東涌西站支柱施工質量問題 路政署要求港鐵兩周內交報告 路政署表示,星期一接獲港鐵通報,指在巡查時發現東涌西站工地月台層部分混凝土支柱位置出現施工質量問題,及承建商曾在未有獲批的施工方法下嘗試進行修補工程,港鐵已即時指示承建商停止有關工程,署方高度關注事件,強調東涌綫延線2029年的通車目標維持不變。路政署回覆查詢時表示,接獲通報後於星期二、三派員到場核查情況,以及於昨日與港鐵舉行會議,進一步跟進事件及了解調查進度。署方要求港鐵認真展開調查,並在通報事件後兩個星期內提交詳細調查報告,並督促承辦商制定詳細修復方案,盡快自資進行修復工程,以確保工程質量符合標準,同時採取措施,確保事件不會影響整個工程進度。路政署一直密切監察東涌綫延線項目的進度、安全及質量,以風險為本原則定時派員到工地監察進度及抽查關鍵施工工序。上一次於10月派員到東涌西站涉及大堂層位置進行定期監察進度及抽查工作,當時檢視範圍主要為未展開混凝土澆灌工序的支柱。署方重申…
Channel
RTHK即時新聞
@rthk_new_c
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
48,979subscribers
-1,085 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001370810328 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rthk_new_c |
| Description | RTHK即時新聞 https://t.me/rthk_new_c RTHK Latest News https://t.me/rthk_new_e 全港即時最新交通消息 https://t.me/HK_Traffic_News |
| Created | 14 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rthk_new_c |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 11:50 | 48,979 | -23 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:50 | 49,002 | -13 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:47 | 49,015 | -12 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:09 | 49,027 | -12 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:47 | 49,039 | -10 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:47 | 49,049 | -5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:40 | 49,054 | -6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:08 | 49,060 | -1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:51 | 49,061 | -23 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:50 | 49,084 | -19 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 49,103 | -4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:56 | 49,107 | -26 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:08 | 49,133 | -9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:20 | 49,142 | -22 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:40 | 49,164 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:21 | 49,174 | -24 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:56 | 49,198 | -18 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:49 | 49,216 | -19 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:06 | 49,235 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 11:37 | 49,238 | first reading |
Engagement
3,676 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.8%
- avg views ÷ 48,979 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 392
- 1,176 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1,176
- of 3,676 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3,676 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 461,071 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 12:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 112
