Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 财经慢报

Channel

财经慢报

@Financial_Express

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

36,844subscribers

-111 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001375475051
TypeChannel
Username@Financial_Express
Description附属群组 @Financial_Express_Chat 财经慢报是 TG 简中最大的泛财经类资讯新闻频道,实时覆盖大宗外汇全球股票区块链等市场,内容真实中立客观。 部分内容按原文摘自墙内财经媒体并附来源,不代表本频道立场,请客观谨慎看待相关内容,谨防钓鱼误导。部分刷屏内容为现场零延迟文字转录,推送频繁敬请谅解。
Created2 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Financial_Express

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

36,84437,38237,1136 August 2026 — 36,955 subscribers6 August 2026 — 36,966 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,990 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,993 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,060 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,103 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,139 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,169 subscribers15 August 2026 — 37,174 subscribers16 August 2026 — 37,191 subscribers17 August 2026 — 37,183 subscribers18 August 2026 — 37,188 subscribers20 August 2026 — 37,234 subscribers21 August 2026 — 37,247 subscribers22 August 2026 — 37,288 subscribers24 August 2026 — 37,299 subscribers25 August 2026 — 37,307 subscribers26 August 2026 — 37,309 subscribers27 August 2026 — 37,329 subscribers28 August 2026 — 37,323 subscribers29 August 2026 — 37,339 subscribers30 August 2026 — 37,382 subscribers31 August 2026 — 37,370 subscribers1 September 2026 — 37,369 subscribers2 September 2026 — 37,356 subscribers3 September 2026 — 37,342 subscribers5 September 2026 — 37,327 subscribers8 September 2026 — 37,278 subscribers11 September 2026 — 37,217 subscribers13 September 2026 — 37,193 subscribers14 September 2026 — 37,179 subscribers16 September 2026 — 37,133 subscribers19 September 2026 — 37,081 subscribers25 September 2026 — 36,931 subscribers4 October 2026 — 36,844 subscribers6 August 20264 October 2026
35 measurements spanning 59 days, net -111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,763–37,463 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Oct 2026, 06:5536,844-87
25 Sept 2026, 11:3636,931-150
19 Sept 2026, 02:2137,081-52
16 Sept 2026, 17:4137,133-46
14 Sept 2026, 17:4137,179-14
13 Sept 2026, 02:0237,193-24
11 Sept 2026, 03:1737,217-61
8 Sept 2026, 05:3637,278-49
5 Sept 2026, 01:4237,327-15
3 Sept 2026, 06:4837,342-14
2 Sept 2026, 01:4137,356-13
1 Sept 2026, 03:1837,369-1
31 Aug 2026, 06:0737,370-12
30 Aug 2026, 07:5737,382+43
29 Aug 2026, 08:3337,339+16
28 Aug 2026, 10:1237,323-6
27 Aug 2026, 10:4237,329+20
26 Aug 2026, 08:4437,309+2
25 Aug 2026, 08:1337,307+8
24 Aug 2026, 07:4937,299first reading

Engagement

2,200 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.176%
avg views ÷ 36,844 subscribers
Avg views / post
64.9
900 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
900
of 2,200 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 900 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held2,200 (6 August 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total58,397
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Oct 2026, 17:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Links
≈2,870

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 25 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1835.3%
🤡1325.5%
🖕59.80%
😁59.80%
💩47.84%
❤35.88%
🤣23.92%
🥱11.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 September 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Oct 2026, 17:10 UTC4 viewsread 7 October 2026

法国总理塞勒科尔尼:敦促议员将 2027 年财政赤字限制在 GDP 的 5%以内。

7 Oct 2026, 17:10 UTC21 viewsread 7 October 2026

法国总理勒科尔尼敦促议员,将 2027 年财政赤字控制在国内生产总值的 5%。

7 Oct 2026, 17:09 UTC39 viewsread 7 October 2026

美国 10 年期国债拍卖收益率为 5.3%,为 2000 年 11 月以来最高水平。

7 Oct 2026, 17:09 UTC42 viewsread 7 October 2026

美国总统特朗普鼓吹 10 月 6 日美股的表现。

7 Oct 2026, 17:07 UTC59 viewsread 7 October 2026

欧洲 STOXX 600 指数收跌 1.00%,报 630.25 点,逼近 10 月 1 日收盘位 626.65 点,日线图上,8 月 7 日达到 663.41 点以来,呈现出持续回撤的趋势。 欧元区 STOXX 50 指数收跌 1.47%,报 6180.29 点,逼近 10 月 1 日收盘位 6175.45 点、6 月 11 日收盘位 6056.96 点;8 月 12 日达到 6577.20 点以来,也持续回撤。 富时泛欧绩优 300 指数收跌 0.99%,报 2517.48 点。

