Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 404通訊|The CCP-China Watch #资讯 #新闻 #时政 #反賊 #覺醒

Channel

404通訊|The CCP-China Watch #资讯 #新闻 #时政 #反賊 #覺醒

@chinaupdate

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,205subscribers

-111 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001441904706
TypeChannel
Username@chinaupdate
DescriptionAUTOCRACY MUST DIE TODAY. TOGETHER, WE WILL END CCP. LEST WE FORGET. 專政必須死於你我之世代。 THIS NEWS CHANNEL: @ChinaUpdate #政治 #新聞 #資訊 #资讯 #新闻 #时政 OUR GROUP DISCUSSION: @ChinaUpdateBBS 404中文群組: @CNMCCP1921
Created6 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/chinaupdate

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,2056,3166,260.56 August 2026 — 6,316 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,315 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,310 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,309 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,300 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,308 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,303 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,302 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,297 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,298 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,290 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,293 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,279 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,274 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,276 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,255 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,248 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,231 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,239 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,238 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,218 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,215 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,218 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,212 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,205 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net -111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,188–6,333 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 21:186,205-7
2 Nov 2026, 04:196,212-6
30 Oct 2026, 03:586,218+3
26 Oct 2026, 19:386,215-3
23 Oct 2026, 23:506,218-20
21 Oct 2026, 05:516,238-1
18 Oct 2026, 14:286,239+8
15 Oct 2026, 13:506,231-17
12 Oct 2026, 22:096,248-7
6 Oct 2026, 00:406,255-21
28 Sept 2026, 14:156,276+2
14 Sept 2026, 14:186,274-5
11 Sept 2026, 04:386,279-14
6 Sept 2026, 12:206,293+3
2 Sept 2026, 09:586,290-8
30 Aug 2026, 13:146,298+1
27 Aug 2026, 21:476,297-5
25 Aug 2026, 07:426,302-1
22 Aug 2026, 01:576,303-5
18 Aug 2026, 23:516,308first reading

Engagement

152 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.56%
avg views ÷ 6,205 subscribers
Avg views / post
96.9
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 152 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held152 (6 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total3,586
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 13:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈71,500
Videos
≈36,200
Links
≈7,040

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 04m
Average length
1m 28s

Measured directly from 44 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

71 reactions across 62 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3447.9%
🤬1723.9%
🤮79.86%
❤22.82%
👍22.82%
👏22.82%
🤡22.82%
🤣22.82%
👎11.41%
💩11.41%
🔥11.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 152 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 152 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 02:49 UTC160 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Kim Tae Ri @AngelPen8 根據統計,台北市1999去年有三百多次虐兒通報,完全不理會。 蔣寶還是太嫩。 台中市毒媽媽不但不理會,還會拼命傳簡訊,要求你評滿分;傳到你抓狂,打1999投訴,毒媽媽繼續傳簡訊,要求你評滿分;不給滿分,毒媽媽不會放過你;這樣,你就不敢再打1999,完美❤️ PS:本人親身體驗🙃 #國民黨 #蔣萬安 #盧秀燕

🤬1

5 Nov 2026, 02:47 UTC134 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

普京称俄罗斯从未威胁外国,并寻求合作 “而那些尚未准备好的人很快将得出正确结论,并改变他们对俄罗斯的态度,”他补充道。 来源: X/Visegrád 24

🤮4

5 Nov 2026, 01:01 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @getoutforchina

历史证明,选民大多是短视和薄情的。丘吉尔刚领导英国打败了纳粹德国,马上就被英国人民抛弃。法国的戴高乐也享受了类似的“待遇”,他于1946年1月愤而辞职,赋闲在家长达十年之久。 美国总统川普也吃了人民短视的苦头。 川普心中的美国优先可能和MAGA及中间选民们理解的美国优先可能有所不同。 美国右翼选民理解的美国优先是孤立主义,关起门来大碗吃肉,别管外面发生什么。 而川普心中的美国优先是,美国利益第一。为了实现这个目标,把能源掌握在自己的手里,所以擒拿委内瑞拉总统马杜罗,团灭伊朗神棍和军队高层,只是没料到神棍政权倒而不死,不断骚扰霍尔木兹海峡,导致世界能源短期供应紧张。 对世界各国增加关税,目的也是为了把产业引导回美国,让制造业重新扎根美利坚,这实在是功在当代利在千秋之举。但是,这也会引发短期通货膨胀。可美国人民看不到这些,也不会领情。 ICU驱逐非法移民也是同理。川普政府是在帮拜登擦屁股,干的是有利于美国长远发展的伟业。但是,非法移…

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 152 posts we hold for @chinaupdate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

你挨过饿嘛? 听说过其他人挨饿嘛?

  1. 我挨过饿, 也听说过父辈挨饿28%
  2. 我挨过饿, 也听说过父辈爷辈挨饿7%
  3. 我没有挨过饿, 但听说过父辈爷辈挨饿62%
  4. 我没有挨过饿, 也没有听说过父辈爷辈挨饿3%
  5. 我不清楚, 没有问过这样的问题0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 22:24 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

中国民间对侵略台湾的意愿是?

  1. 我愿意统一, 并愿意自己付出一切代价7%
  2. 我愿意统一; 并愿意自己付出部分代价14%
  3. 我顺其自然; 不愿意付出代价14%
  4. 我不愿意统一36%
  5. 我是外国人29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 152 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ruters乳透社🐻
@Ruters0615 · 25,154
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 14 September 2026
学习墙国🐸
@XueXi_China · 86,424
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 August 2026
☠️三战快报☠️一级战备
@endofxi · 21,975
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 September 2026
「VoP」維尼之聲 - Voice of Pooh🔊
@VoiceofPooh · 22,212
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
知乎暴论
@mightyflame · 25,445
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 13 September 2026
影音中国(中国被禁的视频)
@TwtVideoOfChina · 78,181
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 20 August 2026
美国之音
@voachinese · 42,194
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
中国悲剧档案官方频道
@newszg_official · 157,012
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
敏感经济信息分享
@pelosi3 · 72,406
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 August 2026
俄罗斯资讯参考频道
@JShangrong · 24,166
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026
电报时报
@times001 · 84,412
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 August 2026
🥗 视讯快报~密接巨变时代
@shixun160 · 22,725
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“404通訊|The CCP-China Watch #资讯 #新闻 #时政 #反賊 #覺醒” (@chinaupdate), 6,205 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chinaupdate.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.