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 167 of 1,176 posts held from the last 30 days (14.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
諾華與廣州醫藥於港澳藥械通框架下合作 成果於上海進博會呈現 諾華公司與廣州醫藥股份有限公司合作,在「港澳藥械通」政策框架下,推動放射配體療法跨境可及與臨床應用,並首次於進博會呈現合作成果。合作啟動儀式在上海第九屆中國國際進口博覽會期間舉行。廣州市商務局副局長、廣州市投資發展委員會辦公室專職副主任韓楨祥說,期待以今次合作為契機進一步深化與諾華等全球優質企業的多領域合作,攜手廣州醫藥等龍頭企業,吸引更多全球創新醫藥成果在廣州落地、在大灣區轉化。諾華公司中國區總裁兼董事總經理李堯說,「港澳藥械通」為國際醫療創新與大灣區臨床需求,搭建重要橋樑,未來諾華將持續攜手各方推動更多全球創新成果在中國落地。編輯:羅宇光 2026-11-07 19:57:00
陳子達率海關代表團訪廣州 簽合作備忘錄促進水果貿易高質量發展 香港海關關長陳子達昨日率領香港海關代表團到廣州展開為期兩天的訪問行程。陳子達昨日下午出席《關於進境水果經香港國際機場空運中轉廣州白雲國際機場監管合作備忘錄》簽署儀式。備忘錄的簽訂符合國家海關總署本月一日生效的中轉水果監管要求,並加強兩地海關推進水果經香港空運中轉到廣州的順暢運行。透過創新監管模式,由香港海關為合資格貨物發出轉運確認書,確保中轉水果屬於原包裝及附有原植物檢疫証書,以促進粵港澳大灣區水果貿易的高質量發展。行程期間,陳子達與廣州海關關長李全會面,就深化兩地海關協作交換意見。代表團亦到訪廣州白雲國際機場和香港賽馬會從化馬場,深入了解廣州海關在旅客、空運貨物以及跨境馬匹通關方面的智慧監管設備。編輯:陳樂謙 2026-11-07 19:49:00
李家超:《五年規劃》有清晰藍圖提升青年發展機遇 第三屆「香港青年發展高峰論壇今天舉行。特區政府、內地以及來自老撾及哈薩克等地青年發展及教育部門,都有代表出席。行政長官李家超發表視像致辭,他表示,《香港第一個五年規劃》已有清晰藍圖,提升青年發展機遇,培育新一代熱愛國家,具國際視野及有抱負的青年。編輯:梁家奇 2026-11-07 19:47:00
三鐵世界盃香港站一連兩日於中環灣仔海濱舉行 三項鐵人世界盃相隔兩年後,再次舉辦香港站賽事。一連兩日在中環灣仔海濱上演,今日上午先舉行男女子精英組個人賽。女子組冠亞軍分別來自俄羅斯和盧森堡,名古屋亞運女子賽銀牌得主、國家隊的黃安琪得第三。男子組由法國、澳洲和西班牙的選手取得三甲。港隊代表中,女子組以蔡欣妍成績最好,以第37名完成;曾祥星在男子組排第58。編輯:梁家奇 2026-11-07 19:46:00
【重溫】2026年11月7日新聞天地 詳盡報道本地時事、大中華消息、國際局勢等新聞,緊貼最新熱話。 2026-11-07 19:21:00
天水圍嘉湖山莊有單位起火 一名女子昏迷送院 天水圍嘉湖山莊發生火警,一名女子昏迷送院,期間大約100人自行疏散。警方下午5時許接獲居民報案,指嘉湖山莊樂湖居14座一個單位冒煙,消防出動一隊煙帽隊灌救,在傍晚6時07分將火救熄。搜救期間,救援人員在梯間發現一名女子昏迷,將她送往天水圍醫院治理。警方表示,初步調查懷疑火警原因是單位有雜物起火。編輯:陳樂謙 2026-11-07 19:07:00
警方續打擊跨境白牌車 一名持雙程證42歲內地男子被捕 警方繼續打擊白牌車,拘捕一名持雙程證的42歲內地男子,涉嫌「利用汽車作非法出租或載客取酬用途」、「沒有第三者保險而使用車輛」及「違反逗留條件」。警方表示,近日主動進行網絡巡查,發現有人在社交平台招攬乘客從香港出發,經陸路口岸前往內地。警員今日喬裝成乘客,透過社交平台戶口預訂由黃竹坑前往廣州的載客服務,中介索價1500元人民幣,然後派出一輛本地登記,並掛有中港牌的私家車,警員在成功上車並開出後隨即表露身份,當場拘捕該名男司機。警方扣查涉案私家車作進一步檢驗。被捕男子已被控3項罪名,案件星期一在東區裁判法院提堂。編輯:陳樂謙 2026-11-07 18:48:00
香港青年發展高峰論壇會展舉行 李家超稱五年規劃將提升發展機遇 第三屆香港青年發展高峰論壇在灣仔會展舉行,政府形容反應熱烈,參與人數較往年增加。行政長官李家超表示,香港首個五年規劃將提升青年發展機遇,培育新一代具備愛國愛港情懷、國際視野,成為有抱負及正向思維的青年。政務司司長陳國基說,正擴展青年實習及培訓,有信心可以更好服務社會以至國家所需。編輯:譚佩貞 2026-11-07 18:37:00
伊朗外長稱有必要建立不受域外勢力干涉的地區安全機制 伊朗外長阿拉格齊在社交媒體上說,48小時內分別與12國外長通電話,討論地區與國際局勢。阿拉格齊說這些國家包括埃及、沙特阿拉伯、土耳其、阿聯酋、伊拉克及巴基斯坦等。他在通話中闡述伊朗的原則立場,強調必須尊重各國主權,停止侵略與威脅,避免外部勢力進行破壞性干涉,同時強調地區國家有責任防止不安全局勢進一步升級。阿拉格齊又說,伊朗有權維護自身主權及國家安全,有必要建立不受域外勢力干涉的地區安全機制。編輯:羅宇光 2026-11-07 17:52:00
海關檢獲5隻受管制屬瀕危物種活龜 估計市值約5萬元 海關在機場檢獲5隻懷疑受管制屬瀕危物種的活龜,估計市值共約5萬元。關員今日檢查一個由美國進口至香港,報稱載有玩具模型禮盒的包裹。經檢查後,於包裹中發現該批懷疑受管制屬瀕危物種的活龜。案件已轉交漁護署跟進。編輯:陳樂謙 2026-11-07 17:34:00
港超聯至尊沙田1:1標準流浪 大衞施華射入12碼 港超聯,至尊沙田1:1被標準流浪迫和,西班牙球星大衛施華首次為沙田披甲上陣,並射入一球,獲評為今場最佳球員。賽事在啟德青年運動場舉行,吸引近4600名球迷入場,全場爆滿。曾經隨西班牙贏得2010年南非世界盃冠軍的大衛施華正選出場,上半場有多次傳送,亦負責處理自由球和角球,兩隊半場踢成0:0。換邊後標準流浪球員懷疑在禁區內手球,經VAR覆核後,球證改判12碼,大衛施華在56分鐘操刀射入,至尊沙田領先1:0。隊友趙正宇、龜谷宇護其後錯失兩次擴大領先機會,標準流浪伊巴謙則憑一次反擊機會,在禁區內射入,兩隊踢成1:1。大衛施華在第79分鐘被對手踢跌後,用手推對方,兩人均被黃牌警告。至尊沙田另一名有黃牌在身的外援安沙,其後在禁區內打倒掛,但踢中對手頭部,兩黃一紅被罰出場,球隊要少一人應戰。數分鐘後,大衛施華被換出,離場時獲球迷報以熱烈掌聲。雙方在比賽最後階段互有攻守,但未有再改寫比分,兩…
