474 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
战魔田默|“雪糕刺客”降到6.9元!钟薛高以前那十几块,到底贵在哪?
“把白砂糖还给我们”,果葡糖浆比白砂糖坏多少?
👎1
唐僧的碎碎念|再谈“远洋捕捞”
没有但书|不认罪认罚就不能取保?
Anthropic发布AI滥用报告后 中国监管部门据报对DeepSeek和月之暗面展开调查
习近平访美前夕 外媒谈分歧官媒重定调
贸易、关税、人工智能:一文看懂美中峰会重点
邵阳警察敲诈勒索,政府何以变成土匪?|远洋捕捞|邵阳公安|趋利性执法|刘虎|王局拍案20260922
❤1
上海滩风云:青帮三大亨 黄金荣 杜月笙 张啸林 →
【 #景区砸3000万招NPC称后台简历爆炸 】 #3000万招NPC景区500万悬赏还没兑现 近日,山西晋城司徒小镇景区因一则“3000万寻找100名NPC”的消息引发热议。据悉,司徒小镇负责人“司徒小镇老周”发布信息称,景区缺少让游客情绪价值拉满的NPC,经开会决定,拿出3000万来邀请各路高人。“无论你有什么才艺,只要你能让台上游客互动得开心,让台下游客互动得过瘾,我们就给你提供舞台,给你提供百万年薪、千万年薪。”他说。 @中国新闻周刊 致电司徒小镇景区,一位招聘人员表示,“后台直接‘爆炸’了”。她说,目前还没看到统计数据,后台简历根本翻不到底。很多账号都在发,“人太多了,不知道该怎么统计”。 至于景区是否能容纳这100名NPC,她表示,景区场地还要再扩大,且还会再增加新项目,“游客现在来就能看到,好多地方都围起来了,都在修”。她说,他们不卡年龄,“我们主要想要能整活儿、有才艺、能给游客提供情绪价值的人”,并表示,希…
❤1
康客: 2026年中秋前夕,一些门店月饼销售额同比下滑45.17%,礼盒销量大跌49.04%,市场连续第二年走低。 背后原因很现实,年轻人对月饼的兴趣不高;想吃月饼的人群,又忌惮它高糖、高GI的特点,不敢多吃。 如今月饼早已不是解馋点心,更多只剩中秋的仪式感。 月饼本身没有消失,只是回归本来定位:少量尝鲜,而非大量囤货。 市场降温,本质是消费回归理性。 https://twitter.com/kangke888/status/2102382821528502365
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,034 posts we hold for @times001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@chinabbs · 2,10219 posts2021河南洪灾资料存档
@herlanflooddoc · 399 posts中国产新冠疫苗副作用记录
@cnvac · 5156 posts不能不明白
@baoxinzhe · 235 posts>>>华人文化研究所<<<_tag支那屠支芝麻共和改良反共
@chinesebadcultual · 1574 postshistory record
@historyrecord · 14 posts我的收藏
@wodeshoucang · 1183 posts中国纪录片
@chinesedocumentary · 4,9102 posts士兵突击
@hisbs666 · 32 postschinalie
@ChinaLiesReport · 11 post中国高校新闻
@chineseuniversitynews1 · 1141 post拉清单channel
@laqingdan2021 · 6071 post情况发生变化
@status_is_changing · 2011 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@zaihuapd · 282,472#1
@tnews365 · 164,267#2
@XueXi_China · 87,338#3
@newszg_official · 162,958#4
@DNSPODT · 71,856#5
@CE_Observe · 74,794#6
@woshadiao · 115,324#7
@solidot · 47,464#8
@liangjiahepost · 18,369#9
@fucku_idiot · 40,335#10
@xhsyp · 31,565#11
@titan_pain · 20,773#12
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,585#13
@acgdaily · 16,627#14
@shixun160 · 22,955#15
@mightyflame · 26,081#16
@cdtchinesefeed · 44,229#17
@endofxi · 21,476#18
@iyouport · 27,837#19
@wxbyg · 19,522#20
@dododolidadada · 9,739#21
@personal_hub · 11,584#22
@pelosi3 · 70,867#23
@fangshimin · 16,188#24
@FinanceNewsDaily · 57,644#25
@juexinggonglue · 16,248#26
@xintiandi9 · 10,382#27
@moyu2023 · 8,792#28
@NewlearnerChannel · 67,412#29
@douban_read · 36,101#30
@weibo_read · 19,461#31
@Mandark_5678 · 4,835#32
@VoiceofPooh · 22,612#33
@luojisw001 · 3,755#34
@CN_Privacy · 16,720#35
@appdopic · 16,192#36
@tg_InternetSecurity · 10,651#37
@NFSCHimalayaNews · 9,527#38
@dogdairy · 14,008#39
@baguabox · 33,433#40
@dragonsden2k · 2,483#41
@Ruters0615 · 25,589#42
@jike_collection · 35,819#43
@xhqcankao · 163,238#44
@wearemjj · 9,564#45
@GodlyNews1 · 68,855#46
@cnbeta_com · 27,529#47
@Financial_Express · 37,081#48
@illusory_world · 10,974#49
@lychee_wood · 17,738#50
@chinaupdate · 6,274#51
@telonews_cn · 83,700#52
@landiansub · 44,850#53
@zhujiwiki_info · 10,687#54
@pingrangTV · 29,178#55
@vps_xhq · 49,725#56
@LetITFlyW · 9,586#57
@KarenMoeMoe · 9,401#58
@qunyouwen · 89,462#59
@voachinese · 34,682#60
@SIM_CN · 10,084#61
@JISFW · 12,753#62
@Hearse_Drifting · 10,547#63
@jandan_pic · 25,263#64
@abskoop · 306,586#65
@text1024 · 19,749#66
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@shixun160 · 22,955
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
@TwtVideoOfChina · 74,789
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 20 August 2026
@VoiceofPooh · 22,612
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
@Ruters0615 · 25,589
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 14 September 2026
@newszg_official · 162,958
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
@aimeinv88 · 23,360
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 18 September 2026
@mightyflame · 26,081
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 13 September 2026
@cdtchinesefeed · 44,229
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026
@pelosi3 · 70,867
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 August 2026
@XueXi_China · 87,338
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 August 2026
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,585
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
@hkposter777 · 22,381
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
@JShangrong · 24,860
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026
@zaobaosg · 36,845
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026
@baguabox · 33,433
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 4 September 2026
@freechinese · 27,568
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
@iyouport · 27,837
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
@rthk_new_c · 49,581
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
@OutsightChina · 41,309
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
@readingclubus · 29,174
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 8 September 2026
@nowtv_news · 42,741
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
@FinanceNewsDaily · 57,644
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@voachinese · 34,682
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“电报时报” (@times001), 84,914 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/times001.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.