感谢 风暴 网友购买普洱茶 支持频道!

Channel
A股股票轻舟股市指标
@qzdzb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
8,254subscribers
+1,105 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001978214480 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qzdzb |
| Description | 轻舟指标 | A股股票基金分析与散户交流 专注于 A股/股票/基金 技术分析。本频道分享由轻舟编写的【轻舟指标】及模拟操作记录和财经资讯,旨在为散户提供实战交流参考。 🔹 核心内容: 炒股笔记、指数分析、技术指标分享 🔹 唯一频道: @qzdzb 🔹 交流群组: @agdbtlq / @gpjlqa 💡 入群须知:本频道所有信息仅供参考。若受益,须赞赏“桐城小花”一斤以支持创作。订阅即视为接受风险自担协议。本频道无客服,更不会主动联系你,防止被骗。 #炒股笔记 #指数分析 #轻舟指标 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qzdzb |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:38 | 8,254 | -38 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:54 | 8,292 | -14 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:56 | 8,306 | +33 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 8,273 | +22 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:08 | 8,251 | +49 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 18:07 | 8,202 | +81 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:44 | 8,121 | +38 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 19:40 | 8,083 | +95 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 06:38 | 7,988 | +170 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 07:19 | 7,818 | +172 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 7,646 | +88 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 7,558 | +83 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 7,475 | +53 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 7,422 | +54 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 7,368 | +28 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:13 | 7,340 | +43 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:08 | 7,297 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 7,291 | +36 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 7,255 | +24 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 7,231 | first reading |
Engagement
166 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.90%
- avg views ÷ 8,254 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 239
- 60 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.597%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 60
- of 166 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 60 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 166 (6 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 14,355 |
| Reactions total | 47 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 12:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,680
- Videos
- ≈631
- Links
- ≈7,950
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 17s
- Average length
- 17s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
52 reactions across 32 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 31 | 59.6% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 21.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 5.77% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 166 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 166 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 37 of 60 posts held from the last 30 days (61.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
感谢 王威 网友购买红茶 支持频道!
减持 田中精机 本模拟内容仅用于个人学习、复盘与技术研究,不构成投资建议或买卖依据。更多学习资料与讨论内容已更新至桐城小花交流群,支持轻舟的朋友就加入会员群交流。 #炒股笔记 #A股 #股票 #轻舟指标 导航: 频道|群组|VIP服务|加群
🍌1
减持 四川路桥 本模拟内容仅用于个人学习、复盘与技术研究,不构成投资建议或买卖依据。更多学习资料与讨论内容已更新至桐城小花交流群,支持轻舟的朋友就加入会员群交流。 #炒股笔记 #A股 #股票 #轻舟指标 导航: 频道|群组|VIP服务|加群
❤1👍1
上证和深证指数多空柱指标黄色持续,希望一直持续! ...............................................更多技术细节在桐城小花群里交流。 #指数分析 #A股 #股市 #轻舟指标 导航: 频道|群组|VIP服务|加群
❤🔥1👍1😁1
回补 田中精机 回补 裕同科技 回补 税友股份 回补 浦发银行 回补 金银河 回补 东方铁塔 回补 万泰生物 本模拟内容仅用于个人学习、复盘与技术研究,不构成投资建议或买卖依据。更多学习资料与讨论内容已更新至桐城小花交流群,支持轻舟的朋友就加入会员群交流。 #炒股笔记 #A股 #股票 #轻舟指标 导航: 频道|群组|VIP服务|加群
👍2❤🔥1
中国叫停软银54亿美元收购ABB机器人业务,硬刚物理AI关键技术 中国监管部门已否决软银以约54亿美元收购ABB机器人业务的交易。ABB周四确认,软银告知其中国外商投资安全审查部门禁止了该收购(尤其涉及中国业务部分)。 中国是ABB机器人最大市场,面向中国客户的机器人超90%在本地制造,ABB在华员工约1.27万。交易此前已通过反垄断审查,但卡在国家安全审查环节。 核心担忧:机器人运行数据可能出境,被用于训练海外AI模型(包括软银重仓的OpenAI相关技术)。同时涉及供应链与制造能力是否留在中国。此举凸显中国锁定物理AI(机器人+AI)优势、防止高价值技术与数据外流的决心。 对孙正义“物理AI”战略是重大打击,软银股价当日受压。双方仍在沟通,看能否调整方案再争取。 #物理AI #机器人数据安全 #中国技术管控
👍2👌1
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_853854321
❤🔥1
科技股历史性重挫!华尔街一天蒸发2.5万亿美元,AI交易遭遇现实冲击 11月5日,纳斯达克综合指数暴跌5.52%,正式跌入技术性调整区间(较10月6日高点回撤超10%),创下去年4月关税动荡以来最大单日跌幅。科技股整体市值单日蒸发约2.5万亿美元,创历史纪录;美股整体市值蒸发约2.8万亿美元。 中期选举后,对AI持怀疑态度的力量上台,市场担忧更严监管+地方数据中心建设受限,直接引爆抛售。芯片、算力、能源、光通信全线重挫:费城半导体指数跌超12%,英伟达跌9.3%、AMD跌17%,特斯拉跌超10%。从亚洲芯片到德州电力、新泽西算力、硅谷软件,产业链同步走低,抛售自我强化。 AI热潮从“无限增长预期”转向“政策+回报现实检验”。七巨头合计蒸发约1万亿美元。 #AI现实冲击 #纳指调整 #科技股重挫
👍3
【轻舟观察】11月6日投资避雷针:纳指暴跌5.52%,半导体指数重挫12%,AI产业链遭遇集中抛售 财联社11月6日投资避雷针显示,隔夜美股科技板块遭遇大幅抛售,纳斯达克100指数下跌约6.4%,市值蒸发约2.3万亿美元,费城半导体指数下跌12%。存储、光通信、芯片及数据中心产业链全面承压。 国内方面,广电总局明确扶持真人微短剧、规范AI微短剧;炼焦煤市场继续偏弱,多家上市公司披露经营及股东风险事项。 一、海外市场:AI产业链遭遇重挫 1、美股三大指数集体大跌:道指下跌3.44%,纳指下跌5.52%,标普500指数下跌4.35%,创2025年4月以来最大单日跌幅。纳斯达克100指数下跌约6.4%,市值蒸发约2.3万亿美元。 2、半导体板块大幅杀跌:费城半导体指数下跌12%,闪迪跌超22%,西部数据、美光科技跌超17%,海力士跌超13%;英伟达下跌9.18%,市值蒸发约4470亿美元。 3、光通信与云计算同步承压:Lumen…
👍2👎1
感谢 晚风 购买普洱茶支持频道!
做T 裕同科技 本模拟内容仅用于个人学习、复盘与技术研究,不构成投资建议或买卖依据。更多学习资料与讨论内容已更新至桐城小花交流群,支持轻舟的朋友就加入会员群交流。 #炒股笔记 #A股 #股票 #轻舟指标 导航: 频道|群组|VIP服务|加群
Showing the 12 most recent of 166 posts we hold for @qzdzb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @qzdzb as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 5 November 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 5 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 26 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“A股股票轻舟股市指标” (@qzdzb), 8,254 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qzdzb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.