Showing the 12 most recent of 3,676 posts we hold for @rthk_new_c. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@rthk_new_c edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 17 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@universalsentinelsinblack · 11,57710 posts香港法律新聞及評論
@hklegalnews · 3025 posts香港傳媒出版職工會Channel
@publishinghkchannel · 1235 posts📣教育界 資訊傳播Channel
@wearehkteachers · 2,2875 posts鍵盤戰線頻道
@kbflF5c · 5,6943 postsQUIT USA 美國好伏
@quit_usa · 163 posts全民健身channel
@Hkersgymch · 4,0712 posts港大新工會資訊頻道
@hkunewlabourunion · 682 postsWaterloo Lion Rock Spirit || 連登即時新聞
@waterloolionrockspiritnew · 352 posts@BNOUK
@BNOUK · 7781 postHKIAF香港獨立兵團
@HKIAF · 6871 post戰鬥烽火新聞社🔥🔥
@HKbattlelive · 11,4601 post黃丹晴 Tan Ching Wong
@Lemonwong_TM · 1541 postLIGHT YOUTH @ NOW
@LightYouthNow_HK · 3351 post紅土街坊資訊站
@ReclaimHungTo · 1,6951 post香港平安
@SilentCandleNight · 8001 postTG ScoutBotHelper 自助式報哨機械人技術支援頻道
@TGScoutBotHelper · 6631 post東涌街坊情報
@WeAreTungChung · 191 post九西Channel
@YTM1G · 2,4031 post反送中已核實資訊頻道
@antiextraditionverifiednews · 38,1631 postON9 台灣關注組
@davidli01 · 1051 postDiu7贏錢莖過引 心水分享
@diu7hkjcdog · 10,2001 postFlash Lunch Channel
@flashlunch · 111 post香港牙Q頻道 Hkers with Q.🌏⚛
@hkerwithq · 1661 postHK New Channel
@hknewchannel · 2,3361 post[頻道] 香港人限定 資訊速遞
@hongkongpeoplechannel · 1,0721 post證據整合 有份宣傳JPEX既KOL
@jpexscam · 461 post是咁的 法官閣下
@judgehk · 4,3291 post本土新聞暫停營運後援資訊台
@localpresshk · 6,1901 post馬鞍山Defenders 綜合資訊站
@mosdefenders · 4,1541 postPufff's Channel
@paofvnotonline · 1391 postPkmGo港島東及灣仔區資訊站
@pkmislandeastraid · 4541 post理大反送中 PolyU AntiElab
@polyudongotoschool · 1,1651 post南區萬事屋官方頻道
@southernethouse · 3761 post清泉-深水埗
@sspo1 · 1,9311 post守護港大聯署小組頻道
@standuphkuer · 4,4301 post📌大埔災後重要資訊頻道
@taipoinfo · 1941 post荃民街坊資訊頻道
@twinfochannel · 1,7921 postTwitter 戰線 channel (要FC)
@twittermansyunzou · 7,8071 post維尼債務重組有限公司
@waineiishandsome · 1971 post米高講財經
@wallstreet_stock_free · 1681 post8月2日《公僕仝人,與民同行》集會
@wearehkgovcivilservants · 5841 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@metwarn · 24,230#1
@inmediahknet · 38,595#2
@channelchk · 23,074#3
@HK_Traffic_News · 43,652#4
@tnews365 · 167,104#5
@nowtv_news · 42,377#6
@zaihuapd · 289,289#7
@europechinese · 7,153#8
@weatherjj · 42,174#9
@hkweathernews · 4,756#10
@windseasonhk · 10,650#11
@thewitnesshk · 12,190#12
@DNSPODT · 73,218#13
@lihkg_official · 12,109#14
@whocaresweather · 2,565#15
@cr881903 · 3,357#16
@iBreaking · 3,223#17
@StockIntelligenceNews · 17,115#18
@HKbattlelive · 11,460#19
@GZMTR_Pill · 596#20
@hongkongersecrets · 3,489#21
@cnanewstw · 3,434#22
