===== 评论区 ===== 建一 月山: 再弄点和川普、普京、三胖的😁

Channel
Ruters乳透社🐻
@Ruters0615
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
25,278subscribers
-602 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001240594461 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ruters0615 |
| Description | 官方电报频道,国安部最高通辑,专注于乳包反共鬼畜作品。 投稿: @rtspost2bot [email protected] X(原Twitter): @Ruters0615 YouTube: 小反旗&小池塘 Rumble: http://rumble.com/c/c-1401966 Spotify: Ruters乳透社 友链: @VoiceofPooh @XueXi_China |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 44 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ruters0615 |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:15 | 25,278 | -16 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 18:05 | 25,294 | -14 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:38 | 25,308 | +1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:40 | 25,307 | -22 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 16:27 | 25,329 | +1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 12:58 | 25,328 | -5 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:36 | 25,333 | -2 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 01:28 | 25,335 | -53 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 17:37 | 25,388 | -54 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 05:21 | 25,442 | -90 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 25,532 | -57 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 25,589 | -11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:54 | 25,600 | -10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 25,610 | -14 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 25,624 | -16 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 25,640 | -11 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 25,651 | -19 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 25,670 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 25,675 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:42 | 25,681 | first reading |
Engagement
422 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.46%
- avg views ÷ 25,278 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 622
- 156 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.933%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 156
- of 422 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 82 of 156 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 422 (5 August 2026 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 97,102 |
| Reactions total | 481 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Oct 2026, 23:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈13,200
- Videos
- ≈1,680
- Links
- ≈2,850
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 34m 53s
- Average length
- 54s
Measured directly from 39 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,203 reactions across 211 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 642 | 53.4% | |
| ❤ | 125 | 10.4% | |
| 😁 | 78 | 6.48% | |
| 🤣 | 62 | 5.15% | |
| 👍 | 60 | 4.99% | |
| 🥰 | 47 | 3.91% | |
| 🤮 | 25 | 2.08% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 2.00% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 1.41% | |
| 🗿 | 17 | 1.41% | |
| 🤩 | 16 | 1.33% | |
| 💩 | 15 | 1.25% | |
| 🤡 | 13 | 1.08% | |
| 🌭 | 12 | 0.998% | |
| 💅 | 8 | 0.665% | |
| 😭 | 8 | 0.665% | |
| 🫡 | 8 | 0.665% | |
| 😨 | 6 | 0.499% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 0.416% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 0.416% | |
| 7 further kinds | 10 | 0.831% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 226 of the 422 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 422 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
习:结过婚我也认!
🤮6❤3
===== 评论区 =====
小美人跳的哥哥心都化了😍
===== 评论区 ===== 玉敏 袁: 习🈲评 KiroT: 我反正翻墙就是看片,讨论领导人挺low的 不服私聊我@mIkasa_0921 KiroT: @mIkasa_0921 我看的少,不知道觉醒究竟在觉醒啥🤔 很多键政的感觉听风就是雨 无脑信的才是傻逼 还有那些恶搞习近平的 玉敏 袁: 习近平把你家产都没收给你拉清单的时候,你就不支持习近平了 玉敏 袁: https://t.me/XueXi_China/114828?single 抵制华为,人人有责。 赚黑心钱 五千六百: 西京平安
一位中国网友的祝愿: 北京平安 南京平安 东京平安 ***安 最后他号没了
===== 评论区 =====
中共高层集体演唱《Uptown Funk》
🔥2
===== 评论区 ===== 建一 月山: 谁有空做一下川习断不了情根😁 玉敏 袁: 买来垫旱厕 玉敏 袁: 习近平🐷如果能收复台湾🇹🇼,那么老母猪就能上树,癞蛤蟆能吃天鹅肉,所有游戏都没有外挂,CS2就没有大陀螺自瞄
中国行动出版社 预售《习近平谈全过程民主》 体验原汁原味的 中国式民主 ! 购书链接 https://china-action-publishing-fbm2026.sacdccascwe.chatgpt.site/#exhibition
💩7❤2
===== 评论区 ===== 玉敏 袁: 高中博士
👍1
谁家小学博士?
👍7🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 422 posts we hold for @Ruters0615. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Ruters0615 edited 88 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 21 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@XueXi_China · 86,709#1
@VoiceofPooh · 22,322#2
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,903#3
@xhqcankao · 165,765#4
@DNSPODT · 72,815#5
@times001 · 84,450#6
@zaihuapd · 286,702#7
@VoPMilkTea · 1,844#8
@mightyflame · 25,635#9
@acgdaily · 17,043#10
@endofxi · 21,758#11
@fucku_idiot · 41,189#12
@chinafounder · 14,692#13
@VoiceofCN · 14,059#14
@CHlNA011 · 1,926#15
@ttsmr · 1,974#16
@bumingbai0 · 275#17
@weinidaohang · 587#18
@pelosi3 · 71,940#19
@zunshiyulu · 2,535#20
@shixun160 · 22,770#21
@ziyouzhisheng1 · 1,587#22
@tnews365 · 165,331#23
@titan_pain · 20,789#24
@chinaupdate · 6,238#25
@voachinese · 41,507#26
@cdtchinesefeed · 51,217#27
@iyouport · 27,648#28
@pingrangTV · 29,303#29
@cprpwork · 718#30
@GodlyNews1 · 70,227#31
@zhinashashi · 641#32
@vps_xhq · 50,298#33
@solidot · 47,715#34
@zghaju · 376#35
@CE_Observe · 76,396#36
@HachimiCat · 5,325#37
@projectXtls · 30,018#38
@NFSCHimalayaNews · 9,355#39
@hseznet · 1,681#40
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@VoiceofPooh · 22,322
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
@endofxi · 21,758
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 September 2026
@XueXi_China · 86,709
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 August 2026
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,903
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
@voachinese · 41,507
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
@times001 · 84,450
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 August 2026
@shixun160 · 22,770
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
@hkposter777 · 22,493
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
@hktgb · 38,014
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
@HK_Schedule · 23,210
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Ruters |
|---|---|
| Description | a channel satirising CCP leaders |
| X / Twitter | @ruters0615 |
| YouTube | UC57yqbfltOVBo0hMP1l-Q6w |
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ruters乳透社🐻” (@Ruters0615), 25,278 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ruters0615.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.