7 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC54 viewsread 7 October 2026

旧金山加入反数据中心浪潮:45 天内暂禁新建数据中心 金十数据 10 月 8 日讯,美国旧金山市监事会当地时间周二一致通过一项为期 45 天的暂停令,加入了全国范围内日益高涨的反对人工智能基础设施建设的浪潮。该命令立即生效,并可延长至大约两年,期间市政府官员将考虑制定更长期的限制措施。旧金山是 OpenAI 和 Anthropic 等公司的所在地。由于担忧数据中心的用水量、电力成本和环境影响,美国其他地区也已采取行动限制数据中心开发。旧金山这项条例的发起者特别提到了位于该市湾景-猎人角(Bayview-Hunters Point)社区的一个具体开发项目,该地区还设有其他数据中心设施。发起者表示,该地区“已经承受过重的空气污染负担,并面临环境公平方面的问题”。

7 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC51 viewsread 7 October 2026

法国财政部表示债券发行策略不变 法国财政部表示,并未调整债券发行策略,并将继续利用国债标售中的灵活性。此前报道称,在长期债券近期遭到抛售后,法国正考虑发行更多短期债券。该报道援引了对法国财政部长 Roland Lescure 的采访。“法国的债务发行策略以投资者需求为导向,”法国财政部在评论中表示,“这使我们在决定每次标售发行哪些具体债券时具有灵活性,从而尽可能贴近需求。”“我们减少了较长期限债券,也就是 30 年以上期限债券的发行,就体现了这一策略,”财政部补充称,“在收益率更高的环境下,一级交易商过去几个月传递的信息显示,对这些债券的需求下降。”

7 Oct 2026, 17:05 UTC47 viewsread 7 October 2026

美国 10 年期国债拍卖后收益率涨幅收窄,最新上涨 1.91 个基点,报 5.29%。

7 Oct 2026, 17:05 UTC44 viewsread 7 October 2026

法国总理勒科尔尼:法国今年冬季电价不得上涨。

7 Oct 2026, 17:04 UTC72 viewsread 7 October 2026

乌外交部:乌方目前正研究“五种不同的停火机制” 金十数据 10 月 8 日讯,10 月 7 日,乌克兰外交部发言人季希在基辅举行的新闻发布会上表示,乌克兰愿意参加乌克兰、俄罗斯和美国三方和平会谈。他表示,乌方希望会谈能够于 10 月举行。季希同时表示,乌克兰不仅愿意参加领导人级别会晤,也愿意参加其他级别的三方会谈。此外,他透露,乌方目前正研究“五种不同的停火机制”,包括全面、无条件停火,以及土耳其和埃及提出的黑海停火方案。乌方还在研究印度提出的涉及能源领域的方案,以及美国方面此前讨论的能源停火可能性。

Showing the 12 most recent of 2,200 posts we hold for @Financial_Express. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

【华尔街见闻】- 财经时讯 | AI 实时互动
@FinanceNewsDaily · 58,162
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
竹新社
@tnews365 · 164,674
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 August 2026
Telo News 简体中文 - 加密货币|DeFi |Web3
@telonews_cn · 82,542
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
分叉财经(crypto news)
@fenchacaij · 246,604
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
风向旗参考快讯
@xhqcankao · 164,627
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 August 2026
【李老师不是你老师】官方电报
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,740
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
LoopDNS资讯播报
@DNSPODT · 72,312
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 August 2026
每日消费电子观察
@CE_Observe · 75,687
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 19 August 2026
RTHK即時新聞
@rthk_new_c · 49,379
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
Solidot
@solidot · 47,626
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
敏感经济信息分享
@pelosi3 · 71,360
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 August 2026
电报时报
@times001 · 84,684
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“财经慢报” (@Financial_Express), 36,844 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Financial_Express.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.