乳包界又出新梗:徐竟培 https://x.com/i/status/2085682370724954521

Channel
推特高雅壬與菟子
@ttsmr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,000subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001385946446 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ttsmr |
| Created | 29 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ttsmr |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 2,000 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 2,002 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 2,004 | -4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 2,008 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 2,011 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 2,012 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 2,018 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 2,017 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 2,019 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 2,021 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 2,023 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 2,023 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6m 57s
- Average length
- 1m 44s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 3 | 33.3% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 22.2% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://youtu.be/z8RljOVwFPY?si=4ffbZwHOsEEN-2tw
北京已采取报复性措施,中美贸易战再燃。 https://youtu.be/sdxps0q7Gik?si=lOzVYj58E2tyFtod
一群蒙面亲巴勒斯坦暴徒出现在一国党与宝琳·汉森的见面会场外,试图恐吓胆敢参加的普通澳大利亚人。 同样的剧本,同样的口号,同样的道德姿态。他们头戴阿拉伯头巾,挥舞着旗帜,高喊着所有进门的人都是种族主义者。在维多利亚州,如果保守派人士和平集会,激进分子就会出现,大声叫嚣、恐吓和抹黑。https://www.rebelnews.com/masked_pro_palestine_mob_tries_to_shut_down_one_nation_meet_and_greet?utm_campaign=ay_hansonprotest_080526&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel
男人可以风流,不可以下流。王菊花永远不懂的道理
民主党集团继续和中共勾兑,拿美国人的工作换廉价的血汗劳工产品。 https://x.com/i/status/2084615124547965159
《拯救美国法案》48-50被拦下,共和党反对票:Thom Tillis、Lisa Murkowski、Mitch McConnell 和 Susan Collins
事实证明,女权进步的绝后效率的确是比计划生育还要好的。当初共产党应该听话的😁,可惜这是一个嗜血的暴力团伙,不给自己弄点国际舆论压力那是不肯罢休的。
有点黑色幽默了
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
0.58元玩具逼万亿巨头动用法务你以为华为赢了 #涨知识 #品牌公关 #商誉分析 #A股 🔗 喜羊羊(资源分享) (@enoch4306)
🤣3
为什么厕所不应该分男女?嫌女孩被强奸还不够多是不是?厕所之所以分男女不就是为了保护女孩子吗?民主党这帮人都疯了! https://youtu.be/HyPd8HCAAhA?si=xETkQIjNPCzhvD_1 本编认为:民主党人已经被极左叙事绑架,我们应该抛弃他们。
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ttsmr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ttsmr named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Ruters0615 · 25,589
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 14 September 2026
@VoiceofPooh · 22,612
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
@hkposter777 · 22,381
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“推特高雅壬與菟子” (@ttsmr), 2,000 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ttsmr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.