@ncetransport · 46,478#23
@the_chaser_news · 7,582#24
@XueXi_China · 86,396#25
@localpresshk · 6,190#26
@princeandlisa · 14,209#27
@hkposter777 · 22,578#28
@mingpao_news · 755#29
@times001 · 84,408#30
@TDMMacaunews · 2,401#31
@theinitium_rss · 12,884#32
@hkindepenAsso2 · 2,385#33
@TW_KC_TY_Transport_channel · 1,670#34
@Financial_Express · 36,973#35
@cnbeta_com · 27,443#36
@xhqcankao · 167,873#37
@CE_Observe · 77,408#38
@solidot · 48,789#39
@hkitalk · 4,128#40
@fucku_idiot · 41,696#41
@sohadays · 4,799#42
@woshadiao · 114,520#43
@illusory_world · 11,110#44
@mtrupdate · 2,833#45
@iloveulobbchu · 13,340#46
@Hearse_Drifting · 10,863#47
@GodlyNews1 · 70,950#48
@outvivid · 9,302#49
@GoldRacing · 5,131#50
@KarenMoeMoe · 9,363#51
@theinitiumnews · 18,014#52
@landiansub · 46,944#53
@SIM_CN · 10,007#54
@IngressChinese · 3,819#55
@NewsFW · 6,825#56
@youarenotalonehk_live · 31,547#57
@jandan_pic · 25,472#58
@zaobaosg · 46,686#59
@vps_xhq · 50,779#60
@meanmodemedian · 1,483#61
@iyouport · 27,611#62
@mansiandyou · 16,711#63
@cnphotog_collect · 6,761#64
@LetITFlyW · 9,721#65
@JISFW · 12,890#66
@hongkongfp · 2,551#67
@wtfhifi · 2,019#68
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nowtv_news · 42,377
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
@HK_Traffic_News · 43,652
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
@hkposter777 · 22,578
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
@metwarn · 24,230
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 September 2026
@inmediahknet · 38,595
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
@weatherjj · 42,174
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
@channelchk · 23,074
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 September 2026
@hktgb · 37,743
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
@realtimenewsbroadcasts · 58,527
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 28 August 2026
@appledailyhk26 · 29,401
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 7 September 2026
@VoiceofPooh · 22,206
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
@HK_Schedule · 23,156
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
@youarenotalonehk · 48,011
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
@youarenotalonehk_live · 31,547
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
@TwtVideoOfChina · 78,238
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 20 August 2026
@voachinese · 42,187
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
@zaobaosg · 46,686
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RTHK即時新聞” (@rthk_new_c), 48,979 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rthk_new_c.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.